Eat The Press

sudan-map.jpg

from NationalGeographic.com

Bad news from Newsweek: The first study focusing on the death toll in Darfur has found that 200,000 to 400,000 people have died there since the violence began — a number far in excess of the tens of thousands generally reported in the media. Northwestern University sociologist John Hagan and University of Wisconsin professor Alberto Palloni today have published a study in the journal Science which estimates a significantly higher death toll than released by the U.S. Department of State, which in 2005 gave the significantly lower total of 63,000 to 146,000 dead.

Newsweek's (and, actually, HuffPo's) Tony Dokoupil spoke with Hagan and Palloni, who said that the chaotic and war-torn nature of the region makes coming up with accurate numbers challenging; and the Sudanese government isn't exactly helpful. The scientiest drew on a number of sources including a World Health Organization survey of people in displacement camps, dating from 2004. At this time, they estimate that 1 million people have been displaced in West Darfur alone.

Hagan called the underestimation of the total by the media "an overabundance of caution that approaches the irresponsible." Hagan cites reports from the BBC and Reuters from this week stating the toll as "in the tens of thousands" — "a full order of magnitude below reality." Hagan puts 200,000 as "the cautious statistical floor," estimating that the actual number could exceed 400,000.

In National Geographic, Hagan notes that the low U.S. government estimate produced "patterns of underestimation" in the press, which minimized the severity of the situation. "After that announcement, much of the media reporting started to talk in the tens of thousands rather than hundreds of thousands, or they didn't talk about deaths at all and talked exclusively about displacement. It had the effect of diminishing the sense of urgency."

A good sign: The Newsweek piece is currently the #1 article at Newsweek International. Will it make it over to the National edition? It's a web-only story right now...hopefully millions of Americans will be reading it leafing through it come Sunday. And hopefully some of them will be from the U.S. Department of State.


Media Blogroll

Chatter

Romenesko Gawker TVNewser Wonkette Crooks & Liars CJR Daily Drudge Dealbreaker Dealbook Defamer Deadline Hollywood Daily Mickey Kaus Jeff Jarvis Radosh James Wolcott IWantMedia The Slot Bloggermann Jake Tapper Blogging Baghdad Russert Watch Jossip Mediabistro The Media Mob at the NY Observer The Transom FishbowlNY FishbowlDC FishbowlLA GalleyCat Reference Tone Panopticist The Minor Fall, The Major Lift Penguins On the Equator Gelf Magazine- Gelflog Animal (New York) White House Press Briefings Altercation
Page Six Liz & Cindy NYDN Gossip Intelligencer Reliable Source Patrick McMullan

Analysis

Jack Shafer Howard Kurtz WWD Memo Pad NYO Off The Record Broadsheet Gail Shister Keith Kelly NYT Business/Media Jay Rosen’s PressThink Fine on Media Simon Dumenco’s Media Guy Jon Friedman Media Matters The Guardian (Media) NRO Media Blog Columbia Journalism Review On The Media The Public Eye The Daily Nightly Today’s Papers Regret the Error Dan Froomkin David Folkenflik

Commentary

Slate Salon New York Magazine The New Yorker The New York Review of Books The New Republic The Nation Harper’s The Atlantic Monthly The Virginia Quarterly Review Vanity Fair Esquire n+1 The Believer

News

The New York Times The Washington Post The New York Observer The LA Times Time Newsweek US News & World Report Wall Street Journal Editor & Publisher NY Daily News NY Post USA Today NY Sun Times of London Financial Times The Smoking Gun McClatchy
NBC ABC CBS CNN Fox News MSNBC NPR Air America BBC C-SPAN Al Jazeera
AdAge Broadcasting & Cable MediaPost MediaWeek Variety Entertainment Weekly Folio:
HuffPo Home