Eat The Press

Page Six logo redux.JPG

from nypost.com

More allegations of impropriety at Page Six, except this time they are being alleged by Jared Paul Stern instead of against him. Read all about it...in Page Six, which decided that the best defense was a good offense and printed all the allegations. According to the Post, they come via an unsworn statement from Ian Spiegelman, who was himself fired from the Post after he lost his temper and sent out "a threatening, profanity-filled, homophobic e-mail one night." Via Stern, Spiegelman makes allegations of freebies accepted, stories killed, and general unethical palliness between Page Six principals and those they cover (read them all here).

But, they buried the lede, in the thirteenth paragraph of an eighteen-paragraph story, concerning an allegation that Spiegelman made that Richard Johnson and Page Six staffers accepted $3,000 in cash from restarateur Nello Balan. The Post's response:

On this point, Spiegelman is one-third correct. The Christmas gift was $1,000. "Richard Johnson made a grave mistake in accepting cash from Nello Balan," Allan said yesterday. "After he informed me of his error in judgment, he was reprimanded, and policies were adopted that render such ethical lapses completely unacceptable."

That kind of admission about Johnson, in Page Six? Wow. Big. Given that, it seems rather churlish to refer to Stern as a "rogue former freelancer" and "disgraced journalist" since no charges were ever made against him (Page Six may know things they are not disclosing, but they do not back up this statement: "As outlandish as most of these smears and lies are, the biggest surprise in the affidavit is this statement: 'Jared Paul Stern was known to be the least corruptible, most responsible and valued member of the staff'"; at this point, it's sort of required to back up such claims) (though they do call him "litigious" and you certainly can't find fault with that). Either way, this plot is thickening yet again on this issue which refuses to lay down and die. Interesting PR strategy on the part of Rubenstein père and fils, but if anyone would know how to best squelch a scandal, it's them. So we shall see how events unfold.

LIES AND SMEARS AIMED AT POST [NYP]
Jared Paul Stern Lawyer: "They've Libeled Him Again" [Gawker]
Howard Rubenstein: "The Allegations Are A Disgrace" [Gawker]

Media Blogroll

Chatter

Romenesko Gawker TVNewser Wonkette Crooks & Liars CJR Daily Drudge Dealbreaker Dealbook Defamer Deadline Hollywood Daily Mickey Kaus Jeff Jarvis Radosh James Wolcott IWantMedia The Slot Bloggermann Jake Tapper Blogging Baghdad Russert Watch Jossip Mediabistro The Media Mob at the NY Observer The Transom FishbowlNY FishbowlDC FishbowlLA GalleyCat Reference Tone Panopticist The Minor Fall, The Major Lift Penguins On the Equator Gelf Magazine- Gelflog Animal (New York) White House Press Briefings Altercation
Page Six Liz & Cindy NYDN Gossip Intelligencer Reliable Source Patrick McMullan

Analysis

Jack Shafer Howard Kurtz WWD Memo Pad NYO Off The Record Broadsheet Gail Shister Keith Kelly NYT Business/Media Jay Rosen’s PressThink Fine on Media Simon Dumenco’s Media Guy Jon Friedman Media Matters The Guardian (Media) NRO Media Blog Columbia Journalism Review On The Media The Public Eye The Daily Nightly Today’s Papers Regret the Error Dan Froomkin David Folkenflik

Commentary

Slate Salon New York Magazine The New Yorker The New York Review of Books The New Republic The Nation Harper’s The Atlantic Monthly The Virginia Quarterly Review Vanity Fair Esquire n+1 The Believer

News

The New York Times The Washington Post The New York Observer The LA Times Time Newsweek US News & World Report Wall Street Journal Editor & Publisher NY Daily News NY Post USA Today NY Sun Times of London Financial Times The Smoking Gun McClatchy
NBC ABC CBS CNN Fox News MSNBC NPR Air America BBC C-SPAN Al Jazeera
AdAge Broadcasting & Cable MediaPost MediaWeek Variety Entertainment Weekly Folio:
HuffPo Home