The controversy over the Park51 Islamic cultural and religious center in New York has generated controversy that is way out of proportion to any rational assessment of its importance. The so-called "Mosque at Ground Zero" is neither -- it is a community center with a prayer space located three blocks from Ground Zero. If you're not familiar with New York, three blocks is much farther than it sounds -- the density of buildings and population means that there is an awful lot between the two sites, including churches, businesses, strip clubs, and all the accoutrements of life in the big city.
Try as I might, I can't attribute this flap to anything but religious prejudice, whatever fancy rhetoric it's cloaked in. It's been nine years but we aren't building a memorial at Ground Zero -- we're building new buildings -- offices, restaurants, apartments will once more occupy the site, so how is it hallowed ground? And even if I buy the "hallowed" argument as anything other than a shibboleth for anti-Muslim bias, to whom is it sacred? There were American Muslims who died in the towers, there were American Muslim first responders who risked their lives and were injured or killed, so doesn't any "memorial" include them? And why isn't the site of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City "hallowed ground," or the IRS office in Austin?
I'm not sure how important this issue is taken on its own, but in a larger picture I think it's very important. First of all, some 60% of Americans according to the polls seem prepared to sacrifice the First Amendment to bias. Yes, all Americans have the freedom to worship when, where, and how they choose unless they are the designated enemy du jour. Secondly, that same proportion of Americans seem to be willing to tar all Muslims with the terrorist brush despite all the evidence that, as with every faith, Christianity and Judaism included, the extremists who would wipe out those of other faiths or forcibly convert them are a small majority
Most disturbing to me, however, is that we seem to be moving in the direction of a clan-based culture. The "culture wars" touted by O'Reilly, Beck, Limbaugh, Coulter, and others on the right seem eerily similar to what Ayaan Hirsi Ali describes as the clan culture of her native Somalia.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, in case you don't recall who she is, was born a Somali and went on to become a Dutch citizen and a member of the Dutch Parliament. She co-produced with Theo van Gogh the film Submission that cost van Gogh his life at the hands of an assassin and led to threats against her as well.
Ali's book, Infidel is a memoir of her growing up in Somalia and Kenya and her gradual distancing herself from Islam to the point of becoming one of its leading critics. Her criticism of the religion of her birth is couched in terms of her personal struggle with what began as a deep and unquestioning faith and became apostasy. Witnessing that struggle, we are privy to her thought processes as well as her emotional conflict, and it's not always pretty or easy reading.
One of the themes running through Ali's book and life is the rigidly hierarchical clan system in Somalia, which while not based in Islamic law, is closely intertwined with the religion, its practices, and its traditions. Ali's family belongs to a high-caste clan that has traditionally led and governed in Somalia. At the time of her growing up the country is ruled by the brutal dictator Mohammed Siad Barré, and Ali's father was a leader of the resistance that was ultimately successful in overthrowing the government. Sadly, the result of this revolution was not freedom but vicious civil war among the clans, a war based in old rivalries and prejudices, that is still dominating Somali life today.
When Ali came to the Netherlands and got involved in politics there, she found similarities between the system of political parties there and the clans in Somalia -- much the same stereotyping, rivalry, and refusal to cooperate, under a more civilized and peaceful facade. Reading her account of life in both systems, I became increasingly uncomfortable with what I perceived as similarities to life in the US today as we seem to be moving toward increasing polarization and enmity between right and left, non-Muslims and Muslims, "native" and immigrants.
It is axiomatic that the United States was founded on principles of individual freedoms (speech, assembly, even the right to bear arms), group freedoms (religion, freedom from discrimination), and protection of minorities under the rule of the majority. More importantly, another critical principle is that these freedoms are based on rights that are "inalienable," that is impossible to take away.
In 1947, the then Department of War made a short film that was rarely if ever shown. The film, called Don't Be a Sucker showed how easily the right in Germany hoodwinked the German people into supporting murderous racism, a process that was echoed in Pastor Martin Niemoller's famous statement ("First they came for the Communists..."). We would do well to remember our Virgil -- "the descent to Hell is easy," and to keep in mind that while it may be the Muslims now, sooner or later "they [will come] for me and there [will be] no one to speak up."
Follow Ed Gurowitz, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/egurowitz
Dr. David P. Gushee: 'Ground Zero Mosque' Controversy: America's Dreyfus Affair?
Nancy Fuchs Kreimer: Park51 Should Not Be Complicated for Jews
Man Mistaken for Muslim Draws Confrontation at Mosque Protest
Blast kills at least 15 in Pakistan mosque
Muslim Miss USA: Move mosque from Ground Zero
Scary fanatics like Newt Gingrich turn Ground Zero mosque debate into ugly ...
Using Mosque and 9/11 to Attack Cuomo
Is The Ground Zero Mosque A Local Issue
Ali said that when you migrate to a country you are entering "their" space and "their" laws. Any country has a right to put into their immigration policy a comment to the effect that you will abide by the laws that we have and the belief of how our society should be run. those refugees can decide can I give up my beliefs that are so strong in order to fit in. That is not to say they have to become christian or any other religion. They just have to decide that they will not try to change the society into the one they have just left.
if they agree and then come to say Australia and then try to introduce sharia law then they should be put on a plane and sent back where they came from.
Maybe the idea that "diversity is strength" has it's limits and that the U.S. could disintegrate like Somalia or Yugoslavia given a series of unfavorable events. If it were to occur, hopefully it would happen peacefully like the breakup of Czechoslovakia, and not the partition of India.
Hmmm... Freudian slip, doc?
I agree that we are becoming more "clannish", but whether this is good or bad (or simply necessary), only time will tell. When under attack (as I firmly believe Western Civilization is), it is both reasonable and prudent to "rally round the flag", figuratively or literally. The barbarians are united in their hatred of Rome. Rome should either unite for the common good or... well, we have seen what fate Nature has in store for the weak and defenseless.
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world."
This is a quote from the Quran, and there are many similar ones:
"Surely, those who believe, those who are the Jews and the Sabians and the Christians – whosoever believed in Allaah and the Last Day, and worked righteousness, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve."
[al-Maa’idah 5:69]
BTW-- Mohammad was married to a Jew (Reyhana) and a Chrisian (Miryam). His first wife was his boss, at work. She owned a trading company. HE worked for HER.
One of his wives became a judge and a general.
The iuran was also the first holy book to give women inheritance rights (European women did not have inheritance rights, at that time. It also gave women the choice to marry, or not.
Poop old Winston mus not have got an "A" in comparative religions!
Nor did you. Read much?
A small, but growing amount of people are falling prey to the negative stereotypes, and hateful tactics used to divide, and ultimately conquer great societies.
Together as one we can achieve so much more; divided we will only suffer and lose. It is truly sad to witness.
The sad thing is not that certain interests are spreading incredibly STOO-pid and false arguments for demonizing American Muslims. The SAD part is that nominally intellingent people are SWALLOWING them. Such political Kool Aid is just as deadly, in its way, as the stuff Jim Jones handed out to his equally deluded followers.
Honestly, the Democrats are even worse. Tribalism is identity politics.