iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Edward Flattau

GET UPDATES FROM Edward Flattau
 

National Parks: Rational Access

Posted: 05/10/2012 6:12 pm

Two time-worn sayings come to mind in relation to merchants' complaints that the National Park Service is unfairly reducing public access to popular destinations in its system. The sayings are: do not "kill the goose that lays the golden egg" nor "lose the forest for the trees".

The destinations at issue are the Cape Hatteras National Seashore in North Carolina and the Biscayne Bay National Park off the coast of Miami.

National Park Service officials are determined to avoid such sorry outcomes for Hatteras and Biscayne from commercial miscalculation. To achieve this goal, the Service is restricting certain human activities where lax enforcement has resulted in damage to especially fragile portions of the two parks' ecosystems.

Conflicts have arisen because local business people tend to view Hatteras and Biscayne foremost as sources of income and only secondarily as national park units with all of the stringent environmental protections that the law demands.

Commercial interests' self-serving priorities are those of a distinct minority. The overwhelming majority of the public, who have as much proprietary interest in the national parks as those residing adjacent to the sanctuaries, embrace the aforementioned priorities directly in reverse. It is also a values alignment that the law obligates the Park Service to follow. The Enabling Act establishing the National Park System requires that the Park Service's first order of business is to provide for enjoyment of park natural resources "in such manner and in such means that they will be left unimpaired for future generations." Recreation is important, but clearly not at the expense of unique natural resources set aside for posterity and all Americans.

With that principle in mind, the Park Service has designated roughly one-third of the Cape Hatteras National Seashore's 67 mile stretch of beach permanently closed to off-road vehicles (not to pedestrian traffic mind you) in order to protect nesting endangered birds and sea turtles. It should also be noted that only 10 percent of those visiting Hatteras even drive off-road vehicles on the Atlantic coast beach.

As for the 70,000 acre Biscayne Bay Park, the Park Service has proposed to make 10,000 acres a marine reserve off-limits to fishing in order to give a badly degraded coral reef and the fish species spawned there an opportunity to recover from excessive human activity.

Local merchants have protested that these moves damage business by closing off areas popular with fishermen, even though a depressed economy and high gas prices might well explain any recent visitor decline.

If the businesspeople were to get their way, the economic losses from the subsequent environmental degradation would eventually be greater than any suffered from access restrictions.

Undaunted, members of Congress from the two districts have dutifully rallied around a bill to overrule the Park Service and modify its decisions. Hopefully, the legislation will be blocked by environmentally sensitive federal lawmakers defending the Park Service formula that allows for the maximum recreational use without jeopardizing natural resource preservation.

The reality is that merchants operating next to national parks face a tradeoff. They benefit greatly from their proximity to a prime tourist attraction, but are most impacted economically by restrictions on park recreational use in the name of conservation. If they cannot successfully integrate such a tradeoff into their business plans, they should consider either another line of work or a different place to set up shop.

 
 
 

Follow Edward Flattau on Twitter: www.twitter.com/greenmorality

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 57
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:11 PM on 05/26/2012
don't waste your time trying enlighten Mr. Spaceship Earth... he's really not human.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
09:34 PM on 05/12/2012
In the case of Biscayne Bay, it's a proven fact that setting aside areas closed to fishing helps rebuilding of stocks of fish and actually helps the areas outside the closed zones because fish migrate from the closed areas. There are certain groups that think it's their right to introduce all kinds of off road vehicles that do major damage to natural areas.
04:37 PM on 05/13/2012
Since I cant reply to your reply for some reason, I'll do it here. NPS has attempted to show that vehicles do damage to the beaches numerous times and each time they have failed miserably. So, without the science to back it up, your claim has no merit on the beaches of Hatteras and Ocracoke islands. Just because something may be true in Florida, does not make it true here. We enjoy perhaps the most dynamic beach system in this country because of the confluence of the Labrador and Guld Stream currents and are in fact closer to the GS than virtually all of Florida. It is nothing to see acres of beach dissapear here only to return a few weeks later. Come visit sometime, I'll teach you about our beaches if you can hold it all in your head.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
09:10 PM on 05/13/2012
The tourists may buy that, the Gulf Stream comes within five miles of Palm Beach County because it has to go between Fl and the Bahamas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
07:30 PM on 05/12/2012
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/rewilding/mission.html

Official Mission of the Wildlands Project (emphasis is of D.W.):

Our Vision
We are ambitious: we live for the day when grizzlies in Chihuahua have an unbroken connection to grizzlies in Alaska; when wolf populations are restored from Mexico to the Yukon; when vast forests and flowing prairies again thrive and support their full assemblage of native plants and animals; when humans dwell with respect, harmony, and affection for the land; when we come to live no longer as conquerors but as respectful citizens in the land community
04:42 PM on 05/13/2012
We are respectful of our environment and it's inhabitants. You don't have much choice when you live on a sandbar with an average width of 150 yds. You don't have much choice when your livelihood depends on the very ecosystem in which you dwell. And you darn sure don't have much choice when your life is constantly at the mercy of the sea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:13 AM on 05/14/2012
Magnificent. So articulate in the science of ecology, which explains how the Earth functions and cycles to create and support all life or that mankind exists and breathes because of ecosystems, and ecosystems' biodiversity, like turtles and plovers, are the creators and saviors of ecosystems and the Earth. All the reasons mankind exists.

Visionary and ecologically literate. f'd Rich in the science of ecology! You nailed it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
08:03 AM on 05/14/2012
We do not need!
"the day when grizzlies in Chihuahua have an unbroken connection to grizzlies in Alaska; when wolf populations are restored from Mexico to the Yukon"

Crying Wolf Documentary | Facebook
www.facebook.com/CryingWolfDoc

We were given some great proof from a wildlife biologist on how the USFWS and MTFWP ignored the existing wolf population here before the "reintroduction."
08:41 PM on 05/11/2012
As part of the requirement to follow the stipulations of the National Environmental Policy Act, NPS was required to do an economic impact study which would naturally include a visitor use study as well. To do this, NPS hired the Research Triangle Institute out of Raleigh, NC. The study they produced has been deemed flawed and incomplete by both RTI and NPS. Therefore, quoting numbers from that study, though NPS uses them none the less, produces nothing but error and bad information.
To suggest that the various merchants and service providers move somewhere else is an insult. About 99% of the businesses here on the islands are "mom and pop" shops and don't exist "next" to the Seashore but are surrounded by it. In fact, there are businesses extant that predate the establishment of the Seashore in 1952.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:17 AM on 05/14/2012
So, we must sacrifice the eco-nomy of the Earth and all life, including mankind's, for mom and pop shops? Smart and so scientific. And, we sit up for pet cats and dogs entertainment, the existences of the strands in the web of all life?

I don't think you'll earn your badge in ecology.
01:28 PM on 05/14/2012
Stay in your city Linus, learn from your books. I'll stay on the beaches and learn from the real world.
07:17 PM on 05/11/2012
With a slight adjustment on the Southern end of the village of Ocracoke, also surrounded by the Seashore, the entire village could be placed in one of these closures with room to spare. These are the largest closures of their kind in the entire country and are unwarranted and unsupported by sound, peer reviewed science.
Your claim that only 10% of the visitors to the Seashore come to drive on the beach is also false. NPS has no way of tracking visitors to the Seashore to begin with. They used to have a traffic counter at the entrance to the Seashore at Whalebone Junction which is at the Southern end of Nags Head. It recorded every vehicle that passed by it including, EMS, police, NPS, the milk truck, the ice trucks, NCDOT, and a host of other persons. NPS considers anyone, including the residents of the eight villages surrounded by the Seashore to be a visitor even though many of those people will never venture to the beach. Some of these people come from families that have lived on these islands since before this nation was born.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
09:36 PM on 05/12/2012
And lots of cities and factories used to dump pollution and sewage directly into the ocean and rivers. Things change.
03:02 AM on 05/13/2012
We don't have cities here. We have eight small villages surrounded by the Seashore. We don't have box stores or anything similar. The nearest 7-11 to my place is about an hour away. We live on two sandbars set about 35 miles out in the Atlantic. And we don't have issues with what you mention above. We take care of this resource because our lives and livelihoods depend on it. Don't condemn a place you don't understand.
04:48 PM on 05/11/2012
. With a slight adjustment on the Southern end of the village of Ocracoke, also surrounded by the Seashore, the entire village could be placed in one of these closures with room to spare. These are the largest closures of their kind in the entire country and are unwarranted and unsupported by sound, peer reviewed science.
Your claim that only 10% of the visitors to the Seashore come to drive on the beach is also false. NPS has no way of tracking visitors to the Seashore to begin with. They used to have a traffic counter at the entrance to the Seashore at Whalebone Junction which is at the Southern end of Nags Head. It recorded every vehicle that passed by it including, EMS, police, NPS, the milk truck, the ice trucks, NCDOT, and a host of other persons. NPS considers anyone, including the residents of the eight villages surrounded by the Seashore to be a visitor even though many of those people will never venture to the beach. Some of these people come from families that have lived on these islands since before this nation was born.
01:40 PM on 05/11/2012
Incidentally, there are no endangered birds nesting here.The closest you get is a minuscule segment of the Atlantic coast population of Piping Plovers, (charadrius melodus) which is listed as "least threatened". On average, only ten pair of these birds nest at the Seashore per year and each nest fledged about 1.3 chicks. The amount of beach closed for these chicks is astounding. And it is having an incredible impact on our economy as well as ruining the vacations of many visitors. Not once, not once!, in the history of the Seashore, has a plover been killed by human activity related to visitation or vehicular access to our beaches. This being true in spite of the fact that up until 4 years ago, these beaches were open 24/7, 365 days a year. That is the historical record as documented by NPS.
Plover chicks are about the size of a ping pong ball. But as mentioned before, the closures around these birds, the beaches that become inaccessible, are immense. Each chick now receives a 1000 meter buffer around them. This translates to a buffer of 2000 meters or 1.2 miles in diameter. This also equates to 776.285 acres, 751.4 football fields, or 33,815,000 square feet, per bird. It would take 31.5 of the Cape Hatteras Lighthouses to cross this buffer or 4.5 Empire State Buildings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
03:10 PM on 05/11/2012
The individual must be literate in the science of ecology to comprehend the ecological risks of hordes of one specie's foot trampling or foot print on a fragile ecosystem. This isn't a playground; this is all the reasons mankind breathes and exists. Ecosystems are the eco-nomy of all life, and ecosystems are only as life giving as the wealth of their plant and animal biodiversity, just like this protected plover and sea turtles.

Ecosystems provide mankind with his natural resources, but more importantly, his only, "life-supporting services", a long list of why mankind is alive. These scientists claim, man is suicidal when he kills ecosystems, and killing off the biodiversity that creates and sustains the ecosystem, like the plover and sea turtles, is about safe for man as thermonuclear war. The me generation is selfish and clueless as to how Earth functions and cycles to create all life, and it has everything to do with sea shore ecosystems, and their strands in the web of all life or turtles and birds.

Man is the only animal on the planet so stupid as to kill his only nest. The next time you visit this ecosystem, think in terms, this is the real natural Earth, the living, physical body and face of planet Earth, man's only nest. Fewer birds and turtles, the less of a living world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:11 AM on 05/12/2012
You don't realize, this plover is listed as facing extinction in the entire USA; therefore, it is protected by federal law. Obviously, and sadly you are illiterate in the science of ecology, which articulates why man breathes. This plover is in the eco-nomy of life itself or all the reasons you are breathing. You exist only because of ecosystems, the natural earth, and ecosystems exist only because of their biological diversity, just like this plover or Earth's biodiversity, a strand in the web of all life, a rivet in spaceship Earth, all the reasons mankind is alive!

If all birds on the Earth should be extinct, just like this bird facing extinction, you would be as dead as a conscious-less piece of mold or rot. Tragically, most Americans, like you, are unconscious of why they exist, and it has everything to do with this plover, your best friend in the world, if you wish to remain alive.

Sadly, you are unconscious of why you exist in the first place, and it has everything to do with plovers remaining extanct.
02:42 PM on 05/12/2012
Linus, save your dribble for someone who doesn't understand nature or the facts surrounding plovers. Save it for someone that's never been out of the city. I live on Hatteras Island and was raised in a woodland environment and know more about the ecosystem of this island than any current employee of NPS. And, for the record, the Atlantic coast population of plovers is listed as least threatened, not endangered. They have already reached the 2000 nesting pair threshold for de-listing. If you want to lecture someone, call the Park Service and ask them why they kill thousands of animals. Ask them why, because of their management policies, they have lost an avg. 37% of every turtle nest laid at the Seashore since 1979 with a record of 47% in 2010. And call USFWS and ask them why they slaughtered (gassed to death) thousands of geese at Pea Island national Wildlife Refuge. But save your tripe for someone that doesn't understand how things work here.
01:39 PM on 05/11/2012
I am always astounded when I read articles such as this one concerning Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area. And in this case, I read what appears to be a boilerplate opinion of an individual who is very unfamiliar with not only the history of the Seashore but the issues that plague those that call this place home as well as visitors from all over this nation. I cannot speak about Biscayne Bay as I am unfamiliar with the issues there. Hatteras, on the other hand, is something I am intimately familiar with having spent almost a decade learning the facts about this remarkable Seashore. Mr Flattau, your assertion that access to our beaches has caused harm to the environment cannot be substantiated by the National park Service or anyone else either. There is no evidence extant that suggests that we have caused harm to this resource. There is a wealth of speculation and hundreds of statements about "could have, may have, possibly, perhaps, might," etc.. but no sound or peer reviewed science that shows that we are causing harm to this area. I defy you to prove me wrong.
01:21 PM on 05/11/2012
Did the fact checker take the day off? I assume that Mr. Flattau, like most of the special interest groups who have imposed beach access restrictions at Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreation Area, has never visited Hatteras Island, read the ORV management rules in their entirety, or consulted the ecology studies that pertain to the issues. No need, since he seems to have written his blog straight out of Audubon Society and the Southern Environmental Law Center press releases Protests against the Park Service's closure of public Cape Hatteras beaches to access by the tax-paying public don't come solely from local business people. They come from thousands of fishermen, vacationing families and people who love the uniqueness of the Outer Banks who aren't able to enjoy their beaches. They include not only vehicle drivers, but also pedestrians who aren't allowed to set foot on the sands. (Read the rules, Mr. Flattau.) They include the majority of the public who, contrary to Mr. Flattau's statement, flatly oppose the Park Service's restrictions. They include Hatteras and Ocracoke residents whose families have lived on the islands for centuries and who were active conservators of native wildlife long before Audubon took up the cause as what some say is a fund-raising strategy.

There are other instances of egregious substitution of opinion and personal preference for fact in Mr. Flattau's blog. Since the fact checker didn't catch them, the general reader probably won't, either. Huffington Post, I expected better of you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:32 AM on 05/14/2012
We don't have to know specifics if we are literate in the science of ecology, which clearly articulates all the reasons Earth creates and supports all life. The same mentality of ecological ignorance ranges from sea to sea. We know all the ways mankind is killing the Earth, from orv's, to free-ranging, introduced, killer predators. It's in the bag.

The problem is, few are literate in the science of ecology, which explains clearly how Earth functions to create and sustain all life. You wouldn't be putting up such a fuss -- if you were literate in the science of ecology.

The author of this article is an ecological literate and gets the big picture.
11:23 AM on 05/11/2012
The DOI and NPS are systematically removing us from the lands they manage. Look at a few of the lawsuits and public issues before DOI and NPS:

• uranium mining in AZ,
• oyster farming in Point Reyes, CA,
• snowmobiles in Yellowstone, MT,
• ORV on Big Cypress, FL,
• oil pipelines in NE,
• the right to gather on the 4th of July at Yorktown Victory Center, VA,
• Padre Island, Texas will now have a reduced speed limit due to the final rule at Cape Hatteras.
• Back country horseback travel in Sequoia and Kings Canyon, CA

Can you now see whats happening in your home state and all across America?

Wake up America!! Have your Congressman co sponsor Mr. Jones bill #4094 and S2372…… Ms. Feinstein (CA), Mr. Harris (MD), Mr. Rigell (VA), Mr. Cantor (VA) restoring access to Cape Hatteras......

The dots at Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area are now connected:

Eliminate the vehicles and nesting increases.
Eliminate the people and nesting increases.
Eliminate the dogs and nesting increases.
Eliminate the kites and nesting increases.
Walk only in the water and nesting increases.
Kill all the predators (animals and birds) and nesting increases.
Hey, if the weather helps us out, nesting increases.

Now charge a permit fee ($120/calendar year- $50/week) and make it inconvenient to obtain (In person only at 3 locations 50 miles apart) and complicate things more.

Those plovers and turtles came in handy, didn't they ??

Hatrasfevr
10:52 AM on 05/11/2012
The new regulation for ORVs at Cape Hatteras strikes a balance between protecting the beach and allowing reasonable and responsible driving for those who can't seem to enjoy the beach any other way. Most of the Seashore is open to vehicles. If anything, the regulation leaves too much beach open to vehicles.

The NPS finally implemented reasonable restrictions on ORV use in 2008 and birds, turtles, and the beach have been doing great. If you want the truth rather than feverish blabber, you can see the NPS natural resource reports on the Seashore's web site.

The Seashore belongs to the people of this great country, not the tiny minority, special interest group of off-road vehicle enthusiasts or the local politicians that don't care what they have to run over--birds, turtles, everything else--in the name of joy-riding down the beach. No one needs a vehicle to enjoy the beaches of Cape Hatteras. The ability to drive on the beach is a privilege that needs to be regulated to prevent damage to the beach, birds, turtles, the landscape, and safeguard families that want to enjoy the beach.

The NPS needs to stand strong to protect the Seashore from the assaults of uncaring, self-proclaimed "beach lovers" and the misguided politicians who introduced job-killing, destructive legislation to turn Cape Hatteras back to the disgusting parking lot that it was in 2007, and will serve no purpose except to drive people away from the Outer Banks of NC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:28 PM on 05/11/2012
This beach is the habit/homes, food, shelter, nurseries and cover for the rivets of spaceship Earth or biodiversity. This isn't merely a playground or toy center for man; this is an ecosystem that generates our natural resources, but most importantly, provides mankind with his lifelines to existence or in the science of ecology, "life-supporting services". While mankind might make it without playgrounds and toys, he won't go long without oxygen, the atmosphere, fresh water, the nitrogen cycle or the entirety of Earth's biogeochemistry and the biosphere, life itself, all inextricably interconnected to the existence and health of birds and turtles.

If all the turtles and birds dieoff in this ecosystem, there goes the look and feel of the beach, the plants and trees, the look of the beach, and all ecosystems are integrated. The looming extinctions of both the sea turtles and the birds make the Earth a less living Earth and less alive and life supporting for all life, including man. Ecological illiteracy is killing all the reasons man breathes.
09:25 AM on 05/13/2012
This is one of the most hilarious posts in this entire thread and smells like a Wisconson stock yard for the same reason the stock yard smells. Most of the Seashore is closed to vehicles as I write. In fact not only vehicles but pedestrians as well.
You mention the NPS resource reports and treat them as some sort of gospel but you clearly know nothing of the actual numbers whic, are NOT reflected in those reports.
Beach driving was regulated long before 2008 with no documented harm to the resource. I would say also that you really know nothing about our economy. If there has been anything that has killed jobs on these islands, it's been the new regulations, worse now than in 2008. We have over 500 homes in foreclosure and over 60 businesses that have gone under since these draconian restrictions went into effect. rather significant considering that between Hatteras and Ocracoke, there are only about 5000 residents. Get your facts stright.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:36 AM on 05/14/2012
I have my facts right. You are the one illiterate in the science of ecology, which clearly articulates all the reasons man exists and breathes. You want this ecosystem as your personal playpen, for a few pieces of silver. It happens all the time. We comprehend only 10 percent of Americans are educable. We got it!

This isn't only about you; we face this ecologically illiterate element daily.
09:23 AM on 05/11/2012
Since when has killing one species to protect another been the 'let nature take its course' approach of the Department of the Interior or the National Park Service. Salazar is in charge of both and has promoted the killing of thousands of mammals (documented by NPS) at Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area to 'protect' the endangered Piping Plover. The bird is at the southern edge of its habitat and has less than 10 nests per year here of which half are usually destroyed by storms or seagull predation.

Millions of YOUR tax dollars have been spent in meetings, scientific studies, lawsuits, Environmental Impact Studies and every other kind of roadblock imaginable against visitors to protect 6 bird nests while the bird is flourishing in other parts of the country.... The process has taken over 5 years!

When are we going to realize that we cannot change the course of nature and remove the people from office that think they can? Read about this DOI and NPS debacle at www.ncbba.org.

Have your US Representative co-sponsor Support HR # 4094 by Congressman Jones and Senate Bill2372.......Can we just have our access to Parks and NPS land restored?

Hatrasfevr
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:03 PM on 05/11/2012
Protecting our national parks in most cases, protects man's lifelines to his very existence as most of our national parks, if not all, are ecosystems, the eco-nomy of life. One of this nation's top, ecologically literate scientists states, the extinction of biodiversity, like the dying off plover, is about as safe for mankind's existence as "thermonuclear war", and when man kills ecosystems for any reason, man is "suicidal".

Domestic cats are an immense issue in attempting to save animal biodiversity, and domestic cats are not biodiversity; they are an introduced, unnatural, invasive killer predator. As our national parks are ecosystems and support mankind's very existence, they should not be anyone's personal playground. They are the living of all of Earth, the living, physical body and face of the Earth. Ecologically, everything interconnects,

All ecosystems are integrated, and they all have loops and feedbacks to both the climate and the atmosphere, and all ecosystems, altogether, create the life zone of the Earth, the biosphere/ecosphere --- life itself.

Playground or life itself, should not even be an issue.
09:19 AM on 05/11/2012
The DOI and NPS are systematically removing us from the lands they manage. Look at a few of the lawsuits and public issues before DOI and NPS:

• uranium mining in AZ,
• oyster farming in Point Reyes, CA,
• snowmobiles in Yellowstone, MT,
• ORV on Big Cypress, FL,
• oil pipelines in NE,
• the right to gather on the 4th of July at Yorktown Victory Center, VA,
• Padre Island, Texas will now have a reduced speed limit due to the final rule at Cape Hatteras.
• Back country horseback travel in Sequoia and Kings Canyon, CA

Can you now see whats happening in your home state and all across America?

We are making many ‘environmental’ Attorneys wealthy as they continue to sue us, the Federal Government, in the name of Conservation.

Wake up America!! Have your Congressman co sponsor HR #4094and S2372…… Ms. Feinstein (CA), Mr. Harris (MD), Mr. Rigell (VA), Mr. Cantor (VA) restoring access to Cape Hatteras........

The dots at Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area are now have people and vehicle free areas in OUR Parks.
06:59 PM on 05/10/2012
I'm a tree hugger and I will stay away from anyone promoting themselves as an "environmentalist" There is less wildlife this year at the beach even though the NPS has severely restricted access to humans. The NPS itslef has killed thousands of animals (predator management) on the outer banks in the name of saving a few birds, who really don't chose to nest here. Please stop with the lies. You and your environmental money and lawyers have killed an entire economy. Save the humans. I bet you have never been here. No, I know you've never been here from your last comments about how we should get another job. Fishing (heavily restricted) and tourism are the only jobs. We've been here longer the NPS, it is our island.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
08:32 PM on 05/10/2012
I would think the word, "national" would indicate your beach belonged to all of America. If it is a wild, natural landscape, it belongs to the Earth and is an ecosystem, every reason you breathe and are alive. If the birds are native biological diversity, along with all native plant and animal biodiversity, these birds are the bricks and mortar of man's only house, the Earth.

If ecologically illiterate humans are destroying this national park/ecosystem, it needs help and protection, from humans and their introduced, transported planet killing predators, like domestic cats, which are not a strand in the web of all life, like these birds. Birds are in decline in continent on the Earth.

If all the birds on your beach were to dieoff, then there goes all the rivets holding spaceship Earth altogether, including the plant biodiversity and trees, pollinators [some birds], seed dispersal [birds], pest control for all the flowers and plants [birds] and mankind's protection from human disease pathogens that cause human pandemics. Birds hold big jobs in the eco-nomy of the Earth.

Why everyone just adores our national parks is, because they are the handiwork and art of God. And, nothing else in the human consciousness produces the joy and ecstasy of being in America the beautiful, God shed his grace on thee. Wilderness, where else would man find paradise!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
02:47 PM on 05/11/2012
Are you really condemning domestic cats as planet killers?
10:47 PM on 05/10/2012
you have no facts to back your extremist position. Beach access has been severely limited and the bird count is the lowest in a long time. It is not OK in my opinion to kill one animal to save another, and in the process they have also killed "species of concern". FACTS that's what journalist use to support their position. You don't have any facts. I think the NPS has done more damage to the ecosystem by killing animals that belong here. These park lands originally belonged to the parents & grandparents of many of the residents of the Islands. The intention was to make it a beach for the public, for public use. Many of these landowner gave their land or sold it cheap for this purpose and now you say to their children & grandchildren "go get a job somewhere else?" move from your family home because of my incorrect extremist position? If you can't make a living anymore and you can't feed your children you should think its oky because a nesting bird is more important. Shame on you!
11:12 PM on 05/10/2012
Playing GOD
Year.......Mammals destroyed or removed.........plover eggs hatched

2001.........n/a..........3
2002.........n/a..........1
2003.........n/a..........4
2004.........n/a......... 4
2005.........93...........8
2006.........38...........9
2007........333..........17
2008........721..........22
2009........464..........22
2010........593..........33
2011........263..........35

From the park service documents.
Seems a bit obvious to me what helps the few plovers that hatch
I'm at a loss to see how these stats show how preventing human access to the beaches helps...seems more like a predator issue...but I'm just looking at their numbers

From the NPS own stats
http://hamptonroads.com/2012/03/park-service-predator-management-angers-some
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:04 AM on 05/11/2012
Differences occur in animals. Native species of animals and plants are the rivets of spaceship Earth, the creators and supporters of Earth's ecosystems. Ecosystems supply mankind with his natural resources, but most importantly, ecosystems provide mankind with a long list of every and all reasons man is alive or ecosystems, "life-supporting services".

Birds are in decline in every continent on the Earth, and birds, unlike domestic cats, a top agent of the extinctions of the strands in the web of all life, are not. Domestic cats are not faced with eternal obliteration, and domestic cats have no jobs and play no role on any ecosystem on the Earth. Scientifically, they are classified as an introduced, invasive, killer predator, killing all the reasons you breathe and are alive.

You must realize, most of us are illiterate in the ecology of the Earth, and therein is the problem, this illiteracy is killing the Earth and man's future.
06:53 PM on 05/10/2012
National parks were not meant to be wilderness areas. They were put aside for the enjoyment of people. That's why they named it "Cape Hatteras Recreational Seashore" NOT "birds only nesting site"