More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Edward Ugel

GET UPDATES FROM Edward Ugel
 

Legalized Internet Gambling in Washington, DC? What a Con.

Posted: 04/15/11 03:14 PM ET

The District of Columbia has decided to move forward with a plan to legalize internet gambling within its borders. Knowing just how broke the city is, the layman might think this plan is sound -- if not ingenious. But to those of us who know a thing or two about state sponsored gambling, this is going to be hell for DC residents.

On the surface, who can blame the District of Columbia? Like so many cities across the nation, Washington, DC is gasping for air, desperate to find cash in order to pay its bills and, ostensibly, help its citizens. The district's lawmakers are not trying to harm their citizens on purpose. They are guilty of ignorance, not malice.

The last thing the District of Columbia needs to do is get even further into is the gambling business. Like some forty other states, the DC lottery is already a huge player in state sponsored gambling. Along with sales of booze and cigarettes, the city makes a tidy sum selling these "sin" products. However, the sale of alcohol and tobacco have strict regulations against state sponsored advertising -- not so with the lottery.

Whereever you live, how many times a day do you see or hear a lottery commercial? The answer is too high to count. Lottery advertisements are ubiquitous. We see them so much we've become immune to them. Imagine for a moment if the same advertising methods were allowed for tobacco and alcohol. State sponsored ads for cigarettes, Jim Beam or Jack Daniels? There would be an angry mob in front of the mayor's house by sunset. It's verboten -- and rightfully so.

Why then, do we allow Washington, DC -- and all the other lottery states -- to push their casino games to their very own residents via hardcore marketing campaigns? Because the states (and DC) have convinced their constituents that lottery revenue goes toward education and other essential programs. It's a half-truth that's allowed the proliferation of lotteries to grow in a way never imagined nor intended as modern lotteries re-emerged in the late 1960's. Yes, lottery money does go toward education but often in lieu of budgeted money (PDF) -- not in addition to the formerly budgeted education dollars. That right there is the dirty little secret of the state lotteries.

For hundreds (yes hundreds) of years, lotteries were a simple thing: based upon picking a set of numbers and hoping that they matched that day's, or week's drawing. Was it harmful? It depends on your definition. But there was a limit to the harm one could do to themselves, as it was only so interesting to buy a ticket and wait a few hours or days to see if you won.

That old-school, "quaint" lottery has been replaced by far more addictive, casino-like games. In many states (and soon the nation's capital), you can go sit in a bar, have a drink... or five, and play video poker -- state lottery sponsored video poker where you need only to wait a second or two to see if you've won. Moreover, you can keep playing and playing -- without supervision or regulation just as if you were in a real casino. Those type of casino games are the most addictive. Don't think for a second that the lotteries aren't well aware that fact.

So, let's call it what it is. The lotteries have become state sponsored casinos. Add to it the fact that they market and advertise these games all over the various forms of media, and you've got yourself a sticky situation.

I like casinos -- sometimes a bit too much. But, I know the deal when I'm there. They want every dollar I have. I want the "free" room and the escape that a few days in Vegas or Atlantic City allows. Casinos are cutthroat businesses. But at least they don't pretend to be anything other than what they are.

The states (and the District of Columbia) should be ashamed of themselves for advertising addictive casino games to its own residents. Because these games are offered by their own governments, residents have the false notion that there is some good that can or may come from playing. After all, your own state or the nation's capital, couldn't possibly be out to take all your cash...right?

Wrong.

Each year, lotteries spend hundreds of millions of marketing dollars trying to get non-players to play and current players to play more -- a lot more. Most highly educated people know better than to throw money at the lotteries. Sadly, who plays well beyond their means? The least educated, the most impoverished, the ones who can afford it the least. Those are the ones that the lotteries bleed dry. There's no doubt that they'll also be the target of this new idea to allow legalized online gaming.

Laughably, the DC Lottery is slated to "manage" the new online gambling system in Washington, DC. Is there any doubt that they will use all of their marketing expertise to maximize profits out of this new revenue area?

Shame on the city for allowing this to happen. Shame on us for letting them.

 
 
 

Follow Edward Ugel on Twitter: www.twitter.com/edugel

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:04 PM on 04/20/2011
Until all the facts are in, we don't know how this will pan out. Questions like if you own a business or residence in DC will you be able to access the poker sites outside the district, or will you have to be physically inside the city? What about people living on the border of DC, Maryland and Virginia, will it be as simple as walking across the street to the DC line and play?
11:40 AM on 04/22/2011
Exactly, sounds like a DC govt. nightmare. Ever try to pay a ticket in DC. Not fun.
06:43 PM on 04/16/2011
Euphoria can be found clean and sober - the only action I need is me getting out of myself.

http://soberlivingblog.wordpress.com
11:27 PM on 04/15/2011
You state a valid viewpoint on this legislation without mentioning an essential effect of DC's decision, due to the federal case against the three top online poker sites. This means that many, many people who actually make a living with online poker, and aren't necessarily addicted, can potentially go to DC to continue earning a living. I don't suggest that you condone it but at least make note of it one way or another because it is crucial aspect of the new law.
09:29 AM on 04/16/2011
You're 100% correct, Tiffany. Ironically, I wrote this article the day before it was posted. An hour after this article went online, I heard about the indictment of the online poker companies. Frankly, it changes everything. It's going to be an interesting few weeks/months in the online gaming world. In my opinion, when there are so many dollars (billions and billions) on the table--the online gaming industry won't simply vanish. What will yesterday's indictments do to DC's plan to legalize? Time will tell. Who knows? Maybe the nation's capital will fill up with poker players? Based upon some of the folks who call DC home--some would say the arrival of poker players would do nothing but class-up the joint.
10:52 AM on 04/16/2011
D.C. would be better than having to leave the country, but I'm not sure whatever site is put up in D.C. would be big enough to replace the giants of online poker that were taken down yesterday. You could see new people enter the workforce, migration to Canada, Europe, or any number of countries that allow online gambling. Or we could all pack up and head to D.C. to class up the joint! This really makes me wonder about the timing of the D.C. legislation though. Did they know something we didn't? A lot of poker players are on tilt today, not because their Ace King lost to a pair of Nines, but because their bankroll is tied up online. Some have tens of thousands that is being held hostage right now. Will the federal government release those funds? And if not, who gets the loot?
09:10 PM on 04/15/2011
I think this really shows that the gov't needs to regulate online gambling. I don't mean following DC and having federalpoker.com, but rather legalize, tax, and regulate the private companies that host the tables.

Here's to hoping that the indictment today leads to a better online gambling experience for everyone. One where I don't have to have a Canadian bank account or use Western Union to xfer funds.
07:50 PM on 04/15/2011
LOL Course i debuck your Story on Hypocrisy and you wont post it LOL
07:48 PM on 04/15/2011
Hypocrite Story MR. You like Casino's RIght and you are an ADULT right! I am an Adult and i like on-line gambling. I know it is GAMBLING so i completely understand the Risks, and again I am an ADULT. Like you said there is the Lottory, BINGO, and Casino's all over America. Why can't I sit in MY HOME and drink a beer and play poker? Because some Adults are Weak and not responsable I CANT PLAY? And by your Post you are a Prime example of the Hypocrisy going on in the US Today LOL You go to Vegas yet tell me and others On-Line Gambling is wrong lol It is very sad and very UNAMERICAN that Gambling is legal to a Few and Illegal to others!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
08:14 PM on 04/15/2011
Oh Eric...let's not splash our chips all over the place. The article doesn't say internet gambling is wrong. I play poker online, too. I have zero problem with you (or me) playing internet poker or casino games. If you catch your breath and read the piece once more, you'll see that my problem is not with online gambling, but with STATE RUN online gambling. I want our states to concentrate on things like schools, and roads, and feeding the poor. Leave the casino business to the casinos and other businesses. They don't need the states to get involved. Now, am I a hypocrite? Or, did you just kinda miss the point of the piece?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ctizzie
12:07 AM on 04/16/2011
Follow up definitely needed in light of today's huge indictments in the online poker world... I'm curious to see what this means (if anything) for DC's move to sanction online gaming in the city...