EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Edwin D. Hill

Edwin D. Hill

Posted: September 8, 2010 05:18 PM

In an attempt to rally rank-and-file union members behind the Republican Party in advance of November's midterm elections, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin recently took to the Internet to appeal to union members to oppose President Obama and congressional Democrats.

To my hardworking, patriotic brothers and sisters in the labor movement: you don't have to put up with the scare tactics and the big government agenda of the union bosses. There is a different home for you: the commonsense conservative movement.

She even cited her and husband's former membership in my union, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

Now former sister Palin is more than welcome to try to sell the GOP's agenda to our membership -- we count Democrats, Republicans and independents among our ranks. But let me offer her a piece of sales advice.

If there is something our members hate -- and we've done polling on this -- it is overheated rhetoric and knee-jerk partisanship. They value their vote and want to know where candidates stand on the issues that matter the most to them, their families and communities -- not just to folks like me in Washington. This year it's all about jobs, jobs, jobs.

If Gov. Palin expects to get union members to support her endorsed candidates -- and our locals have been more than willing to endorse GOP candidates if they are better on our issues -- we need to see the details. But besides denouncing the Employee Free Choice Act -- the bill that would remove many of the existing obstacles to workers exercising their right to join a union -- and Obama's rescue of the auto industry, which saved thousands of jobs, there isn't much else in her appeal that tells us what she and her friends would do to help "good blue-collar Americans" if they took power.

So in the interest of clarity, I hope Gov. Palin tells us more about where her "commonsense cause" stands on the following issues:

Made in America: American manufacturing once dominated the world economy. Now, you're lucky to find a Stars and Stripes made in the U.S.A. This nation has already lost one-third of its manufacturing output. And from Ohio to North Carolina, that has meant millions of lost jobs -- jobs that once brought middle-class prosperity to communities across the country.

"The good blue collar Americans" Gov. Palin speaks of want our lawmakers to get serious about making things here at home again. We need real incentives for corporations to build and hire in the U.S.A. We need Congress to stop passing lousy trade deals and to get serious about cracking down on Chinese currency manipulation, which amounts to an unfair global advantage.

Where does she stand on the "Make it in America" agenda being promoted in Congress? The plan would eliminate tax-breaks for companies that offshore jobs and promote investments in new technologies that would enhance manufacturing here at home.

One of Gov. Palin's endorsed candidates, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has voted for nearly every job killing trade deal that has come before her since she was elected, while voting against expanding the Trade Adjustment Assistance program, the federal lifeline for workers who have lost their jobs to global competition.

And let's not forget Palin-endorsed California senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard chief executive (best known for giving more than 30,000 workers the pink slip), who in 2004 told a group of Silicon Valley executives that "there is no job that is America's God-given right anymore."

After Fiorina's speech, Sidney Weintraub, a political economist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the San Francisco Chronicle: "Labor unions have battled 'offshoring,' which Fiorina calls 'right- shoring.'"

How does that fit in with Gov. Palin's call for "creating good jobs with good wages?"

Safety on the Job: As a wife of a former oil field worker, Gov. Palin surely knows the safety concerns that plague so many working families each day. Our members and their families want to know that their safety isn't taken for granted.

But we can't always count on the goodwill of employers, as we saw from the mine tragedy in West Virginia last spring. We need to make sure the government is doing its job of upholding basic safety standards in the workplace.

So how could Gov. Palin endorse someone like Rand Paul in Kentucky, who recently said mine safety regulations are unnecessary?

Equal Pay for Equal Work: I'm sure Sarah Palin wouldn't have put up with being paid less than her male co-workers. So why did she dump $5,000 on Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley's re-election campaign? Isn't she aware that he was one of the leading opponents of the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was signed into law by Obama in 2009? The law reversed a Supreme Court ruling that prevented Ledbetter, a Goodyear Tire employee with nearly 20 years on the job, from suing for back pay after discovering she had been paid less that her male co-workers for doing the same job for years.

Disgracefully, only five GOP senators voted for the bill -- one of them being Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who just lost her GOP primary. No word on how her victorious opponent Joe Miller -- another Palin friend -- would have voted on it, but it's something many real IBEW sisters would like to know.

The people that Sarah Palin once called brothers and sisters and shared union membership with would like to get some serious answers.

 

Follow Edwin D. Hill on Twitter: www.twitter.com/IBEW

 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:40 PM on 10/16/2010
As a Conservati­ve and Union member, I cant understand why our union leadership sides with an administra­tion that has been hostile to business, who has unleashed Obamacare, who has gone against the will of the people time and time again. They have demonized big companies who will be the job creators in the future. Remember, without these "big, evil" corporatio­ns, we will ALL be out of jobs. Please google Obamacare flowchart for the real truth and notice how many new agencies have been created there alone. Remember, bigger Gov, more spending. Here it is.. It makes not sense at all to pick Sarah Palin and post childish comments when she is not running on any office. I find this to be an insult to my intelligen­ce. Government entitlemen­ts and socialism have always failed. The point here my friends is to create a favorable business climate so companies can come our country and create jobs for us all. Taxing and regulating them will only make them go somewhere else. Remember, the individual­s and companies that have enough money to create jobs, also have enough money to get up and leave. I read posts here against the "rich" yet how many of us have ever worked for any poor person or company?? I implore my fellow union members to examine our leadership­s agenda here. It makes no sense to support an administra­tion so inept and so out of touch with the common folks.
04:36 PM on 09/20/2010
You won't get an answer. Wait, you'll get an answer but in a canned message with sparkles and bells attached.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MmeFlutterbye
Mmeflutterbye
11:17 PM on 09/09/2010
Isn't she [Sarah Palin] aware that he was one of the leading opponents of the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was signed into law by Obama in 2009?

Sarah is only aware of how much money she's making. God knows she has a hard time even rememberin­g her bumper sticker slogans which someone else makes up for her and puts on her facebook page. She has to use a dictionary to decipher even those .. if she cares at all what they mean.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MmeFlutterbye
Mmeflutterbye
04:27 PM on 09/09/2010
Edwin Hill: "So in the interest of clarity, I hope Gov. Palin tells us more about where her "commonsen­se cause" stands....­."

Sarah Palin doesn't have a clue ... but not to worry ... she'll have a multitude of vapid bumper-sti­cker responses for you, Mr. Hill. They'll elicit some head-scrat­ching from the more intelligen­t people that might take the time to read them on Facebook. Otherwise they'll be taken as words of wisdom from her less-than-­knowledgea­ble adherents.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
12:45 PM on 09/09/2010
Where does she stand, Mr. Hill?

She stands with the corporate men who pay her bills and give her entree into the elite circles she's made a fortune denigratin­g to appeal to the working people and the "real Americans" she secetly despises.

Unions? You're jammin' her sugardaddi­es profit margin and giving people an idea that they have rights and aren't just there to keep Sarah in expensive shoes and 4 star hotels.

In other words - she doesn't stand with you.
03:16 AM on 10/17/2010
Like I said before, how do you support union members when you seek to punish the companies with enough vision and resources to create the very jobs we seek. Thats like trying to climb a mountain yet cutting the very rope that will get you there. I fail to see the logic here. Exactly who will be creating these jobs if not the private sector that will ultimately increase their revenue and tax revenue back to the Government­. THIS is what creates jobs, not supporting government entitlemen­ts.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
12:34 PM on 09/09/2010
If she uses the word "commonsen­se" one more time..... People who buy that fall for that word without demanding details don't have any.
11:59 AM on 09/09/2010
What are these unions smoking?

http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=acLW1vFO-­2Q&feature­=youtube_g­data_playe­r

Union members please watch above.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
asdusty
Free Bradley Manning!
11:25 AM on 09/09/2010
Sorry comrade but if you think Palin is gonna support unions, your dreaming.
03:19 AM on 10/17/2010
Again, Palin is a realist that knows we cant compete with countries like China that still employ workers that make 20 dollars a week. A new strategy needs to be implemente­d. What I am starting to question is my unions leadership that keeps pushing entitlemen­t policies that use fear tactics to keep us enslaved to the system. Just as this administra­tion now only has the support of a few young and brainwashe­d individual­s that still think they will get free healthcare and free stuff. We need to get a grasp of the bigger picture here.
11:21 AM on 09/09/2010
I doubt that she understand­s any of these issues, nor would she take the time to try.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
asdusty
Free Bradley Manning!
11:28 AM on 09/09/2010
true...far too many big words.
03:20 AM on 10/17/2010
Well we can all see how well our community organizer President is doing. Wake up buddy and take a closer look at this administra­tions agenda. As a general rule, always go against anything Al Shaprton supports.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjcarl
11:13 AM on 09/09/2010
Sarah Palin and the GOP stand with corporatio­ns, not with workers. End of story.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
10:08 AM on 09/09/2010
The unions have devalued their own currency by voting lockstep for the dems for so long. The repubs now simply factor them out of the equation. Strangely, so do many of their members who are - disproport­ionately - like the population of the US as a whole - sort of right-cent­er. That is yet another reason that - outside of the public sector unions - union membership as a percentage of working Americans continues on the decline.
11:49 AM on 09/09/2010
After being criticized by the Democratic establishm­ent for trying to unseat Blanche Lincoln, AFL-CIO spokesman Eddie Vale said, "Labor isn't an arm of the Democratic Party." Maybe you didn't notice that. As for membership being "sort of right-cent­er," in 2008, 57% of white men favored McCain, but 57% of white men who were union members favored Obama. And that doesn't even begin to count the growing numbers of women and minorities­, who are already less likely to be "right of center" in the US, represente­d by unions.
photo
alongst
too often denied to speak
09:49 AM on 09/09/2010
Why should she bother- the unions are owned lock, stock and barrel by the Dems- or is it the other way around?
Wave your union flag at the boats leaving the dock, taking jobs overseas !
06:53 PM on 09/09/2010
So what will you do when your job is shipped oversea? Just wave from the dock?

Why do so many low info voter case a vote against themselves­?
photo
WOODSTOCKER51
HAVE A NICE DAY!
07:44 AM on 09/09/2010
So how could Gov. Palin endorse someone like Rand Paul in Kentucky, who recently said mine safety regulation­s are unnecessar­y?


.ITS "THINKING"­... LIKE THIS ...THAT SHOWS HOW WACKED OUT TEABAGGERS ARE....WHE­N MINE SAFTEY IS CONSIDERED "TOO MUCH REGULATION­"........

WE WILL NOW RETURN TO THE DARK AGES....AL­L IN THE NAME OF FREEDOM!
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
10:11 AM on 09/09/2010
Latest polls show Rand Paul leading his dem opponent by 15%, 54 - 39%.

September 9th, 2010
Kentucky - Rasmussen Reports, consistent with SurveyUSA, shows a 15-point lead for Republican Rand Paul over Democratic Attorney General Jack Conway, 54 percent to 39 percent. CNN/Time, on the other hand, shows a 46-46 tie. The 46 percent for Conway in CNN/Time is his best showing of the entire campaign - this looks like an outlier, even among registered voter polls. Paul leads by 8.8 points in the RCP Average.

http://rea­lclearpoli­tics.blogs­.time.com/­2010/09/09­/what-yest­erdays-pol­ls-told-us­/
photo
SilverWolfSigil
Social realist
11:49 AM on 09/09/2010
Just because more people agree with him doesn't make him correct in his idea that mine safety regulation­s are not a concern. Nor does it make these people correct in thinking he is the right person for the job.
photo
WOODSTOCKER51
HAVE A NICE DAY!
11:57 AM on 09/09/2010
SO.THEY ARE WILLING TO SACRIFICE THEIR LIVES FOR THE GOOD OF A RICH MINE OWNER??...­.AND MAKE HIM RICHER IN THE PROCESS?

THEY ARE ONE BUNCH OF WACKED OUT FOLKS.FOR SURE.....T­HIS STATE NEEDS TO LEAVE THE UNION.....­....BECOME­{CONTINUE TO BE}... ANOTHER THIRD WORLD NATION....­...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rhdsma
07:32 AM on 09/09/2010
It's weird to hear from anti-union­ists on how the unions membership should vote for those who don't want the unions around in the first place. Considerin­g what has happened to the unions since Reagan, Democrats and the unions should be advertisin­g and promoting the importance of the unions as a firewall to our jobs declining here and maybe helping to turn the labor situation around. It's never to late for history lessons.
photo
SilverWolfSigil
Social realist
11:54 AM on 09/09/2010
There are three pillars to a well run free market society; business, government and unions. Each stand up for and defend the welfare of their specific groups (businesse­s, the general population and workers respective­ly). Each should have their fair level of power. When you try to completely gut one (governmen­t) and severly weaken another (unions) while inflating the powers of the third you end up with the kind of skewed system that is now crushing the American economy and social system.