More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Elisabeth Braw

GET UPDATES FROM Elisabeth Braw
 

"The Revolution Will Spread Throughout the Muslim World - and Beyond"

Posted: 01/31/2012 9:56 am

People call him "The Godfather of the new Islamist Middle East." Rachid Ghannouchi, whose Ennahdha party won Tunisia's first free elections last November, does indeed spearhead the post-Arab Spring Middle East. After being imprisoned and forced into exile by President Ben Ali for his Islamist views, Ghannouchi triumphantly returned during the Arab Spring. Tunisia's Islamist government is set to be joined by more; Islamists recently won the Egyptian elections.

But Ghannouchi doesn't like the everyday business of political office, he tells Metro. He has chosen to remain party leader while fellow Ennahdha member Hamadi Jebali serves as prime minister. But Ghannouchi is the country's real power central, "the man who pulls the strings," Tunisians say.

Far from a firebrand preacher, Ghannouchi is a soft-spoken former philosophy professor. He met Metro at Ennahdha's headquarters in Tunis. Staff scurried through the dilapidated building, while hordes of poor Tunisians gathered downstairs, hoping for handouts from Ennahdha.

Islamism was banned during the rule of Ben Ali. Did you expect Tunisians would vote for your party in the elections?

I always expected our party to win the elections once the dictatorship collapsed. We won the majority in the 1989 elections, but the regime falsified the results and decided to eliminate our movement. Nothing can convince me that the people of Tunisia have changed their minds since then.

How will Tunisia change now that the coalition led by your party is in power?

Our government is the result of the revolution. There will be a lot of change, and we'll respond to the needs of Tunisians. Right now, Tunisians want calm more than anything else, and we'll provide that.

How do you foresee the Middle East developing as a result of the Arab Spring?

Of course I'm very proud that Tunisia started the Arab Spring. In one year, we've seen five revolutions, and most of them have succeeded. This wave of revolutions will spread and will influence all Arab and Muslim countries, and even influence the rest of the world. And the Muslim world will be lead by the Islamic movement, specifically the mainstream moderate Islamic parties. These parties are against extremism and terrorism.

The Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party won Egypt's elections. Are they the same kind of Islamists as you?

They're part of the mainstream Islamic movement, and the mainstream is moderate. But each country's Islamic movement has specific elements.

How do you see the situation developing in Egypt?

The Muslim Brotherhood just won the final stage of the parliamentary elections, and I believe the Egyptians will be able to establish true democracy. I'm certain that the army will cede power to a civilian government. Egyptian politics is more complicated than politics in Tunisia, because they have a strong army and large minorities, but I have no doubt that the Egyptian people will once and for all succeed in replacing their dictatorial regime with a democratic one. And I'm convinced that SCAF [Supreme Council of the Armed Forces] will voluntarily step down rather than risking bloodshed.

So countries like France and Britain will feel the Arab Spring at home?

Absolutely. The Arab Spring has given people a new understanding of Islam. Before, it was linked with terrorism. Now it's linked with revolution, democracy, human rights and justice.

Did people simply misunderstand Islamism in the past?

I think what the world has discovered is that Islamism goes hand in hand with modernity and human rights. Islam and terrorism are incompatible. In the elections and Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt moderate Islamists won the majority of votes. Still, some people stick to their old views on Islamism. Those views are fueled by the media. Most newspapers and TV stations still spread the idea that Islam is a threat to democracy, human rights and modernity. But in time we'll convince those people as well that Islam is in favor of people's interests.

What's your response to people who see Islamism as a threat?

In Islam all human beings are equal in front of God and in front of the law. Nobody can pretend that he's better than others. During the history of Islamic civilization Muslims have co-existed with Christians and members of other religions. We haven't had any religious wars like the Catholics and Protestants. The Holocaust happened in the West, not in an Islamic state. The conflicts in the history of Islam have been about politics; which party or person will rule? But your religious convictions are up to you. Religious minorities in the Islamic world today have full rights as citizens.

What about religious minorities in Tunisia?

We only have tiny minorities of Christians and Jews. Two months ago, the head of the Jewish minority came to congratulate me on our election victory. Afterwards he told a newspaper that he's not afraid of Ennahdha because we're moderates.

How do you plan to tackle extremism among Muslims?

Extremism and terrorism are a very real threat to Islam and Muslims. Most people killed by Muslim extremists are Muslims! Just consider Iraq, Egypt, Indonesia and Algeria. Being perceived as a religion of extremism is a danger to Islam as well.

But how can you make sure that young men in particular aren't drawn into extremist networks?

Terrorism is the fruit of dictatorships. For example, the seeds of terrorism by Egyptians were sewn Mubarak's prisons. Once democracy is established we won't see these strange phenomena of Islam.

How will you convince those who doubt that Islamists are peaceful?

Through deeds. By being role models. If we succeed in implementing our model, people will see that Islam is compatible with democracy, development and women's rights.

The West supported secular dictators in the Muslim world to make sure Islamists didn't win elections...

It was hypocrisy. Ben Ali and Mubarak ran Mafia regimes. Western leaders acted against the very beliefs they professed to have. By doing so, they trampled on human rights and democracy. I hope the post-Arab Spring will lead to an opening between Islam and the West, based on mutual respect. After we won the election, Western leaders called to congratulate us. Now they have an understanding of what we're trying to do.

Ben Ali supported women's rights, and observers worry that your government may revoke some of those rights, including women's right to divorce. Will you?

My party won't change the rights women have under Tunisian law. Allah, God, created us male and female, and we're equal. In Islam we can't distinguish between people based on gender. Of the 49 female MP's in Tunisia's newly elected Assembly, 42 belong to my party. The majority of Tunisian women accept our views on Islam. They fight for their rights inside Islam, not outside. One of our MP's is a woman who doesn't even wear a headscarf.

One human rights observer told me, "even if Ennahdha wanted to force women to wear headscarves it wouldn't have to, because more and more women are wearing it anyway"...

Scarf, no scarf: it's the woman's choice, just as she decides what she wants to eat and drink. The state doesn't have any reason to intervene.

Previously published in Metro, http://www.metro.lu

 

Follow Elisabeth Braw on Twitter: www.twitter.com/elisabethbraw

 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:09 AM on 02/02/2012
Seriously? The American media is horrible. This article is absurd
11:14 AM on 02/01/2012
Despite the concern for secularity and democracy expressed by some posters below, the overriding concern of the United States has been imperial foreign policy, and the suppressio­­n of local democratic groups (whether they be secular or religious) whenever and w­here ever they might interfere with such policy.

In different times and places, we have supported and opposed both secular dictatorsh­­ips and religious groups solely upon on their correlatio­­n with US interests, irrespecti­­ve of their inherent secular or religious merit.

For example, while the current vogue is to define the alleged inherent evil of “Extremist Islam,†we have supported it in Afghanista­­n in the past, and currently support the Saudi monarchy, both of whom rely for legitimacy upon what many in the Islamic world consider extremist interpreta­tions of Islam.

And while we now preach to the Islamic world about Secularism as the true path to “modernity­­,†we have supported (and in many instances continue to support) secular dictatorsh­­ips that have brutally suppressed both religious and secular democratic parties, with no apparent concern for either “modernity­­†or “democracy­†in the target countries.

What we should be doing is supporting democratic parties, be they secular or religious, that advocate the interests of their local population­­s and are accountabl­­e to them, for suppressio­n will only serve to empower its more radical elements.

The point is that both Secularism and Islamism are capable of supporting dictatorsh­­ips, autocracie­­s, monarchies­­, democracy, and yes, perhaps even “modernity­­†in the Islamic World.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:58 AM on 02/01/2012
"The Arab Spring has given people a new understanding of Islam. Before, it was linked with terrorism. Now it's linked with revolution, democracy, human rights and justice."

"I think what the world has discovered is that Islamism goes hand in hand with modernity and human rights."

Where did this article originally appear, The Onion?
11:40 PM on 01/31/2012
''But Ghannouchi is the country's real power central, "the man who pulls the strings," And you call this democracy? At this point, they're in their initial stages of ruling Tunisia. However, later on they will slowly introduce religion into power and then, they will start dictating what is permitted and what is forbidden. I'm sorry, but I don't see the democracy and Al Nahda hand in hand.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:08 PM on 01/31/2012
Islamists (Muslim Brotherhood – you know, the one liberals said were moderates?) block protest march in Cairo. And so it ends. Poor Egypt.

NYTimes, David Kirkpatrick, 1/31/12, "Gaining Power in Parliament, Islamists Block a Cairo Protest"
photo
Tolerant
See perfection in every situation
07:42 PM on 01/31/2012
Are there any Muslims who want Islam as opposed to a made-up, Western entity called "Islamism", a term that has never existed in the Islamic universe and is being imposed on them in a politically manipulating manner?
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
07:39 PM on 01/31/2012
Nonsense.

The idea is that the PEOPLE in these countries are to be used as cannon fodder for global war against India, China and Russia, and others and if not, the US wants to let them slaugher themselves.
photo
Semprini
The Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
06:22 PM on 01/31/2012
"Religious minorities in the Islamic world today have full rights as citizens"

That just isn't true. In fact, it's an outright lie.
06:10 PM on 01/31/2012
Real social change will not be forthcoming until these nations cease to be de facto or official theocracies.
06:08 PM on 01/31/2012
We in the west need a "Spring" to overthrow the MIC Complex trying to enslave Americans!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Damon
Do or do not, there is no try.
05:50 PM on 01/31/2012
If you are not a Muslim and you don't find this article chilling, you're just not paying attention.
11:49 PM on 01/31/2012
Sam, you are incorrect. You don't have to be a non-Muslim to actually find this article chilling. Not all Muslims are extremists. And the ones who aren't, SHOULD find this article chilling. As I said in my previous post, I just don't see how Al-Nahda and democracy can go hand in hand. In my opinion, Tunisians took one step forward and ten steps back.
04:53 PM on 01/31/2012
There are two issues that really matter and we will not know for several years how either work out. The first one is "democracy" - I put it in scare quotes to avoid defining it exactly - in the sense that, at suitable intervals, the government exposes itself to public approval and, if the governed people disapprove, it peacefully transfers power to a group the people prefer. In short - no dictatorships.

The other is civil rights for the citizens of a country - ALL of its citizens. Including the right to open dissent from the government and the right to openly advocate reforms.

There is nothing in Islam that makes either of these impossible - or even difficult. But the record of "Islamic" nations on these scores has not been good. But it will a few years before we know what will actually happen.

It is important not to jump to the conclusion that the results will be bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
06:03 PM on 01/31/2012
I think the Muslims are fully capable of being modern in the way you are saying. It's not like the Iranians support their government. The Lebanese kept their democracy for a long time (even if it's in a little trouble right now due to Syrian domination and being invaded by her Southern neighbor). It was the hapless Brits who appointed kings to so many countries when they had nationalist aspirations
11:51 PM on 01/31/2012
I totally agree with you. However, do you really believe religion and democracy go hand in hand? Religion dictates what people can and cannot do. Religion dictates what is and is not a forbidden. Religion dictates how and what people can wear, think or even say. How can that be considered democracy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teva
02:00 PM on 01/31/2012
If only this were true of what the future holds.....but I have strong doubts and feel this man is peering through rose-colored glasses.
12:37 PM on 01/31/2012
Talk about lobbing softballs!
12:10 PM on 01/31/2012
"Only when Philosophers become Kings or Kings become Philosophers will there be peace on Earth."

So it begins.