NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
GET UPDATES FROM Elizabeth Dowling Taylor
 

Let Us Honor Slave-Owning Presidents?

Posted: 02/20/2012 7:27 am

Here it is again, the intersection of Presidents Day and Black History Month. Eight of our early presidents, beginning with George Washington, owned slaves during their tenure in the nation's highest office. The two I am most familiar with, given my career at the historic sites of Monticello and Montpelier, and as the author of the recently published A Slave in the White House (Palgrave Macmillan, $28.00) are Thomas Jefferson and James Madison.

Jefferson and Madison owned over a hundred enslaved people at their Virginia plantations and took several slaves with them to the White House. Running the domestic side of the executive mansion was a private undertaking then, and the third and fourth president each assembled a household staff, headed by a French steward, of about ten: white and free black workers, slaves hired in the capital, as well as slaves from their plantation.

Slavery was not a debate. It was a crime being perpetrated on real people in real time.

Ten-year-old Paul Jennings was one of the home slaves selected by President James Madison for the White House household staff. As a footman Jennings set and served meals, assisted the coachman, and ran messages and other errands. Later he became Madison's personal manservant or valet, and in freedom he authored the first White House memoir.

One enslaved man, John Freeman, served as a White House footman during both Jefferson's and Madison's administrations. Jefferson purchased Freeman in 1804 with the understanding, set by his former master, that he was to be freed in sixteen years. In 1809, the year Madison's first term began, the third president sold Freeman to his successor for $231.81 (calculated to the penny based on Freeman's remaining time as a slave). This is the only recorded instance of the sale of human property between these two presidents, though Jefferson also sold a woman, Thenia Hemings, and her five young daughters, to another of our slave-owning presidents, James Monroe.

It is easy to see the contradiction--some say hypocrisy--in the author of the Declaration of Independence and the father of the Constitution lording over plantations of more than one hundred slaves and presiding over a government devoted to upholding individual rights while being served by enslaved footmen in livery.

Yet we tend to make excuses for the failure of our Founding Fathers to end slavery. They were men of their time, they had to put union first, they did not understand that we are all one biological race. We look back and see slavery less as a political issue, more as a moral offense. The truth is that Madison and Jefferson saw it that way, too.

Madison acknowledged that slavery was an evil of great magnitude, a "moral, social and economical" failure. Jefferson called it an "abominable crime" and a "moral depravity" and allowed that should a violent contest between slaves and slave owners transpire, there was no doubt which side God would be on.

Both men supported gradual emancipation if something could be done with the free blacks. It was the concept of colonization, the transport of free blacks to Africa that offered Madison relief from his despair over slavery. Maybe all slaves could be freed, he wrote, if the "double operation"--emancipation followed by colonization--was put in place.

Thus in the end it was not slavery but race--racism--that was the sticking point. Jefferson and Madison thought that people of color should enjoy the same individual rights as white citizens. But not here. They averred that black and white could never live harmoniously in America together.

Two centuries later (centuries!) we are still working on proving them wrong in their prediction, still working on realizing a truly pluralistic society that all Americans honor.

Paul Jennings's great grandson, Dr. C Herbert Marshall, who, along with his fellow black doctors, could not practice in all-white hospitals or even join the American Medical Association, wrote an "op-ed" in the Negro History Bulletin in February of 1960 that started off, " I have every reason to be proud of being an American." It concluded, "Today, we find ourselves on the threshold of a new era ushering in the type of freedom for all for which my fore-parents sacrificed so much."

If Dr. Marshall could offer that positive a sentiment in February 1960, then certainly we in February 2012 can take a sanguine view of the distance we have come since then. If we are not post-racial yet, we are getting there. No matter the sins of the Fathers, it is on us now. A sprint to the finish, anyone? Everyone?

 
Here it is again, the intersection of Presidents Day and Black History Month. Eight of our early presidents, beginning with George Washington, owned slaves during their tenure in the nation's highest ...
Here it is again, the intersection of Presidents Day and Black History Month. Eight of our early presidents, beginning with George Washington, owned slaves during their tenure in the nation's highest ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,619
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (43 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Westberry
college student & blogger
11:12 AM on 04/17/2012
Of course slave-owning presidents should be forgiven. Slavery was a terrible time in our history, but owning slaves doesn't take away from the hand these men had in the founding of our country. As bad as things currently are, they would be much worse if our country founded at all.
02:52 PM on 02/23/2012
"Thus in the end it was not slavery but race--racism--that was the sticking point. Jefferson and Madison thought that people of color should enjoy the same individual rights as white citizens. But not here. They averred that black and white could never live harmoniously in America together."

I agree with Tommy Jefferson and Jim Madison on the race question and we haven't proved them wrong, but it's too late to send 38 million people of African descent to Africa but what the Nation of Islam advocated is a more realistic solution to our 40 year racial cold war. It serves no purpose to argue the reality of the situation but a Black Commonwealth with an option for separate nationhood on American soil with NATO protection is probably the only sane solution.

The election of a Black President has only confirmed my deepest suspicion that the war is not between Minorities and Whites but a personal hatred of African- Americans by the majority WHITE SOCIETY and no amount of government intervention, prophets of peace or passing of laws will create a level playing field. Many African- Americans will never forgive or forget and those Whites who opposed our emancipation under whatever guise the maintain the racial war to stay in power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:59 PM on 03/01/2012
You really can't be serious, and your conclusions are an insult to all Americans of any color or race. Forgiveness of those long since dead and gone doesn't mean Forgetting the LESSONS of the past. Your attribution that there is "a personal hatred of African- Americans by the majority White Society" is not only demonstrably false, it is indicative of your own personal "hatred"... not that of others.
04:55 AM on 02/23/2012
i think we're living in post racial times. there isn't a "white voices" header above this column.
11:02 PM on 02/22/2012
Really. A different time and place but each president is important to our heritage. Should Presidents
be honored who were in office during war?
04:21 PM on 02/22/2012
A great stain on their legacies. If you're raised/inculcated by a culture to conduct life in certain ways -- you will. And it surely was their involvement with the notion of 'liberty for all' that started them and the nation to end slavery -- though it took till the 1960's with the death of the 'Jim Crow' cultures in the south ( and in Los Angeles). Just like that rubber band stretched to much -- we're still snapping back-n-forth. It's slowing though -- my god, we're discussing on getting rid of hyphenated ethnic designations and there isn't any rioting/burning/killing...remember, the current genetic and anthropological research shows WE all came from Africa.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
12:31 PM on 02/22/2012
I don't give a pass to anyone, including past Presidents, who owned slaves.
04:48 AM on 02/22/2012
President Obama promise of "Hope" and "Change"

I respectfully suggest that you issue their full pardon to all cannabis prisoners

Mr. President Obama, I am hereby respectfully requesting that your exercise your executive privilege as President of the United States and that you grant full pardons, vindication and subsequent removal of their felony convictions of all cannabis prisoners

LEGALIZE IT, DON’T CRITICIZE IT!

LEGALIZE FREEDOM because
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Key
Intellectuals at the Gates
03:26 AM on 02/22/2012
President Jefferson's writings are never so tortured, not just anguished, but blind and bent, as when he struggles, repeatedly and continuously, with the extreme enslavement of people. We also have the ten thousand letters of women complaining bitterly of the "black harems" to which white men were clinging during this period of Slavery. A day does not go by I am not proud how far we have come. A day does not go by, I do not see -- clearly -- how far we have yet to go.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roydoe
roydoe knows all-sometimes
09:02 PM on 02/21/2012
Hey slavery was LEAGAL in 1789! So was beating your wife. So was beating your kids.
07:33 PM on 02/21/2012
The shackles of slavery were not dispensed with by the Civil War; and in fact still weigh heavily (psychologically and economically) on America's ethnic quilt-work to this day . Lets face it: African-Americans suffered all the overt debaucheries of institutionized racism (first nurtured in the cesspool of slavery) against them right on up to the civil rights struggles of the mid to late 20th century. Economically look at the vast gulf of disparities that have a strangle-hold on too large a proportion of African-American citizens. Look at how many black-owned stores exist in any neighborhood that you frequent. These are all the vast and sweeping legacies of our slave-owning Presidents.
photo
Iconcoclast
complicated laws are opportunities for scoundrels
11:51 PM on 02/21/2012
"These are all the vast and sweeping legacies of our slave-owni­ng Presidents­. "

Rubbish. The true legacy of our slave-owning Founders was the freeing of the slaves, regardless of whether or not they individually freed their slaves. The radicalism of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution inexorably drove our nation to Emancipation.

And the only racism that has any socioeconomic effect is state-sanctioned racism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Key
Intellectuals at the Gates
03:36 AM on 02/22/2012
@Iconcoclast[sic]. Nothing in the Constitution "inexorably drove" the nation to Emancipation. Under the bizarre code of "Property Rights", white men clung to their harems and their positions in a plantation economy using 2d Amendment guns. Raw cotton was gold, and Southern oligarchs had a monopoly. Slavery was not dwindling in a "free market" -- it was profitable. Ironically, it was their "State's rights" and hostility to any taxes which defeated the Southerners in the Civil War. If The South had taxed raw cotton a small amount in the decade leading up the the Civil War, they would have been able to buy an army three times the size of the Union forces. The South had the richest oligarchs in the world. Of course, because they were oligarchs, the States did not have much power, and without protection for the markets, no "free market" existed.
09:07 AM on 02/22/2012
Post "Emancipation" : "Jim Crow" Law and the state-sanctioned vigilantee injustice / racism (of the lynch-mobs) ensured the terrorism imposed on black Americans for another 100 years following the Civil War.
06:11 PM on 02/21/2012
If you want to stop racism stop talking about it. Black history = American history.
Deal with it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxfordavenue
11:21 PM on 02/21/2012
Yes, finally a person I can relate with in regards to all this Black History Month. Why do black people have a black history month? The black people living in the USA are only 15% of the population. I thought that when you are born in the USA that you were Americans. I am of german decent. I don't go aroung calling myself German American. If you can't leave the African out of American, then go back to Africa. Maybe you would be much happier living there. Also, why is there a Martin Luther King Day? He was no soldier. He cheated on his wife. There are so many other Americans who deserve recognition. The black people are always crying. Get over it. It so 60's. You have everything now. Even affirmative Action gets black people anything they want. They don't even have to prove themselves because they will get the job just because they are black. It definitely doesn't follow the words of MLK because he said to not judge him on his skin color but by his merit, his abilities as a person. Where is the justification. Black people are causing a divided country and they are so few, only 15% of the population. I know this will never get printed. The black voices don't want anyone to know the information I just said.
07:52 AM on 02/22/2012
Most white Americans do go by some type of prefix, Italian American, German American, French American, so let's not pretend, otherwise there would not be so many parades in towns and cities across America. Most black people do not go by African American, personally, it is an insult to me. I have no connection to africa other than what my DNA says. I look like a black person, therefore I am. And as far as black people having everything they want...clearly you are not black. This is the problem when a discussion on race and black people comes about, it is assumed that all black people are illiterate, lazy, jobless, welfare-receiving and pitiful. I am none of the above as are most black people. And Affirmative Action is not a fast track to the front of the applicant line for college or jobs, it was a measure put in place to give black people the same opportunity to be considered for a job at a time when blacks were automatically disqualified for their "race". And there are plenty of people America honors that are white that were philaderers such as JFK, his brother, slave holding presidents that made trips to the slave quarters and fathered children.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
03:15 PM on 02/23/2012
Black History month was begun because the history most of us learned in the first 3/4s of the last century ignored almost all mention of Black America.
Except for the guy who invented peanuts, the triangular trade, and a truncated mention of slavery when studying the Civil War they were not mentioned in the books or the classroom.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
11:28 PM on 02/21/2012
Because not talking about it makes it go away?
01:01 AM on 02/23/2012
No racism will never "go away". But we can cut the head off the beast by not giving them power. As long as you are hung up on the small things you will never see your freedom fly away. Talking about racism will never make it go away in fact it will only push it forward. If we say black history we are separating it from American history. Every child should be taught that the veil act of slavery happened in American history. If you promote it as a special month people get blinded by the fact that there is a black history month. They will never look at what that history means. They will never see "black" people as equals. I for one do not care what your color is I will work with you I will live by you and I will die with you. First we are Human then we are American then we are our ancestors. Rejoice in who you are. I am out.
05:02 PM on 02/21/2012
This issue just goes to show that for christian men to justify slavery thru the use of scriptures means that these christians didn't believe that all men were made in the image of God. This was because of A: They believed that only white men were made in the image of God?, B: all other ethnic people were savages, therefore couldn't be made in the image of God? If they knew that all men were created in Gods image, would they still feel it was right to put others in the bondage of slavery?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zariana
For SCIENCE!!!
02:49 PM on 02/26/2012
The Bible encourages slavery and segregation. It was often used as a tool to defend it.
03:29 PM on 02/26/2012
Pretty much the same ole' song and dance to discriminate against the LGBTQ community. Those darn Republicans, they can't ever seem to get on the right side of a social issue using the bible. If they can't use logic or reason to make their point, forget integrity, roll out the lies, half truths, and misrepresentations to inflame the "true believers".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
04:22 PM on 02/21/2012
Still, a strange salute to the presidents on Presidents Day.
03:47 PM on 02/21/2012
The comments I have read so far underscore the neccesity of discussing history in the first place. The fact that the these Presidents live in direct conflict with the ideas there were willing to argue, fight and/or die for makes them human. Denying them of their complexity cheapens their greatness. We are all flawed and at somtime have contradicted our best selves. Greatness comes when you can wrestle with your demons and achieve the extrordinary despite your imperfections, not in the abscene of them.
And for those people who seem think Africa was the only place slaves were traded before the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, you might want to read about the Vikings and other European militaristic societies that had a lot in common with their southern neighbors, like taking slaves.
photo
Iconcoclast
complicated laws are opportunities for scoundrels
11:52 PM on 02/21/2012
well stated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Key
Intellectuals at the Gates
03:46 AM on 02/22/2012
Many (not all) of the Indian tribes also had "slaves". Indeed, the institution seems to have arisen with the specialization of urban life and the rise of priest/king hierarchies. However, the US Constitution did take one of the first steps to righting this boat by outlawing "titles of nobility". Technically, the elimination of Lord/Commoner distinction should also have outlawed the Master/Slave slave "titles". The repeated recognition -- expressly made by Franklin, Paine, and many others -- that "all men are equal" in rank was a great American contribution.
11:35 AM on 02/22/2012
You make a very good point. Slavery existed in some form in many civilizations including those on this continent. However, the treatment of slaves varied widely. What made slavery in Americas the peculiar institution was the systematic denial of humanity that occurred to justify and codify the practice.
That said, we arguably, have the best blue print to create a society based on equality. If Reconstruction would have been allowed to continue and flourish we would be a lot further to the realization of the goal of all "all men" being equal not just in word but in deed. Despite that misstep, I believe we have traveled the furthest in realizing that goal. This is due in part to the breaking down of the ridgid class structures that you pointed out.
photo
hawaiianstile
all hail the balance of nature.
02:35 PM on 02/21/2012
america has a nasty habit of omitting, altering, and straight fabricating the history it teaches its people. its a technique used by most such governments to keep their people well under control. americans just seem to be a lot less aware of it than most, and even happy about it in many cases.
11:11 AM on 02/22/2012
I guess that you haven't been to Japan recently...