EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Emily Henry

Emily Henry

Posted: June 21, 2010 09:37 PM

It began with an article posted on the Fox News website -- With Revolutionaries 'Looking On,' Teachers Take Kids on a Protest Trip to Arizona -- and soon spiraled into a slugging match between the far, far left and the far, far right. Anything involving the SB 1070 law has a tendency to do that, especially when it also happens to involve teachers, students and South Central.

The Fox story implied that Santee Education Complex teacher Jose Lara had led students on a "field trip" to Arizona to protest the SB 1070 law. The set up of the piece was obviously designed to raise questions about indoctrination: should teachers air opinions in front of students, potentially encouraging them to follow suit, or simply keep their mouths shut and teach?

But Lara wasn't shocked by the content of the story. He was disturbed by the journalistic process by which it had come about.

Lara, whose staunch social justice activism is captured through his FLIP camera and distributed via a handful of social networking accounts, was not directly quoted in the article, but both his Facebook and YouTube accounts were used as sources. Being that his first encounter with the story was after its publication, the situation raised questions for Lara about the validity of journalists sourcing social networking accounts rather than actual people.

If they had spoken to him directly, Lara says, they would have realized that they were publishing a factually incorrect account of events.

Lara has composed a response to the Fox news article and the questions it raised for him about "fair and balanced" journalism:

Fox News does it again
By Jose Lara

In a recent article, Fox took another swing at immigrant rights activists, teachers, and our public school system by misreporting and misleading the public.

According to Fox, three teachers took a Los Angeles School District sponsored field trip to Arizona to protest the new law, SB 1070. However, nothing can be further from the truth. Instead of fact checking and conducting authentic journalism, Fox decided to look to YouTube and Facebook for their "fair and balanced" news report, and without establishing actual contact with the subjects of the story, published it anyway.

Here is the truth: Firstly, teachers did not take any students on a field trip. The Los Angeles Unified School District would not have approved of such a trip. Secondly, the high school student quoted in the Fox article went on the Arizona protest trip with her mother, who is also a teacher. All of Fox's sources appear to come from Facebook, YouTube and online discussion groups.

I have a few questions for Fox:

Is a journalist who gets all their information from YouTube and Facebook without fact checking really a journalist at all?

Shouldn't Fox retract this story if they know it to be false?

Who benefits from stories like this?

Perhaps Fox News does not intend to produce authentic journalism, but yellow journalism instead. That is to say that Fox uses eye-catching headlines and over-sensationalized stories with little to no authentic research in order to gain ratings.

And, unfortunately, it is a successful method of attracting eyeballs. It also increases hate and division among people. The Fox News message board is filled with hateful rants - comments such as "Deport them all now", "Bring it on beano", and "America is being invaded!!!!" Fox fuels the fire by attempting to pass off opinion pieces as authentic journalism.

There is a lesson to be learned here for both active Internet users and journalists. Abundant forms of information sharing mean abundant opportunities for bad, unethical journalism. Beware. On the one hand, using a social networking site feels like a personal experience. On the other, that is a downright lie. It seems that anything accessible on the Internet is now fair game (despite what points one and two of the SPJ Code of Ethics clearly state.) Your status feed might as well be a press release. An opinionated update can become a story, and a story can become a horde of angry emails, tweets and blog comments.

Lara quickly felt the effects of his Internet ambush. One Twitter user called him an "idiot" - adding that it's "no wonder California has some of the worst schools in the nation." Another emailed directly to say that "homeland security should put him on the terrorist list."

Hoping, somewhat naively, for a chance to respond, Lara accepted an invitation to the Bill O'Reilly show last week. Within minutes of the show airing, the comments on his blog entries became a war of two worlds: pro-immigrant activists versus anti-immigrant conservatives, straying to the far reaches of the immigration debate.

 

Follow Emily Henry on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EmilyHenry

 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
10:58 PM on 06/25/2010
What do you expect from a political group who vetted their VP candidate on YouTube and Google? And yes, I do consider Fox a political group. As was pointed out they are not a new group; journalism is not involved. In fact, a judge said Fox is not obligated to report the truth. And they've taken this to heart. Yellow journalism is way too polite a term for what they do. In fact, they hired that YouTubeGoo­gle-vetted ex-VP candidate to be a commentato­r on their faux network.

Misleading­? Misreporti­ng?

Why is anyone surprised?
06:57 AM on 06/25/2010
"If they had spoken to him directly, Lara says, they would have realized that they were publishing a factually incorrect account of events."

I think you just answered your own question of why they didn't speak to you. Plausible deniabilit­y.
10:04 AM on 06/25/2010
According to the story, Lara did not respond to a request for comment made by email. Ron Gochez, another social studies teacher in the article, did talk to Fox.

This is not a defense of the Fox story. It sounds like they got their facts completely wrong and the headline in particular was egregious. But Lara, at least in the portion of his blog that is quoted here, implies that Fox made no attempt to talk to him. It would have been nice if HuffPost had cleared that up and even made an attempt to talk to the Fox reporter about when the email went to Lara and whether some of the assertions in the article should be retracted.

Readers loathe to read or watch a Fox story are left with the impression that the entire story was put together from YouTube and Facebook posts.
12:59 PM on 06/25/2010
Here's how the game works:

Fox puts together a story to support their narrative. The pieces rarely come out and explicitly state Fox's viewpoint, but there's no doubt in any objective viewer's mind what their slant is.

As part of their to cling to their "journalis­m" cover, they make half-assed attempts (calling 10 minutes before a piece is to air, emailing rarely checked addresses, etc.) to contact the targets of their hit pieces, just so they can claim they made the attempt, but the target "refused to respond" or somesuch. O"Reilly and Hannity do the same thing, and then they'll call them cowards for refusing to come on their shows.

Mr. Lara was clearly willing to speak to Fox, but they didn't wait to get his side before posting the piece. Because they knew he would debunk their narrative and kill their story.
09:48 AM on 06/24/2010
...what I noticed is how DemocracyN­ow.org doesn't give Fox this kind of coverage - this is important to consider really

I did a search on http://www­.democracy­now.org/se­arch/fox/2 and from the search results the first headlines that had "Fox" in them go back to:

Fox News Hires Sarah Palin
January 12, 2010 | Headline

Fox News Correspond­ent: Woods Should Convert to Christiani­ty
January 07, 2010 | Headline

I guess their too busy practicing real journalism
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjaco
03:45 PM on 06/23/2010
Too bad Fox will not recant but no surprise there. Thank you for helping get teacher's voices out there. They need to be heard - in general.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:29 AM on 06/23/2010
FOX = LIES
06:15 PM on 06/22/2010
thank you Emily Henry for bringing us important news stories from Los Angeles!
05:48 PM on 06/22/2010
Of course, Fox is the same outlet that defends teachers who try to indoctrina­te kids into Christiani­ty. What a circus of hypocrisy.
06:53 AM on 06/25/2010
Well, real America is a Christian nation (forget all those traitors who refuse to be saved by Jesus Christ). They're just defending real America's teachers' right to teach our kids real American values.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:35 PM on 06/22/2010
If the country got a dollar for every lie told by Fox Noise, it probably wouldn't take long to pay off the national debt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuePh
04:56 PM on 06/22/2010
A nickel would be enough. It's 24/7 misinforma­tion, after all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:19 PM on 06/22/2010
... no time to look up the Cite, but it's important. About ten years ago, Fox fired two journalist­s from a TV station they own in Florida. The Journalist­s sued and I think they won. The case was appealed. On appeal, the Appellate judges ruled that FOX NEWS HAS THE RIGHT TO LIE TO READERS AND LISTENERS. ... I typed that in all caps so you would get the point: Fox News can lie to us and is immune from civil liability.

Perhaps someone else out there has the time to look up the Cite and post the details.

tt77
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:33 PM on 06/22/2010
Apparently­, the First Amendment includes the right to lie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sherwoodfamily
04:35 PM on 06/22/2010
I think that was part of the Glenn Greenwald documentar­y on Fox: "Outfoxxed­."