iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Engy Abdelkader

GET UPDATES FROM Engy Abdelkader
 

The Question of Muslim Women's Rights

Posted: 07/08/11 11:12 AM ET

The question of Muslim women's rights is an intriguing one requiring discernment of Islam's egalitarian principles from the ill-informed practices of some of its adherents.

To be clear, Islam is defined as a monotheistic, Abrahamic faith. Islamic jurisprudence is largely comprised of teachings from the Quran, a holy book believed to be the literal word of God, as well as those of Prophet Muhammad, considered the seal of a long line of prophets commencing with Adam.

Muslims are followers of Islam. And, as with believers of any religion, Muslims are fallible, capable of falling into error with the divine.

While this distinction appears elementary, it is often lost on those who conflate the Islamic faith with the adherent's misguided conduct. Nowhere is this, perhaps, more painfully obvious than the question of Muslim women's human rights.

Islamic tradition extols the Prophet Muhammad as the human embodiment of Quranic lessons. His conduct is thought to be worthy of emulation and his teachings as guiding principles of spiritual illumination.

So it seems logical for this discussion of Muslim women's rights to begin with a brief examination of the lives of extraordinary Muslim women who defined Islamic culture during Prophet Muhammad's lifetime, more than 1,400 years ago:

‱ Aisha bint Abu Bakr was a female scholar of great eminence. She was considered more knowledgeable than most of her male contemporaries in matters related to Quranic interpretation, poetry, medicine and history. She issued legal decisions and delivered public speeches eloquently.

‱ Maimunah bint Haris was a Muslim woman with a reputation for setting slaves free.

‱ Zainab bint Hayye was known for her kind treatment toward the Jewish people.

‱ Naseebah bint Ka'b, a female soldier, fought in battles against the pagans who persecuted Muslims for their staunch belief in the one God of Abraham.

‱ Naseebah bint Haris was a nurse.

‱ Zainab bint Abdullah was her family's primary breadwinner providing financially for her husband and their children.

‱ Khansaa bint Amr was lauded as a great poet.

‱ Shafa bint Adwiya was an intelligent woman skilled in politics and entrusted with overseeing the administration of the marketplace.

Their names may sound foreign, but their lives should not: Their noted achievements mirror those of remarkable American women like Anne Bradstreet, Clara Barton and Bella Abzug, among others.

So, perhaps the problem is not with Islam but with some Muslims' lack of proper understanding and patriarchal interpretation of it. Let us continue a dialogue toward greater inter-cultural and inter-religious understanding.

Engy Abdelkader is a Legal Fellow with the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
politicky
just follow the $$$
08:11 PM on 07/17/2011
I am grateful to live in a country that respects my choice to practice any religion I choose to, and also gives me the choice to practice no religion at all. And so is my Muslim friend.
starjack
astrologer & radical queer muslim activist
11:54 AM on 07/10/2011
MashAllah! (In this context that would be "Brava!" for my non-Muslim friends) The liberation of Muslim women can only be accomplished by Muslim women. Men and non-Muslims can only support our sisters' efforts and cannot dictate. More and more, as women study religion and history, we can strip away the accretions of patriarchal culture that have hidden the liberating core of Islam.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 AM on 07/10/2011
So, perhaps the problem is not with Islam but with some Muslims' lack of proper understanding and patriarchal interpretation of it.
==========

This sentence contains the thrust of the article.

Much of the comment ignores the claim it makes. What is clear is that Islamic principles are translated into political practice differently in various Muslim majority states.

The question that remains is this: Is Tunisia's view of Islamic principles more accurate than Saudi Arabia's? Or is the reverse true, and why?

The entire discussion begs the question of whether or not religious principles should be enforced by any government in any way.
01:02 PM on 07/09/2011
Perhaps the best example is the Prophet's first wife, Khadija, who was at least 15 years his senior, and who was a successful business women in her own right. She hired Muhammad to work for her as a caravan leader, and eventually they married. Tradition suggests that she proposed to him. Until her passing, she was Muhammad's one and only wife.
03:50 AM on 07/21/2011
She was Christian before she met him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
03:10 PM on 07/08/2011
as it should be
02:46 PM on 07/08/2011
I wonder what would happen to those women if they wore a dress that exposes their arms or knees, not to mention having a love affair before marriage..­.

I believe that some BUT NOT ALL Muslim woman buy into wearing a burka and living with extreme restrictio­n. But those that don’t want it, or would wish to just try anything outside the tight and controllin­g restrictio­ns may face horrible consequenc­es. A woman in Saudi Arabia wearing a short skirt may be stoned to death.

What else needs to be said?
03:28 PM on 07/08/2011
You are right that a woman in Saudi Arabia could be stoned for wearing a short skirt. However in other predominantly Muslim societies, let's take Tunisia for instance, you are as likely to see women dressed in short skirts as you are to see veiled women, occasionally with the same women wearing both. In Libya, women receive the same basic education as men and actually have overtaken men’s achievement rates in higher education in recent years.

Not all Muslim societies are repressive of women; some dictators use religion as a way to control the masses and create loyalty among society whereas other dictators are secular and prosecute religious extremism to maintain their power base as well as western support. You also tend to see less women’s rights in extremely poor societies where life in general is very similar to how people lived in that patch of the desert 1,400 years ago, where more modern societies with more widespread opportunities have generally made progress on women’s rights.

It’s not as black & white as saying all Muslim societies are repressive of women. It is a factor, but if you look at data from around the world, you see the strongest correlations between reduced women’s rights and nations that have extreme poverty problems, and an especially strong correlation in nations that have seen US military attacks or CIA interventions post WW2.
05:55 PM on 07/08/2011
I agree that poverty, opression, lower education, shorter life are corolated. That is clear, but what comes first? Poverty? Lack of education? Opression?

I read that with one exception (the US) lower standards of living are prevelent countries where religon plays a major role. And of course, contries such as Norway, Swedan, Denemark and others offer high standard of living while religion is far from main stream.

I don't know why the US is relativly well to do while being so religous.

I can certainly accept that different societies can be more severe while others more tolerant. Reading your response it almost sounds like there are many places of freedom for Muslim women, and Saudi is one of few bad places. You mentioned Tunisia. It is good to know, and I am pleased to hear it. But the question remains in my mind - what portion, say percentage of woman in the middle east are "relatively free" (say to wear a short dress), and what portion is not? I would appreciate a somewhat accurate answer.

I was under the impression that the "freedom" is an exception to the rule. I will be so gald to be wrong.
05:58 PM on 07/09/2011
dan - the one other thing which you hshould have said is that you did not understand the blog and you don't know any Muslims. My Muslim friend is a man who washes the dishes, changes the baby, vacuums and helps his children do their homework. And, because he is very devout, you may be sure he is doing as he should do according to his interpretation of the Bible. The q'uran gives women more rights than the Bible does. So anyday you want to reread the blog and then think about women fighting tooth and nail for rights in the "Christian" west, feel free to write another response.
12:38 PM on 07/08/2011
Human rights are based in law.

Religion is only a belief.

It's your human right to believe in anything - or nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pyrum
02:16 AM on 07/09/2011
No. Human rights "are endowed by their Creator," just like it says in the Declaration of Independence. You don't have to believe in God to acknowledge this, but you do have to understand there's a higher power that makes human rights innate, and that it's wrong for any government, or law, to limit them.
12:24 PM on 07/08/2011
Human rights are based in law.

Religion is only a belief.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pyrum
02:20 AM on 07/09/2011
Laws do not grant human rights. Laws can only either enforce human rights, or limit them.
03:07 AM on 07/10/2011
Pyrum - read the Bible. Laws which demand the stoning of people for eighteen different crimes. Laws that make saying god or OMG forbidden - a sin. I prefer British commonlaw myself. It sure ain perfect but it does slowly crawl along towards mercy.
photo
studana51
Old and tired
11:39 AM on 07/08/2011
It will certainly be the women who bring Islam into the modern world of social rights and freedom. And this is at great jeopardy to them and their families. I think the women in Iran and Saudi Arabia are extrordinary in this regard. I worry about them.
11:38 AM on 07/08/2011
We have to stop listening to the innovators who have stolen the God-given rights of Muslim women. Women were never meant to be caged. Instead Muhammad, pbuh, insisted that God (and therefore we must also) saw men and women and equals. For some strange reason the ones who say it is haram to do any sort of innovation, are the ones who have done the most innovating. I feel blessed to live in a time when the ummah is taking back the beautiful path of Islam from those who tried to use it in abusive ways (and abuse cannot be part of Islam or it is not Islam).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watching rock grow
FE = Iron, and Female = Iron Male :)
02:46 PM on 07/08/2011
I read the Holy Qur'an and in Arabic. However in doing so, I realized that any religion that insists on a holy language so everyone is on the same page isn't for me. Arabic wasn’t my native tongue. That was over 30 years ago, and my need to use Arabic has long passed away. I have forgotten the language. I am thankful for a religion that accepts me as I am; imperfect, and then works to improve me like everyone else that submits to the will of the God with the help of Christ. Glory to God in the Highest!
04:17 PM on 07/08/2011
Are you familiar with the story of Aisha, Muhammad's favorite wife? Or with Safiyya? You should read of these two women whose lifes help us to understand the origins of Islam...
06:15 PM on 07/09/2011
zenju - have you read the Q'uran? Do you think Islam is always the same anymore than the radical orthodox Jews in Israel are like Noam Chomsky? Shi ites and Sunnis are different. Sufis are also different. Some Jews believe in Jesus and that he is the son of god. So anytime you want to bring forward and discuss the eighteen crimes which call for stoning somebody to death in the Old Testamnet versus the Koran which doesn't call for stoning for any crime - play on. Let knowledge rule your discourse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curmudgeon98
11:19 AM on 07/08/2011
The Crusaders main complaint about Muslims "you treat your women and your slaves too well"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patchinr3
03:02 PM on 07/08/2011
crusaders didnt let women lib push them around
10:55 AM on 07/08/2011
"And, as with believers of any religion, Muslims are fallible, capable of falling into error with the divine."

Wow is that an understatement!

Until there is a change within Islam, there will be no inter-religious understanding.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:30 PM on 07/08/2011
Why must it only be Islam that changes? Is Christianity (and each and every one who claims to be a Christian) so perfectly in tune with the divine that no greater effort need be put forth by all who claim to adhere to Jesus' precepts? I think there's also a great need for Christians to accept others as they insist others accept them.
10:36 AM on 07/08/2011
Don't forget Mohammed's wife who was a school teacher (of girls and boys together)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Abdul-Halim Vazquez
11:07 AM on 07/08/2011
Do you mean Aishah? She was also an alim who gave fatwas.
10:21 AM on 07/08/2011
thank you engy abdelkader
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terramartom
Grapes of Wrath!
10:09 AM on 07/08/2011
What are you afraid of?
The Truth!