More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eric Alterman

GET UPDATES FROM Eric Alterman
 

Think Again: Dowd, Not Coulter, 'Falters'

Posted: 11/04/11 01:13 PM ET

In a column about the recent sexual harassment claims against Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, New York Times pundit Maureen Dowd writes:

Ann Coulter has a point when she says that feminists rewrote their own rules on sexual harassment to support Bill Clinton. It is never right for any boss, especially the president of the United States, to mess with an intern, even if she's the aggressor.

But Coulter falters when she charges that, like Clarence Thomas, Cain is the victim of a high-tech lynching, that "if you are a conservative black, they will believe the most horrible sexualized fantasies of these white women feminists."

What, one must ask, could Dowd have been thinking? In the first place, she is forcing us to remember her own heartless and obsessive treatment of young Monica Lewinsky, who was helpless to fight back against Dowd's nasty comments about her imperfect body and other human shortcomings.

But for goodness' sake. Ann Coulter? That's who Dowd felt a need to quote so respectfully on this topic? The same woman who said, "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building"?

No need to personalize this, however. If Dowd doesn't mind treating as a sensible and respectful source a woman who joked about the mass murder of her friends and colleagues, how about these other Coulter quotes:

On Bill Clinton: "In this recurring nightmare of a presidency, we have a national debate about whether he 'did it.' ... otherwise there would be debates only about whether to impeach or assassinate."

On executing conservatives: "We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate conservatives, by making them realize that they can be killed too. Otherwise they will turn out to be outright traitors."

On women's suffrage: "I think [women] should be armed but should not vote. ... women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it. ... it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care."

On women's suffrage, again: "It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 -- except Goldwater in '64 -- the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted."

On homosexuality in the Clinton administration: "I don't know if [former President Bill Clinton is] gay. But [former Vice President] Al Gore -- total fag."

I actually got to know Coulter before anyone had ever heard of her. We were both hired by MSNBC when the station first began, back in 1996, to fill up airtime with our arguments while the station figured out what it was going to do with itself. Just a congressional aide at the time -- to an Arab American no less -- Coulter would say some of the craziest things ever said on American television up until that time -- and then top herself by saying something crazier. Coulter was eventually fired by MSNBC for attacking a legless Vietnam vet on the air, but by then, conservatives, with the help of a mindless mainstream media, had already made her into a star.

To continue reading, please go here.

 

Follow Eric Alterman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Eric_Alterman

In a column about the recent sexual harassment claims against Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, New York Times pundit Maureen Dowd writes: Ann Coulter has a point when she says that femi...
In a column about the recent sexual harassment claims against Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain, New York Times pundit Maureen Dowd writes: Ann Coulter has a point when she says that femi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 63
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:02 PM on 11/06/2011
I find both Maureen Dowd and Ann Coulter lacking so the fact that Ann said something Maureen agrees with is not surprising I think both women have stayed well past their fifteen minutes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lasjazzman
Stress = perfectionist + lousy typist!
02:36 PM on 11/06/2011
In my view, I had never heard a convincing argument against free speech until Ann Coulter started getting paid huge sums of money to open her mouth.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hellaci0us
Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character
01:51 PM on 11/10/2011
i couldn't agree with you more...
12:04 PM on 11/06/2011
Dowd's judgement has been compromised if she can agree with anything Ann Coulter has to say. Ann spews hatred all for the sake of getting her name in the news. Shame on Dowd. She's always had this "thing" for the Clinton administration. Perhaps Fox News would be more to her liking these days. Maybe she and Coulter can become BFF's.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nofriendofrepublicans
Mother friendly.
07:17 AM on 11/06/2011
Corporate media, just for entertainment purposes.
photo
CenaW
Did you know AOL belongs to A L E C
12:20 PM on 11/06/2011
Wrong. Corporate media, just for propaganda purposes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
auramac
02:11 AM on 11/06/2011
Dowd has an irrational hatred of Lewinsky that colored her objectivity regarding the Clintons and reverberates even today- not her finest hour.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frano
Religio_Intolerance cost 359 coworkers! (11.09.01)
04:17 PM on 11/06/2011
I never cared 'bout Lewinski, except she obviously takes lousy care of her stained clothes...
10:03 PM on 11/05/2011
Ann's assets have a soothing effect on her followers. (working neurons discouraged)
photo
triplettam
Mind Bender
09:57 PM on 11/05/2011
Dowd does that a lot. I like her sometimes, but she's very inconsistent.

On another note: she's kind of sexy. : ))))))))
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:26 PM on 11/05/2011
Pandering for readership...stooping to a very low level for Dowd. But it's been done before.
On another note: There are feminists and there are other feminists -- some didn't condemn President Clinton as they might've partly because of the caliber of his ever present on TV enemies, like the loathsome Ken Starr.

We lost so much during that time, when the Supreme Court decided President Clinton had enough time to do his job and to also attend to matters of a lawsuit. No, he didn't.
08:51 PM on 11/05/2011
Your quote about executing "conservat­ives" is erroneous: Coulter talked about executing "liberals"­.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
01:05 AM on 11/07/2011
Ann is in a equal opportunity execution advocate.
05:44 PM on 11/05/2011
I'm sorry, but Ann Coulter should be locked away in a rubber room. There's something WRONG wrong with her . .
04:07 PM on 11/05/2011
I very much agree with this column. Coulter does coarsen our culture. WHile there are some nasty people on the left, no one sinks to this level on the left. Ann Coulter has the right to say her peace. America has the right to ignore and we should do just that.
09:08 PM on 11/05/2011
No one sinks to this level on the left? Time and space make a full rebuttal impossible. Just research The Bush 43 administration. Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld etc would fill a book with the mindless hatred directed at them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
10:18 PM on 11/05/2011
Oh, it wasn't all mindless hatred.

A lot of it was well researched and reasoned justifiable derision, exasperation, astonishment, dismay, regret, anger, despair, horror, and disbelief.
01:59 AM on 11/06/2011
To the level of Ann Coulter, no. As a matter of fact very few people on the right stinks to level of Ann Coulter.

Yeah there was a lot of hate directed towards GWB's administration. Some of it was mindless. Most of it was not.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
02:32 PM on 11/05/2011
Coulter is no star.
She is a caricature.
No one with a functioning mind wishes to emulate her.
People do not reach for her books, they receive them as joke gifts.
01:39 PM on 11/05/2011
You know, I figure that is what will come up sooner or later with Republicans, women cannot vote. Would that surprise any of you?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davegstein
09:13 AM on 11/06/2011
That's next,after they have taken care of minorities,the youth vote,etc,etc....
01:29 AM on 11/05/2011
Coulter is nothing if not consistent, she is the character she has built for the last 15 years and is comfortable with the contraversy she creates. I think she prefers to be an entertaining pundit rather than a serious political comentator by framing all of her ideas in a manner that will cause shock rather than court anyone to her ideas. She is a pundit for those who understand what she is saying not what she says. Both sides have similiar personalities and they keep the discussions from getting boring. She likes being the bad girl of politics and is secure in role but because sarcasm doesn't translate into print very well, quotes are not her friend. But like her popularity, she owes at least as much to her opponents as she does her fans, their outrage to her comments earn her a lot of air time to address her comments and explain what she ment to those who really aren't listening anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:11 PM on 11/05/2011
"She is a pundit for those who understand what she is saying not what she says." Huh..? Sorry, don't understand what your saying didn't say.
01:04 AM on 11/06/2011
Sarcasm ... when taken out of context means something different than when placed in context.
12:17 AM on 11/05/2011
Why is Coulter wrong?
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
08:05 AM on 11/05/2011
Because she is defending Thomas and Cain as victims.
04:26 PM on 11/05/2011
".....defending Thomas and...." Who's Thomas? Another victim of the Liberal Smear Machine?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
writerjohnny
08:10 AM on 11/05/2011
I blame her parents.