More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Eric Alterman

GET UPDATES FROM Eric Alterman
 

Think Again: The Long March of Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted: 02/23/2012 4:30 pm

It's no secret that MSNBC had more than enough cause to end its relationship with Pat Buchanan as it did last week, especially with the release of his new book, Suicide of a Superpower. Nobody has a constitutional right to give his or her opinions on cable television. ThinkProgress has been particularly diligent in keeping readers informed of some of the recent lowlights of Buchanan's career including attacks on immigrants, minorities, and liberals up to, and including, his flirtations with fascism and possibly even Holocaust denial -- all of which apparently reached a kind of crescendo in his new book.

One can identify any number of oddities in Buchanan's half-century career as one of America's most prominent and most extreme conservative voices. The first of these, of course, is the fact that he is complaining about being kicked off of MSNBC. Since virtually all of the mainstream media -- and even former President Bill Clinton -- considers that station to be a liberal analogue to Fox, how is it that MSNBC has this extreme right-wing culture warrior to cut loose in the first place? (And what about the fact that Joe Scarborough, the guy who occupies 15 hours a week of the station's programming and is lamenting Buchanan's departure, is a conservative former Republican congressman?)

Other anomalies abound. If conservatives believe in one thing in America, it is "family." But Buchanan and his wife have no children. (While there may be medical or other reasons for this, it is odd that Buchanan has, to my knowledge, never addressed them, particularly since he complains, "The West is dying. Its nations have ceased to reproduce, and their populations have stopped growing and begun to shrink.") And if conservatives believe in one other thing, it is "free enterprise." Yet Buchanan's entire life has been divided between "government" and "media" -- the twin bugaboos of every conservative complaint session. Finally, if conservatives exhibit one emotion in unison in America, it is anger, and yet Buchanan, who is liked by almost everyone who knows him even those who find his views abhorrent, is known as a kind of pussycat in person -- however effectively he plays a tiger on television.

I'll confess that when I got to know Pat while researching my first book, Sound & Fury, published 20 years ago (and from which I draw for this blog), I found him to be just as charming and engaging as the rest of Washington did. My research at the time revealed that while he was already one of the most famous figures in Washington journalism, he had only spent a grand total of two months as a reporter before becoming an editorial writer and beginning his distinguished career as a conservative polemicist, part-time government official, and presidential aspirant.

Buchanan comes from a deeply religious Irish Catholic family that prized loyalty and discipline above all. To impress upon Buchanan what the loss of the soul through mortal sin meant, Buchanan's father would light a match, grab his son's hands, and hold them briefly over the flame, saying, "See how that feels? Now imagine that for all eternity." Buchanan proudly observes that he comes from "the tradition that my great-grandfathers tried to overthrow the government of the United States."

It was in this atmosphere that Buchanan imbibed the religious dogma that he has so effectively preached in American political life. "Our political and social quarrels now partake in the savagery of religious wars because they are, at bottom, religious wars," Buchanan explained. This war, according to Buchanan, was "a conflict between what might be called the Right, which proceeds from Christian beliefs and values, and the counterculture, which proceeds out of secularist beliefs and values. Its manifestations can be seen in the move to equate homosexuality with normal heterosexual activity, tolerance of pornography, [the belief that] anything goes so long as it doesn't hurt another individual."

To this strange mixture of intolerance and good-heartedness, of religious certitude and political savvy, of strict pre-Vatican II Catholic conservatism, add a street fighter expelled from Georgetown University for punching two D.C. policemen, and you have an enormously effective spokesman for a radical, reactionary minority.

The secret to Buchanan's success, at least in my estimation, was his ability to conduct his holy war in a huggable fashion. On The McLaughlin Group, where he first came into the public eye, Buchanan played the tough Irish cop with twinkly eyes and a heart of granite. And when the cherubic Catholic crusader decided to announce his race for the presidency in December 1991, it came as no surprise to anyone who had closely observed his career in the punditocracy. He carefully considered the idea four years earlier but had deferred in favor of the more conventional politician, Rep. Jack Kemp (R-NY). By the time Buchanan reversed course, however, the displacement of "real" politicians at the center of the political dialogue was considerably further advanced. All of a sudden, in 1991 there was nothing ridiculous about the idea of the move from the small screen to the White House without having earned any interim qualifications.

Buchanan was a popular and much-admired character in President Ronald Reagan's Washington and proved invaluable to the conservative cause in the Nixon, Ford, and Reagan White Houses. In between, as well as afterward, he became a widely syndicated columnist, the co-host of CNN's Crossfire, a regular on McLaughlin, and the host of Novak's own pundit CNN roundtable, The Capital Gang, when Novak and McLaughlin's egos grew too large to fit in the same room.

From the 1970s through the first decade of this century, Buchanan could almost always be depended upon to take things further to the right than most people had previously imagined possible. In Nixon's White House, Buchanan was the primary mover of the president's race-based "Southern Strategy" designed to move those offended by voting rights for blacks into the Republican column. As Reagan's White House director of communications, Buchanan was the only member of the president's inner circle to speak favorably, at least in the abstract, of treason. During the Iran-Contra scandal, when the first "Buchanan for President" boomlet began, its standard-bearer gave inflammatory speeches insisting, "If Colonel North ripped off the Ayatollah and took $30 million and gave it to the contras, then God bless Colonel North."

When the AIDS virus first hit the national news, Buchanan pooh-poohed the trauma. "The poor homosexuals," he wrote, "they have declared war upon nature, and now nature is exacting." Buchanan regularly referred to gay men as "perpetrators" and argued that "by buggering one another," and "committing promiscuous sodomy," they "threaten doctors, dentists, health workers, hemophiliacs, and the rest of society by their refusal to curb their lascivious appetites."

To continue reading, please go here.

 

Follow Eric Alterman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Eric_Alterman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
KIampfbeobachter
Misanthropic economic and political shaman
12:26 PM on 02/24/2012
The only scene I remember on TV was this bloke calling for the United Nations to leave US soil. He even suggested to send 10 000 marines to help them packing.

If my memory serves me right this was after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Bloc. Helmut Kohl than floated the idea that the UN should relocate to Bonn, the soon to be abandoned capital.
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
09:14 AM on 02/24/2012
Thank you for putting this on the record. I used to write regularly to MSNBC, protesting his racist and anti-Semitic statements.

Keeping him on was shameful, and it gave cover to all those who still promulgate discrimination and hate.

The groveling at the network by some of the talking heads when he finally left made me angry. I won't forget, and these friends of his will always be suspect.

None of us can afford to be silent about bigotry.
03:58 PM on 03/23/2012
Thanks.
08:49 AM on 02/24/2012
First of all both MSNBC and FOX have their token representatives of the opposition and second Buchanan is not a favorite of the warmongers at FOX and now at MSNBC and when MSNBC decided to purge the hosts who were independent enough to be critical of the white house they decided to wait until Buchanan's contract ran out.
06:40 AM on 02/24/2012
The comparison between Buchanan and William F. Buckley is an important one. Buckley was the last true conservative of any merit in this country. He believed in the discussion of ideas. His program "Firing Line" offered views from the left and the right with the full opportunity for presentation of those ideas. I remember watching him with Eldridge Cleaver (one of the most radical proponents of Black Power at the time) with my jaw gaping to the floor. I can't imagine anything like that happening on Fox News today.
photo
AlfredE69
Occupy Election '12: Vote 3rd Party
09:24 PM on 02/23/2012
Buchanan has opposed neo-conservativism and its cousin liberal interventionism, saying that "Interventionism is the incubator of terrorism,"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Davwbaird
43 years standing for equal rights
03:08 AM on 02/24/2012
Projecting
photo
AlfredE69
Occupy Election '12: Vote 3rd Party
08:09 AM on 02/25/2012
...the truth
07:50 PM on 02/23/2012
MSNBC, while it has those who are to the left of where the center is in 2012, is not quite the "liberal analogue" to FOX "news" for many reasons, too many to list here, but a very important one is that MSNBC does NOT lie nor make up "news" like FOX does, such as "Death" panels
04:36 PM on 03/23/2012
The other day I watched Joe interview Michael Patrick Leahey about the Tea Party where Mike said the Tea Party movement started in February of 2009. Joe knew that was a flat out lie because he interviewed Ron Paul about the Tea Party in 2007.

Did he correct his guest's big error? No he didn't. Mika hemmed and hawed through their obvious fibs. Here watch it,

Morning Joe: Defining the Tea Party's core values
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc_tv-morning_joe/#46794503

I find that disgraceful. Here is the clip of Joe interviewing Ron Paul over a year before Mike Leahey said the Tea Party started,

Ron Paul on "Morning Joe" 12-18-07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alxjl4IjZ9k

To quote Joe, "How did he raise the money?"

I know how. I told my girlfriend Melanie at makepotlegal555.org to check him out and he took off. She is a military wife and I was a girl scout leader.

I think Joe should give me a little more credit for what I have been doing, but I think he can at least stick to the public record about the Tea Party.

The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA

I'm sorry, but I call that lying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
StillAmused
Some mayo on that troll, please...
06:42 PM on 02/23/2012
Don't overlook CNN's embrace of the t0xic Ari Fleischer as a regular commentator... Fleischer, who last distinguished himself as the public address system for a cabal of w@rcr! m!nals.
06:28 PM on 02/23/2012
I've followed Pat for a long time and have agreed with around 95% of what he's had to say. Though I wish he had gotten more traction on issues like free trade and foreign policy. Those are issues that would really resonate with a'lot of Americans, Americans of all backgrounds. Especially since the elites tend to call the shots when it comes to free trade and foreign policy. Yet it was overshadowed by his opinions on social and cultural issues. The war mongering neocons or globalist free traders (offshorers) could easily discredit Buchanan because his "controversial" views on other topics such as gay marriage. I happen to believe his opinions on some cultural/social issues do have merit, but at the end of the day I, and probably most other average Americans, are more concerned about having a job than what the next guy is doing in the bedroom.
madkoz
Dog is my co-pilot
06:08 AM on 02/24/2012
I wonder what you disagreed with Buchanan about? Scary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
09:45 AM on 02/24/2012
Considering that Buchanan is a neo-fascist who has flirted with neo-nazism, I am delighted that his right-wing extremist, repugnant views are once again being shown for what they are.
05:42 PM on 02/23/2012
Anyone who doesn't see the correlation between many of the problems we face today and the marked shift away from religious/moral values that exploded with the late sixties is blind. Buchanan's theories are not strange-- they are common sense.
12:51 AM on 02/24/2012
Ah yes...the "we have allowed women to become closer in equality to men, and stopped arresting gay people for being, so that has made the country fall apart" theory! The idea that the country would be in better shape, if we only just adhered to all biblical principals is nonsense. If you want to look at why this nation has fallen since the 60's, you need look no further than Nixon, Ford Reagan (especially Reagan) and the Bush boys. The conservatives have OWNED the executive branch and have taken the country down with their horrible economic and social ideas. Sense has never been a common thing when it comes to the right (wrong) wing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
09:48 AM on 02/24/2012
Agreed, fanned and faved!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
09:47 AM on 02/24/2012
They are theocratic fascism and yet more proof that Hitler, Mussolini and Franco were on the extreme political right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
05:33 PM on 02/23/2012
I didn't know Pat Buchanan died