More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eric Boehlert

Eric Boehlert

Posted: December 14, 2010 09:44 AM

That sore-loser phrase doesn't seem to get much use these days. Yet watching Senate Republicans in the minority essentially close down the chamber, not allowing any votes to proceed until their demands are met regarding tax cuts for the very wealthy, I'm pretty sure that fits the working definition of "obstructionist":


One who systematically blocks or interrupts a process, especially one who attempts to impede passage of legislation by the use of delaying tactics, such as a filibuster.

I've been noting this for months now: The GOP's Obama-era brand of hyper-partisanship and obstructionist voting patterns has no precedent in modern American history. None.

And you know why that is? It's because in the past when the party out of power tried to systematically obstruct the will of the majority, they'd catch holy hell for it in the press and from commentators. Meaning, there was a downside to trying to hold Congress hostage.

But not for today's GOP. And Republican leaders know it. The Beltway press has mostly turned a blind, non-judgmental eye while the GOP has re-written the rules for governing from the minority. Yes, the press covers many of the votes that Republicans stymie. But there's little or no media debate about what the Republican Party is actually doing, which is practicing obstructionism on a massive and previously unseen scale.

That's not normal and it's about time the lapdog Beltway press corps awoke form its current coma and started calling the radicalism by its proper name.

Instead, we get crickets. ("Obstructionist" has become the media's Noun That Cannot Be Mentioned.) There's not even a hint that today's organized, across-the-board filibuster strategy is unique or odd. Pundits and reporters cover the spectacle as if it's everyday hardball and just more "partisan combat." It's not. It's extraordinary.

Read the entire column here, at Media Matters.

 
 
 

Follow Eric Boehlert on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EricBoehlert

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
09:38 AM on 12/15/2010
True to a point but i think the real problem is twofold .After 40 years ,starting with" the nattering nabobs of negativism"nonsense that safire put in agnews mouth the press has been hammered by the right and the d.c. establishment for" liberal bias".and reacted by becoming overly timid.That said there is an unprecedented amount of places where one can get informed information and anylasis.The root of the issue is that the general population is apathetic, ignorant and so insecure that anyone who challanges them is destroyed.So instead of exorting people to reason and act politicos and the media on both sides always ascribe some kind of ingrained wisdom to the american electorate regardless that they and we know it to be absurd.
01:26 PM on 12/14/2010
When America's Free Press refuses to speak or write with moral authority from the Constitutional Rights given them it is evident that the Media (Free Press) is no longer free from the corruption of corporate collusion that paralyzes them to remain silent because they have also become accomplices in the excesses and exploitations of American families for their benefactors and bosses: CEO Corporate Crooks who value PROFIT more than PRINCIPLE, RATINGS more than REFLECTION and COMPLICITY more than VERACITY, INTEGRITY and HUMANITY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mommadona
I paint. I blog. Therefore, I am.
01:08 PM on 12/14/2010
Shall we start naming names? Andrea Mitchell comes to mind. And Wolf Blitzer. And George Will. And And .... so many ...and so little time.... http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199710--.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesuswasademocrat
12:38 PM on 12/14/2010
"That's not normal and it's about time the lapdog Beltway press corps awoke form its current coma and started calling the radicalism by its proper name."

This is absolutely on target. The real media are not doing nearly enough to push back against the lies from Faux. Instead they sometimes magnify the damage by repeating them.
10:43 AM on 12/14/2010
Where is that liberal media we keep hearing about ?