- BIG NEWS:
- Glenn Beck
- |
- Conde Nast
- |
- Fox News
- |
- Meet the Press
- |
I spent much of Wednesday night watching American Idol and old TiVo'd shows -- hey, i'm a TV critic, It's my job! -- so I didn't see the original telecast of the big Democratic debate on ABC News, the 21st collision between these two candidates on TV.
(Much of America wasn't as disinterested as I; ABC News reports that 10.7-million people watched the debate, making it the most-watched debate of the 2008 presidential cycle).
And, if the news reports are to be believed, the first 50 minutes or so were spent quizzing Obama on a long litany of controversies that don't have much to do with the issues of the day, from Rev. Wright and his loose connection to a former member of the Weather Underground to the fact that he doesn't wear a flag pin on his lapel. So what headlines have dominated coverage of the event?
Hillary Clinton's admission that she does indeed think that Obama can win the presidency if he is the nominee.
It sounds like Wednesday night was a perfect storm of conditions converging to ensure an irrelevant debate. These candidates have already tangled publicly on policy issues for months (and on many issues, their positions aren't that different); they just appeared separately as a public forum on faith issues Sunday, we haven't had a primary in weeks, so there are no fresh electoral results to parse and the resulting lack of real campaign news has flooded the news cycle with irrelevance.
But through all that, the top headline on many post debate stories either criticized ABC News for focusing on such trivialities or played up Clinton's admission that she thinks he can win the general election, even as she presumably tells superdelegates in private that he cannot.
Despite some critics claim that Obama survives challenges by crying racism, there seems to be something else going on. I hope it's that people are parsing the BS on their own, with little help from the media.
And if that isn't an example of thekind of Teflon politics that Bill Clinton seemed to perfect during his years in politics, I'm not sure what is.
Follow Eric Deggans on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Deggans
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Bill Clinton made a speech about todays' contest between Obama and Hillary:
.youtube.c om/watch?v =RGW38Zy4b Jo
http://www
The funniest part about it is the Clintons are so self absorbed they didn't even realize they were running against a better version of Bill Clinton. They didn't see it coming and had no counter stratedgy. They learned nothing or remebered nothing from thier 92 campaign that they viewed as personal weakness because they span and lied their way out of every corner leaving them to believe they were unbeatable and unfallable.
Whoops, they couldn't have been more wrong and it's Hillary-ous!!!
It would be one of life's twists and ironic turns- if Hillary gets defeated by her husband's altar-ego. ....
Actually, Clinton wasn't Teflon - he was more like a juggernaut. Nothing slid off him, he carried it all every day and kept marching on - to this day. Reagan was Teflon. Obama is a mix of Teflon and rubber. Not only does it not stick, it's more likely to bounce back and harm the accuser.
I too missed the debate and was fianlly able to watch it today. To my mind while the debate looked like it was run by the Republican party I thought that Obama did OK. It was not his greatest night but it was just not that bad given the rubbish that was thrown at him.
Yes we can!
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with