Last week's massacre in Mumbai is the most recent sign that the ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Kashmir, and terrorist attacks in western India, are beginning to merge into something bigger and even more dangerous. The attack on Mumbai (formerly Bombay) is being called `India's 9/11,' and rightly so. Like the inattentive Bush administration, India's government ignored warnings of impending attack and reacted with confusion and ineptitude. Equally important, the attacks that left some 173 dead and over 300 wounded were clearly designed, like 9/11, to strike at India's economy. Mumbai is the center of India's business and a symbol of its spectacular 9% growth rate in recent years. Foreign investors are going to think twice about investing in India after last week's horrors. It may be no coincidence that the Mumbai attack comes soon after the India-US nuclear agreement in which Washington gave its official blessing to India's extensive nuclear weapons arsenal. The massacre had personal resonance for me: I have often stayed at the hotels that were attacked: Mumbai's Oberoi and the venerable Taj Mahal. The Islamabad Marriot, where I have stayed for 25 years, was destroyed in September by a truck bomb. From now on, travelers are likely to be made almost as miserable by hotel security as they are in airports. The seaborne raid, which India claims was launched from Pakistan, appeared to have twin goals. First, to punish and humiliate India over the Kashmir conflict. Kashmir is India's only Muslim majority state. India has 500,000 troops and paramilitary units fighting Muslim Kashmiri independence-seekers. The brutal, 19-year old struggle there has left at least 40,000 dead, mostly Muslims. Pakistan and India have fought three wars over divided Kashmir since 1947. Clashes between Pakistani and Indian forces along the Kashmir cease-fire line are frequent. I have been under fire on the border - known as the `Line of Control' - numerous times. The Mumbai attacker's hunt for Britons and Americans also suggested revenge for intensifying US bombing of villages in Afghanistan and Pakistan's tribal zone that was recently denounced even by Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan's US-installed leader. Muslim in South Asia are seething with hatred for the US because of the Afghanistan war. Last June, 41 people died when India's Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, was blown up. India immediately blamed Pakistan's intelligence service, ISI, and accused its agents of recent bombings in Mumbai, Delhi, Ahmadabad, and Bangalore. Islamabad denies these charges and accuses India's spy agency, RAW, of bombings in Pakistan's frontier tribal zone and Karachi. On the surface, Indian-Pakistani relations have been improving under US pressure. But that was an illusion.
While Indian and Pakistani leaders were making nice to one another, India was rapidly pushing its influence for the first time into Afghanistan. Large numbers of Indian intelligence agents are now operating in Afghanistan. In addition, India is arming and financing the anti-Pakistan North Alliance and the old Afghan Communist Party, and has just opened an air base in neighboring Tajikistan, deeply alarming Islamabad. Washington does not want Pakistan distracted by its old feud with India over Kashmir or by India's machinations in Afghanistan, which Pakistan considers its backyard. The US has 'rented' 130,000 Pakistani Army troops to fight Pashtun tribesmen along the Northwest Frontier who are supporting their Taliban cousins in Afghanistan. Indian threats of retaliation for the Mumbai attacks could force Pakistan to redeploy these troops to its eastern border with India, exposing already vulnerable US supply lines to more attacks. India insists Kashmiri and Pakistani extremists groups - it names 36 - are backed by ISI in an effort to destabilize India.
India and Pakistan's large arsenals of nuclear-armed missiles and strike aircraft are on a hair-trigger alert. The ongoing Indo-Pak confrontation, which I warned about a decade ago in my book, War at the Top of the World, is the world's most dangerous nuclear threat. President-elect Barack Obama has laudably vowed to seek a settlement of the six-decade Kashmir conflict. India's 155 million Muslims have been largely passive and avoided violence. But there a growing belief among some young Indian Muslims that they are second class citizens, oppressed, and denied any part of India's current economic boom. Many were radicalized by the horrible pogrom in 2002 in the state of Gujarat in which up to 3,000 Muslims were massacred, many burned alive by Hindu mobs egged on by right wing Hindu politicians. Small numbers of young Indian Muslims, infected by bin Laden's jihadist philosophy, are turning to violence in spite of Delhi's modest efforts to be responsive to Muslim demands and concerns. The relentless expansion of the U.S.-led Afghan conflict is dangerously destabilizing already turbulent Pakistan. As India and Pakistan intensify their proxy struggle to dominate Afghanistan, bankrupt Pakistan is being bribed by Washington to wage war on its own Pashtun tribal people who oppose the western occupation of neighboring Afghanistan. Violence in Kashmir is again on the rise. Indian crackdowns on both violent and non-violent Kashmiri Muslim independence-seekers have recently intensified. India's patience is wearing thin. But after a decade of terrorist attacks, it still lacks a well defined target for revenge or a way of preventing them. Delhi is now claiming that the Kashmiri independence movement, Lashkar Toiba, was behind the attack. This is, in fact, quite possible, though in the past Lashkar has been quick to take responsibility for its attacks. Lashkar gunmen staged deadly suicide attacks on India's parliament in 2001. But Lashkar denies involvement in the Mumbai massacre. No known group has claimed authorship. Delhi has also long charged that Lashkar and two similar militant Kashmiri independence groups, Jaish e Mohammed and Lashkar Jangvi, are armed, trained and financed by Pakistan's ISI intelligence. They certainly were in the past, as I saw while inspecting Lashkar training camps in Pakistani Kashmir. But Pakistan's former dictator, Pervez Musharraf, cut off officially support in 2002 under US pressure. However, it is very likely that secret links still exist between the Pakistani Army, ISI and Kashmiri militant groups. However, it defies credulity that Pakistan's current feeble, bankrupt government, which is wholly dependent on US handouts, would stage a monster provocation against India. But there are many groups in Pakistan who want to see their nation cease aiding the US war in Afghanistan and return to the struggle to free Kashmir of Indian rule. If Delhi concludes that elements from Pakistan were behind the Mumbai massacre, it will either have to keep the finding secret or else be forced to take action. Indians are understandably thundering for revenge. The Congress Party-led coalition is facing elections against the resurgent, Hindu chauvinist Bharatiya Janata Party, which is beating the war drums against Pakistan. India could launch air strikes against militant training camps in Kashmir, or even send its increasingly powerful navy to blockade Pakistan's main port, Karachi. Pakistan has only six days worth of oil reserves. After that, it will run dry. Whatever India does, it must use extreme caution. Both nations' nuclear forces are going on high alert. In the current supercharged atmosphere, a confrontation could easily get out of hand, leading to major military clashes that lead to a nuclear exchange in which up to two million people would immediately die, according to a RAND Corp study - including thousands of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your contribution of as little as $2 will go a long way.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.