More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eric Margolis

Eric Margolis

Posted: March 23, 2010 09:40 AM

Private Killers a Growth Industry

What's Your Reaction:

The US does not have enough combat or support troops to wage wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and, most lately, Pakistan. So it has rented armies of mercenaries, known in the US by the euphemism, "private contractors."

This has led to a fascinating scandal in Washington that is exposing the sordid underbelly of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.

According to a New York Times investigation and other Washington sources, the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies have fielded covert mercenary networks in Afghanistan, Pakistan (aka "Afpak"), and Iraq whose mission is to murder tribal militants and nationalists opposing Western occupation.

The New York Times is quite right. This writer's sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan have reported for the past three years about "black" operations by mysterious US non-military units. Many attacks on civilians have been blamed on these shadowy groups.

US law forbids murder or using mercenaries. But, as Cicero said, "laws are silent in times of war."

Rename torture, "harsh interrogation," or mercenaries, "contactors," and it's all right to violate the law.

A former senior Pentagon official specializing in murky foreign operations, Mike Furlong, reportedly set up a company, International Media Ventures(IMV), to supposedly provide the US military with "cultural information" about Afghanistan's Pashtun tribes. Codename: Operation Capstone.

Two obscure, Orwellian-named Pentagon outfits, "the Cultural Engineering Group" of Florida, and "Counter-Narcoterrorism Technology Program" of Virginia funded Furlong with $24.6 million.

Furlong hired a bunch of former special forces types and assorted thugs. These rent-a-Rambos's real mission was to assassinate Pashtun leaders in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and target tribal compounds for strikes by US Predator drones.

Another heartwarming example of free enterprise at work and a really effective way to win Muslim hearts and minds.

In short, a 2010 version of the Mafia's contract killers, known as "Murder Inc."

Thickening this plot, retired CIA types, including the flamboyant Dewey Clarridge, whom I well recall from the 1980's Afghan war, were reportedly involved. IMV's CEO came from major defense contractor L-3, long involved in top secret operations. Joining them was a money-hungry former news director of a major TV network.

It is uncertain if Furlong's Murder Inc had time to go operational. But its exposure is causing a huge ruckus. In best US government tradition, the Pentagon has cut Furlong adrift. He is now under criminal investigation.

Shades of CIA agent Ed Wilson, whose frightful case I long followed. Wilson was set up in the 1980's as a deniable "independent contractor" by CIA to supply arms and explosives to Libya and Angola. When the story blew wide open, the evidence was destroyed by CIA, Wilson was kidnapped by US agents, convicted on the basis of lies by the government, and buried alive in federal prison for 27 years.

This latest guns-for-hire scandal also recalls the brutal, 1980's guerrilla war in El Salvador, which I covered, where the US became deeply involved with government death squads that targeted Marxist guerrilla leaders.

It is also reminiscent of the long-forgotten 1968-1972 Phoenix Program in South Vietnam in which CIA and South Vietnamese special units killed from 26,000 to 44,000 suspected Communists or their sympathizers. US Special Forces were heavily involved in these liquidation operations.

The Furlong scandal comes at a time of growing criticism of the US government's use of over 275,000 mercenaries (aka "private contractors") in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. These hired gunmen and logistics personnel operate without any accountability, legal structure, or oversight.

Intelligence sources in Pakistan say that US mercenaries are likely behind some of the bombings of civilian targets, particularly those in Peshawar. Indian intelligence agents are also spreading mayhem in an effort to destabilize Pakistan.

Private mercenary firms like Xe (formerly Blackwater) and DynCorp have raked in fortunes running private armies for the US. They are major donors to the far right of the Republican Party. Deeply worried civil libertarians warn these private armies are only a few goose-steps away from resembling the Nazi Brownshirts of late 1920's Germany.

Amazingly, it seems US Special Forces in Afpak have not until this month been under the control of supreme commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal. They apparently reported to his rival, Central Command chief Gen. David Petraeus in Tampa. These Rambos have been rampaging around, killing at will and committing atrocities against civilians, says a new UN report.

This is ironic since McChrystal rose to his high rank by leading US Joint Special Operations Command's special forces on campaigns of liquidation and intimidation in Iraq, and later, Afghanistan.

To the Pentagons's fury, CIA has long run its own killer paramilitary units and drone assassination operations, 90% of whose victims are civilians, according to Pakistani media investigations. Such "wet affairs" undermine the agency's basic mission of intelligence-gathering.

CIA's paramilitaries report only to Langley which does not talk to the Pentagon. Pakistan's feeble rent-a-government is not even informed in advance of Predator strikes and assassinations on its own territory.

How many of the 15 other US intelligence agencies are running their own little illegal private armies? Add special forces from NATO contingents, whose operations remain a deep secret.

Australia, for one, has come under heavy criticism for attacks on civilians by its SAS units. Britain's renowned SAS and SBS commandos are very active in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Israel also plays a discreet background role in advising US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan on counter-guerilla, urban security, and interrogation techniques.

The US brands all al-Qaida suspects and Taliban "illegal combatants," denying them due process of law and the Geneva Convention's prisoner protections. It's ok to murder and torture such "terrorists," says Washington.

But what, then, about the army of mercenary Rambos that is running amok, who wear no uniform, kill at will, and have no legal oversight? Such death squads are worthy of Iraq or Algeria, not the United States.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:34 PM on 03/23/2010
The govmt. needs to reenact the draft so that americans can get a better look at the true cost of war. The american media should do a better job of coverage of the wars that are being waged and answer the difficult questions that arise such as are the Iraqi citizens better off after 7 going on 8 yrs of occupation and how are their lives better, interview real people instead of just announcing viewpoints of a select few. But sadly much of what should be news reporting in america has turned into views reporting and much of the true stories are not reported. Anyone who truly wants to be informaed nowadays must resort to foriegn news and I might add they do a fair job of reporting.
03:40 PM on 03/24/2010
This writer has a vivid imagination and seewms to suffer from a severe case of cranial-rectal immersion.
DynCorp does not have a "private army" unless you count the former police officers currently training the fledgling police forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Get better informed before making sweeping general statements like "Private mercenary firms like Xe (formerly Blackwater) and DynCorp have raked in fortunes running private armies for the US." If the writer had done his homework, he would have realized that DynCorp major revenue stream is aircraft and base maintenance, none of which require "private armies".

Get you facts straight
04:07 PM on 03/24/2010
As former employees who did the interviewing of foreigners who applied for positions as soldiers, might disagree about a private army. Indeed, this did take place and may very well still exist. Me thinks thee doth protest too much. You sound as though you have intimate knowledge of all procedures pertaining to Dyncorp ......... hhhmmmmm!