More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Erica Dhawan

GET UPDATES FROM Erica Dhawan
 

Business Schools Don't Prepare Women For Leadership Roles

Posted: 02/13/2012 1:54 pm

A version of this post first appeared at Forbes.com

Last week's Sloan Women in Management Conference on 'Innovating Through Adversity' posed tough questions about the systemic gender inequalities that still exist in business today. Marissa Mayer of Google, Jennifer Siebel Newsom of "Miss Representation," and Fredericka Whitfield of CNN took the stage to share their insights on women's advancement in business. Behind the scenes, a fantastic team of ambitious MBA women organized the conference at one of the nation's top business schools.

But do business schools really prepare women for senior leadership roles with companies?

As a graduate of Wharton's undergraduate program and an MBA candidate at MIT's Sloan School of Management, I'd say no. Here's why.

Business schools primarily think about female and male students as future employees rather than as women and men with complex lives for whom employment is a significant, but not the only, activity. If MBA programs truly want to develop principled leaders, they need to address the different sets of concerns students can expect to encounter in the classroom, as well as when they graduate and enter the workforce.

Women in MBA programs often feel like they have to "do it all," and that the frequent tradeoffs inherent in a busy work and family life (often leading to a high level of stress and anxiety) are something to be overcome, not managed. Imagine the possibilities if business schools gave the private concerns of their students a genuine place in the planning of work through courses and programs on gender and life issues, such as a talent management course for both men and women, a case study in all leadership courses on the impact of diverse groups on career and home dynamics and continued support for gender-related conversations and discussions.

"The last frontier for women's advancement at work is understanding how men and women re-define roles at home," says Anne Weisberg, head of Diversity at Blackrock, a global financial management firm and author of Mass Career Customization: Aligning the Workplace with Today's Nontraditional Workforce. She emphasizes that MBAs should be discussing life and home issues as part of the planning of work at the business school level. Currently there is no place for these issues, but these topics need to be integrated into the curriculum.

The after-effects are clear. According to Harvard Kennedy School Professors Barbara Kellerman and Deborah Rhode in their book, "Women and Leadership: State of Play and Strategies for Change," "one in three women with MBAs are not working full time, compared with one in twenty men. A large portion of these women do, however, want to return to work, yet generally do not without significant career costs and difficulties." Both men and women need to be made aware of these costs and difficulties starting in business school -- or companies are going to lose good employees and face major transition costs.

Aside from future concerns for women, there are many areas in current business school environments where women face different challenges than men do based on age, participation and who they consider role models. The implications of not addressing gender-specific challenges in the workplace end up hurting both men and women's recognition of gender differences in leadership positions.

"On average, women are younger than men in top ten MBA programs," says MIT Sloan Dean David Schmittlein. "This may lead to a negative perception of their experience in the business school environment." What's more, he cites research that "has shown that women aren't called to participate as proportionally or as often in the classroom. When women are called on, the next person is less inclined to build on their comments."

According to a study entitled Wives of the Organization, by Leipzig Professor Anne Huff, women tend to volunteer more often for maintenance-level roles such as note-taking, opportunities that they may not get recognition for. Huff's research shows that gender is an area to be further investigated in MBA programs.

There are also clear differences for women in terms of role models and faculty at business schools. "Some of the most well regarded and least well regarded faculty are women," says Schmittlein. Yet women still make up a much smaller proportion of faculty across business schools.

While I believe hosting women in management conferences at the nation's top business programs is an important first step to building a female talent pool, women senior leaders and business school leadership must recognize how gender differences in business school play a major role in and out of the classroom as well in future careers. In today's age, this issue is not just for women, but is crucial for both men and women to reach their individual and often shared potential in work and life. There is a need for new dialogue across MBA programs that address how gender plays a role in business school environments and subsequently in building a pipeline of female leaders in companies and on boards.

Erica Dhawan is a writer and speaker on next generation leadership and co-founder of Galahads: The Secret Society for Kickass Women. Join the conversation at ericadhawan.com and follow her on twitter @edhawan.

 

Follow Erica Dhawan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@edhawan

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:40 AM on 02/17/2012
You try to suggest repeatedly throughout this article that this is some how for the benefit of men and I am not buying it. This is about women trying to modify their world to serve their needs and do a better job of competing with men, all the while asking men to help them accomplish this goal. Yes a better work life balance might help some men, but realistically those who rise to the top will be those willing to sacrifice more to get ahead. Instead of trying to rig the game, why not educate women on the necessary sacrifices. Tell them to find a nice nurturer husband who can take over the other role while she fights her way to the top. There is no way we can all work 60-80 hour weeks to get the promotion and be full time parents. Something has to give and we can't have it all.

"Deborah Rhode in their book, "Women and Leadership: State of Play and Strategies for Change," "one in three women with MBAs are not working full time, compared with one in twenty men. A large portion of these women do, however, want to return to work, yet generally do not without significant career costs and difficulties.""

That quote is a reality check but we should not feel sorry for those who can afford to care for their families themselves. Women leaving the work place with such regularity might cause employers to hesitate to hire women.
02:54 PM on 02/15/2012
While single and in an MBA program, women believe the corporate world is all equal; well it is if one remains single, committed to the company and can "give all hours". What changes is when marriage/kids come along and what is necessary is for single men and those that are in power positions to allow Dads to also "leave early to pick up kids by 6 p.m." (cutoff time for most school after care), change work hours for some early pick up days and also start to change the culture allowing for men to easily do these things. I have heard from many Dad/Mom couples that Dads are reluctant to take too much "early time" to get to kid's activities/events....in mid-America, this often leaves the prof. mom (as many don't have funds to pay nannies). Bringing up these work/life balances while both men and women are (for the most part) single and in MBA programs might, in fact, change the overall expectations of future managers and management not to mention enlarge the dating circle of professional single women who might be searching for a partner whom will be supportive of her career, while jointly raising a family.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
09:14 PM on 02/14/2012
"Women in MBA programs often feel like they have to "do it all," and that the frequent tradeoffs inherent in a busy work and family life (often leading to a high level of stress and anxiety) are something to be overcome, not managed."

So, we should remake the world to conform to women's unrealistic expectations?

That makes sense.
01:12 PM on 02/14/2012
You must be up to your neck in academia because I'm struggling to translate the article contents with reality which doesn't require formal study experience.

1 There is no leadership in corporate America there is only Money and Status Symbol Chasers with subordinates.

2 There is no bias towards women in the board meeting there is simply "Survivor" tactics (yes like the tv reality show). If your weakness was your outnumbered by Jewish persuation then that would be the leverage by which other Money and Status Symbol Chasers would use. Male or Female.

3 You don't get to be in the executive meetings unless you've been sabotaging your subordinates and under cutting your colleagues as well as kissing some prime rib eye butt. So lets not pretend its a position of prestige as prestige is defined in the websters. Either that or your anonymous and no threat to anyone and they dont care about you.

4 Think I'm off base and just uneducated middle manager who's disgruntled from being laid off ?.........nope

5 If you can walk in to the board meeting without a plan for strategic positioning amoung your competitors and offer Off-shoring and Downsizing 10,000+ human beings all in an effort to get a slightly higher bonus and a pat on the back by the senior executive while still going to church and proclaiming your a pillar to the community, a responsible practicing Christian and here's the catch FEEL GOOD ABOUT IT..........then YOUR "Leadership" material. Congratulations
06:52 PM on 02/13/2012
"women tend to volunteer more often for maintenance-level roles such as note-taking, opportunities that they may not get recognition for. Huff's research shows that gender is an area to be further investigated in MBA programs"

I agree there is definitely more room for study within this topic. For example, evaluating the motivation of a woman to volunteer for those types of positions would be useful. I've found myself, that woman, sitting in a meeting when the chair asks who will take notes and half the room looks to me, apparently because I'm a woman and that is expected. I've never experienced a negative repercussion for not volunteering for something like that, but within the contexts I've experienced that dynamic in, there wasn't anything for me to loose for not volunteering. I wonder if there is for some women. I wonder if they're concerned they'll be perceived by male peers & superiors as non-cooperative or not a team player if they don't fulfill that silent expectation.
05:07 PM on 02/14/2012
I had a mentor who avoided this problem by always bringing a subordinate into the board room with her. As a result she was never expected to take notes herself, but her subordinate was. It was a way of deflecting the expectation without appearing to be non-cooperative. She was very aware that to simply be the "note taker" was not the dynamic she wanted to perpetuate in the board room. I doubt if any of her male co-workers had to deal with this issue.
05:52 PM on 02/13/2012
Nice essay. And I think your proposals are great. I would perhaps take a slightly different perspective on one point, which is that redefining roles at home is important, but there is also inherent prejudice about e.g. parenting, and we have to work to first heighten awareness about this and then eliminate it. The contrast comes out especially in two short blog entries:
The motherhood penalty: it's not children that hold mothers back http://bit.ly/motherhoodpenalty
The fatherhood bonus: have a child and advance your career http://bit.ly/xEiTox