Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Erica Heller

GET UPDATES FROM Erica Heller
 

Happy 50th Anniversary, Catch-22

Posted: 10/10/11 01:49 PM ET

On Tuesday, October 10, 1961, I got up as usual, went to public school, came home with a swollen jaw after being punched by a school bully (a not uncommon occurrence), came home, sat down in the kitchen with my brother, had a snack and we did our homework. Unbeknownst to us, however, the trajectory of our lives, that day, had changed.

Catch-22, my father's other "child" (with a gestation period of nine long years), was published that day. A hardcover copy cost $5.95 and 7,500 books were printed.

As for my own relationship with Catch-22, it was love at first sight.

The first time I saw it, I fell madly in love with it. But I was only nine years old, and read only about three pages before putting it down. And although I've tried many times to finish reading it, I'm actually only reading the whole book for the first time now.

This was never planned. The truth is, I never set out not to read Catch-22; there was never any kind of deliberate tactical avoidance. As it happens, I sat down with it more times than Yossarian flew missions, but then always halted midway. Something invariably came along to distract or deter me and inevitably, confoundingly, I let it. I wasn't in the mood for a "war book," hadn't read Norman Mailer or James Jones on the subject, so why read this? Why, indeed.

During my entire life I have been urged, prodded by boyfriends, professors, dentists and one stubborn Dutch ex-husband to go ahead, take the plunge and risk the unknown journey between Catch covers. But the more they insisted, the more I resisted. At some point, a few years became many. Suddenly Catch-22 was a teenager, had grown up, entered its 20s and 30s. Today, it has, astoundingly reached 50. One day, barring the success of certain cynical, mean-spirited Republicans, Catch-22 will be old enough to qualify for Social Security.

In my defense, one teetering at best, is the fact that the inscription Dad wrote in my copy of Catch-22 in 1961 read: "To Erica Jill, With the hope that when you read this book in ten or fifteen years you will love it at least a little--and you will love me too. Daddy, September 3, 1961." Somehow I mistook this for amnesty and figured there was no rush. But 50 years?

Unpopular at first, my father's book caught on and has sold more than 10 million copies. So now it's 2011 and Catch-22 is still, amazingly, everywhere. I popped into my neighborhood Barnes & Noble the other day and spotted it without trouble. (Not so for my recently published memoir, Yossarian Slept Here, When Joseph Heller Was Dad, the Apthorp Was Home, and Life Was a Catch-22, a fact which kept me grumpy for days.) This surviving chain store, once the Goliath to small, independent neighborhood bookstores, is now the David to Amazon. It's on the Upper West Side, near the Apthorp, where I live, where I grew up and where my father wrote much of Catch-22.

It was there, in apartment 2K South, a cramped, somewhat sunless space overlooking the building's circular courtyard, that Dad began spinning the threads of his circular logic. Irony was never in short supply.

When Catch-22 was published, JFK was president. The New York Yankees took the World Series over the Cincinnati Reds. Elizabeth Taylor won an Academy Award for her role in Butterfield 8. The electric toothbrush had just been invented. This was the year the jaunty, crooked little red man first hopped across Dad's bright blue-and-white book jacket. Fifty years however, turned out to be insufficient time for my father's daughter to have read the book that gave birth to this ubiquitous, now essential phrase so at home in our lexicon. So essential that once, a physician just I'd seen for the first time, many years ago, asked me to autograph his copy. When I refused, telling him I had not written Catch-22 so could not "sign" it, he came flying at me with a huge crumbling dictionary opened to the appropriate page, asking me, his eyes pleading, to please sign it in the margin. (I refused.) Being in the dictionary, after all, is certainly a colossal little piece of real estate, it just didn't belong to me.

Now as it turns out, the first book Dad wrote is the last of his I'll read. And as for why I haven't read it before, a question that has buzzed about in my own brain for many years and one to which I've given a great deal of measured thought, my best answer is that reading it means relinquishing the anticipation of reading it. Once I have plumbed the mysteries of Catch, they will no longer be mysterious. Will I love it? Hate it? I am anticipating the former, but that is almost inconsequential. What I won't have anymore is the feeling that this half-century old surprise is still there, waiting to be unearthed. Nothing about this makes sense and yet, in true Hellerian form, it all adds up.

Meanwhile, now seems to be the time when many of the writers of my father's generation have sons and daughters crafting their own tales, stepping gingerly from the brooding shadows to tell the back stories of our great 20th century writers: Vonnegut; Cheever; Salinger; Jones. Most recently, Alexandra Styron wrote a book called Reading My Father, about growing up with Dad, Bill. Now, into this already crowded arena I offer my own, about growing up with Joseph Heller, a man who was brilliant, cryptic and side-splittingly funny. In fact, he was known for laughing loudest at his own jokes. (It helped immeasurably that his were always the funniest.)

But where Alexandra Styron has "read" her father, I have not, or at least not Catch-22. She has said that she understands her father more after writing about him, but I cannot make such a claim. While foraging for information about Dad, all I've come to understand is how little I understand, to know how little I know. My father was like a magnificent mansion with a thousand doors, each with a thousand locks, opening up a thousand more.

Sometimes saving the best for last comes at a price, and in my case, not having read what many revere as Dad's greatest book (he, however, was partial to Something Happened) means that now, when I do read it, I can never tell him what I think of it. Then again, such opinions would have been moot. Whenever he was asked why he hadn't ever again written a book as good as Catch-22, he'd eye his interlocutor as if his or her head were on fire, while delivering his customary stinging riposte: "Who has?" It wasn't bragging. It was a serious question to which he never received a satisfactory response.

When my father was poor, living in Coney Island and still in grade school, his mother, a Russian immigrant, told him that he had a twisted brain. But who can say what constitutes twisted? And if I'm not crazy for never having read it before, does that make me crazy for reading it now?

So be it. To the first book that emerged from that twisted brain, I say Happy 50th Anniversary, Catch-22. Long may you live and continue to dazzle twisted brains everywhere.

And may my own finally be among them.

Erica Heller's book, Yossarian Slept Here: When Joseph Heller Was Dad, the Apthorp Was Home, and Life Was a Catch-22, is out on Simon & Schuster

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MaybeMilo
"You can't fight in here. This is the War room!"
03:10 PM on 10/15/2011
Don't worry - every time I go back to that book, I get something new from it. Probably because I'm not the same person that read it the previous time.

That's funny about the Apthorp - my mother and uncle grew up there in a north-side apartment overlooking Broadway on (I think it was) the 11th floor. We'd visit my grandmother there while I was a kid, and I remember playing with these obsolete wall-mounted buzzers that were intended to call "the help" to particular rooms. I always used to love staring down toward the ground floor lobby through the curving bannister in the stairwell.
11:25 PM on 10/13/2011
Catch 22 - great book, hilarious! I picked it up after reading a review of the book by Kurt Vonnegut - and since Vonnegut is a favorite author of mine, I thought - hey I should check this out. And wow - I have thoroughly enjoyed it - but have yet to read the last few chapters - I'm so close to finishing! Although I know how it ends, it doesn't really matter. It's an entertaining escape and I love how the theme of the insanity of war holds to this day.
03:21 PM on 10/13/2011
As a writer myself, I believe that no one who isn't the child of one could really know what it's like. For better or worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverball
05:37 PM on 10/12/2011
..i read it when i was serving in viet-nam....made perfect sense......
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LabRat
Common sense ain't
07:49 AM on 10/12/2011
While I have read the book and enjoy it I did so *before* I was in the Army.

I guess I should read it again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChrisRoberts
Chris Roberts, God of Short Stories.
07:56 PM on 10/11/2011
Joesph Heller goes about the business of numerical postulating and rehashing. I see nothing artful or original in a soldier who sees twice but rather it is repetitive for the sake of it and J.D. Salinger quite easily trumps this banal device, and Heller's entire novel, in "For EsmƩ - with Love and Squalor." So, it is clear: this brief short story encapsulates the entirety of WWII. As a point of comparison, Norman Mailer's, "The Naked and the Dead" is made a collection of typed pages best left beside the typewriter.

The author's story line is transparent, in a bad way, and any attempt at exposing the mystery of the military man's psyche is telegraphed by Heller, the beginning and end become the same. Catch-22 is rather about smoke and mirrors, a second-rate magician's parlor tricks. It is conceptually weakened by the over arcing, anti-finessed characters. Each goes about with a sledge hammer banging out Joesph Heller's ideology, an artificial artifice. It would never be published today by a known house and caught in his own 22, Heller would, need do and left to, the self-publishing ocean of unread authors.

Chris Roberts
photo
kerriberri
Let's Obviate Obfuscation!
10:14 AM on 10/12/2011
You're wasting electrons again : )
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hopalongpoppyseed
May you reap what you sow.
02:07 PM on 10/12/2011
kerriberrim You have spoken true to your micro bio.
07:15 PM on 10/12/2011
A quick perusal of Mr. Robert's numerical postulations show that the man rehashes nothing but his own delusions of grandeur. Mr. Robert's goals are transparent when he attempts to enlighten us on the state of literature, it is poor because he is not in the New Yorker. His telegraphed hatred of the anointed ends with the building of his pedestal made up of the wasted typed pages of the literature that was not a Roberts. Look at me I can write meaningless diatribes as well... I might even agree with some of the points about Catch-22 if it was wrote with much less vitriol. Like: Even given some of the literary shortcomings of Catch-22, the joy I get from the whole far outweighs some of the weaker literary parts. A nice way to say it's not perfect but darn is it entertaining (or you can still be a hater and leave that off).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mrkurtzhedead
I'll be back, when it's dark!
12:54 AM on 10/13/2011
"Artificial artifice?" Why not "repetitive redundancy"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChrisRoberts
Chris Roberts, God of Short Stories.
09:56 AM on 10/13/2011
It's a play on words, so let us continue our game: Elderly elders.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sturho
03:43 PM on 10/11/2011
Yossarian is the person that I wished I could have been.
rdriley1522
Vietnam 67, 70
03:07 PM on 10/11/2011
Read it first when I was in the Army in Europe 1965. Could sure identify with a lot of the characters. A fine book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Koziol
03:01 PM on 10/11/2011
Catch 22 is just like Murphy's law. They are similar.
Muphys law state "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong".

Catch 22 states "An individual needs something that can only be acquired by not being in that very situation".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sturho
03:43 PM on 10/11/2011
Murphy's law is for us, the Great Unwashed. Finagle's law is for the Elite. They are the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Jeffrey
My micro bio will remain empty
02:52 PM on 10/11/2011
Having first read Catch-22 many years ago when I was 12 or 13, and having re-read it five times since, I am celebrating the anniversary with the Fall (not fall) of Yossarian. I have just finished Tracy Daugherty's excellent biography of Joseph Heller and yesterday read the first fifth of Erica Heller's book, which I highly recommend either on its own or as a companion to the biography. Once I finish Ms. Heller's book, I will re-read Catch for the sixth time, but first in many years. The only other book I have read that often is Crime & Punishment. I would like to do the same with War & Peace, but doubt I have enough years. Few other books have warranted more than a second read. I hope Ms. Heller enjoys the book as much as I plan to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LastAngryWoman
waiting for godot
05:03 PM on 10/11/2011
Funny, but Catch-22 is on my all time top ten list of GREATEST books I have ever read. And I've read it several times.
But Crime and Punishment...I have the same thing going on as Ms Heller (without being the daughter of the author, obviously). I have started reading it NUMerous times. Never finished it. Once...I only had about four chapters left. Couldn't finish it. How weird is that? I am going to read it before I die (I hope)...just don't know what has been keeping me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Jeffrey
My micro bio will remain empty
08:07 AM on 10/14/2011
Good luck. I have the same problem with Henry James. I have tried several of his books several times, and I don't think I have made it past the second chapter yet. But I will keep trying. I almost didn't make it through Catch the first time. I didn't get it at all and thought it kind of boring for the first 50 pages, and was just thinking about stopping for what would have been the first time in my life when it suddenly began to click. Good thing that I am usually a stubborn reader.
08:26 AM on 10/12/2011
Thanks very much.
I have a feeling I will.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LenR
author: sci fi/ fantasy.
02:40 PM on 10/11/2011
I read Catch 22 and Stranger in A Strange Land in 1962. I read Catch once. I virtually memorized Stranger. It was a generational thing. Catch belonged to the "Greatest Generation". Stranger belonged to their kids. Do you "grok" it?
03:44 PM on 10/11/2011
I, too, read both at nearly the same time and, also nearly memorized Stranger, but still see, and hear, passages of Catch-22 in the absurdities of life, especially now in the political climate in Washington DC. I only read Catch-22 once but still have my original copy on my bookshelf some 50 years later. I don't think I actually grok "grok" but I do grok that both books had profound but different impacts on my life. They are on my short list of the most memorable of the very many books I have consumed in my life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vicky Lupo McDonald
02:37 PM on 10/11/2011
I love that book! I read it in 8th or 9th grade English class!
I thought it was amazing and might just read it again!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
01:31 PM on 10/11/2011
I too am partial to 'Something Happened'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
09:09 AM on 10/11/2011
Great book.I've read it about 3 times now. Maybe once every ten years or so. It made me never ever consider a career in the armed forces.Thanks for that Yossarian.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
09:07 AM on 10/11/2011
IMHO the greatest book ever written.