Erich Pica

Erich Pica

Posted: July 29, 2010 05:01 PM

Taxing Wall Street Greed to Pay for Global Needs

What's Your Reaction:

After President Obama signed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act last week, Congressman Pete Stark (D-Calif.) advanced the theme of financial (and moral) responsibility by introducing the Investing in Our Future Act (H.R. 5783). This smart new legislation would place a tiny levy on an untaxed financial market most Americans don't even think about -- the foreign currency exchange market, where one currency is exchanged for another. This small fee has the potential to raise urgently needed funds for climate change and health programs in impoverished countries.

The financial crisis has pushed millions around the world deeper into poverty and forced already strapped countries to further cut budgets for environmental and health programs. Yet Wall Street continues to reap massive profits and pay its executives exorbitant bonuses.

The Investing in Our Future Act would tap very lightly into Wall Street's exploding coffers of wealth by placing a micro-tax of only 0.005 percent on currency transactions by large-scale investors in the U.S. The bill exempts transactions under $10,000, so it would have very little impact on small-scale traders, middle class investors, and travelers.

Although it's a drop in the behemoth bucket of Wall Street's profits, this minuscule levy could generate billions to solve some of the most pressing global crises! And, as an added bonus, this tiny tax would help curb speculation, which happens when Wall Street profiteers bet on infinitely small differences in currency costs to earn quick cash -- a risky game that fuels instability in financial markets to the detriment of society.

As a top climate polluter and the planet's largest economy, the U.S. owes the world a huge debt when it comes to climate change. The Investing in Our Future Act would begin to steer the United States on the right path toward living up to our responsibilities. Forty percent of the revenues generated would go toward United Nations climate funding to help developing countries deal with climate impacts that they did not cause, such as increasingly severe droughts, floods, crop losses and water shortages. This fund would also assist developing countries grow their economies sustainably with clean technology solutions. The rest would help provide critical public goods -- 40 percent for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and other international health initiatives and 20 percent for affordable childcare for working parents in the U.S.

Before the House of Representatives recesses for August at the end of this week, I invite you to ask your members in Congress to co-sponsor this important piece of legislation. You can join Friends of the Earth by taking action here.

 

Follow Erich Pica on Twitter: www.twitter.com/foe_us

 
Comments
14
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeptical Patriot   12:42 PM on 8/02/2010
The assumption by all tax and spenders is that there is no cost to the taxation only benefit in some for of income redistribution or social engineering agenda. At the core, we need a meritocracy and a system that promotes innovation, hard work, and opportunity. The political system is the worst way to govern the flow of investments.
Kai-HK   09:59 PM on 8/02/2010
So true!
Kai-HK   08:29 PM on 8/01/2010
Mr. Pica:

I enjoyed reading your article however there are a few points I would like to point out.

1) Every time we tax an industry or product or service, we are adding to the cost of it in our country and making it more expensive relative to competing nations. In the case of taxing currency exchange this is particularly problematic since money is quite liquid and will move to those places where it gets the biggest bang for its buck. If for example, you tax that industry in America, it will move overseas and take the job creation aspect of the industry with it overseas: in effect moving another high-skill non-polluting industry overseas, say to China where they generally give preferential tax rates to companies there to attract that industry. In effect transactions go down in the US and we lose.

2) Taxing one industry to subsidize another, environment etc, unfairly penalizes one industry that is competitive for another industry that is not. Those industries need to learn to be competitive in their own right.

Kai
Snarliechell   06:04 PM on 8/02/2010
fanned
JShep   05:44 PM on 8/01/2010
If it is truly an "investment in the future", then the revenues should be used to drive down our out of control deficits which are placing an untenable burden on our "future generations". We don't have any funds to spend on third world dictators, we can only increase the debts passed on to our grandkids. Ah, but it is so easy to think of many "deserving causes" where we can spend someone else's money
photo
Soulsurfer   01:01 PM on 7/31/2010
It's nice to dream, but the people who are perpetuating and participating in the Wall St. money orgy have absolutely NO SOCIAL CONSCIENCE. They don't like, respect, or care about society, "the little people". You'll have to pry that miniscule amount from their cold, dead, hands.
photo
humanbeing-rick   11:12 AM on 7/31/2010
Tax all short term trading, and hedging, for these are high-risk practices that broke our financial systems. We want to encourage long-term investment for a stable economy, and discourage the high frequency and high speed trading practices that put the average consumer at a disadvantage, and ruin our markets. If they want to gamble, then they should be taxed heavily on it to protect ourselves.
pauldeba   05:21 PM on 7/31/2010
Hedging is a high risk practice? You clearly have no idea what it is. And you have no idea qhat broke our financial system, it was neither. It was excessive debt, period. High speed trading puts no one at a disadvantage and taxing them heavily (whatever "them" and "heavily" is) does nothing to protect anyone.
photo
humanbeing-rick   10:10 AM on 8/03/2010
Wow, what universe are you living in? The hedge fund managers have raped our financial systems and turned Wall Street into a gambling casino. The financial power houses have high speed computers that trade and hedge with micro-second split timing to skim the profits off the markets before anyone else has a chance to even think about it. These same folks have lower tax rates than the rest of us, and use off-shore tax havens and gimmicks to further escape their social responsibilities.
Your comments make no sense, and wither in the face of actual experience and facts here in America, planet Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Low Prices are Good   11:53 PM on 7/30/2010
Headline should read: "Taxing Wall Street Greed to Pay for Political Greed"
Kai-HK   08:29 PM on 8/01/2010
Classic! You caputred it perfectly.
research   07:02 PM on 7/30/2010
The Bankser used still legal SWAPS to rob the world of the trillions it need to invest in main street.

We have only tow options:

Claw back the trillions,

Print money to inflate the rich back down to our level.

Save money, cut the deficit, employ everyone, cut energy dependence:

Immediately order energy retrofits for all gov buildings.

Rooftop PV Solar, Offshore wind, and Waste Bio char, can supply the worlds energy and fuel needs: cleanly, safely, Forever, within 12 years and cheaper in the long run 2-6 cents now, and 26$ per barrel bio oils.

http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm
about 1$ per Wp solar panels, new.

install solar plants for about $1.30 per watt, compared with an industry average of about $1.75, according to Hardy." http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602099&sid=a7K1FZoNgJ0w

Wind: “between two and six cents today, depending on location.12 Wind power approaches competitiveness with conventional generation at this price point. “

http://www.repp.org/articles/static/1/binaries/wind%20issue%20brief_FINAL.pdf

http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/publ/BiofBioproBioref%203,%20547-562,%202009%20Laird.pdf

26$ per barrel bio oil from waste bio char.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone   05:40 PM on 7/29/2010
An interesting idea. The issue is one of practicality.

It appears we may be facing an unrecognized emergency. Confronting it may be required for survival. The necessary actions could produce many jobs and stimulate the economy.

400 parts per million of carbon has recently been found to be the Arctic Tipping Point, which could conceivably endanger us all. We are approaching 390 ppm and adding 2 ppm each year. The safe limit is 350 ppm.

According to one scientist, a very thin oil film on the surface of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans that could spread from the Gulf, threatens to raise temperatures toward the catastrophic Tipping Point.

A monumental effort on a wartime scale may very well prove necessary.

If the threat is real, renewable energy systems that can be deployed in time should rapidly be produced on a 24/7 basis. The White House, Congress and anyone concerned should check the facts without delay - and if confirmed, do whatever is necessary to make that possible.

See A 5 Point Emergency Program at http://www.aesopinstitute.org

Little known and hard to fathom breakthroughs involving radically new energy technologies can help to supersede fossil fuels much more rapidly than conventional wisdom suggests might be readily understood or easily believed.

See Moving Beyond Oil on the same Aesop Institute website.

If the threat proves genuine, the immediate need is for the White House to urgently request and initiate whatever emergency actions are necessary to avoid a catastrophic loss of life.
photo
Soulsurfer   12:57 PM on 7/31/2010
You are correct sir. BUT, the "Hell, my awl stocks are doin' jus' fine, boy. Ya'll are talkin' crazy, look the sky ain't fallin', and Ah'm late for mah huntin' trip with Dick, so forget it." crowd that pretty much runs things will never let it happen. I have severe doubts as to whether we will be smart enough to save ourselves. Thanks for keeping the faith, though.

Twitter Edition