Roger and Gene

It's 1978 and I'm flipping between the five channels our TV offers -- and doing it the old-fashioned way, without a remote -- when I come across a scene from Magic, starring Anthony Hopkins and Ann-Margret, a movie that has just been released in theaters. I can't believe my luck. Then two guys come on and talk about it. There are scenes from other movies and the same two guys talk about them, too. One guy is tall, thin and bald, the other is fat, with big glasses and thick hair swooping over his forehead. The whole thing feels like it's a one-off or a mistake and I assume it'll end any second. How can they show scenes from new movies ... on TV? That isn't allowed, is it?

The show was, of course, PBS's Sneak Previews, and three of the reasons it was unique -- it was 1) an entertainment show, 2) offering clips of new movies, 3) while two guys argued -- have become, in the three decades since, so ubiquitous as to be part of the downfall of our culture. But even after Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel (the fat guy and the bald dude, respectively) left PBS for their various syndicated shows (& the Movies, At the Movies), and even after they were copied to death, it was always worthwhile to follow them to whatever channel in whatever market in whatever time-slot they wound up in.

They weren't pretty. They didn't dress well. Obviously no one told them to smile at the camera. All of these things worked in their favor. They were about as non-corporate as you could get. They snuck onto television the way Ed Sullivan snuck on. The people following in their wake -- Jeffrey Lyons, Neal Gabler, Michael Medved, et al. -- all felt a little less genuine.

Siskel and Ebert loved movies. You could feel it through the TV screen. They argued all the time, usually intelligently, always forcefully, sometimes bitterly. One of the dumbest things people say about movies today -- "Hey, it's just a movie!" -- would never have occurred to them because movies mattered too much to them. I remember a special episode they did in the late '70s slamming all of the gratuitous violence against women in movies. They chastised Hollywood for all the tired sequels. They encouraged the studios to take the right path. Insert your own joke here.

I always thought I agreed with Roger more than Gene -- that Gene seem bitter in the 1980s -- but looking over old clips, on both YouTube and At the Movies, I question this. In the clips, Gene seems more amused by their fighting while Roger sits still and angry. And was it my imagination or did Roger give a free pass to too many films starring or directed by African Americans? I mean, She Hate Me? Roger Roger Roger.

It's over now. Gene died in 1999, while Roger, battling thyroid cancer, has been more off than on since 2002, but the official notice came last week when Disney announced the replacements for Gene's and Roger's replacements. Both are young men named Ben who have cinematic lineages. Both have been vetted. Neither snuck in.

It's just time passing, of course, that's what's truly sad about it, but Roger has a nice farewell here. I wish I could offer him a better tribute than this. But I will remember to save him the aisle seat.

Comments

[loril]

My dad and I used to watch Sneak Previews every week. I think we stumbled onto it the same way you did. I can remember watching it on a black and white tv before we got cable. I never thought of looking for clips of this show on You Tube, but now I think I will. I didn't keep up with the show as I got older. But, I remember thinking that it couldn't be the same without Gene. They will always be a pair in my memories.

[joad]

I'm gonna miss this show. Even without Siskel and Ebert being on it over the last couple years, At the Movies still felt like a comfortable place to spend by Saturday late afternoons (as this is when it runs in Minnesota). I'm a film buff, and I looked forward to the show steering me in the direction of projects that could easily have slipped under the radar. I really do like Richard Roeper, and he did a fine job continuing the tradition (even after the Thumbs-Up, Thumb-Down was replaced with See It or Skip It). I may give the new show a chance, but it will never be the same. I've never thought about it before now, but At the Movies was one of my favorite TV shows... and certainly one I took for granted before learning it was pretty much going away. Something tells me the new version will be akin to the shallow, corporate feel of Reelz channel, recommending the next Adam Sandler crapfest as opposed to indie darlings. Ugh!

[JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin]

Siskel and Ebert really believed in the art and power of cinema. I got disgruntled with both of them in the 1990's when they became true celebrities and recommended almost everything they saw (especially Ebert). But now that Gene is gone and Roger can no longer speak, I've softened my opinion considerably.

I've watched some old clips of their early shows, and Gene seems more at ease than Roger does. And yes, Roger is overly PC at times. His review of Harold and Kutmar Go To White Castle was funnier than the film itself. He bent over backwards praising it for casting an Indian-American and an Asian-American, calling the film "important". No, Roger, it's just about 2 stoned guys who have the munchies who just happened to be Indian and Asian. It's not "important". Silly boy.

Many critics today are overly snarky, hostile, and have no sense of film art in their reviews. They obsess about box office take and the celebrity aspects of it, and ignore the artistic aspect of cinema, which still exists and will always exist.

[vbond]

Excellent... thanks.

[chicklette]

Thanks for posting this. That has been one of my favorite shows since I was a kid, and I'm just really sad to see it go. Movies, when done right, are simply magical. They got that in a way that few of their contemporaries or "replacements" have.