Where in The World Are Iraq War Movies Popular?

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted April 2, 2008 | 03:52 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Discussions about box office tend to stop with Monday morning's numbers and bad puns. So 21 "raked in the chips," and Superhero Movie was "a superdud," and Stop-Loss was "shot down at the box office." Why not push the envelope? How about Stop-Loss was car bombed? Had its legs blown off? Got ambushed in an alleyway in Tikrit?

Admittedly Stop-Loss's numbers weren't great: $4.5 million, 8th place. But it played on only 1,291 screens, meaning its per-screen-average, while pretty sucky ($3,505), was still better than all but three films in the top 10. Unfortunately our discussions about box office don't go that far. Instead we make some bad puns and add Stop-Loss to the list of Iraq-war-film casualties: Lions for Lambs ($15 million domestic box office), Rendition ($9.7M), In the Valley of Elah ($6.7M) and poor, poor Redacted ($60K). Underperformers all. Cue taps.

Except: If Stop-Loss follows the example of these films, it will make most of its money abroad. Rendition made $14.9 million, or 61% of its total, abroad (U.K., mostly), while Lambs pulled in $41.9 million, or 74%, from foreign countries (Italy and Spain were the big spenders). Elah also made 74% of its total abroad (France and Spain, mostly), while Redacted, which couldn't do much worse, didn't, pulling in $600,000 (France and Spain, again), or 10 times what it earned here.

Is this something else Americans should be embarrassed about? We went into Iraq thinking it would be good entertainment, and for a while it was (Pvt. Jessica, "Mission Accomplished"), but when it turned serious we turned the channel. It was supposed to be a Jerry Bruckheimer flick, Shock and Awe, with clear heroes and villains, and it's become a complicated, hard-to-understand, morally ambiguous film out of the French New Wave. It's become Battle of Algiers.

Hollywood has tried to make it easy for us by making its Iraq War films about us, and setting the action here, in the U.S., but the source material is still that morally ambiguous, hard-to-understand, French New Wave film. So we're letting foreigners figure it out. They're figuring it out over there so we don't have to figure it out over here.

Yeah, we should be embarrassed. This is our national story but we can't be bothered. Elah is a good movie but we can't be bothered. Stop-Loss is another good movie, and it's got handsome leads, and it's about camaraderie, and the few sacrificing over and over again for the many, who are us, but we can't be bothered.

How awful is that? We can't even be bothered with how little we're being bothered by the war. And how much others are sacrificing.

Thank God for France.


 
 

Comments
4
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- MrsWakely See Profile I'm a Fan of MrsWakely permalink

Just saw "Stop-Loss." It's no "Deer Hunter," but, what is? It was involving throughout, and every time I felt like "oh, this is getting melodramatic," I realized "this is happening every fucking day: Humvees pursuing 'insurgents' into traps, clearing buildings, killing women and children because they're in the way of the guy with the grenade, guys being stop-lossed after giving and giving and giving, and just not being able to take it anymore. We're not talking about WWII or Korea or Vietnam - draft wars all, millions of men, so you rotated in and out. Now? We're talking about "I did two tours, I did and saw some unspeakable shit, I made it home, and these motherfuckers are telling me to go back?"

And for what? For what? A "stable Iraq?" First: fuck a stable Iraq. Let them sort their own shit out. Second: see first. The big "how do we get out?" debate? Simple. We get the fuck out. Yesterday. And anything that happens after we leave? It's on one person and one person only: George Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 04/05/2008
- OttoMann See Profile I'm a Fan of OttoMann permalink

Our nation can't even watch the war on TV, let alone in the theater. America doesn't want to look, period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 04/03/2008
- kjacobsmeyer See Profile I'm a Fan of kjacobsmeyer permalink

It's not that American's "can't be bothered." It's about poor timing. All of the successful, critically acclaimed movies about Vietnam were in the 80s. We are still in a war, and you expect the public to want MORE war in the form of a movie? It would be masochistic to want to watch a movie about Iraq at this point. Hollywood should be happy that the movies are doing well overseas, especially if they are anti-war. It would do a service to all Americans to show that the everyday citizen is not as bloodthirsty as our government. A good anti-war movie - at best - should act as ambassador abroad: to separate human beings from those in power.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/03/2008
- amensupremera See Profile I'm a Fan of amensupremera permalink

Why should I see a movie about something that I see on the news everyday and debated on televison every night. I've read the news articles, watched the documentaries, bought the books and right now I really don't feel like watching "actors" do what I see real people doing everyday. An in depth warts and all documentary is more appealing to me right now than a scripted movie....no matter how good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 04/03/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags