Erin Gates

Erin Gates

Posted: February 7, 2008 07:00 PM

Gossip Detox: Part 1

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

For the past few years I have started every morning with a fresh, hot cup of coffee (or three) and six celebrity gossip sites. Yes, SIX. I have them all bookmarked, waiting for my eager little fingers to click on them with the hope that something earth-shattering may have happened in the 8 hours I have been asleep. Usually I find out that Britney went shopping at 4 a.m. and that Reese and Jake went to the grocery store. I click on the next one hoping maybe they have unearthed something more scandalous. But it's just the same photos of Britney shopping and Jake and Reese buying apples and Bounty. And so my day begins, followed by continuous gossip blog-checking, the thrilling receipt of my US Weekly in the mail and e-mails from friends saying "Can you believe (insert any celebrity drama here)?"

I always feel I can defend my celebrity gossip addiction by comparing it to other far more harmful habits -- say, drugs, excessive drinking, shop-lifting or semi-automatic weapon smuggling. But that defense is getting harder to justify, as I actually think my gossip addiction has become toxic to my life. Perhaps it's because the paparazzi have begun to viciously stalk anyone whose name has appeared in lights in the last decade, or maybe it's because our celebrities seem to be slowly, but surely, careening off the deep end. Gossip is no longer the good, clean fun of seeing your favorite star without her makeup, but rather watching one tragically lose control of her life, her kids, her mental health -- and have it plastered on every blog, website and tabloid out there. What is so fascinating to us about the downfall of another human being? And why are stars being shown that the sicker they are the more press they will get?

What made me question the harmlessness of celebrity gossip was the coverage of Heath Ledger's death. Watching a hoard of photographers and "fans" waiting outside his apartment to get a glimpse of his body being wheeled out in a body bag was nauseating. Have we really come to this? Are we so desperate for obscene amounts of knowledge about such awful events that we wait in anticipation of a body bag? But there I was, sitting in front of the TV watching the coverage on Access Hollywood (which I previously referred to as "the news"). I do not want to support the actions of the paparazzi, nor do I want to be the kind of person who is interested in that kind of severe personal violation. Let the dead rest in peace, and the grieving heal alone, out of the watchful eye of all of America.

Another bothersome side of this world of gossip can be found when flipping through the latest tabloid. You can't help but notice that half of the pages seem to be dedicated to autopsy-like physical critiques and a cataloging of items that "could make your life better". A new nose, new boobs, $3,000 handbag, two nannies, a certain shade of lipstick, a $15 million home and designer dog- all ripe for the taking if you only were a star. It's a bible of excess and materialism and we all have started preaching it and believing it. The message is no longer one of suggestion, but rather direction. You are not good enough as you are. I certainly have found myself occasionally feeling this way and hoping that a new pair of shoes will uplift me from a temporary funk and make me walk with the swagger of a celebrity. They never do, and so I have finally made a decision. A big decision for a life long gossip addict like me.

I am going to stop seeking out celebrity gossip for the next two weeks. Cold turkey.

If I pass a tabloid with a cover announcing Angelina's pregnancy, so be it, but no longer will I spend my mornings with Perez, Michael K. or any of the other gossips regaling in the latest saga of the beautiful people. My US Weekly will be recycled unread and the TV tuned to the nightly news. I'll spend it reading more about the events going on in our world, starting a new painting, playing with my dog or trying to do something nice for my husband. The real people and things in my life deserve those precious moments, not the vapid trials and tribulations of Hollywood. Will it improve my daily life and sense of well being? Will I want to go back to my daily addiction? That is yet to be determined.

But I do have a feeling it will be harder than I predicted, seeing as I have my mouse anxiously hovering over People.com as I write this.

 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Have mercy. Allow yourself mags in the grocery line -- now which line has the fullest carts.

Doctor, Dentist, and Lawyer office - trash mag reading permitted.

Hospitals.

We are talking a new way of life.

Go in peace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 02/12/2008

Thanks for the catalyst to quit looking at these sites. I spend far too much time each day checking out the four sites I go to. When I really look at the content, I find that for every interesting little tidbit I glean there is an enormous pile of derogatory, repulsive, defaming invective that brings my consciousness down to a level with which I am actually not comfortable.

Don't know if I can quit--I'm a creature of habit--but I can give it a shot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 02/10/2008
- eaglecapri I'm a Fan of eaglecapri 5 fans permalink

I have to admit, I love celebrity gossip, too! I feel like Miranda in SATC - 'It's my thing, get over it.'

However, I don't feel so 'guilty' about it since I do read respectable publications: The Economist, Atlantic Monthly and the NYT. It all seems to balance itself out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 02/08/2008

Thanks for this post--I will join you in this 2 week detox. I look at this celebrity stuff too, even though I know it's basically toxic and incredibly stupid. It's so easy to rationalize, especially since even when reading news sites there are very often celebrity type articles as well. Anyway, I'm with you and I'm going cold turkey!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 AM on 02/08/2008

thank you so much for this. When Princess Diana was alive I couldn't pass up a magazine w/her on the cover. Since she died, I don't buy magazines anymore but I do look on line. You are so right. It is not harmless fun anymore at all. It takes away from the real news and I do feel sorry for the celebrities. The Heath Ledger thing was so very upsetting and disturbing in so many ways I can't go into it. Just that on the same day that he died, there was an item on TMZ showing him outside of his apartment with his daughter talking about how awful he dressed. How awful that would be if you couldn't leave your house with your child w/o people commenting on everything you did.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 AM on 02/08/2008
- MizJ I'm a Fan of MizJ 8 fans permalink

Ain't it the sorry truth?? I too got fed up with myself and vowed (during Lent) to steer clear of those sites. However, I kept breaking down and "sneaking a peek" now and them. I give myself credit with keeping up with the political blogs but I have strayed off course lately. Now I am reading blogs put out by Rosie, Roseann, and Oh My God, Adrianne Curry! God help me, I need an intervention!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 02/07/2008
- Rockyman I'm a Fan of Rockyman 6 fans permalink
photo

Best of luck in your "gossip detox". Try to remember that the Hilton's, Spears and Lohann's of the world have NO impact on our lives. To become voyeurs to volitionary misery IS to waste time. And consumes finite time as there is infinite stupidity to witness. We can find more positive and life-affirming endeavors to pass time. And by doing so we express our unique selves--much better than spectating the lives of others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 02/07/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect