iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ervin Laszlo

Ervin Laszlo

GET UPDATES FROM Ervin Laszlo

Quantum Consciousness: Our Evolution, Our Salvation

Posted: 04/ 5/10 11:33 AM ET

In the first post of this series I promised to explore the wider implications of our having a quantum computer in our head. What does this revolutionary understanding of the capacities of the human brain mean for our life and our future?

Here I call "quantum consciousness" the consciousness we access when we use the potentials of our quantum-computer brain. Our brain is a macroscopic quantum system, yet we use it as if it were exclusively a classical biochemical system. With its quantum-system functions, our brain can receive information not only from our eyes and ears, but directly from the wider world with which we are "entangled" -- nonlocally connected. Insightful people throughout history, whether shamans or scientists, poets or prophets, have extensively used this capacity, innate to all human beings. Today it is widely neglected. This impoverishes our world picture and causes a nagging sense that we are separate from the world around us.

I believe that quantum consciousness could be the next stage in the evolution of our consciousness -- and that this evolution could be our salvation. Let me explain.

The first thing I ask you to note is that human consciousness is not static, fixed once and for all. It's the product of a long evolutionary development and is capable of further development. In the thirty- or fifty-thousand-year history of the species we proudly call Homo sapiens, the human body didn't change significantly, but human consciousness did. And it can change again.

In a variety of "alternative cultures" a new consciousness is already emerging. The members of these cultures -- the green movement, the peace movement, the sustainable living movement, the movement of cultural creatives, and others -- share similar social values and are open and interactive with the larger society; they don't seek isolation or indulge in promiscuous sex. They aim to rethink accepted beliefs and values and adopt a more responsible style of living. They shift from matter- and energy-wasteful ostentation toward voluntary simplicity and the search for sustainability and harmony with nature.

A new consciousness is now struggling to be born. Does this mean that the consciousness of humanity itself is evolving? Some famous thinkers have said so. The Indian sage Sri Aurobindo spoke of the emergence of superconsciousness in ever more people, and this, he said, is the harbinger of the next evolution of human consciousness. In a similar vein the Swiss philosopher Jean Gebser spoke of the coming of four-dimensional integral consciousness, rising from the prior stages of archaic, magical, and mythical consciousness. The American mystic Richard Bucke called the new consciousness "cosmic," and in the colorful spiral dynamics developed by Chris Cowan and Don Beck, it's the turquoise stage of collective individualism, cosmic spirituality, and Earth changes. For philosopher Ken Wilber these developments signify an evolutionary transition from the mental consciousness characteristic of both animals and humans, to subtle consciousness, which is archetypal, transindividual, and intuitive, to causal consciousness, and then ultimately to "consciousness as such." Psychiatrist Stanislav Grof summed up the characteristics of the emerging consciousness as "transpersonal."

There is remarkable agreement among these visionary concepts. Superconsciousness, integral consciousness, cosmic consciousness, turquoise-stage consciousness, and consciousness as such are all forms of consciousness that transcend the divide between you and me, the individual and the world, the human being and nature. If these thinkers are right, this kind of consciousness will be the next stage in the evolution of the consciousness of our species.

Quantum consciousness -- QC -- could perhaps be the next stage in the evolution of the mind of humanity, but why would it be our salvation?

The answer is simple commonsense: because QC is a consciousness of directly intuited, felt connection to the world. It inspires empathy with people and with nature; it brings an experience of oneness and belonging. Quantum consciousness makes us realize that, being one with others and with nature, what we do to them we do to ourselves.

Not only will QC make us behave more responsibly toward other people and the planet, it will also encourage us to join together to cope with the problems we face.

Most of us cooperate with members of our own family and community. But cooperation has now become vitally necessary on the global level: it's in all our best interest to cooperate with our fellows in the global community. Without such cooperation we'll be hard put to overcome the global threats and problems that face us. Without cooperation we risk joining the countless species that became extinct because they couldn't adjust to changed circumstances.

With dedicated and purposeful cooperation we can meet the challenges of human survival: we can have seven billion or more people living peacefully and sustainably on the planet. We have the technologies, the skills, and the necessary financial and human resources. Abject forms of poverty can be eliminated, energy- and resource-efficient technologies can be made widely available, water can be recycled and seawater desalinized, and sustainable forms of agriculture adopted. We can be more efficient and effective in harvesting the vast stream of energy that flows from the sun to our planet. And to finance these projects we would only need a small part of the enormous sums of money that we now commit to speculative, self-serving, or downright destructive ends.

Cooperation on the global level is a new requirement in the history of our civilization, and we are not prepared for it. Our institutions and organizations were designed to protect their own interests in competition with others; the need for them to join together in the shared interest has been limited to territorial aspirations and defense, and to economic gain in selected domains. The will to cooperate in globally cooperative projects that subordinate immediate self-interest to the vital interests of a wider community is still lacking in the political as well as in the economic domains.

When all is said and done, the fundamental need of our time, the precondition of creating a peaceful and sustainable world, is the spread of a new and more evolutionarily adaptive consciousness -- the quantum consciousness of oneness and belonging.

Forms and intimations of the new consciousness are already emerging in the world, but they haven't yet reached the mainstream. When QC becomes mainstream, humanity will have reached a higher stage of maturity. It will have become a species that has not only the technologies and the skills, but also the wisdom and the will, to survive in the world it has itself created.

 

Follow Ervin Laszlo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ErvinLaszlo

In the first post of this series I promised to explore the wider implications of our having a quantum computer in our head. What does this revolutionary understanding of the capacities of the human br...
In the first post of this series I promised to explore the wider implications of our having a quantum computer in our head. What does this revolutionary understanding of the capacities of the human br...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 616
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
LeFlaneur
does nuance.
02:28 PM on 04/12/2010
Got a tired old bag of New Age blather? Well don't despair, you can polish up the most worn out and hackneyed pseudo-philosophy and make it all shiny and new. Just add the word "quantum."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
12:08 PM on 04/11/2010
Some strong positions taken here, so I will add mine for what's its worth..This idea has been around for a long time. The parallels between mysticism and physics was something I was introduced to in "The Tao of Physics" in 1975 written by Fritjof Capra. It completely destroyed the cartesian world view I carried till then. All I can say is, explore it for yourself. This is not a subject one can grasp with such a limited scope as an article in HP. After you do that, maybe you will understand better, or maybe not...

"That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand.."
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MoreDimensions
07:49 PM on 04/10/2010
Basic overview of string theory by Physicist Brian Greene. This is an excellent video lasting about 19 minutes.

http://www.ted.com/talks/brian_greene_on_string_theory.html
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
11:47 AM on 04/11/2010
The TED series is awesome...I wish more teachers will utilize the resource to bring a bigger world into our kids perception. This is easily comprehended by even kids in high school. Thanks for the link!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MoreDimensions
06:53 PM on 04/12/2010
Good point, your welcome.
06:36 PM on 04/10/2010
I encourage everyone who has read this bombastic mess to pick up Barbara Ehrenreich's "Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCFree
Computers & Cameras & Cars, Oh My!
11:13 AM on 04/10/2010
Sorry, reverse the order of the last two posts
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCFree
Computers & Cameras & Cars, Oh My!
11:13 AM on 04/10/2010
Then Rome took over the "church" and used the religion to do what Rome does best: control people. They then "canonized" a rule book and filled it with stories that fit their control theme. They chose a writer named Paul (who never actually met the living Jesus) to write what fit their way of making man subservient. This rule book was then called "fact" and you either believed or you would not be acceptable to Rome. Believe or die. From this point on, the message was lost and the messenger became the focus of worship. Praise Jesus!
Almost every Atheist I have met has rejected religion over the corrupt Christian myth being called fact. In essence, they have thrown out the baby with the bathwater. I can't think of one Atheist I have met that rejected another religion. Probably because other religions don't focus on the "control" part as a way of repressing believers.
I left the "church" as a teen but found God through science. Science is just another religion that uses a newer language to express itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCFree
Computers & Cameras & Cars, Oh My!
11:12 AM on 04/10/2010
Religion has always filled two functions. One: To explain the world we live in. Two: To organize and control people. Based on the first purpose, science does the same thing. The big difference with science is that it is open to new ideas and will adjust itself as new theories and facts present themselves. Well, most of the time it has no problem adjusting (these posts prove that point).
Now let's look at the second purpose. Generally, religions are composed of a set of social standards in ways to live a harmonious life with others and the world around us. In many "Easter" traditions along with Native American (who are, in fact, descendants of Asian people) traditions, this harmony mostly exists through to today (hence the New Age movement that is steeped in these traditions). Then there is the religion that we call Christianity. The teachings of a poor carpenter's son who was seen as a rabbi, put forth very simple teachings that used much of this "Eastern" type of thinking (the "Sermon on the Mount" is mostly all Buddhist philosophy). The four Gospels are stories to teach a way of living and thinking.
12:45 PM on 04/08/2010
To consider the that human progress, evolution, and a greater understanding of ourselves is a purly mechanistic process - DNA transfer, something measurable by means which we can scientifically verify, seems - well, presumtuous. Eurocentric at the least. Ignorant about the past, arrogant about the present, and dangerous, if continued into the future.
Our abilities to resolve our problems - war, pollution, etc., seem stuck in first gear. We've been at war forever and continue to destroy our planet. Our scientific model isn't working (just like our 'American Dream' model has failed). Without moving into another gear, evolving out of this difficult condition, we may be doomed. That seems apparent. And having young adult children, it seems that this kind of realization is growing among younger people. That's good. We need to resolve our important issues, and the scientific method, and considering life and interelationships between entities as being only measurable by this method, is not working.
And to make up, willy-nilly, some kind of story or supposition about some utopian relationship that we should have, is also folly. But reaching further, into other real places of the mind, and to re-connect with ancient wisdom that has never really left us (burried yes, obscured by modernity yes), seems an important way to go. No, it's not the New Age junk that will allow us to move on, to evolve, it's the knowledge of the ancients that is still around us. You just need to know where to look.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
10:06 PM on 04/08/2010
Yes the "knowledge of the ancients" the knowledge that said slavery was acceptable. That said women had to be subservient to men. That people who loved the wrong way were not fit to live.The knowledge that only one religion could be correct and that people were justified in doing anything, no matter how evil, to someone who believed the wrong thing, the knowledge that democracy was, oh wait there was no democracy only kings and chiefs.

Blindly believing that anything represents some perfect ideal is wrong. We need to use our reason and evaluate ideas based on their logic and results. Sorry if that sounds like science but truth be told science is the only thing that has enabled us to see beyond our bias, fears, and hatreds and in only a few hundred years has given us enormous amounts of insight into who we are and how we got to be here.

I'm not saying science as all the answers. But to blindly say we must discard it, especially for some ancient wisdom by people who thought the earth was the center of the universe, seems the height of folly.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AtheistUS
02:52 AM on 04/09/2010
"knowledge of the ancients" - any example?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
03:14 AM on 04/09/2010
I-Ching, Tao Te Ching....True knowledge.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhillyProfessor
Dog hates dyslexia! Tneper!
11:43 AM on 04/08/2010
As a biologist, I look at things differently. While each human is an organism, each human is also part of larger corporate superorganisms - family, church, state, and country for example. And the information that human corporate organisms contain is not limited to DNA, but in the stories, the writings, the teachings, and the laws that govern their conduct. The information contained in our DNA has experienced a limited amount of change in the last several thousand years, but the information contained within our superorganisms has changed radically. What makes a right wing republican different from a left wing democrat, or a radical Muslim extremist different from a christian extremist is not the DNA that governs behavior, but the philosophies that tell them what sources to believe and how to act. And like all organisms, success is ultimately determined by their ability to grow and reproduce. If a group is better at protecting itself from damaging change (e.g., maintaining homeostasis), acquiring useful energy ( e.g. money), it will have evolutionary advantages . Evolution does not think about long term consequences. It can only work in the now. Organizations that promote long term health of the larger superorganisms ( like the biosphere loving lefties) - will not win out over ones that promote short term health of smaller superorganisms ( like racial supremacist righties), unless their behaviors today lead to more successful growth and reproduction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KayWrites
Freedom requires truth
01:17 PM on 04/08/2010
Excellent analysis. If species success revolves around successful growth and reproduction, the question then becomes, how do those with long-term vision become more successful in their growth and reproduction?

The answer is to make it profitable. Then it doesn't matter whether one group is short-sighted racial supremacist righties and the other biosphere loving lefties. Both will be working for the evolutionary stability of the species.
09:52 AM on 04/08/2010
All attempts to translate quantum mechanics into macro level applications for non-scientific purposes is, simply put, a New Age version of religious/spiritual Snake Oil.

It's just plain nonsense, and even the few New Agers I've known who possess higher than average IQs have eventually come around to that basic and factual understanding.

To quote Julia Sweeney, "Depak Chopra is full of $hit!"

And so is Mr. Laszlo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnderTheHedgeWeGo
Show me some evidence.
04:24 PM on 04/08/2010
Yep.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCFree
Computers & Cameras & Cars, Oh My!
10:36 AM on 04/10/2010
By your statements, you don't really understand Quantum Theory or the "New Age" movement. The New Age movement is basically a rebirth of ancient Archetypal thinking and not really "new." Quantum Theory basically is science mathematically proving that these old "mystic" concepts have grounding in science. In other words, the material world needs our "observations" to make it "real" and this is why a bunch of atoms, that are mostly composed of empty space, whose components flick in and out of existence (they don't know yet where the electron, protons and neurons go when they disappear from atoms), why we perceive them as "solid." Sure, we were taught that there is "Magnetic repulsion" that forces our hands away from them an create the feeling of "solid" but this does not explain the force when components of the atoms are disappearing and reappearing from existence. And then there are the sub-atomic particles...
06:34 PM on 04/10/2010
But science ISN'T proving that, and there's no science in this article. It's a metaphor and Chopra even admits this. Quantum mechanics IS NOT proving mystic concepts true. Science is being conflated with mystic concepts for the very intentionally deceptive purpose of providing those concepts with some form of legitimate-feeling validity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
05:31 PM on 04/07/2010
My reply to the "brain is a quantum computer"

http://reddogbear.blogspot.com/2010/04/why-your-brain-is-not-quantum-computer.html
06:09 PM on 04/07/2010
You're right to point out that greatly increased parallel processing is no big whoop. And yes the probability of the quantum brain model being correct seems very small.

But for me the bigger point is that even if there were quantum processes (similar to the electron tunneling that happens in silicon circuits, for example) involved in communication between neurons, it's just as big a SO WHAT? as increased parallel processing. Having that brain model wouldn't give us a special way to experience the oneness of the universe, or social cooperation or any other value that is supposedly being promoted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
07:10 PM on 04/07/2010
Absolutely.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AtheistUS
08:54 PM on 04/07/2010
Tengmark (if I remember the name correctly) considered in detail the model of Penrose et al and found that quantum superposition is destroyed too fast. I think there were a few articles back and force in Phys.Rev. or such, I'm sure you can find refs easy.
08:23 AM on 04/08/2010
That's Max Tegmark. He and I were physics grad students at Berkeley at the same time in the 90s. He's scary wicked smart. After I finished, I took my tiny brain and went into engineering. But he's a big time professor, and deservedly so.
01:11 PM on 04/07/2010
Likely this comment will get screened out, but here goes:
This is the kind of article that begs the question: Why did HP create a Religion section when they have not yet created a Science section? (They have "Tech" but that is about applications of science, not the fundamentals.)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AtheistUS
02:47 PM on 04/07/2010
Celebs news and religion are a much easier sell. Following bad taste demands seems working fine for this site.
03:56 PM on 04/07/2010
@ "Ids8714"
2:55 PM CST

Quote :

..."Why did HP create a Religion section when they have not yet created a Science section?"...

...That's a very good point.

Try :

old world gallery at hot mail dot com

J.B.
4/7/10
12:14 PM on 04/07/2010
blogger: "Forms and intimations of the new consciousness are already emerging in the world..."

Where? How?

Every well-meaning cause creates a frenzied opposition. It's nice to have pie in the sky notions and give them new names, but really, we humans are what we are.

And BTW, this planet cannot sustain 7 billion more people. Who cares if we eventually go extinct. Life and consciousness goes on in other forms. We're not so special.
01:21 PM on 04/07/2010
I'm with you. And I wonder... what exactly was the "old" consciousness?

As for us humans, I hate to be a Negative Nelly, but the old saying is unfortunately true: By pretty much any reasonable measure of our overall impact, we humans are the worst thing that has happened to Earth, and also to the regions of space we have so far polluted.

(btw, Romantics talk about colonizing other worlds, etc., but I say we have long ago demonstrated our incompetence and disregard for our environment, and have therefor forfeited all rites to propagate.)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AtheistUS
02:49 PM on 04/07/2010
I cannot agree that "humans are the worst thing that has happened to Earth". Really, there are no good reasons to make such claims.
11:42 AM on 04/09/2010
"we humans are the worst thing that has happened to Earth"

You ever look at sattelite maps of cities from far away? It reminds me of cancer on a healthy organ sometimes.
01:23 PM on 04/07/2010
doh! forgive those spelling errors of mine!
01:53 PM on 04/07/2010
"rites to propagate" kind of works...
12:06 PM on 04/07/2010
The brain is made of materials that have interacted on a macrolevel with other forms of matter constantly. How can we assume there is some kind of wavefunction that unites it to other particles, and that somehow the decay of a wave function then somehow puts the brain in a state of "consciousness" of some kind of rationale event? It just makes no sense.

If anything, I would say to think of consciousness as an energetic epiphenomenon not in the matter of the brain, but rather a field perhaps interacting with the neural hardware. That energy could be far more likely to be relevant when it comes to quantum entanglement than the material brain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KayWrites
Freedom requires truth
04:39 PM on 04/07/2010
Excellent thought. You should expand on that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:07 PM on 04/13/2010
fanned. That is an outstandingly interesting concept, which I have never heard articulated like that at all.
09:25 PM on 04/06/2010
"I know the whole story and its already over."-Kuan Yin
photo
Uncle Bob
Darwin loves you.
01:36 AM on 04/07/2010
vague yet well said.

Granted, if you called out the woo for what it is, your post would get deleted (like mine is about to be)