iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Esther Wojcicki

Esther Wojcicki

Posted: July 5, 2010 02:52 PM

Written together with Michael Levine, Executive Director of the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

America is celebrating.

The Fourth of July is a time for parades, parties, BBQs, fireworks---we certainly have much to be thankful for here in America, the most innovative country on earth.

But one area of American life that is consistently resistant to innovation is our education system. On our nation's birthday--a cause for celebration of our founders' audacity, independence, courage and innovation skills-- we are sadly mired in the muck.

Perhaps most tellingly, we cannot even teach our kids how to read well and comprehend the complex issues our generation has utterly failed to address! Millions of kids are reading below grade level in fourth grade, a key measure of school success. Why should everyone care how well kids read at the fourth grade?

Because children who are below grade level by age ten tend to stagnate and eventually give up and drop out in high school. Harvard educational psychologist Jeanne Chall famously called this phenomenon the "fourth grade reading slump," where children cannot make the transition from learning to read to "reading to learn," which hinders their learning in all other subjects. International comparisons show that because of these early literacy setbacks America is losing the global race in science and math, areas central for 21st century skilled jobs.

While national policies such as No Child Left Behind have strongly emphasized the need to teach key reading skills like decoding and phonemic awareness in the early grades, far too many students hit a wall by fourth grade and by high school more than 7000 students per week are dropping out, a national crisis that costs us billions of dollars in lost wages, according to Alliance for Excellent Education in Washington, DC.

It has been 25 years since the landmark study A Nation at Risk, and we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars trying to ramp-up children's mastery of basic skills. Unfortunately, the current approach to solving the literacy crisis is locked in a time warp, almost totally removed from the ubiquitous digital media consumption that currently drives children's lives outside of school. Unless the American education system changes course quickly to integrate literacy and digital culture into our current educational paradigm, academic achievement gains will continue to stagnate.

To rectify the reading problem, we need to make sure that children have been exposed to a wide ranging vocabulary with complex words and ideas before age five. Kids who are read to frequently or who have a regular dialogue with parents or family members are exposed to a wide variety of experiences which prepare them for school. Unfortunately, today many low income children do not have this luxury. They have unemployed parents and difficult living situations and schools that failed to teach early literacy in a way that compensates for the lack of these skills.

It is here that digital media can make a vital contribution.

Educational video games, simulations, modeling tools, handheld devices, and media production tools can allow students to see how complex language and other symbol systems attach to the world. Digital media has the potential to increase the "book" vocabulary, and the concepts attached to such words, for children whose families are unable to do so.

In the classroom, digital media also have other major advantages. These media teach students to master the production of knowledge, not just the consumption of knowledge. Kids learn to create videos, write blogs, collaborate online; the also learn to play video games, do digital storytelling, fan fiction, music, graphic art, anime and even more.

Their informal process of learning, collaboration, and transforming passion into knowledge is desperately needed in schools today. Despite sluggish gains in reading, our nation has not seriously integrated digital tools and new teaching practices into all classrooms. Schools of education are still failing to teach student teachers how to integrate digital media in the classroom. For example, most teachers, experienced or newcomers, have never even heard of Open Education Resources (OER), which offers thousands of free online resources for teachers; nor have they heard of Creative Commons, an open licensing format to help teachers share work and work collaboratively.

We recommend the following for policymakers, business leaders and practitioners to consider help make schools more effective.

Establish a Digital Teacher Corps
Teachers cannot teach what they do not know. Most practitioners are unskilled in embedding new media in powerful instructional practices. A Digital Teacher Corps should be established to work in the lowest-performing elementary schools in order to train teachers to help students learn to read by transforming information for discovery and problem-solving.

Provide incentives for schools of education to update curriculum
Teacher training programs should be modified so that all beginning teachers learn how to use online collaborative tools, video production tools, blogging tools, mobile tools and a variety of commercial and non-profit programs targeting the classrooms. Frequently young teachers know how to use these tools on a personal level but not in the classroom.

Design alternative assessments and include project based learning in standards
Besides measuring traditional skills, assessments should be measuring skills based on project based learning, digital skills, problem solving skills and collaboration skills. Assessments drive the curriculum and so we need new assessments to drive a 21st century curriculum.

Support after-school programs and create a "Digital Hangout for Kids" in every community.
Kids are already spending nearly seven and a half hours every day consuming all types of media, but very little of this time is spent on quality media or intentional learning, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Let's building on national models like Communities in Schools, First, Computer Clubhouse, Club Tech of the Boys and Girls Clubs, and the Quest to Learn, Digital Youth Network and School of One models in Chicago and New York City.It is time to extend the learning day and create a place in every community where young children can gain confidence in their literacy and interactive technology skills.

Establish Model Digital Schools in every state
Highly successful, innovative small charter schools such as High Tech High, Green Dot and KIPP Academies have proven that kids can learn essential literacy skills starting in early childhood with a personalized curriculum, integrated technology, and skillful teachers. Each state should establish at least one digital partnership elementary school as a model and demonstration site. These schools should be laboratories for testing many different digital approaches to learning and assessment, as well as for testing different ways to break down the barriers between in- and out-of-school learning. They could become a hub for the professional development of digitally savvy teachers.

Modernize public broadcasting
Public broadcasting initiatives should advance experimentation with new formats such as games, virtual worlds, and social network communities that will engage children in both literacy and digital skills. Educational media companies should also make available publicly-supported productions to educators at low or no cost via the internet and new communities of practice.

One hundred fifty years ago, Alexis de Tocqueville, the French historian and author of Democracy in America, wrote: "I (fear) that men may reach a point where they look on every new theory as a danger, every innovation as a toilsome trouble, every social advance as a first step toward revolution, and that they may absolutely refuse to move at all."

Hopefully, American policy makers and educators will not refuse to move and soon embrace the potential revolutionary power of the digital tools that have defined the first decade of the 21st century. Then we will have cause to really celebrate.

 

Follow Esther Wojcicki on Twitter: www.twitter.com/EstherWojcicki

 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:14 PM on 07/23/2010
Another suggestion is to make Internet Access more accessible.

1. Make Internet access more accessible, treat it as a basic human right. People without Internet access will continue to fall further behind in our flatworld. Educational tools, school applications, and job applications are all found online. Access to these three tools will create liberty and equality for society regardless of socioeconomic status. More: http://technologyinclass.com/blog/2009/12/30/is-internet-access-a-basic-human-right/

TIC
http://www.technologyinclass.com
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
04:42 PM on 07/06/2010
The biggest problems are that society scapegoats teachers, parents don't support them, and kids find education unfashionable. We can certainly do more with technology, but until students understand that they NEED an education and MUST WORK for it, things will not really change.
If I were racist, I could not have come up with a better way to keep people of color down than to persuade them that "education is for whites." I don't know how it happened, but it did. Poor white children too often buy into the idea that education is for out-of-touch elites. In essence, children have to chose between culture and school, and school loses.
04:05 PM on 07/06/2010
Just as we can buy educational courses online that feature the best teachers, why not do that with kids who are already more computer savvy than adults? Instead of preparing for and giving lectures and grading papers, teachers could then spend much more time giving kids individual attention and helping them understand the courses.
02:49 PM on 07/06/2010
These are good ideas concerning digital education. Let's hope you can keep the advertisers away so the focus stays on education and educational content.
01:53 PM on 07/06/2010
This article represents everything I have been trying to teach for years. As a past high school principal, teacher and central office manager, I have seen countless teachers struggle to find innovative ways to reach failing students. Technology has changed everything. It is the best advantage any school or teacher can have. All children love the Internet and social media. As educators we are obligated to integrate these learning tools into the curriculum. We can no longer afford to say there is no place for texting or blogging in the classroom. In many schools, students struggle. How can we not jump at the opportunity to reach kids in a new and exciting way? Yes, some schools are very positive about the use of technology in the classroom. But the fact that we are still having this discussion indicates resistance. It should be a universal belief that technology has changed literacy and now a universal desire to teach literacy accordingly. As we debate the issue - which will progress anyway and is happening regardless of what we think - well, other countries are just continuing to excel leaving us more behind. Please help support the new literacies in education. Visit http://drpfconsults.com and http://kidslearntoblog.com if you would like to join us in our quest to see the new literacies of the Internet and blogging for kids in every classroom!
11:08 AM on 07/06/2010
My husband is a science teacher who believes banning cell phones from school is not the way to go. Why let the adults become more ignorant while the kids become more savvy? Fortunately, there are plenty of people who agree with this. He's also the technology professional development instructor educating teachers in how to use google docs, spreadsheets, etc. A big problem is that for all the excellent technology out there, schools do not actually have the tools to explore this. Some schools can't even get smart boards because they are not up to code.

Aside from this, some of your other theories are already in place. After school programs exist, but parents have to be willing to put some money toward it. Programs to help those behind are so rampant that some people feel average and above average students are being ignored. And revamping curriculum is always happening - sometimes a good thing; sometimes not. A lot of time is wasted training teachers to teach something they already know how to.
photo
yeah-isaidit
Does not fear the funk
09:14 AM on 07/06/2010
I am amazed by the amount of folks that have seriously compromised reading, writing and speaking skills, and are yet able to function in their professional lives. Some of these computer whiz kids don't even bother to use spell check. Technology is a double edged sword in that it can facilitate learning or dumb you down if your not careful.
09:01 AM on 07/06/2010
Every country will need to change its education system in response to the digital age if we want to give our next generation a fair chance at the opportunities that are coming up to them. This plan seems to be quite a good plan to start with.
07:28 PM on 07/06/2010
Thanks so much for your comment Tara--check out more of what we are doing at www.joanganzcooneycenter.org. Would love to hear your thoughts!

Michael
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
starmanx
beam me up, Scotty
02:37 AM on 07/06/2010
Now if America would stop killing brown people in the Middle East, why they could afford better education for their kids. But, oh no, they'd rather give it to the money-drunk Industrial Military Complex so they can continue to murder people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bikelady1
Believe 1/2 of what u see, nothing of what u hear
10:44 AM on 07/06/2010
You are off subject.
01:44 AM on 07/06/2010
We've heard endless nonsense this past forty or so years about how to improve education. I'm a liberal by any modern political definition and I also believe that liberals have inadvertently destroyed education in this country. I experienced the transition myself from the old school no-nonsense teachers ( in my first grade we even even had a dunce cap placed threateningly on a shelf for all of us to see) to the laissez-faire attitude that took root in the 70's that "celebrates" everyone's individuality (we're all gifted!). It's been a disaster. Not that our culture could ever agree any longer on what 2+ 2 equals but, assuming we could, the answer to the problem is getting back to the hard work of the basics of mathematics and grammar that lay the foundation for later learning, throw out all the gadgetry, and, yes - horrors! - that would even include some memorization. Who knows? We could end up with a nation where people could find the state they live in on a map and know the country from which we declared independence!
11:09 AM on 07/06/2010
Fanned.
photo
WilliamBradford
Veritas vos Liberabit
02:22 PM on 07/06/2010
I agree wholeheartedly. The author identifies the main reason we have literacy problems - parents who are uninvolved and unconcerned about the academic success of their children - but fails to offer any real evidence that "digital" solutions have any relationship to the problem.

My kids are very active with video games, Internet, video-making, PowerPoint, and digital music. But this is not a substitute for reading a book. Although it is sometimes challenging, they spend a set amount of time per week reading a physical book. We don't need new techniques. We don't need better assessment. We don't need more "social media". We need kids to sit quietly and read.
07:30 PM on 07/06/2010
Thanks so much for your comment Bill--check out more of what we are doing on literacy and learnign for kids at www.joanganzcooneycenter.org. Would love to hear your thoughts!

Michael
01:19 AM on 07/06/2010
This is what we're doing in Australia -
www.deewr.gov.au/SCHOOLING/.../COMPUTERFUND/.../NationalSecondarySchoolComputerFundOverview.aspx - you are the guys that set the example for Public Education in the first place for the rest of the world - what's going on?
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
12:16 AM on 07/06/2010
And do you know what education experts are already out there that can lead in the digital age?

Teacher librarians. Or in some states they are called library media specialists.

I'm sure you've heard of them. They're those ones whose jobs are being eliminated with all of the budget cuts from the economic crisis.

Nationally there were an average of 1 librarian for every 900 students. The average in California was one librarian for every 5,000 students.

If you want digital literacy and someone to lead professional development, then don't get rid of your experts, then cry because it's not being taught.
12:34 AM on 07/06/2010
I would certainly agree with you on this one. At the university level, the first to broadly adopt the new technologies were indeed the librarians. Whenever I was looking for a new job, I would request that one of the interviewers was either the head of the libraries, or at the very least, the head of the technology libraries. They were the ones who understood data integration, not just accumulation.
11:35 AM on 07/06/2010
I might also add teachers need many hours of time without students to set up technology programs yet this fact is never considered when we attempt to innovate. Do you think people learn new instructional techniques through osmosis? Adults and children need ONGOING instruction. As a teacher, I worked 8 to 10 hrs per week after school for several months to get my computers and supplementary tech hardware set up. Whenever I had a problem, I had to wait weeks for tech support to schedule me because they had too many schools to service, leaving me unable to teach critical skills.
11:10 AM on 07/06/2010
Exactly. Whenever a budget fails in my town, technology is the first to get cut. Not the administrative support at central office, of course.
11:29 AM on 07/06/2010
It's all about MONEY, not teacher resistance to change. Cutting tech budgets, library positions, tech support positions and intense training has been one of the reasons schools are falling behind in the tech revolution. Teachers cannot integrate technology into classrooms without ongoing (not one-shot workshops) training, immediately available tech support persons (yes, there needs to be a person or 2 in every school, not one for 30 schools), and money for yearly upgrades if we are going to change.
12:13 AM on 07/06/2010
First, let me say that you are half right. thank you, Developing digital classroom work is essential. Several of your prescriptions are half wrong. You make two basic errors. Some of your facts are wrong. You need a proposal to deal with school budgets devastated by the economic crisis. In California the budgets have been cut over $2000 per child. There is no school reform, nor digital resources under such conditions. Second major problem. Like most of the foundation types, you fail to listen to teachers. If you do not involve teachers in developing your plan, it won't work. See more at
www.choosingdemocracy.blogspot.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SFpermatourist
01:15 AM on 07/06/2010
One always has to wonder what kind of long-term firsthand observations writers like Esther Wojicki have made on the very populations that are most at risk for failing to reach the 'reading to learn" stage by fourth grade. If they really do their homework they will discover that these students need the kind of home environment in which they would focus strictly on the types of websites that really help them learn, not just the semi-educational game sites, let alone websites for the popular, often violent games that are most familiar with students from at-risk backgrounds.

I am 100 percent in favor of using interactive software for some types of learning, and use of recreational and educational software primarily for rewards. But recent studies have proven that children and even highly literate adults can read printed text faster and absorb more information than from computer monitors.

And just as dcampbell points out, $2000 per student cannot afford much of anything, let alone DSL-ready workstations and technicians worth their salt that can keep a schools' internet running smoothely.
11:45 AM on 07/06/2010
Exactly. Also, read Gerald Bracey's analysis of 'A Nation at Risk' as propaganda, touted by Wojckci and many others as rational for drastic reform of the public education system.

http://www.america-tomorrow.com/bracey/EDDRA/EDDRA8.htm
09:04 AM on 07/07/2010
The effects of reading through back-lit screen have not been studied either. It could be a real financial boon for cash-strapped districts in that the entire year of texts could be loaded on a single source, as could much supplementary reading. I'll pursue it with my Neuro-Opthalmologist in October. He teaches at 2 Universities in Chicago as well as maintaining a private practice. He is superb!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drkazmd65
Mom Taught me - Question Everything - Thanks Mom!
11:51 PM on 07/05/2010
I learned reading by sitting on my mom's, my dad's, or my Grandpa/Grandma's laps while (at first) the read to me,... then later they tolerated my sounding my way through reading to them.

The fault isn't solely the schools' - although No Child Left Behind was a debacle. I know - I teach some of the students that resulted from that debacle in my First Semester Biology class each semester. It is hard enough to teach them science, and logical thinking, when they have a hard enough time forming a decent, complete, English sentence or forming a complete thought.

We don't need innovation in teaching kids how to read. We need somebody to actually sit down with them, read to them, listen to them, and spend time with them rather than just sitting them in front of the TV or letting them surf the internets.

Old school is needed, not innovation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CateManhattan
Common sense is way too uncommon.
03:13 AM on 07/06/2010
Absolutely -- reading should be an enjoyable activity learned from people who clearly like spending time helping the child gain skills.