Why Love Hurts

In the book, I use evidence from great classics of nineteenth-century fiction - Jane Austen in particular - to help measure the distance we have travelled from pre-modern modes of loving.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

In Why Love Hurts, my aim is to do for love what Marx did for commodities: to show that it is shaped and produced by concrete social relations; to show that love circulates in a marketplace of unequal competing actors; and to argue that some people - principally men - command greater capacity to define the terms in which they are loved than others.

Below this top-level ambition, I explore the ways in which we experience love and its pains - how our sense of self is increasingly bound up with, even constituted by it; how the possibility of infinite choice makes choosing and committing more, not less difficult; and how irony has become a self-protective layer, the mode par excellence of knowingly expressing modern love and insulating oneself from disappointments.

In the book, I use evidence from great classics of nineteenth-century fiction - Jane Austen in particular - to help measure the distance we have travelled from pre-modern modes of loving. And, equally tellingly, I make use of the frank admissions of contemporary interview subjects to shed light on love as it is experienced today.

Mr Knightley’s love for Emma

Why Love Hurts

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot