More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Faheem Younus

GET UPDATES FROM Faheem Younus

Pakistan's Blasphemy Knife

Posted: 11/22/10 03:29 PM ET

After the assassination of John F Kennedy in 1963, a white reporter asked Malcolm X in reference to civil rights movement, "You feel however, that we are making progress in this country?" Malcolm responded by saying, "No. You stick a knife into my back nine inches and pull it out six inches, that's not progress."

Such is the condition of the likes of Asiya Bibi, a Pakistani Christian woman accused of blaspheming Prophet Muhammad, facing the death penalty under section 295B of the Pakistani Penal Code. This is the same law that has subject Pakistani Ahmadi Muslims to relentless and systematic persecution since 1984. Hundreds of Pakistani citizens belonging to various minority sects have been killed over the past decade in the guise of blasphemy laws. As Shariah Courts continue to hand down decrees to kill, stone, and humiliate and the Blasphemy laws continue to impose death sentences as a punishment for freedom of expression, the situation with America's strongest ally remains dicey.

Just over the past six months Pakistan has twisted this "knife" among minorities nationwide. A mob burnt down the homes at the outskirts of Karachi when a Hindu boy drank water from a mosque cooler in July. During the same month, a Christian priest and his brother accused of blasphemy, were shot dead outside a Faisalabad court as they were returning from a hearing. In November, an Ahmadi family was pressured into exhuming the body of their relative buried in the Muslim graveyard after clerics threatened violence. And now a death sentence was awarded to a Christian, Asiya Bibi, as a punishment for blasphemy. Pope Benedict XVI has called upon the Pakistani authorities to release Asiya Bibi on Wednesday.

And as Amnesty International, Human Rights Commission and Jinnah Institute are rousing with condemnations against such human right abuses, Pakistani parliament and judiciary are silent. Governor Salman Taseer's passing remark to repeal these laws in 2009 was too little too late.

Which brings me to the million dollar question: Is Pakistan even committed to pulling the knife back? Not really, say many of the pundits. Some say the Blasphemy laws are Shariah-compliant based on a 1988 court decision. Some go as far to declare them constitutional (based on the 1993 Supreme Court of Pakistan decision). Regrettably, these laws now form the basis for the defamation of religions resolution currently pending before United Nations.

And the actions of politicians like Punjab Chief Minister, Shahbaz Sharif, support the dismal outlook painted above. Earlier this month he directed to withdraw all cases against clerics within 48 hours for protesting against alleged blasphemy incidents during the Musharraf government. And after the May 28th gruesome attacks on Ahmadis in Lahore, 13 religious leaders convened and publically declared the attacks to be a conspiracy in order to repeal blasphemy laws.

So where do we go from here?

Malcolm X answered this question in the same interview, "Even if you pull the knife all the way that's not progress. Progress is in healing the wounds below. You don't even admit the knife is there."

Reading the mainstream Urdu media and some of the comments online, it becomes clear as day that a majority of Pakistanis are either oblivious or ambivalent of this knife.

It took a revolution in America to remove the knife of racial prejudice, and even after half a century the wounds are still bleeding. Deplorably, as the world lets these human rights violations go unchecked, Pakistani minorities may have to live on the knife-edge for quite some time.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:07 PM on 11/23/2010
Faheem is very compelling in his condemnation of the Blasphemy laws. Pakistan has humiliated itself time and time again. Another example of religious bigotry and why the U.S. should still shine as a beacon for religious and secular freedom. The Ahmadyian community in Pakistan is sworn to peace... if only the rest of religions were the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaFemmeSASE
08:21 AM on 11/23/2010
Is this what they seceded from India for? Ali Jinnah's dream of a northwest nation for indian muslims has failed. Pakistan cannot secure its borders (nor does it really want to); it cannot prevent terrorist attacks from taking place within its borders; some regions in Pakistan are regressing into a primitive lifestyle and thinking; and to top it all off they have nuclear weapons. I shudder to think whats next for this country which is yet to decide whether to join the civilsed world or hang back with the brutes who terrorise and suppress people in the name of religion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Butterfly M
01:22 AM on 11/23/2010
I think the Blasphemy law should be removed conditionally. That is, the Christian Church should first give up the bigotry of their Nicene Creed then the Blasphemy law can be removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaFemmeSASE
08:10 AM on 11/23/2010
Does the Christian church stone people at present over the Nicene Creed? Nope
In present day, is there a christian theocracy threatening to kill those who do not confirm? -Nope
In this case, I fail to see your point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Butterfly M
09:26 AM on 11/23/2010
The Nicene Creed does create a religious war like condition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8jm3y6xy3g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dmwTuhmfEA
08:46 PM on 11/22/2010
This is horrifying, how in 2010 does such a thing occur? Why have we not heard about the others before?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
05:55 AM on 11/26/2010
only in Pakistan.....do not be surprised....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Qasim Rashid
Muslim Writers Guild of America
05:19 PM on 11/22/2010
It's mind numbing to me why anyone with any intelligence would support blasphemy legislation. It is repulsive to human rights, repulsive to common sense, and repulsive to the essence of Islam (which teaches that there is no compulsion in religion (HQ 2:257).

Recently Secretary Clinton commented on these laws. Hopefully that leads to more pressure on Pakistani leadership to actually provide equally for the common good of their citizens.