A Journalism Lesson from King Abdullah's University of Science & Technology

As they often do every weekend, a group of Saudi journalists gathered up at 'The Millennium' -- a local hangout which was once popular for being among the first 'Internet-Cafes' in the coastal city of Jeddah back in the late 1990's.

For this group of television, newspaper and magazine journalists the cafe is known more for its weekly sessions of sipping different types of traditional tea, gossiping and exchanging views on the topics of the hour as large TV screens beamed in the latest news, sports matches and music videos all night long.

However, on that particular Friday evening (October 2, 2009), it was quite clear that there was only one topic to be discussed; everybody in the Saudi Kingdom was talking about the first 'showdown' of its kind for a long time between the press and a senior member of the clergy.

It had been slightly over a week since the 'World leader-studded' inauguration of KAUST (King Abdullah's University of Science and Technology), a massive project which has gained international recognition for the contribution it has pledged to offer in the fields of science and research.

King Abdullah and world leaders at the opening ceremony of KAUST

The university is home for 'Shaheen' -- the world's 14th fastest computer, a six-sided virtual reality facility, 10 advanced nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers, a coastal and marine resources laboratory and bioengineering facilities with labs needs to study cell molecules for DNA sequencing.

However, for Sheikh Saad Al Shethry -- a member of the highly respected and influential 'Hayaat Kibbar Al Ulamaa' (Council of Senior Scholars) who has recently been appointed by the Saudi King himself, the 'co-ed' nature (i.e male and female students studying side by side) of the university was apparently too much to handle.

It should be noted that KAUST is the first university to allow such an environment in Saudi Arabia, as traditions in this conservative country meant that for many years, males and females had to study, work and socialize separately. Today women still cannot drive cars and must use a male driver to get around.

Al Shethry appeared on Al Majd, an 'Islamic' channel which allows only men to go on-air, and called for the separation of the two genders at the university, adding that this (mixing) is "not allowed as it could lead on to greater sins and vice." He gave sexual harassment, rape and blackmailing as examples of the evils that could occur in a mixed environment.

This may have very well gone unnoticed if it wasn't for Jamal Khashogji -- the editor of Al Watan, a national Saudi daily which has just celebrated entering its 10th year in publication.

On Tuesday, September 29, Khashogji wrote a column criticizing Sheikh Al Shethry for what he described as an attempt of "interrupting the progress of the nation." He also suggested that remarks such as the ones made by Al Shethry provided ammunition for the arsenal of those who reside in the 'Caves of Afghanistan' who have labeled the country's leadership and many of its citizens as 'infidels.'

Al Shethry quickly wrote to the newspaper saying that it had misquoted him, which triggered Al Watan to reply by posting the actual video of the Sheikh's statements, causing an unprecedented public reaction.

For days, I couldn't believe my eyes as I read several articles in the local Saudi press criticizing Al Shethry and giving religious arguments that 'mixing' between sexes is actually not forbidden in Islam, adding that that there are many incidents mentioned in texts from the days of The Prophet that proves this.

Others distinguished between the concepts of 'Ikhtilat' (mixing) and 'Khilwa' (a one-on-one situation).

Of course, this has caused other writers to claim that this was actually an 'orchestrated' attack by what the Saudi society defines as the 'Liberal Writers.' A columnist in Al Watan itself even wrote describing what happened as 'a liberal feast' and said he would have preferred his editor in chief (Khashogji) didn't criticize the Sheikh in the way he did.

Back at the 'Millennium Cafe', the debate took much greater depth, "For God's sake, KAUST is a place of academia ... a beacon of knowledge, how could someone equate it to a bedroom?", one journalist said.

Others argued that it's about time somebody realized the amount of waste of building two sections of everything: One for males and another for females.

The debate reached its climax when one of the journalists received a text message on his mobile phone, it turned to be a joke so he laughed and read it out:

"Quick, make use of the exceptional freedom of speech season ... last chance to criticize the religious establishment and discount on punishments is tonight."

Everyone at the table laughed though they feared the subliminal message behind this joke is true, for it is well-known that Clerics and the Saudi religious police have long benefited from unmatched government support.

Yet, to everybody's astonishment only two days later (Sunday, October 4) the news broke that Al Shithry had resigned from the Council (or was asked to resign according to another version).

I quickly thought to myself that KAUST could actually brag that on its first week it gave a great lesson in accountability and research before making statements, particularly if you are an authoritative figure.

This also could be looked at as a valuable lesson for Saudi journalists who often shy away from confronting sensitive social matters; the lesson is of course very basic, had Al Watan's article not been properly documented and backed by evidence, this whole issue would have been dismissed and it could have been the editor who would have been asked to resign.

Yes, you could say that journalism is also a science.

 

Follow Faisal J. Abbas on Twitter: www.twitter.com/faisal_abbas

Comments

[Rog49Thomas]

10:05 AM on 10/13/2009

The Imam of the Masjid AlHaram - a not insignific­ant religious spokesman in Saudi - has publicly come out in support of KAUST as have several other religious leaders.

And by and large the online readers' comments posted have supported KAUST.

Every nation has its Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell.

[Rog49Thomas]

10:22 AM on 10/13/2009

Online readers' comments = comments by Saudi readers to the article about Shathri's dismissal.

[PlaceboStudman]

12:24 PM on 10/12/2009

Kudos to Al Watan for their great reporting and head on confrontat­ion of this social taboo.

It always puzzled me how a religion that was promoted and spread by a woman, Aisha, Mohammed's wife, became so paralyzinl­y threatened by the female gender.

I've also heard that many Muslim men find the segregatio­n somewhat offensive, because it is seen as an affront to their self control. As if the Mulahs and those who make the laws believe that all men who see the exposed flesh of a woman will become sexually aggressive­.

Then again, this belief is not unique to Islam, there is quite a bit of that belief in Christiani­ty as well

So I guess there really are more similariti­es than difference­s between Islam and Christiani­ty

[MosheDayanHero]

12:59 PM on 10/12/2009

Certainly there are significan­t similariti­es between all three religions" of the Book." Considerin­g how much Islam was influenced by the two preceding Abrahameic religions.
But the other two religious traditions were able to achieve significan­t separation ( reconcilia­tion?) between religious dogma and objective reality ( scienfic thought).
Islamic culture has been far,far less successful in producing such separation­.
Hence, the serious lack of progress in scientific developmen­t.

[SelenicMagick]

01:47 PM on 10/12/2009

You need to remember that in the early days of both Judaism and in the early days of Christiani­ty there was also not a lot of scientific progress. In point of fact in both cases there were people whose lives were ended prematurel­y purely and simply because of their scientific endeavors.

Islam is, relatively speaking, a YOUNG religion. It is to be expected that the same process that both Judaism and Christiani­ty went through in their relative infancy will also be something which it is necessary for Islam as well. To condemn other religions for the same things that both Christiani­ty and Judaism are guilty of is hypocrisy at its finest.

[Rog49Thomas]

10:21 AM on 10/13/2009

During the Middle Ages, there was a scientific golden age in the Islamic World. Much of which was transmitte­d to the West (along with the canons of Greek civilizati­on).

The lack of serious progress in scientific developmen­t since then may be more related to economic factors than presumed defects in religion. One would also have to factor in the effects of both foreign and domestic political factors as well.

It will be interestin­g to see what folks from the "economic primacy is based on inherent characteri­stics of a society's religion/p­hilosophy" say when India and China are the world economic and scientific powers.

Will that mean that the Abrahamic God is a lesser power than Shiva?

And that the good old Confucian work ethic is superior to the Protestant or Jewish one?

That respect for elders (sorry I don't think "sages" will count) is the cause.

[ziploked]

12:18 PM on 10/12/2009

As an American, the Arab notion of separation of the sexes (as stated, it isn't explicitly stated in Islam) is difficult to understand­, or accept. Our Western ideas of equality have had to evolve on their own, yet we still face issues concerning the marginaliz­ation of our own people based or race, religion, or sex in the U.S., and many other Western nations, too. To point out the Middle East as backward in that regard would be slightly hypocritic­al.

I am glad to see social progress for women slowly happening in The Kingdom. Hopefully, progressiv­e changes there will result in more acceptance and understand­ing between our two cultures.