More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Father Alberto Cutie

GET UPDATES FROM Father Alberto Cutie
 

Bill O'Reilly and His Particular Interest In Hell

Posted: 04/29/11 01:41 PM ET

I don't believe anyone needs to be a theologian to discuss issues like heaven, hell and other fascinating religious topics. The fact is that most of us have some sort of "religious" upbringing, or at least, a few ideas about theology that come from all kinds of sources from religion class to pop-culture. In any case, I think we can all agree that religion is one of the most fascinating and controversial subjects to discuss; apart from politics.

But, I do have to admit that I was bit surprised with Bill O'Reilly in the last few days commenting and getting fired up about Time Magazine's cover article in reference to Pastor Rob Bell's new controversial book entitled: Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived. The fundamental questions O'Reilly debated on his program were: Why we should believe that hell exists and who should be there? O'Reilly then went on to say that the Roman Catholic Church -- which he called "my church" -- does not really teach that people of other faiths and/or denominations, like Gandhi, would be excluded from heaven.

I beg to differ. While it is true that the Catechism of the Catholic Church (promulgated in 1992 by Pope John Paul II) does speak of salvation outside the church, the official Church teaching continues to insist that there is only one true church and anyone who does not believe what it teaches and is not in a state of "sanctifying grace" and dies, is in fact, in danger of going to hell. In the Church's official teaching, this includes people who use any form of contraception, in-vitro fertilization, women who get their tubes tied (even after having several children), men who get vasectomies, people who are re-married and have not received a church annulment, homosexuals who live in monogamous and committed relationships, etc. etc. etc. These -- and so many other things -- are all considered "mortal sins" and dying with mortal sin in your soul means eternal damnation. That is, in fact, still what the Roman Catholic Church teaches. I would ask O'Reilly: Isn't that sending a whole lot of people to hell? You don't have to be Hitler or Stalin to be headed for hell in Bill's religious denomination.

What was perhaps most troubling about Bill O'Reilly's theological reflections is that he basically claimed that without hell the basis of the Judeo-Christian system falls apart. In other words, his fundamental premise was that if you are not afraid of hell, you are going to do whatever you want. So basically, it is "fear" that motivates people to do good and avoid evil. O'Reilly may have learned that in the third grade and it may have worked for him then, but I believe that true and authentic faith should motivate us to love -- never to fear.

As controversial as the "no hell" or "yes hell" topic is, I thought the most entertaining, yet a bit troubling thing, was to watch O'Reilly the theologian give us his reasoning for why hell is so important. The eternal and unconditional mercy and love of God was not mentioned once. And that was theologically very scary!

Debate video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rlrx5fHnky4

 
 
 

Follow Father Alberto Cutie on Twitter: www.twitter.com/padrealberto

 
 
  • Comments
  • 145
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
herbertpop
10:04 AM on 06/14/2011
I agree!
photo
mannapat
Truthiness shines a light.
11:28 AM on 05/06/2011
O'Reilly's view of hell is getting caught.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
God is a Parent, not an abuser.
02:05 PM on 05/07/2011
You mean he won't do it live?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titus
Bourbon, no ice
10:07 AM on 05/06/2011
Thanks Padre. I never thought Pascal's wager was the right reason for being a believer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
07:50 AM on 05/06/2011
Ancient religions, with their threats of hell and the eternal reward of heaven as the carrot, were designed to entrain human behavior through EXtrinsic motivations, which is how we manipulate children to this day. Adults go inside themselves, discover the truth of what they feel, know and believe, and then learn to relate to life through these INtrinsic drivers. Fear of punishment is the worst reason I can imagine to instruct me how to behave. The best reason is because in my heart I know it's the right thing to do.
01:19 PM on 05/06/2011
A code of morality without a threat of torture? Impossible.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Confuso
Australian/American Broadcast veteran...
05:26 PM on 05/05/2011
As a recovering Catholic (whose parish priest is currently incarcerated and has been de-frocked), I distinctly remember being told time and again that only Catholics will go to Heave. Of course, I was also advised that kissing a girl would have dire, unmentionable consequences. To me, O'Rielly and Hannity are obvious, transparent products of a northeastern catholic upbringing and it's associated guilt.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
02:53 PM on 05/05/2011
I wish I knew what I'd done with my copy of "Yes, Virginia, There Is Right and Wrong."

Fear of punishment is one of the lowest levels of moral, ethical behaviour. Higher levels are seeking reward, going for the warm fuzzy feeling, and, at the top, doing the right thing just because it logically is the right thing to do.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
02:50 PM on 05/05/2011
I have noticed that some 'religionists' (as opposed to theists) see the function of religion as a governor (in the automotive sense) to the actions of individuals. Their social theory appears to be that without overt oppression by religion we'd all be starring in 'Girls Gone Wild' videos or throwing car batteries through storefront windows to steal TV sets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
02:14 PM on 05/05/2011
I find Christianity to be an interesting system in which to place belief. It is similar to many religions that have the same mythological structure-- a child of the "true" God born to a virgin, spreading the word of love throughout his life, being executed for his beliefs and rising from the dead 3 days after. This is the 3rd major religion to use this story in the last 3500 years.
My religion believes that the Goddess, who not only created the world but is the Earth, wants us to strive to be the best people we can be in intention and deed. We are rewarded with peace and fulfillment in this life. Bad actions and intentions rebound on us with increased intensity, causing more grief to us than they ever could to the person the original bad intentions/actions were directed at.
We respect life. We respect nature, and realize that we are part of a greater scheme of interaction. We each have our personal inner problems to overcome, and how we work at overcoming them is a mirror to our progress on a spiritual level. Nature is our sanctuary, and respect and love our mantras.

Scaring people into belief is not true belief. Instilling fear is not Godlike. Our dieties should radiate love and acceptance rather than fear and exclusion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:52 AM on 05/05/2011
I was raised in a Catholic household and I took seriously my decision to leave the church and my later rejection of all mystical beliefs. I'm frequently appalled at the lack of knowledge particularly exhibited by professed Catholics, who seem to have a large number of bigots.

The official Catholic church doctrine shares many attributes with both orthodox Judaism and Islam in terms of rules, rituals, and judgments. The official church bears little resemblance to the church my mom has attended and given money to for the past 80 years.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
11:50 PM on 05/04/2011
Religion is somewhat perplexing to me.......

Perhaps Mr. O'Reilly can explain his take on this biblical quote?

"It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."

That passage would scare the "hell" out of me, were I in his position.

Either that or he has somebody out there building a really big needle, and someone else breeding miniature camels.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
02:43 PM on 05/05/2011
I recently read an interesting interpretation of that odd-sounding analogy.

There was apparently a side gate in the defensive wall of Jerusalem called the "Eye of the Needle". Gates in a thick fortress walls were often narrow zigzag tunnel-like passages, and this one was tight, designed for foot traffic. You could force a camel through it, but only if it were a rather patient and agreeable camel and completely unloaded of baggage. As the rich man would also have to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titus
Bourbon, no ice
10:08 AM on 05/06/2011
Interesting. Where did you find that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
signgrrl
typeface geek
11:25 AM on 05/07/2011
or: 1) he doesn't consider himself "rich"
2) he doesn't think it'll apply to him because he is "special"
photo
PublicCitizen21044
The truth will set you free!
09:21 PM on 05/04/2011
What was perhaps most troubling about Bill O'Reilly's theological reflections is that he basically claimed that without hell the basis of the Judeo-Christian system falls apart. In other words, his fundamental premise was that if you are not afraid of hell, you are going to do whatever you want. So basically, it is "fear" that motivates people to do good and avoid evil. O'Reilly may have learned that in the third grade and it may have worked for him then, but I believe that true and authentic faith should motivate us to love -- never to fear.

As controversial as the "no hell" or "yes hell" topic is, I thought the most entertaining, yet a bit troubling thing, was to watch O'Reilly the theologian give us his reasoning for why hell is so important. The eternal and unconditional mercy and love of God was not mentioned once. And that was theologically very scary! As you should. Be Afraid,Be VERY AFRAID!
05:24 AM on 05/05/2011
Please explain my position as a former born again Christian PublicCitizen21044,

What reason is there to believe if you have a seemingly more fulfilling and fruitful life without religion? The only reason I can see is that if I don't believe it, God places me in torture me for eternity. What kind of a belief is that? I have to be fearful or eternal punishment and not question OR ELSE......

What reason is there? Judeo Christian systems do fall apart without hell.
photo
PublicCitizen21044
The truth will set you free!
08:37 AM on 05/05/2011
Doodie Pants I am not sure what you are asking but my response was meant to ridicule Mr. O'Reilly for proselytizing on his FoxNews show. If this is Mr. O'Reilly's attempt at demonstrating that one can mix/combine religion and politics in a meaningful and substantial way, I think it is scary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
07:56 AM on 05/06/2011
That's indeed the absurdity - and the sadism - embedded in our ancient religions. We never get to grow up, as a species we remain hopelessly flawed and are in need of constant salvation, and the church never goes out of business because new sinners are born every day who will need weekly redeeming...for a price.
08:26 PM on 05/03/2011
In fairness its does say, (In DANGER Of Going To Hell) But I always loved the idea that someone living in say Bhutan in lets say the 1920s who didn't even know that there was another VILLAGE over the other side of the mountains let alone a whole WORLD could be consigned straight to hell for all eternity for not knowing it.
That's one HELL of a of a sense of humour there God!
Thank, er (Goddess?) that I dont believe in anything THAT patently absurd and lacking in ANY form of charity or compassion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
02:14 PM on 05/05/2011
Blessed be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:40 PM on 05/05/2011
I wonder about our own arrogance of thinking that the creator of the universe subscribes to a particular, man-made religious structure. Maybe the creator appeared to the native Americans in many forms. Why would someone who could create a universe be limited to the structure of a fallible human mind?
07:37 PM on 05/03/2011
Maybe he is worried about going to hell. And simply projecting his fears unto the
world.
Also Tom the cat, in one of the Tom & Jerry clips, is having a nightmare about going
to hell. - In other words, such fears of others can be taken very easy, they can even be
fun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGcAQtFpeDM&feature=related
photo
TitaniumAvatar
Sinister yet Dexterous
04:59 PM on 05/03/2011
Where do you want to go?

Hell for the company.

Heaven for the scenery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lemeritus
Been there, done that, lived to tell
04:55 PM on 05/03/2011
"So basically, it is 'fear' that motivates people to do good and avoid evil. O'Reilly may have learned that in the third grade and it may have worked for him then, but I believe that true and authentic faith should motivate us to love -- never to fear."

I think this may be the paramount difference between all universal ideologies -- certainly between conservatives and liberals.
photo
pciorlandosales
have come to chew bubble gum and kick ash
09:10 PM on 05/04/2011
but you do not need faith to be compassionate and to love and you do not need fear to keep you from doing evil :) when Jesus was on the cross and said his final words he said "my lord my lord why has tho forsaken me?" what right did he have to question God the Creator, if he profisized his demise to so many, why would he question it all in the end? he was not like any mortal man he was the son of God?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
02:18 PM on 05/05/2011
Those words attributed to him were written hundreds of years later. Imagine playing gosspip in the third grade. Did the original message resemble the initial message after being interpreted through 25 eight year olds? How can you expect the initial message of Jesus be intact after hundreds of oral retellings and embellishments and hundreds of translations?
01:25 PM on 05/06/2011
Moral and well acting non Christians pretty much blow that Idea away. The entire theology is useless.