iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Frances Beinecke

GET UPDATES FROM Frances Beinecke
 

More Research Needed to Understand Health Risks of Fracking

Posted: 10/05/2012 12:30 pm

A few weeks ago I went to Linda and David Headley's farm in Smithville, Pennsylvania to talk about what it's like to live next door to natural gas drilling. The Headley's house was packed with people who have drill pads and wastewater pits in their yards. They described seeing their tap water turn brown, smelling gasoline and kerosene in the air, and feeling their houses shake day and night when wells are fracked.

But their most pressing concern was what fracking was doing to their health. Many residents said they suffered migraines, dizziness, and asthma, and they believe the drill pads have something to do with it.

One woman showed a video of her young grandson who lay sleeping, but his whole body twitched. She said the boy had never experienced neurological problems until two wells and a large compressor station were installed near their home.

I am not a doctor or researcher. I do not know if all of these medical conditions are connected to natural gas development. But I do know that people need answers and more information about what fracking may be doing to their health.

The trouble is there isn't much information to share. While people have been concerned about fracking's impact on health and the environment for years, very few studies have been done.

2012-10-05-_DSC0609.jpg
Photo credit: Melanie Blanding

One of the biggest challenges is simply finding out what natural gas companies are pumping into the air and water. Fracking is exempt from many federal requirements to monitor air and water pollution, and gas companies don't do much voluntary reporting. In addition, most states do not ask energy companies to identify the fracking chemicals they pump into the earth or dump into wastewater pits sitting in people's backyards, and only six states call on companies to share that information with doctors and nurses treating patients living next to fracking operations. A new law in Pennsylvania requires health care professionals to sign a confidentiality agreement before companies divulge their fracking chemicals. If doctors pass that information to their patients, they could be sued.

Industry opposition and lax standards have limited the amount of data we have. But the data that do exist strongly suggests that fracking poses risks to public health and the environment.

There is significant evidence, for instance, that fracking operations release air pollutants linked to health problems. One study analyzed air pollution levels close to well sites during the fracking process. Researchers concluded that the types and levels of contaminants measured in the air could create an increased risk for respiratory illness, neurological conditions, and cancer.

Fracking can also contaminate water by introducing chemicals and stirring up naturally occurring toxic metals. NRDC reviewed water quality data from 25 families living next to fracking operations in five different states. We found 44 contaminants in the water -- including benzene, ethyl benzene, and arsenic, which are linked to elevated cancer risk. Most of the contaminants were found in levels below federal drinking water standards, but benzene exceeded the standard in 5 of 25 wells, the ethyl benzene in 3 of the wells, and arsenic in 1. Since these contaminants have multiple potential sources, however, without pre-drilling water monitoring we cannot know whether they were present in the water before fracking, and if so, at what levels...

These studies are a start, but we need more data and more analysis because we must prevent pollution that can harm human health and the environment. Communities have a right to know what they are exposed to and how best to protect themselves and their families.

I sensed a lot of fear in the communities I visited in Pennsylvania, and it reminded me of when I served on the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, and people in Louisiana and Mississippi told me how scared they were for the health of their families. They knew they had been exposed to oil and to chemicals used in the dispersants, but they didn't know if that exposure would be harmful or how to keep their families safe.

Residents of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Colorado, North Dakota, and the 25 other fracking states have similar questions, and they deserve answers. In order to provide them, we need stronger federal and state standards to require mandatory disclosure of all chemicals used in fracking and increased air and water monitoring before and after fracking. Officials should also require and ensure companies prevent pollution in the first place.

We also need government agencies to fast-track more research. No one should have to live next to a frack pad when it might be impairing their health and the health of their loved ones.

This post originally appeared on NRDC's Switchboard blog.

 
FOLLOW GREEN
A few weeks ago I went to Linda and David Headley's farm in Smithville, Pennsylvania to talk about what it's like to live next door to natural gas drilling. The Headley's house was packed with people ...
A few weeks ago I went to Linda and David Headley's farm in Smithville, Pennsylvania to talk about what it's like to live next door to natural gas drilling. The Headley's house was packed with people ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:08 PM on 10/09/2012
So, the Government agencies have allowed these fracking companies to keep the chemicals used, secret, but the author is calling for Government agencies to do ....... what??????
photo
werenotademocracy
Art. 4, Sec. 4,... you slept through that part?
11:42 PM on 10/07/2012
Everybody should watch Fox's special about the EPA tonight. The fracking information (translate “fraud”) exposed is priceless. The classic fracking video showing methane being ignited in the water system – that you all have swallowed as real without even investigating the facts -- is totally FAKE! They hooked up a hose to the ‘methane vent’ commonly found on many wells and lit THAT on fire. It's all FAKE!!! What a bunch of desperate liars in the green movement! I lived in LA in the 60's when you couldn't see 1/4 mile to the Altadena hills. We’ve cleaned up our air. Burning rivers no longer exist. Nixon’s EPA did a great job in the early years, but today's EPA is out of control. Banning DDT is responsible for several million deaths from malaria and some guy runs around the country EATING DDT with NO ill effects. The 70's saw the beginning of theatrical SCARE tactics on the part of the EPA and the “Green movement”. Much of the information is designed to scare you into submission to the Fed. Acid rain is gone. Smog is under acceptable levels all over the U.S. But, now the EPA is trying to control (and TAX) Carbon Monoxide, the gas you exhale every time you breathe. If they have their way, in 20 years you’ll be feeling guilty for breathing!
photo
werenotademocracy
Art. 4, Sec. 4,... you slept through that part?
10:15 PM on 10/07/2012
Everybody better watch Fox's special about the EPA. The fracking information (fraud) exposed is priceless. The classic fracking video showing methane in the water system is totally fake. They hooked up a hose to the methane vent commonly found on many wells. It's all FAKE!!! I lived in LA in the 60's when you couldn't see 1/4 mile to the Altadena hills. Yes, there has been some great strides in cleaning up the environment, but today's EPA is out of control. Banning DDT has been responsible for several million deaths from malaria. The 70's saw the beginning of SCARE tactics on the part of the EPA and the Green movement. Much of the information is designed to scare you into submission. Acid rain is gone. Smog is generally under acceptable levels. But, now the EPA is trying to control (and TAX) the gas you exhale every time you breathe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
10:34 PM on 10/06/2012
When legislators write laws that don't require a DR tell you what is in the chemical composites that go into fracking water shot into the ground water table Americans should be aware it is some nasty chemicals that can leach into the water table. This is a trend to keep Americans as much in the dark about how the process works and what the agents can do to harm the public's water table in wells, the natural gas companies are lobbying strongly to put in place safety outlets for them should they cause spills or accidents!
jhNY
Mercy.
02:09 PM on 10/06/2012
The corruption of academic science by powerful interests goes on unabated. First thanks to your practical ownership of politics,, make the process to be studied opaque legislatively and regulatorily, then hire a compliant school to study what you give them, which is less than all you might have, then, watch, in return for a huge grant that is but a sliver of the week's profits, as the study finds you've done no wrong, and never could, evidence to the contrary under-considered and dismissed, if considered at all.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
06:16 AM on 10/06/2012
I typically think the NRDC is a joke, frankly, after reading hundreds of statements coming from their personnel. However, this one is well written, and correct (of course, this is coming from the NRDC boss herself - hard to find good help nowadays) - let's do the research. Let's do pre-drill testing, let's do air monitoring, let's get ALL states and the Feds to pass laws that force companies to tell us just what exactly they are pumping into the ground. That's fair and logical. It will also spur what America is known (or used to be known) for: Innovation. New techniques, "greener" chemicals, air scrubbers on motors that, with some scaling, could be used on new coal plants, etc. Let's do the science and the engineering - not just spout rhetoric.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
08:18 PM on 10/06/2012
Thanks for that post. With regulation and enforcement, those who do things right do not have to suffer for the crimes of others. I have seen a report on one alternate fracking approach, and no doubt the technologies can be improved if the desire to do so is there.  Waterless Fracking Technology May Be Used at New York Shale Gas Site
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
07:42 PM on 10/05/2012
Safe and efficient.
A completely closed system with automated remote operations

GASFRAC's proprietary LPG process is designed for maximum safety. Our pressurized, closed system ensures the process is completely controlled and that the LPG gel maintains its fluid state—with zero exposure to oxygen—preventing vapour build-up.

The entire fracturing system is completely computerized, allowing safer conditions and less hazardous fieldwork. This enables our personnel to conduct pumping operations outside of the safe zone during the actual stimulation process.

The monitoring systems identify any gas accumulations and if necessary, shutdown systems, with backups, are able to completely isolate potentially released LPG.

Cameras, both visual and thermal, are constantly monitoring all pressurized lines and equipment throughout the entirety of the stimulation process, from set-up to completion. In conjunction, the usage of pressure transducers for monitoring unanticipated changes in pressures throughout the system, provide an even greater assurance in safety
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rockymtngma
Science rocks!
10:24 PM on 10/05/2012
Where'd you get this remarkable piece of propaganda?

Unfortunately, once fracking fluid gets to the targeted stratum, the system is no longer closed. Fracking fluid can then migrate into other, permeable rock layers, including layers where there are aquafers -- from which we might get something like well water. I can't imagine gel would be a whole lot different; unless it is totally chemically inert/stable, it could still pollute water sources.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
06:18 AM on 10/06/2012
Think about that statement - if the oil and gas in the rock could migrate that easily, why would their still be oil and gas in the rock to drill for? It's not as simple-simon as you make it out to be - every study out there has shwon that any contamination there is has been caused by poor cement, not fracturing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweaver
Scientist, businessman, semi-retired
07:02 PM on 10/05/2012
Environmental activists frequently claim or hint at serious health problems arising from fracking. However, there is no evidence to show that these problems occur among workers whose exposure to the chemicals is a great deal higher. The largest truth from this issue is the truth that fund-raising programs based on hypothetical medical problems are very effective when an individual "victim" is profiled.
12:19 AM on 10/06/2012
So, you don't know what is killing them? Or you don't care?
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
06:19 AM on 10/06/2012
No one has died from fracturing. No one. Not one case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
06:17 PM on 10/05/2012
Great article
oil patch
if you voted obama, you are to blame
06:05 PM on 10/05/2012
http://www.hydraulicfracturing.com/Fracturing-Ingredients/Pages/information.aspx

there ya go, you wanted to know what is in frac fluids. not really a secret....the secret is in how you combine them and at what concentrations....it's like sweet tea...everyone uses the same ingredients but my momma's is the best because her methods