I'm relieved that our country's taken a first step in getting a grip on health insurance for all, but we're sunk unless we can now get a grip on our health. With diet implicated in much of our nation's disease burden, it makes a lot of sense to reverse the forces that have turned food itself into a national health threat.
That's why I'm thrilled today, March 31, to take part in the launch of a national campaign to retire Ronald McDonald, who for almost fifty years has enticed youngsters into eating habits with horrific life-long consequences.
Did you know that one in three American children is now predicted to be stricken with diabetes?
Corporate Accountability International, a global leader in securing the first global public health treaty--the 2005 Global Tobacco Treaty--is today announcing its campaign to halt marketing unhealthy food to children at a press conference in New York City.
McDonald's targets the most vulnerable among us- our kids. We need to stand up for them and target McDonald's- arguably the company most active in marketing unhealthy food directly to children.
I hope you'll go now to Retire Ronald and stand up for kids and help end these practices. Our kids need us. At the press event, I'll be with my three-year old granddaughter, Josephine, as a reminder of what's at stake.
Here's my statement:
We know Ronald McDonald is everywhere. By 1998, almost 89 percent of kids younger than eight were visiting McDonald's at least once a month. And since, the company has said its goal is 100 percent, and has boasted to its shareholders about "[a] slew of new promotions...targeted at kids as young as two." Former Vice President of Marketing R.J. Milano does not mince words. He's said: "I'm going to own every kid transaction out there."
Why is this a problem? Because it's not about reaching adults, whom we trust to make decisions -- good or bad -- for their bodies.
Ronald is about targeting kids.
Why kids? For starters, kids under twelve command up to $50 billion in direct purchasing power, and influence a total of $670 billion in family purchases. McDonald's knows that the surest way to parents' wallets is through their children's stomachs.
The more cynical answer is that kids are the perfect advertising audience: Very young children don't even know they're being marketed to. Plus, brand loyalties created in childhood persist into adulthood.
Children aren't just little adults. As their minds are still forming, they are more impressionable than adults; and therefore more vulnerable to marketers' manipulation. Children under the age of eight simply cannot grasp Ronald's persuasive intent.
The American Academy of Pediatrics is clear: "Advertising directed toward children is inherently deceptive and exploits children under eight years of age."
McDonald's also works to get around "gatekeepers," the term executives use for parents and educators who are just trying to make healthy choices for kids. A good example of Ronald's going around parents and marketing directly to their kids is the "McSpellit Club" in which McDonald's rewards children with free burgers and Chicken McNuggets for meeting educational goals. In one Michigan elementary school McDonald's installed a mural of Ronald as well as a "Mini McDonald's" restaurant where students could redeem academic achievement awards for their favorite fast food.
Ronald also tries to win the trust of gatekeepers through corporate responsibility programs like "Go Active! with Ronald McDonald," which are really just marketing by another name.
So that's where we are today: Parents can watch out for their kids. They can monitor their television use. They can monitor what they read and who they hang out with. But McDonald's marketing team continues its clever strategies to get around parents who are just trying to do their job. That's not right.
How pervasive is McDonald's striped marketing arm? Let me give you an example:
I was talking with my 3-year old granddaughter Josephine yesterday and I asked her:
"Do you know how McDonald's gets kids to eat unhealthy foods?"
Her answer?
"Toys."
It's true. In fact, McDonald's is one of the biggest toy distributors in the world.
Surprised, I asked her whether she'd ever been to a Mcdonald's.
She hadn't.
"Then how did you know?", I asked.
She just pointed to her head.
If a three-year old child who's never been to McDonald's can figure it out, then it should be pretty clear to the rest of us. Enough is enough. It's time to retire Ronald.
Frances Moore Lappe is the author of Getting a Grip 2: Clarity, Creativity and Courage for the World We Really Want (March 2010) and 17 other books, beginning with the three-million copy Diet for a Small Planet. Fellow Huffington Post Blogger and Small Planet Institute Senior Writer Stefan Sirucek contributed editorial support. Find more on living democracy at the Small Planet Institute.
Follow Frances Moore Lappe on Twitter: www.twitter.com/fmlappe
Christina Pirello: How Can Paula Deen Sleep at Night?
Tom Venuto: The Double-Edged Sword of "Healthy Fast Food"
http://living.health.com/2009/02/19/americas-healthiest-fast-food-restaurants/5/
"#8 McDonald’s
14,000 locations nationwide
Among the big burger-based chains, McDonald’s is leading the way in overhauling its menu to offer more heart- and waist-friendly fare. Take the Happy Meals, which you can order with a side of apple dippers (with low-fat caramel) instead of fries and low-fat milk or fruit juice instead of soda. (Now the trick is just getting your kid to go for them!) And if you’ve gotta have fries, McDonald’s are made in a healthy canola-blend oil and come in at just 230 calories for a small.
"
Stop attacking enterprise. Educate people.
Ronald is only helping the childhood obesity epidemic. His time is up!
There’s an interesting post over at the Health Journal Club that makes the case that people should just not eat anything that wasn’t a food 100 years ago. Gets rid of the aspartame, bleached GM flour, high fructose corn syrup garbage they try to pass off as food these days. If interested you can read on it here,
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/2010/01/100-year-diet.html
Should Ronald McDonald be Fired?
http://www.healthhabits.ca/2010/03/31/should-ronald-mcdonald-be-fired/
> they are more impressionable than adults; and therefore more
> vulnerable to marketers' manipulation.
Isn't the same true of using a three-year old as a prop at a rally for a cause she can't understand?
If folks are going to get heated about hypocrisy, a good place to look would be McDonald's so-called "corporate responsibility." Teach kids (read: find a clever new way to market to them behind their parents' backs) about a healthy lifestyle on the one hand, sell them fatty burgers and fries on the other. The prop there is an epidemic of obesity, diabetes, and heart conditions.
1) Hypocrisy in battling hypocrisy is no excuse. Kids shouldn't be props...think of toddlers holding Tea Party signs or Trig Palin being toted around. If the author believes her granddaughter understands McDonald's marketing, she'd have to abandon the primary argument against marketing to children -- that they're too young to understand intent.
2) On RetireRonald.org, there's a cartoon of Ronald McDonald, Joe Camel, the Marlboro Man and Spuds McKenzie. As they say on Sesame Street, one of these things is not like the others. Three -- good riddance -- were for products illegal for children, unlike Ronald McDonald.
3) RetireRonald.org has a banner reading "Hey Kids, This Isn't Advertising." Of course it is -- it's promotion for a point of view. Simple media literacy: advertising isn't just for products.
Most important, this is an ineffectual, self-absorbed effort, far more about CAI's marketing than making a difference. This is like politicians who reduce complex issues to a single person -- Ronald Reagan's Cadillac-driving "Welfare Queen" -- because it's too hard to deal with the systemic issues. Schools, communities, food subsidies, lifestyles, portion sizes, and...yes...marketing are all components. Going after one marketing practice (among many) of one chain (among many) of one industry (among many) of one component (among many) suggests lack of seriousness.
See also the interesting (though overlong) letter to the WaPo about this campaign ignoring good works of the Ronald McDonald Houses.