More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Francesca Vietor

GET UPDATES FROM Francesca Vietor
 

Gov. Brown, Please Regulate Flame Retardants and Toxic Chemicals, For Our Children's Sake!

Posted: 08/01/11 03:04 PM ET

Remember that devil's dilemma, "Would you rather freeze to death or burn to death"? Now it seems that in an attempt to minimize death by burning, California lawmakers have inadvertently created a third option: slow death by chemical poisoning. No choice about it this time.

California law requires that chemical fire retardants be added not only to your living room sofa, chairs and electronics, but also to children's products like car seats, changing pads, gymnastics mats and nursing pillows for breastfeeding infants. Despite California being the only jurisdiction that requires it, most major furniture manufacturers, whether located here or abroad, add fire retardants to any furniture sold in the United States. These flame retardants are associated with lower IQs, undescended testicles in infants, lower birth weights, reduced fertility, hormone disruption, increased risks of cancer, liver and thyroid toxicity and genetic mutations.

The harmful effects of flame retardants were first documented in the late 1970s. We have since learned that these chemicals are unstable, migrating from furniture and baby products through house dust. A 2008 study by the Environmental Working Group showed that toddlers typically have three times the levels of flame retardants in their blood as their mothers -- not surprising given that small children spend a lot of time on the floor, where dust accumulates, and constantly put their hands in their mouths.

But here is the ultimate irony: after decades of tough California flame retardant laws, there is no evidence that they actually save lives. Rather, there is heightened concern that burning these chemicals may increase cancer risk to the firefighters who inhale smoke laden with these elevated levels of toxins. Firefighters, public health officials, doctors, furniture manufacturers and even sewage treatment agencies -- concerned that the flame retardants easily migrate from furniture into house dust, which, through house cleaning and other actions, is washed down the drain and into sewer systems-- are now calling for a change in California standards to provide equivalent fire safety alternatives that do not require the use of toxic chemicals.

Although many have tried to change this troubling situation in California, the legislature has failed to respond. Partisan politics and lobbying by special-interest trade associations like the American Chemistry Council and the Bromine Council have successfully killed legislation introduced by environmental champions like Mark Leno before it can even get out of committee. How can our elected leaders live with themselves when they know that they are failing to protect public health, especially that of our children?

It is time for Governor Jerry Brown to use his executive authority and bully pulpit to push state regulators to end rules requiring the use of toxic chemicals in furniture, gym mats and baby products sold in California. He should send a signal to legislative leaders that their passivity in the face of this very real danger to public health is unacceptable, by sponsoring legislation that ends the use of the toxic fire retardants poisoning our homes, our children and our environment.

Here's what you can do in the meantime:

  • Vacuum your carpets, floors and furniture regularly.
  • Damp-wipe your electronics with paper towels to minimize dust. (Dispose of towels in the trash to reduce sending toxic dust to marine environments.)
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding should avoid exposure to house dust.
  • Wash your hands frequently, especially before eating.
  • Buy products without polyurethane foam, as they are less likely to contain the brominated or chlorinated flame retardants.
  • Avoid furniture, cushions and other products with the "Technical Bulletin 117" label.
  • Buy flame-retardant-free baby products.
  • Buy electronics that do not use flame retardants. Companies such as Nokia, Sony-Ericsson and Samsung are phasing out the use of flame retardants.
  • Call your state senators and assembly members and ask them to support legislation offering consumers the choice to purchase furniture that is both fire-safe and nontoxic.
  • Get involved. The Environmental Working Group, The Green Science Policy Institute and Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles all provide good resources and safer product information on their websites.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:01 AM on 08/08/2011
Thanks for the excellent and informative article.

Many hundreds of peer reviewed toxicology and epidemology studies of halogenated flame retardants show their accumulation and harm to humans and animals. You can read 100 plus paper each year from the Brominated Flame Retardant meetings http://www.bfr2011.org/ and the many hundreds from the Dioxin meetings, http://www.dioxin2011.org/

Please check out www.greensciencepolicy.org and you will learn that in many uses such as furniture foam the flame retardants do not provide a fire safety benefit. Products still burn in seconds and give off more of the toxic gases that cause most fire deaths with the retardants present.

Selling flame retardants is highly profitable, The major support for their use comes from the chemical industry as is evidenced by the many comments about this article from the American chemical council in favor of their use.

Arlene Blum, PhD
Visiting Scholar in Chemistry
University of California, Berkeley,
04:45 PM on 08/05/2011
The author also articulates a concern regarding smoke inhalation and increased cancer risk. But unfounded concerns are not a basis for restricting a valuable and important product that has a critical safety mission, and the author fails to back her “concern†with any evidence. In fact, a lifecycle assessment of fire safety for upholstered furniture suggests that the opposite may be the case; where flame retardants reduce the frequency and gravity of a fire, this means less smoke – and less smoke toxicity – overall.

Let’s not lose sight of the fact that flame retardants are one of several tools in the fire protection tool box that can provide essential time for panicked and confused victims to escape and for fire fighters to save lives. You can learn more about flame retardants by visiting the website of the American Chemistry Council (www.americanchemistry.com).

Bryan Goodman
Manager, Product/Panel Communications
The American Chemistry Council
04:45 PM on 08/05/2011
The author mischaracterizes the health and safety profile of flame retardants. It is important to understand that there are different types of flame retardants. Government regulators in the U.S. and Europe have reviewed the flame retardants currently used in furniture manufactured in those jurisdictions and concluded that they are safe for this use. Flame retardant manufacturers are constantly innovating to develop new flame retardants that will continue to deliver the same critical fire performance while addressing health and environmental concerns. In the past, when the scientific consensus was clear, flame retardant manufacturers responded by phasing out certain flame retardants.

(More)
04:43 PM on 08/05/2011
Readers of Ms. Vietor’s article have a right to know the facts about flame retardants.

To start with, it is well documented that flame retardants are effective in slowing and preventing fires. Fire statistics make it plain that California’s more stringent requirements are working; in fact, according to the California Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation, “incidence of fire death, injury and property loss due to fires involving upholstered furniture has dropped at a higher per capita rate in California than in the United States as a whole.†Several other recent studies speak to the efficacy of flame retardants, including a December 2009 report commissioned by the UK’s Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, which determined that flame retardant standards in the UK for furniture and furnishings “equate to 54 lives saved per year, 780 fewer casualties and 1065 fewer fires per year.â€

(More)
05:10 PM on 08/05/2011
The author mischaract­erizes the health and safety profile of flame retardants­. It is important to understand that there are different types of flame retardants­. Government regulators in the U.S. and Europe have reviewed the flame retardants currently used in furniture manufactur­ed in those jurisdicti­ons and concluded that they are safe for this use. Flame retardant manufactur­ers are constantly innovating to develop new flame retardants that will continue to deliver the same critical fire performanc­e while addressing health and environmen­tal concerns. In the past, when the scientific consensus was clear, flame retardant manufactur­ers responded by phasing out certain flame retardants­.

The author also articulate­s a concern regarding smoke inhalation and increased cancer risk. But unfounded concerns are not a basis for restrictin­g a valuable and important product that has a critical safety mission, and the author fails to back her “concern†with any evidence. In fact, a lifecycle assessment of fire safety for upholstere­d furniture suggests that the opposite may be the case; where flame retardants reduce the frequency and gravity of a fire, this means less smoke – and less smoke toxicity – overall.

Let’s not lose sight of the fact that flame retardants are one of several tools in the fire protection tool box that can provide essential time for panicked and confused victims to escape and for fire fighters to save lives. You can learn more about flame retardants by visiting the website of the American Chemistry Council (www.americ­anchemistr­y.com).

Bryan Goodman
The American Chemistry Council
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:12 AM on 08/04/2011
Great article. Pity more people don't seem to read something so important. But any voice is good and awareness can only grow. You notice my name is perfumeistoxic. This is to raise awareness that fragrances that are everywhere in high concentrations are similarly toxic and are completely untested and unregulated. No one seem to be aware of this danger as they feel something that smells so nice couldn't possibly be toxic. Wishfull thinking.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:17 PM on 08/02/2011
But keep pushing those mercury filled CFL lamps.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
05:16 PM on 08/01/2011
Wow...this is an issue I hadn't thought of in years....I suppose with the new way we heat our homes,flame retardant things like pajama's are not nearly as necessary. I'm not young, so I remember the old gas heaters or wood stoves as primary heating source and the number of seriously burned children....but today with natural gas, etc we no longer have open flames in our homes and this issue should be looked at again.