More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Francesca Vietor

Francesca Vietor

Posted: November 10, 2010 06:08 PM

Last week I was elected president of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). What an exciting time to be involved in California politics! My old friends and colleagues Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom have risen through the ranks and are moving onto the global stage. Jerry Brown squashed the megalomaniac and her $162 squillions. And thank goodness it's Barbara and not Carly. We are poised to kick some proverbial environmental butt with that lineup. As a lifelong environmentalist, its all adding up to a pretty big deal.

The SFPUC is a massive agency -- the third largest municipal utility in California -- with an operating budget of $611.3 million and a staff of 2,200. In addition to providing clean drinking water to millions of Bay Area residents and power services to all SF's municipal buildings, the SFPUC is engaged in the epic-scale, multibillion dollar rebuilding of both our water and wastewater systems. As a volunteer public servant, I hold the environmental policy seat of this powerful five-member Commission. And now I am the president.

I plan to tackle some of the most critical environmental issues of our time. The conservation of our precious drinking water, our transition to a fossil-free society and the challenge of what to do with our municipal waste for starters. I also want to identify any PUC lands that might be available to support growing food and the fledgling urban farming movement. Energy efficiency (lets change out those energy-sucking appliances in everyone's house), recycled water (are we really using our drinking water to water our golf courses?) and reduction of our biosolid volume (what are we going to do with it) all need attention. Moreover, programs, policies and infrastructure design must happen with an eye toward that fast-approaching train-wreck called climate change. Every city, especially those with low-lying waterfront properties like San Francisco, needs to prepare for the rising tides through adaption and mitigate. I mean how would we feel without our beloved ATT ballpark and world champion Giants? Not to mention our threatened coastal sewage treatment plants and diminishing Sierra water supply.

The history of the SFPUC is fascinating, and I am proud to be a part of the continuing legacy. Nearly a century ago, the City of San Francisco decided to dam the Hetch Hetchy Valley. While the construction broke John Muir's heart and continues to be a point of debate in the environmental community, it also stands that our forefathers left us a reliable supply of the purest, tastiest water in the country, and a less polluting supply of power then most municipalities have.

Fast forward to 1997, when then-Mayor Willie Brown asked me to become the president of the newly formed Commission on the Environment for the City of and County of San Francisco (CCSF). He charged me with establishing the new Department of the Environment and getting all of the other City Departments to collaborate on a Sustainability Plan for the city. "Tell them we are going to green this city department by department, and we are going to make San Francisco a world leader on environmental issues. Tell them they must participate."

Long story short, in my four years at the environmental helm, San Francisco acquired more than 300 electric and low-emission city vehicles, established an Ocean Beach task force to deal with erosion, was the impetus in getting the California quail named as the official city bird, obtained a $13 million state grant for Bayview-Hunters Point and Potrero Hill communities, selected 10 model green building projects including the California Academy of Sciences, drafted and implemented pesticide reduction and urban-forestry legislation, and positioned San Francisco to become the greenest city in the nation.

So when I got the call in 2008 from then Mayor Newsom asking if I was interested in the environmental seat of the highly influential SFPUC, focusing on arguably the most important environmental issues of energy, water and sewage, I said yes.

To my new position I will bring my lifelong commitment to the environment, and my extensive experience in the environmental movement -- including my roles as San Francisco's first president of San Francisco Commission on the Environment and later as Director of the Department of the Environment and my jobs with Rainforest Action Network, Greenpeace, CARE Madagascar and the Chez Panisse Foundation.

The decisions made today by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission will impact all of us long into the future. I know my fellow commissioners share this sense of responsibility and agree that we must work to identify inventive solutions that address the challenges facing our communities, our city and our planet. San Francisco has always been home to creative and innovative thinkers, and we are poised to create policy that other urban municipalities can benefit from as well.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
06:34 AM on 11/12/2010
It seems the geographic chasms between; The West coast- and the northeast from the rest of the nation continue to grow- from climate change to gay rights and marriage.

In the years to come this cultural divide likely to grow. With the west coast and the northeast perhaps the only good places to live in the USA- a few Islands elsewhere in the center may be oasis from the regressive ignorant minions who listen to Fox News.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
04:44 PM on 11/11/2010
California and the NW are my hero''s. Especially after winning the fight against the KOCH brothers. I predict Silicon Valley will come up with a alternative energy for fuel. Actually I was wondering about the new fuel cell from Bloom Energy. It has no need for a grid and it seems like it could be used in a car.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Schurman
03:22 PM on 11/11/2010
Congratulations, Francesca! We're lucky to have you as President.
12:31 PM on 11/11/2010
Congrats Francesca!! On water-- the recovering of rain water is not ready for prime time yet. Storage units cost too much! Its like a $10,000 LED TV which will come down in the next 5 years, I assume. I am not clear why it is so expensive. No consistent rebates from local water districts at least in Marin. Given that on average 35,000 gallons of rain water hit the roof of a 2,500 sq ft house per year in SF we should be able to do something before we do desalination. TVD
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:28 PM on 11/10/2010
Please maintain your focus on POINT OF USE solutions like water catchment, rooftop solar and urban gardens, and don't fall prey to the mythology of Big Solar, Big Wind and Big Transmission, NONE of which are even slightly "green" and ALL of which kill our wild places for no reason.
09:50 PM on 11/10/2010
The best thing the SFPUC could do for the environment would be to restore Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park while continuing to provide high quality Tuolumne River water to San Francisco and other Bay Area communities.

San Francisco's reputation as a "green" city may be well deserved to some degree, but why should they be the only city to build and own a reservoir in a National Park, drowning what was once such a spectacular place. Visit www.hetchhetchy.org to learn more and help return this national treasure to the American people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
11:19 AM on 11/12/2010
I doubt that you could restore Hetch Hetchy Valley in under about 500 years, that land has been under water for over a century now and even if drained it would be decades before anything could begin to grow there. And precisely WHERE will you get the water you need from? Grabbing water from the inland valleys as Los Angles does to a large extent and continues to try to do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
11:26 AM on 11/12/2010
You might try some transparency, you are not an 'ordinary poster' but rather a member of the board for directors of Restore Hetch Hetchy.
12:43 PM on 11/12/2010
Susan Elizabeth --- Yes, both Spreck and I are on the board of Restore Hetch Hetchy. Does that mean we can't be "ordinary posters"? But the real message is that both your questions/issues (the time for restoration to happen and the source of "replacement" water) are fully answered on our website -- hetchhetchy.org. Please take the time to read some of the material there. The short answers are that (1) restoration will occur quite quickly according to experts in the field, with only the ugly bathtub ring and the growth of large trees being issues involving decades; and (2) the "where" about the water is simple --- it will still come from the Tuolumne River just as it does today. Engineers today are a bit smarter than those 80 years ago and they've figured out how to deliver essentially the same water to SF without the need for an obtrusive reservoir in a National Park.

Jerry Cadagan
03:30 PM on 01/09/2011
The answers to your two questions are already provided by Cadagan below and are provided in substantial reports by UC Davis, EDF, the National Park Service as well as Restore Hetch Hetchy.

It would not be that difficult and not take that long to return Hetch Hetchy Valley to a phenomenal visitor experience while ensuring a continual supply of high quality Tuolumne River water to San Francisco.

And yes I am a Boardmember of Restore Hetch Hetchy and unapologetic environmentalist in many respects, albeit one dedicated to crunching numbers accurately as we make public policy decisions. I have done a lot of research on this stuff. I do not understand the need for "tarnsparency".