Last week, the Twitter account for John Dougherty's Senate race sent out a tweet that Governor Jan Brewer was rumored to be seriously ill -- too ill to finish a four-year term. Now you could dismiss this as "silly season" rumor-mongering, because Dougherty ran as a Democrat and Brewer is a Republican. Or because it came out first on Twitter, and not from a reputable journalistic source like the Arizona Republic. I don't dismiss it as a rumor. I predict that it will turn out to be true. More importantly, it matters so much to the future of Arizona that voters deserve to know!
I have lived in Arizona for 40 years. During that time, there have been many instances where, because something happened to the Governor (death, impeachment, political appointment to Washington, appointment to an ambassadorship) and we wound up with an ill-equipped person as our Governor in mid stream. The last time was, well, last time -- when President Obama appointed Janet Napolitano to Homeland Security, and she bailed on us, leaving the state in fiscal disarray (no blame, just observation). Governor Brewer was Secretary of State, and was elevated to Governor because Arizona doesn't have a Lieutenant Governor.
We can't afford to let this to happen again. The state is already known for poor governance, and the citizens are being buffeted by budget cuts while the businesses are buffeted by the immigration positions Brewer has taken.
I don't really have a dog in this hunt, as I am a registered Independent. I am usually far away from the rumor mill. But I am very close to Twitter, and to trusted sources on Twitter.
John Dougherty isn't a politician. He is an investigative journalist, and God knows why he even ran for office. In the 25 years I have followed his work, he has broken story after story for Village Voice Media, which is known for award-winning investigative journalism. I know those guys as well. For forty years. Dougherty has reasons to be tweeting this, I believe, that are more journalistic than political.
Why hasn't the "lamestream media" reported this yet? Because they have to worry about future access to the politicians they cover, and they've got to dot every I and cross every t before they go to print. I have also heard that the story will break this week.
I am a student of new journalism: I support collaborative and citizen journalism, I read bloggers, I listen to Jay Rosen and Dave Winer's podcast "Rebooting the News," I heard @ryantate talking about GawkerMedia's decision to stop worrying about "access" to sources, and now I feel willing to tell my friends where to look. I feel comfortable talking about this as a rumor, but one in which I personally believe.
Follow Francine Hardaway on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hardaway
As an Arizonan and voter, I do want to know just how sick she is. I suspect it's true too. She came out to say her doctor says she'd be OK for the next four years. WHAT???
Either you're healthy or your not. Your doc doesn't say, you'll be OK for about four years.
On the same topic, if she can't make it through the next four years, then how can mc drool? If anyone looks like they're going to keel over it's mc drool. That cancer thing on his face looks very angry indeed. I mean even angrier than he looks all the time!
So how can he, the 74 year old angry cancer guy, survive until he's 80? Why should he win re-election? Why is he running? And why isn't the media asking him about his health?
Just who does the sales tax hurt? The poor and middle classes that get taxed disproportionately via sales tax.
Also look at the ballot. She wants to cut out first comes first for the kids, yet keep the taxes generated for that and spend them any way she wants.
She almost wants to be able to sell state trust land (school money) to anyone she wants and keep that money as well.
She has NOT balanced the state budget as she says she has.
Be glad Meg Whitman doesn't live in Arizona.
* Tens of thousands of children removed from the AHCCCS KidsCare program.
* New enrollment in KidsCare remains frozen.
* State support for community health care centers has been wiped out, cutting off programs for the very poor.
* 4,200 children have lost behavioral health services.
* 20,000 poor children removed from the list for child-care subsidies.
* Severe cuts to in-home services, forcing more children into foster care.
* 300 developmentally disabled children have been cut off from state service.
* 850 severely ill children removed from Children's Rehabilitative Services.
* Substance abuse treatment denied to parents, putting a large number of children at further risk.
* Support for grandparents caring for grandchildren has been eliminated.
* CPS is no longer required to investigate all cases of child abuse.
In November, if voters pass Proposition 302, they will destroy the voter-approved program that funds early education in Arizona (First Things First).