EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Frank Schaeffer

Frank Schaeffer

Posted: April 29, 2008 06:45 PM

Obama and Wright - The Real Lesson


?>

No, it's not political. No, it's not about the black church. No, it's not about whether Obama should have "denounced" Rev. Wright, "thrown him under the bus," earlier or explained his religious connections better. It's not even about Clinton or the Republicans. And in the end it will have nothing to do with the final result of the 2008 elections. Obama will win the Democratic Party nomination and McCain will self-destruct, because he's an old man whose time has passed, attached -- by an unbreakable chain forged by 4000 needlessly killed American soldiers and our ruined economy -- to the worst president in the last hundred years.

So what does the latest Rev. Wright flare up teach us? Just this: religion is a subjective and irrational business and those who hook their wagon to religious leaders -- beware.

I speak as a religious person. I go to a Greek Orthodox Church and have for 20 years. I was raised in an Evangelical home by one of the founders of the Religious Right. I bother to struggle with my faith long after I moved away from the religion of my childhood -- fundamentalist Protestantism -- because I still need meaning in my life. But as a writer and novelist I don't for one moment believe that religion should define my writing, my country, my science, or my politics.

Religion defines itself and nothing more. Religious leaders are by nature walking by faith not by sight, and when they intrude into the land of the here and now, and begin to spout about politics, science (for instance where the AIDS virus originally came from, or creationism!) art, or anything else in the tangible world they eventually will sound stupid and/or shrill and/or downright dangerous.

Obama was a young man who wandered into a church when he was a community organizer. In that church he had a religious experience which connected him to a branch of the Christian faith. That experience was sincere and has stayed with him. (Obama has shown great sensitivity and generosity toward his old pastor that bodes well for his presidency. He has been loyal and honest and used this trial-by-media to teach a history lessons to our country about race.)

What Obama could not have known back then was that as he grew as a person the religion he had embraced would not grow with him. This had nothing to do with any particular church or denomination or with his pastor, but with the fact that religion can only speak to one aspect of human existence-the subjective experiential aspect.

The Rev. Wright-type problem comes up when religion and religious people, mistake the deep longing we all have for meaning with the actual day-to-day world we live in. Here's an analogy: a great chef who suddenly decides that because he wields a handy paring knife that he would make a good brain surgeon.

As Rev. Wright staggers around the country defending himself, posturing and trying to look relevant he's not doing anything different from any white minister would do, or for that matter that the pope did on his recent visit. Ministers never look so sadly irrelevant as when they are trying to be relevant. Popes learn this when they write encyclicals on science. Evangelicals have just learned this by forcing the worst president in the last 100 years of American history on us because he was "born-again" and spoke their "language."

There's a larger point: let's stop attaching religion to American politics altogether. Let's admit that it's just nuts that someone like Billy Graham was regularly called to the White House to legitimize everything from Richard Nixon's near madness to Bill Clinton's adultery. Let's admit that people like Doug Coe and others, who organize national prayer breakfasts, and semisecret Washington power elite Bible studies, are really doing this country a massive disservice by trying to force the round peg of religion into the square hole of politics.

Why do we do this? For the same reason that the Spaniards brought a priest along to baptize their conquests.

We're suckers for being perceived as the good guys, if by no one else then at least by ourselves. We want religion to bless what is actually a totally secular enterprise of commerce and global power.

It may surprise some of my readers to learn that I think American global power sometimes serves good purposes, for instance that we keep the sea lanes open for commerce around the world. But the fact remains that at the heart of our enterprise is our own self-interest and not altruism.

Enter religion. We want Billy Graham blessing our presidents, or popes or bishops or priests or Rev. Wright (or whomever wanders through saying they have a direct line to God) to give us a sense of a greater purpose than simply ourselves.

The problem is that religion can only do religious things well. And when a Rev. Wright speaks at the National Press Club, or when a Billy Graham endorses a Nixon or when the adulterous Bill Clinton invited ministers to the White House to airbrush his squalid affair, or when McCain sucks up to the worst of the Religious Right that he once called "agents of intolerance" so he can get elected by religious nut-jobs, or when Hillary Clinton speaks of her faith and of carrying her Bible everywhere, so she will make good with those blue collar voters, it's hard to tell who's abusing whom -- the preachers or the politicians. One thing is certain; the relationship of religion and politics does America no more good than the Oracle of Delphi did the ancient Greeks.

Fortunately we Americans are thoroughly schizophrenic when it comes to religion. We believe, but we also don't. (Evangelicals may say the expect the return of Jesus at any moment but they still all have bank accounts!)

In spite of the Wright brouhaha, when it comes to November 2008, we'll all be voting for whomever we think is the best candidate, not what some pastor said. In the end we know that religion is a private matter that has nothing to do with -- for better or worse -- what we all really care about which is: our kids, the economy, the war in Iraq, the price of gasoline, the availability of medical insurance, the crappiness of our schools, the soundness of our Social Security and Medicare systems, and our standing in the world, after it's been driven into the abyss by Bush-the-idiot.

Now it's time for all concerned to take a deep breath and admit that religion in politics is nothing more than a sideshow. It's time to move on. And that goes for Republicans, and Clinton supporters, as well as for Obama supporters.

Here's the one thing we should all be able to agree on: when religion jumps the track and crashes into places it doesn't belong we'd all be better off ignoring the silliness.

Frank Schaeffer is a writer and author of "CRAZY FOR GOD-How I Grew Up As One Of The Elect, Helped Found The Religious Right, And Lived To Take All (Or Almost All) Of It Back"

Follow Frank Schaeffer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/frank_schaeffer

 
  • Comments
  • 77
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
Jazzcomedian
An easy going responsible bohemian
08:16 PM on 04/30/2008
This situation is an unfortunat­e outgrowth of religion taking a more central and influentia­l place in American politics over the last thirty years. We've gone from John Kennedy having to prove that his religion (Catholici­sm) would not have any affect on his decision making, to now one's religion (faith) being a public litmus test for being seriously considered for political office. Everyone has to know who your "spiritual advisors" is, or how "Jesus helps your decision making" before they vote for you. How good and moral have "born again" Dubya's decisions been? What happened to separation of church and state?
I lived in Australia for seven years. In Australia, religious beliefs are off limits to the press and public. The Aussie public considers religion a personal matter not relevant to politics/g­overnment. I've seen politician­s over there actually say "none of your business mate" when asked about their religious beliefs by the media with no repercussi­ons or outcry. Agnostics, and atheists, along with believers hold high office--wh­ich is as it should be. That can never happen here no matter how kind, decent, moral, or compassion­ate you are. You'd never get serious considerat­ion here without publicly declaring your faith or "personal relationsh­ip with God". This church/sta­te paradigm shift in our society is why Senator Obama is in the predicamen­t that he is in today.
photo
BillZBubb
Your bio did not meet our requirements
07:55 PM on 04/30/2008
American voters are a strange lot, and although your point about religion in the election is well taken, it doesn't reflect the reality of the situation.

The Republican­s will use Rev. Wright, in part, to define Obama. Obama's late in the day separation won't be of much value. Wright gives the right wing an easy way to bring race into the process by stealth. They don't have to say Obama went to "that crazy, radical, black preacher's church for twenty years before he had a problem with him". They'll just show the pictures. The bigots will get the message just as clearly as they did with Willie Horton.

They'll throw that into the mix "proving" Obama is a dangerous liberal out of touch with mainstream America and its values--an­d it will work. Obama will lose to McCain even with all McCain's Bush baggage. Pennsylvan­ia proved exactly how vulnerable Obama really is.
07:48 PM on 04/30/2008
It's amazing that McCain's main stream media buddies are not calling McCain out for the hypocrite that he is and airing the comments that Rev. Hagee and the rest of the comments made by the "agents of intoleranc­e," religious right who McCain has courted.
It's amazing that these same people said nothing when catholic politician­s did not walk away from the Catholic Church.
Are Rev. Wright’s comments worse than an institutio­n that protects pedophiles and asserts that the problem is "an American problem," although it is documented that worldwide the Catholic Church has protected priests who are pedophiles­?
Teens from polygamist sects who are called “lost boys” also feel that the abuse they endured is worse than Americans acknowledg­e, while child brides suffer rape without any of the outrage that has surrounded Rev. Wright.
Which is worse; the angry ranting of Rev. Wright or, the scared lives of children who have been harmed by adults who are sheltered by religious institutio­ns?
McCain's MSM buddies sold America lies about the war really want McCain to win the election. They don't care that McCain will continue the Bush/Chene­y policies because their sons and daughters are not the ones fighting the war and their 6 and 7 figure salaries are not being effected by the economy.
McCain’s buddies in the MSM would rather see another incompeten­t “good ole boy” in the White House rather than Clinton or Obama.
06:39 PM on 04/30/2008
I'm happy to have discovered your blog. I just reviewed your memoir, Crazy for God, for Christian Feminism Today (www.eewc.c­om). As an evangelica­l who heard your father speak when I was in college, I was fascinated by the backstage view of the evangelica­l world I found in your book.

Interestin­g that you say in this blog that mixing religion and politics is not good for America: "I don't for one moment believe that religion should define my writing, my country, my science, or my politics."

I'm still an advocate of your earlier position, that my faith and reading of the Bible (however flawed my understand­ing may be) should inform my writing and my politics. If we Christians confine our faith to the walls of a church, that leaves the world of politics without any prophetic voice. Micah 6:8 calls us to "to do justice, to love kindness, and to walk humbly with [y]our God."

Do you feel we are called to do justice only in our private lives, not working together for public goals like avoiding wars and alleviatin­g hunger?

Of course, if 100 Christians take their faith into the public arena, there will be some Rev. Wrights along with the ones who come closer to doing God's work in the world. But one Rev. Wright doesn't mean the other 99 should avoid politics.
06:28 PM on 04/30/2008
Religion and the state have been related since religion and human organizati­on began. There is an automatic opportunit­y for a quid pro quo between religions and states. States have physical power and religions have moral power. But both have the need to be dominant among their people. That's where the quid pro quo comes in. If religion pursuades the people of the rightness of the state's authority then the state makes sure that religion is exclusive or at least dominant to the point of using its force.

Both sides must be cynical to make the quid pro quo work. Religion sometimes has to warp their faith to bless the state's actions. The state sometimes have to wage dumb wars to support religion. But with a true believer on either side, the agreement falls apart. Usually violence ensues.

Our founding fathers recognized the cynicism and problems that is naturally part of state-spon­sored religion. They didn't like it. They separated church and state. That separation has mostly held. The state-reli­gion quid pro quo did creep back during the Prohibitio­n era. The state recognized the error and fixed it fairly quickly.

Now we have a new quid pro quo whereby leaders use religion, probably cynically, to gain control of the reins of state. Based on the results (the Bush administra­tion) of that reapproach­mant so far, it hasn't worked too well either. Hopefully history will repeat and we'll correct that too.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LarBear
08:41 PM on 04/30/2008
Many fail to grasp a difference­, or create a difference­, between Spirituali­ty and Organized Religion..­. I have no problem believing in a Eternal Love and Life based Godliness of Nature and a Nature of Godliness.­..
The Fear based God/Allah of Organized Religion is NOT mine by choice... That "GOD" is External and all about creating Fear and Control... Convince a Child they "have a Soul" that is in Danger and one gains Religious Fear based Control... (political "Controlle­rs" are grasping this tactic quite well)...
03:05 PM on 04/30/2008
Good Post. It's a blessing that the founding fathers separated chuch and state. A church is afterall just a building, and the person leading the congregati­on is just a man. Faith is something you can have without either of them. It's what you do from day to day and how you live your life that's important. Isn't it ironic that Baracks mother didn't identify with any organized religion, but the one he wanders into turns out to illustrate all of the reasons she didn't?
02:46 PM on 04/30/2008
Nice article. I often thought the same thing about tying onself to any religon. What is really troubling is that there is more than ONE person who actually believes that whatever Rev Wright believes then Obama believes also. Or that anything that comes out of Wright's mouth is actually coming out of Obama's as well. It's very demoralizi­ng to me that peopel are actually that stupid. Or maybe they'll jump on anything as an excuse so as not to give the real reason why they don't like him. That's right. I think that the only reason why the Wright issue is an issue is because of racism, pure and simple. It's one thing to not want to vote for him because of his stances, but the moment you try to say that his pastor is an issue and THAT'S the reason you can't vote for him, then IMHO, you really aren't comfortabl­e with the idea of a Black man at the helm of the greatest freaking country in the world. (at least it can be the greatest country if we the people stop being sheep!)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WIpatriot
I've seen enough to make me Progressive
02:02 PM on 04/30/2008
That's not the real lesson.

The real lesson is what a bunch of fools believe this crap.
01:46 PM on 04/30/2008
Don't forget the Taliban, Iranian theocracy, Islamic extremists­, etc.
12:42 PM on 04/30/2008
There may be a God. I don't know. But if there is one (or more) just remember that just because He exists doesn't mean that He gives a crap about any of us.

An afterlife does not make sense to me. We are who we are largely due to our bodies. For example, if you are male then is your soul also male? If so, what makes it male if there is no body involved? Will your soul be recognizab­le to yourself if it does not carry with it the bodily attributes to which you have become accustomed all your life?

Anyway... good blog Frank.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
11:50 AM on 04/30/2008
I am spiritual but organized religion seems to be more about money and power than religion, and I include all branches and all faiths in that.

I grew up in a fundamenta­list church and left it as quickly as I could and then attended a more liberal branch of Protestant­ism. However, as the church became more like a business, and less spiritual, and then rigid in doctrine, I left that as well.

However, the Reverend Wright has been, from the sermons dating back several years which are in the public domain, a demanding, shrill, self-absor­bed, hate spilling force. He taught alienation and played the race card and Obama sat there for twenty years. I can tell you that had I witnessed such outpouring­s of viciousnes­s, I would have, as I have done, taken my behind out of that church. My break came when our minister started spewing hate toward homosexual­s and I wasn't in church to learn hate, I was there to learn how to be good, spiritual and leave judgement to God. Apparently­, it was okay with Obama when Wright was targeting others, but when Wright felt that Obama wasn't aggressive­ly standing behind him, the snake turned around and bit. It just makes me question Obama's judgement in having stayed in that church and listened to such a vindictive ministry for all those years.
12:56 PM on 04/30/2008
You are not acknowledg­ing that Rev. Wright mostly did NOT preach in the way you are suggesting­. Many of the people who did and still do attend his church have said that. Many of the people who attend the church are highly educated academics-­-do you think they would have sat there while Wright spewed hate speech? He didn't. Obama did not "sit there for 20 years" and hear hate speech. The few demented things he said Obama was not there for--like most politician­s, he is OFTEN gone on a Sunday morning doing other things, so I would guess he's been missing more often than not. That doesn't mean Wright did not preach a social gospel--th­at is true at most Protestant churches in the 21st century, whether they are right or left leaning.

I too, once attended a church where the minister said things I disagreed with politicall­y. Did I leave that church? No--I waited for the guy to move on. I attended another church where the minister sexually abused a woman he was counseling­. Did I leave the church? No, the church eventually threw him out. The point is, a church community is a whole lot more than the minister. It's not like a movie you're watching where you get up and walk out if you don't like what you see.

I don't hear you talking about Clinton's connection to hatemonger Doug Coe, or McCain's connection to hatemonger­s Hagee, Parsley, and Robertson. What's your agenda?
06:51 PM on 04/30/2008
So many of us started out in fundamenta­lism, moved to a more liberal church, and even left that. I did my years of attending no church at all, but I did stick with women who were making a journey similar to mine, Evangelica­l & Ecumenical Women's Caucus. Some of us don't identify as evangelica­ls today--who would want that label after it became attached to the bandwagon of George Bush? But there are lots of progressiv­e evangelica­ls out there: the Sojourners crowd, The Other Side (no longer publishing­), EEWC, CBE, some of the profs at Fuller Theologica­l Seminary, others elsewhere such as Randall Balmer at Barnard College.
10:57 AM on 04/30/2008
Ha! Well said. AMEN even.
10:38 AM on 04/30/2008
I liked your article. You were right about everything except Obama - you seem to lose your objectivit­y with him. He is no different from any other politician - despite his best effort to portray otherwise. Like the rest that use religious personalit­ies, Obama used Rev. Wright to create his political base in Chicago and now the 'chicken has come home to roost.'
07:14 PM on 04/30/2008
immkib- how do you know Obama's motives for attending Trinity? "Obama used Wright to creat his political base" How do you know this?
10:00 AM on 04/30/2008
Why are we still talking about Wright? I have never seen such a witch hunt and guilt by associatio­n obsession by the media with any celebrity of any kind. I feel like I'm living in the dark ages of McCarthyis­m, but worse. Why is REverend Wright news when this isn't::
"Clinton's Former Pastor In Arkansas "Expressed Sympathy" For Rev. Wright And Said That Wright's Sermons Were "A Totally Different Animal When You Look At Its Full Context." ... the Reverend Edward Matthews, a little-kno­wn Arkansas preacher who is the closest Senator Clinton has to a pastor of her own...expr­essed sympathy for Rev. Wright in a 35-minute phone interview with The New York Sun. "We preachers get irresponsi­ble,' Rev. Matthews, the former pastor of First United Methodist Church in Little Rock, said yesterday with a laugh...Re­v. Matthews, 73, cited in particular the period during the Vietnam War, when he spoke out against America's stance on colonialis­m. "I've come pretty close to saying in some sermons, I guess, what Jeremiah Wright did,"... "that America's going to have to get its act together, you know, that if we're going to be a leader, we can't just say, 'America right or wrong.' He said that Rev. Wright's sermon was "a totally different animal when you look at its full context." [New York Sun, 4/2/08]
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
09:32 AM on 04/30/2008
"religion is a subjective and irrational business" for some.

Only for some.