The Fight For Obama Requires Fewer Euphemisms and More Truth

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 27, 2008 | 11:56 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Now we come to it: the real fight for Obama in the harsh light of day. What Obama is up against is essentially the jeering section of the national lunatic asylum. What America is up against is the very real possibility that this jeering section will out shout the rest of us. Beware lest we let them sneer us into oblivion.

The battle lines of the contest for the Democratic Party nomination and the White House are clear. Strip away the euphemisms and we see that the choice before us is not a choice between various candidates and various positions but a choice of historic magnitude about the character of America.

Before saying more let me say that I am an optimist. I believe that Obama will be our next president because his support comes from a widely diverse group of people, from some like me -- a white middle class 55-year-old lifelong Republican, now reregistered as an independent -- to traditional Democrats, blacks, young people, women and men of all races and beliefs. We are united in our hope for a better future. I believe that our disparate group of individuals outnumber those firmly stuck in the past. We will win if we hang tough together and tell the truth.

At the core of the Obama candidacy is the belief that freethinking openhearted people in America outnumber cretins, racists, the willfully ignorant, the gleefully hate-filled, the small minded, the backward looking, jingoistic morons, the frightened, the addicts of brain-wrecking soundbites, and above all those stuck in a pattern of thinking that leads inevitably to shrunken horizons.

What are the spoken "arguments" against Obama? He doesn't wear a flag pin... His minister said harsh things... The blue collar vote don't all like him... In the words of the inimitable George Stephanopoulos; Obama can't say for sure if his minister is as patriotic as he is...

Since these banalities can't possibly explain why there is even a discussion about the choice between Obama and the Clinton hack machine what's really going on?

Here are the real reasons that the Democratic Party has not yet embraced Obama overwhelmingly:

1) This country has a racist streak running through it that is well entrenched in both parties.

2) We include amongst us an undereducated geographically ignorant nation-within-a-nation who are afraid of the world outside of our borders, terrified by the eternal "other," that perpetual "threat" that takes new forms but never changes -- from the late Saddam Hussein to the last Mexican to crawl over the border.

Clinton and McCain cater to those with a bad case of paranoia. Obama does not.

Combine the latent racism that the Clintons so handily embrace when they euphemistically describe the "blue collar" vote as unwinnable for Obama, with the willful ignorance of too many Americans about the world, and the idea of voting for a well-educated, worldly wise, kind, openhearted, unafraid, urbane, hard-to-ruffle, charismatic black man is a scary proposition. He just isn't scared enough! He just isn't keeping his place! He is just too decent! He's just to sane to be "one of us!"

In Obama we have a choice that will set the stage for the foreseeable American future. On the one hand Obama faces McCain; the aging war making enthusiast, the next "prophet" of American exceptionalism, a true believer in military sacrifice as the highest value, even sacrifice for "victory" in unwinnable wars. On the other hand Obama is trying to overcome the perpetually ambitious Clinton machine, fastened to his ankle like a rabid dog, unable to bring him down but very able to distract and draw blood.

Here are the actual choices:

Obama or war without end.

Obama or ambition without moral boundaries without end.

The Clinton/McCain partisans will never say it but they are counting on the worst in the American character in order to "win." Without the support of the racists, the stupid, the undereducated and the perpetually paranoid neither McCain nor Clinton stands a chance. They count on the worst in our national character in the same way that oncologists count on new cases of cancer -- pay lip service is to the cure, but thank God for the sickness! (And by the way the Clinton canard that the blue collar vote is un-winnable for Obama is an insult to most working people.)

This election is a moral test of our national character. If we fail this test, if we allow the mainstream media to derail the process with their insanely tawdry, lowest common denominator soundbites, if we allow the Clintons thinly veiled "I'm more electable" (e.g., more white!) racism to triumph, or worse yet, if we vote for the perpetuation of four (and perhaps eight) more years of the Bush regime reincarnated as McCain, we will have not only turned the clock back but slammed the door on the best chance our country has been given in generations.

It is no accident that the rest of the world is so incredibly interested in this year's American election. Obama is liked (actually loved) all over the world. What an incredible opportunity for us to elect someone who brings such a favorable worldwide standing with him to day one of his presidency. How do we really make America safer? For a start, put a president in charge who is liked and respected and who changes the way others see us for the better.

It is up to those of us who support Obama to fight like hell and make sure that we do not become infected by the insidious despair inherent in the arguments made by the Clintons about who is "electable," or by the Republicans, whose bellicose rhetoric presupposes that America will be hated forever.

Which line would you rather be standing in; a line leading to a future where America is liked and respected again, where our president represents the best about us, or the line back to a world where we are disrespected hated and, moreover, hate ourselves?

Let's state our case openly. Let's trust most of our fellow Americans to rise to the occasion. The choice is clear. The time for euphemisms is past. Let's confront our worst national faults head on. This year's contest for the presidency is between all that is worst about America and all that is greatest.

I believe in America. I believe in Obama. If we hang in there we will win.

Frank Schaeffer is a writer and author of "CRAZY FOR GOD-How I Grew Up As One Of The Elect, Helped Found The Religious Right, And Lived To Take All (Or Almost All) Of It Back"

 
 

Comments
126
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Thank you Frank. You have encouraged me. All of your articles, but especially this one. Today I have been getting the sinking feeling that the untruth squad was winning. The stakes are so high for us and on a personal level, having argued with my Christian friends over the last 8 years with seemingly no dent in their support of the far right supposed Christian point of view, I had been feeling that we are inevitably doomed. Poor thinking. But it helps to hear a voice of reason. a voice of encouragement. thanks thanks thanks!!! Keep writing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 04/29/2008

I was starting to get depressed reading the news today. I saw your post and feel much better.

Thank You Mr. Schaeffer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 04/28/2008

"They (HIllary & John McBush) ............-- pay lip service to the cure, but thank God for the sickness!"

They don't pay lip service to the cure, they pay lip service to the disease. If racism and ignorance are the disease these racist ignorants are nursing their disease and refusing the cure. That is what will drag America down further. These people cling to their racism and their ignorance because anything enlightened makes them feel insecure and stupid. Are you trying to wake up the almost comatose, or the blogger I refer to below?

The blogger below who got offended at being referred to as racist and dumb because he/she's not voting for Obama, maybe you're not, but 85% of those voting with you ARE...and what a group to find yourself in!

Who else put a President in power who can't spell for 4 more years! 59,000,000 that's who, SO YES, the author has a point. It's the dum-dums who voted for Bush who will put Hillary and/or McCain in power because they ARE racist and/or dumb, and what does it say of you to be the minority (albeit, maybe not so dumb, not so racist) of this group???

I guess it says you like to hang out with ignorant racists because it makes you better than them. Hillary and George Bush like to capture this group because it gives them SO MUCH MORE POWER. Why empower people like Obama does, when you can rule over their ignorance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 04/28/2008

Where did you get your statistics? Are you actually saying that George Bush was elected by ignorant racists and by anyone who doesn't plan on voting for Obama? And are you really saying that someone would hang out with racists because it makes you better than them? Does it make you feel smarter to lump people into categories this way?
People come to different conclusions for different reasons. Just because someone doesn't come to the same conclusion that you do does not make them ignorant, racist, insecure, stupid or comatose and it doesn't make them clinging to things. Some people prefer Hillary Clinton over Obama and it doesn't make them dumb or racist whether you like it or not. And, a lot of those people who prefer Hillary Clinton will vote for Obama if and when he wins the nomination and in spite of the ugliness that is out there from all sides.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 04/28/2008

Mr. Schaeffer - thank you SO much for articulating so beautifully what so many of us Obama supporters know and feel so deeply, and helping me to take heart in the swirling darkness of campaign season...I'll be sharing this with all of my Obama supporting friends.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 04/28/2008

Lizzy?..Im soooo with you...he "bottom lined" it perfectly!

OBAMA 08!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 04/28/2008

Amen!

"This election is a moral test of our national character. If we fail this test, if we allow the mainstream media to derail the process with their insanely tawdry, lowest common denominator soundbites, if we allow the Clintons thinly veiled "I'm more electable" (e.g., more white!) racism to triumph, or worse yet, if we vote for the perpetuation of four (and perhaps eight) more years of the Bush regime reincarnated as McCain, we will have not only turned the clock back but slammed the door on the best chance our country has been given in generations."

Call, donate and make positive comments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 04/28/2008

I absolutely agree! However, it appears that the msm is intent in capitalizing on the ignorant part of America. Just look at how they, once again, ripped apart the interview from Rev. Wright! they are intent on keeping that flame on as long as they can and will do anyting not to allow the true essence of Rev. Wright shire through. It appears to me that the media is now being run by a bunch of cretins and unless there is a way to stop them from doing their yellow journalism, we may just end up short.
I certainly hope we do outnumber the cretins of America in the voting booths!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 04/28/2008

After going through the gamut of personality changes, it appears Hillary has settled on "fighter". This is a convenient title because it means the Clintons are instantly immune from any charges of foul play because after all -- they're just fighting for "us". And boy do we need a "fighter". Of course, a "fighter" in the Clinton sense does not necessarily achieve their objectives. Hillary was every bit the "fighter" she is claiming to be now back in the nineties when she "fought" for (and failed to accomplish) universal health care. A tactless "fighter" divides and conquers; an effective "fighter" unites, builds, and overcomes. A "fighter" doesn't say or do anything (regardless of how unacceptable or dishonest) to win; a "fighter" achieves victory on account of having said and done the right *things*. And a "fighter" doesn't need to endlessly remind voters that they're tough and that they're ... a fighter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 04/28/2008

Is there any way you can get this message out to the conservative Christians? My belief is since Bush actually got less than half of the votes, and the people attending churches voted overwhelmingly for him, they were the voting block that put him in power. Certainly he was trying to tell these people what they wanted to hear to get their votes. It is great that you have been having this conversation with us here on huffingtonpost, now how do you go back to those people to give them the message?

I think it might be good if Rev. Wright could be set up with a weekly national TV program. Right now the national audience only hears from conservative preachers who either oppose what you are saying, or keep silent on any such issues. That might be one possibility of something that could be positive for the nation. The problems are clear, but the solutions less so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 04/28/2008

Wow. I'm offended, and I'm bummed at the same time. I just found out that I'm a racist lunatic. And up until a few minutes ago, I thought I was a free thinking, educated caring individual who happens to be a Hillary Clinton supporter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 04/28/2008

Yes, there are very few writers out there that are capable of finding middle ground. I am sorry that he offended you. I am sorry that yes, Clinton and McCain feel they have to resort to low tactics to win. I am sorry that this is how the MSM portrays her supporters. John McCain has the strongest record of any Sen. in the U.S. Senate on Indian (Native American) affairs. He has been progressive and he has attempted to resolve the Indian trust litigation brought by plaintiff Eloise Cobell and 300,000 beneficiaries throughout the U.S. Its not so much what divides us but what where we have common ground. Given this, the western states may be in play with key native voting coalitions. Obama has a descriptive policy statement on Native issues and probably the best yet of any Presidential candidate. Still, McCain's record is fairly good on native affairs. Clinton also has a good record on Indian Affairs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 04/28/2008

well... take heart... buck-up and make the best of it.

Ecclesiastes 9:11-12
Better is vexation than laughter, for by the crossness of the face the heart becomes better...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 04/28/2008

so, the obama supporters are the freethinking, openhearted people, and the rest of us are 'the jeering section of the national lunatic asylum', and we are cretins, racists, willfully ignorant addicts of brainwrecking soundbites with shrunken horizons...that about cover it, scooter? boy, being called a bitter bible-thumping gun toter doesn't sound so bad after all!
is the case FOR obama so weak that the only defense you can mount is a hate-filled diatribe against anyone who hasn't 'seen the light????' sad, truly sad...what i find hilarious is that you and the rest of the obamanites can spew such crap as that, and whine that every criticism of the 'obmessiah' is nothing more than a racist attack and STILL not have a clue as to why you don't get the support of the blue-collar voters! come november you won't know what hit you, and you'll probably just blame hillary

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 04/28/2008

Have you actually listened to Hillary? Golly gee... she'll show up on day two and do your laundry and babysit your kids if you just vote for her! Come on now.!!! If you're that cheap a date, you deserve what you ask for! tsk......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 04/28/2008

Meanguy: Why did you choose "that" name in particular? It makes one think if you DO have an open mind, an open heart and a little ignorance.

Frank didn't say that all of Hellary's or McWar's supporters were racist, bigots, close minded and undereducated. The fact is that they have exploited people's prejudices and fears to gain votes, there is no doubt about that. Racists won't vote for Obama, people with a closed mind/heart won't vote for Obama because of the flag lapel pin/Wright/Ayers/his middle name/ and the fact that a lot of them still think to this day that he is a Muslim. That's it.

Hellary especially has exploited these fears people have of someone that is different from them. I was hoping in this cycle, in the year 2008 that our country has grown more tolerant (which it has) but not to the extent that it should have after all these years. It makes me sick to my stomach when I hear neighbors saying the n word or calling mexicans such horrendous names for stealing their jobs. When will all that stop?

I want my son to grow up in a community and a country that he can be proud of. One that treats all individuals with respect; we don't have to agree, but we do need to understand and tolerate each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 04/28/2008

I'm sure he'll be proud of the respect, understanding and tolerance you are showing Hillary Clinton and John McCain with your name calling. Funny that you would question someone else's name and his level of ignorance with your own rude words.

I disagree the things you've said about Hillary exploiting fears and prejudices. I'm not racist or a person with a closed heart or mind. Those aren't the reasons that I jprefer Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama at this time. If Obama is the democrat's nominee, I will vote for him. That's the democratic process.

If you want your son to understand treating all individuals with respect when we don't agree, you should show him that by your own actions and posts.

I could be wrong....but I doubt it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 04/28/2008

... again... as below... teach the kids:

"Respect is earned... not given."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/28/2008

Not that you need my humble endorsement, but I appreciate your open-mindedness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 04/28/2008

" . . cretins, racists, the willfully ignorant, the gleefully hate-filled, the small minded, the backward looking, jingoistic morons. . ."

How straight to the point. Thank you so much for accurately describing the ignorant racists of our society. Excellent post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 04/28/2008

I read this wonderful article and briefly felt the optimism i once had for this election. And then I read the comments section, and saw what unfortunately supports Mr. Schaffer's arguments. It is so sad that the leaders who pander to the worst in people get the support of the people. It is frightening that so many Americans believe what they are told instead of arming themselves with the truth. And how painful that the idea of change frightens so many into narrow-mindedness.
I'm going to forward this smart, thought-provoking piece to everyone I have ever met, and I hope some of you will do the same. I just donated $50 to Senator Obama's campaign, and I hope you will donate what you can too. Those of us who can travel to North Carolina and show our enthusiasm should do that as well.
Meanwhile, I'm going to re-read Mr. Schaffer's piece and this time try to hang on to the optimism for as long as I can.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 04/28/2008

There is a positive side to those comments. They mean the opposition is concerned about what is being written on huffingtonpost and they have to try to discourage people. The better the job Frank and some of the others do, the more those people will find it necessary to post whatever they can think of to possibly discourage you. That is just the nature of the internet. We must keep it open and free, because if we don't, Franks voice will be silenced before those commenters ever are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 04/28/2008

I agree with the writer... Let's do the fight...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 04/28/2008

"We include amongst us an undereducated geographically ignorant nation-within-a-nation who are afraid of the world outside of our borders."

I have lived in Europe for four years, I have a Ph.D., I have traveled to multiple countries, and have no fear of the world outside our borders. The only time in my life anyone has even come close to calling me a racist is here on HP, a "progressive web site."

Do you maybe begin to understand why a growing number of people are fed up with the Obama supporters who believe in the Bush policy of "either you are with us or you are against us'?

If so many Obama supporters, as judged by comments on this web site, are so intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them, then I can't help but wonder if maybe they are drawn to Obama because he is similarly intolerant. We don't need to replace a bunch of neocons with a bunch of equally intolerant Democrats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 04/28/2008

"mr republican kettle, meet mr democrat pot"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 04/28/2008

What makes you think the author is referring to you as racist, when you don't fit any of the criteria in that sentence you just quoted. The author makes the case that Clinton/McCain most appeals to the ugliness of America, and that is most definitely true if you've been following the campaign in any detail.

Of course there are many open-minded people who support Clinton and McCain based on legitimate values and beliefs including yourself. The author never disagreed with this notion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 04/28/2008

But what's your Ph.D in? Sophistry? You're using the "some people say" line of argument here that's an obvious attempt at asserting facts not in evidence. Claiming that Obama supporters assert "either you are with us or you are against us" is merely your opinion completely unsupported by evidence. Further asserting that they are drawn to Obama "...because he is similarly intolerant" is another of your unsupported opinions, both about the inner workings of other peoples' minds as well as what you claim is -- again without evidence -- Obama's "intollerance."

You may be a Ph.D, but in your case I question what the initials stand for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 04/28/2008

Dr. Pharos:

We all know that one person can travel the world, but when he arrives back at the beginning, he still brings with him his own unresolved issues.

I believe that if you take a similarly internal journey, you will understand where Obama stands, and where his supporters stand.

westbrooks01, JD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 04/28/2008

What makes you think the author is referring to you? You don't fit any of the criteria in that sentence you quoted. The author makes the case that Clinton/McCain most appeals to the ugliness of America, and that is most definitely true if you've been following the campaign in any detail.

Of course there are many open-minded people who support Clinton and McCain based on legitimate values and beliefs including yourself. The author never disagreed with this notion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 04/28/2008

... and this tendency to compartmentalize support for a candidate as some nearly genetic imperative to "follow" and identify like sheep is a further form of "ism"... lets call it "herdism".

FYI... I have the capacity to align myself with a candidate in a general way... as a weighed decision... without adopting the posture of bleating supplicant.

also FYI- If any candidate spoke or campaigned the way I would... nobody would get elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 04/28/2008

When are we going to wake up?

When are we going to stop treating this as American Idol, minus even the talent portion of the competition.

Who is paying attention? Who is expressing outrage?

The Obliterator threatens nuclear anhihilation, the world sees the US as a threat that must be stopped, and the press gives us bowling scores and sermon outtakes.

When asked for response the press replied, "Zzzzzzzzzzz"

If the media cannot give us any kind of focus on the really important distinctions between candidates, WHY DO WE NEED the media?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 04/28/2008

I am not crazy about Obama and I am not Cretins, Racists, Ignorant, Hate-filled, Small minded, Backward, Jingoist, Moronic, Frightened, Brain-wrecked, Undereducated, and Fearful. Right now, I am in Nigeria working with the poor and I challenge any Obama supporter to drop what they are doing, and come on over here and put their actions and not their trash words to work. Including the writer of this post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 04/28/2008

I don't have to go to Nigeria to help the poor! We have enough right here at home! Some of us feel or can't afford to go far to help the less fortunate like you! I congragulate you on your Humanity! Now I give a challenge to You! I've been reading how digusted Britain parliment is with Hillarys words of wipeing out Iran, and how this type of Attitude hurt the way people see America and Americans. I"ve also Heard How Middle East Nations feel she is a loose cannon and can do a lot of harm with her talk of Obliverateing nations. You can tell the readers how people are responding to her war talk of wipeing out Iran there in Nigeria! We'd enjoy reading that, and getting other opinions. Thanks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 04/28/2008

The majority of Nigerians are Christian and they have been killed or imprisoned buy the ruling Muslim political class since independence 60+ years ago for wanting to have the Presidency. The oil money is looted to the North where the Muslims are the majority. The Christians in the south are not hateful or cold blood but they do not shed ant tears over the USA Middle East policies. Now the official Nigerian government being dominated by the north is vocal against the USA but its because of its bond with their Islamic brothers in the Middle East. Let me say on an up note that since democracy has started 9 years ago the south can now elect their own as Governors and Senators but they are still marginalized

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 04/28/2008

You challenge an Obama supporter HALFDEMHALFGOP?

I challenge you to come here to the U.S. and work in an inner city school, or a veterans hospitial or a senior center or a homeless shelter. That's what Obama is asking young people to do inexchange for attending college.

Clean up your own house first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 04/28/2008