More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Frank Sesno

Frank Sesno

Posted: July 16, 2010 01:27 PM

Even before BP capped the oil spill, the Washington Post declared a loss for environmentalists. It's been three months and we haven't seen a cap on carbon, what gives?

"Traditionally, American environmentalism wins its biggest victories after some important piece of American environment is poisoned, exterminated or set on fire. An oil spill and a burning river in 1969 led to new anti-pollution laws in the 1970s. The Exxon Valdez disaster helped create an Earth Day revival in 1990 and sparked a landmark clean-air law.

"But this year, the worst oil spill in U.S. history -- and, before that, the worst coal-mining disaster in 40 years -- haven't put the same kind of drive into the debate over climate change and fossil-fuel energy."

A few weeks ago we talked to John Pemberton of Southern Company, who says that instead of furthering the debate over a climate bill, the oil spill has stalled it. The emotional power of the disaster will make congressional members less likely to compromise and take "small steps forward. We still have a long term energy debate in congress that is not going to solved with short term political decisions."

The Clean Water Act was passed 28 months after the river fire, 33 months after the oil spill, so the political fallout of the oil spill still has time to develop. Maybe a few months of cleaning up the damage and trying to make things right in the gulf will help congress decide whether or not to move forward with changing the way we use energy.

How will this event affect energy policy -- and politics?


 

Follow Frank Sesno on Twitter: www.twitter.com/planet_forward

 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
10:14 AM on 07/19/2010
What they're using in the Gulf is killing plant life. How is it affecting humans? Just go to any of these and keep watching. Your government is lying to you and covering up the impact of this disaster.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9wut9Xb4g8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rokZikefcyg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp7RO5ptlVA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1CPeuOQzVw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfAQdHucNUA&feature=related
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
04:05 PM on 07/16/2010
The life threatening impact of the Gulf disaster may soon prove to be far more serious than might be imagined!

Substantial oil is coming from fissures in the sea floor. Dealing with those leaks may be a huge problem.

See What to Do! at http://www.aesopinstitute.org The subtitle is: A 5 Step Program - to Increase the Odds We Will Survive the Oil Disaster!

400 parts per million of carbon has recently been found to be the Arctic Tipping Point, which could conceivably endanger all of humanity. We are presently approaching 390 ppm. The safe limit is 350 ppm. See www.350.org

A very thin film on the surface of the North Atlantic and Arctic oceans threatens to raise temperatures toward the catastrophic Tipping Point.

If these facts are accurate, an emergency mobilization appears urgent.

Little known and hard to fathom breakthroughs involving radically new energy technologies can help to supersede oil much more rapidly than might be readily understood or believed.

See Moving Beyond Oil on the same Aesop Institute website.

All renewable energy work should rapidly proceed on a 24/7 basis.

We need far more robust and sensible steps to effectively attack the problems in the Gulf and prevent as much oil as possible from reaching the Atlantic ocean.

Sustainability and practical steps to supersede oil and all fossil fuels are possible.

Taking sufficient action rapidly may require an immense effort.

Ironically, that may stimulate economic recovery and far more effective energy legislation.