More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Fred Silberberg

Fred Silberberg

Posted: January 22, 2011 03:04 AM

How many times have you heard someone tell you that they had "a failed marriage"? In colloquial terms, people often describe the fact that they have been divorced as a "failure". Others, referring to someone who has been divorced, commonly say "she had a failed marriage." The connotation is that this individual was not capable of being successful at a marriage because they did not remain in the marriage until one of the partners died.

Amongst the definitions of "failure" according to Webster's Dictionary is "a lack of success." If divorce is a failure then the only possible success requires someone who is married to remain married until that person or their spouse dies. The fact is that there are many marriages that have ended prior to the death of a party, and those marriages were not "failures". We, as a society should stop referring to divorces as "failures." The reference, and the connotation are not at all accurate. It only promotes the view that a divorced person is somehow a lesser person than someone who has not been divorced.

Many people get married with the best intentions and they carry those intentions out, for a period of time. That does not mean that they have failed. In the course of living things happen to people and those things sometimes cause people to change. Sometimes those events cause their goals to change. Sometimes those events cause relationships to no longer be viable. However, that does not mean that a marriage that ended in divorce was a failure.
Take, for example, the hypothetical couple that each of us knows: They were married for many years and raised children successfully. Their children have left the house. Their interests have changed. They decide to divorce. Does that make them "failures"? Who decided that the only possible success in marriage is to live it out until life comes to an end?

It should be an accepted fact of life that sometimes relationships just come to an end, and that end often occurs long prior to one of the spouses passing away. This does not mean the relationship, nor the marriage was a "failure." In the case of the hypothetical couple, they lived happily and successfully for the years that they were together. Their children were all happy and turned into successful adults. If we now decide that because either or both of them no longer wished to be married that they are "failures", do we mean to negate the years of success that they had? What does that say about their children? How could anyone describe that as a "failure"?

Our hypothetical couple may have developed other interests and no longer felt compatible. Our hypothetical couple may only have been together because they wanted children and the purpose was served. Our hypothetical couple may have comprised two people who had different views of life after children, or different expectations for themselves. That does not mean that they were "failures." If our hypothetical couple comprise "failures" simply because they chose not to stay together "until death do us part," is their marriage more of a failure than the couple who stays together for a lifetime in misery? Is their marriage more of a failure than the one where one spouse is burdened with living with a spouse with substance abuse problem the entirety of his life? Would we refer to the marriage of two people involving a spousal batterer and a victim as a "successful marriage" simply because they stayed together until one of them died? I think not.

While divorce is common on our society, it still has a certain stigma to it. As one of my clients once put it "I am losing my social standing simply because I chose to get divorced". In our society we are obsessed with categorizing people depending upon the manner in which their marriages came to an end. After all, is it not common on an application for employment, insurance, or credit to be asked your marital status? Why is it that these forms always distinguish between "single" and "divorced"? Someone who is divorced is, in fact, single. Yet, the person who was once single and is now again single is looked at differently.

In life, things happen to people. One of the things that sometimes happens is that a marriage ends in divorce. However, this does not mean that it was a failure and there is no reason to refer to it as such. In doing so, we give a negative connotation to something that isn't deserving of it, and we attach a negative stereotype to people without any basis for doing so.

 
How many times have you heard someone tell you that they had "a failed marriage"? In colloquial terms, people often describe the fact that they have been divorced as a "failure". Others, referring t...
How many times have you heard someone tell you that they had "a failed marriage"? In colloquial terms, people often describe the fact that they have been divorced as a "failure". Others, referring t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:27 PM on 02/24/2011
Yes, yes, I agree that there is a negative connotation to being divorced....I know this well, as a divorced mother and also as a divorce professional, (divorce coach and parenting coordinator)....The way we characterize conduct does make a difference in people's perceptions, of others and of ourselves.
Some of my work with clients is to help them overcome these negative stereotypes. Maybe we can start spreading the positive word, start letting people know that "Divorce" isn't a dirty word....For starters, let that be your mantra...as a next step, contact me to help you work it through!
photo
PowerPridePinstripes
27 and Counting!
01:06 PM on 01/25/2011
I also believe many people plan to get married just to have a wedding -- then reality hits and oops and Houston we have a problem and his or her name is spouse!
10:46 AM on 01/25/2011
Divorce should not be viewed as a failure. In some cases, the decision to marry was failed from the start. When contemplating marriage, it takes two people to agree. However, in divorce it only takes one person to make the decision. In such situations, I strongly suggest using a mediator to dissolve your marriage. The mediator works towards a common goal and helps minimize the financial expenses that attorneys usually demand. Visit SecondThoughtsonMarriage.com for other ideas.
03:54 PM on 01/24/2011
Most couples I know who have been married for decades really aren’t very nice to each other at all. Perhaps they just prefer being miserable together than miserable alone. Still, I don’t consider it my place to call their relationships failures. Too bad they often can’t extend the same courtesy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
03:23 PM on 01/24/2011
Of course divorce represents "failure", as much as this predator wants to say otherwise.
Why be defensive? If I started a diet and it didn't work, that'd be a failure, and like the failure of divorce, something to learn from. Fact is if you married you made vows, and divorce is the undoing of those vows. Sure, you probably have great reasons - abuse for example, but that still represents the failure of judging character.
Stop making excuses - this guy is putting lipstick on a pig and I aint buying
04:48 PM on 01/24/2011
Oh, if I only had that much control over life so that I could judge others in this way. The reality is that people change, circumstances change and you can't know everything. Pretending that one can know ahead of time what the future will bring is wishful thinking and simply gives a false sense of security: i.e. "I won't get divorced because I know how to judge character". It's one thing to take responsibility for one's choices, it's another to think that you can know everything and control the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:33 AM on 01/25/2011
Keep in mind, I'm not saying there should be any shame in a divorce, just like there shouldn't be shame in any other failure. We learn more from failure than success. OTOH, it's still a failure.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SageFire
I like Obamacare, like Single Payer best
07:20 PM on 01/23/2011
I don't understand why people feel so qualified to own the "truth" about what is right for others. I can't imagine thinking I would know what someone else should or should not do with their relationship and even their parenting. On the one hand, I am guessing it might be comforting to be so sure of how others should live their lives but I guess I just don't think I am that smart and I certainly don't trust that others are either. I also can't imagine the waste of a life that it would be for me to not think for myself about whether my spouse and children would be happier with a different arrangement than the very recent configuration of one man, one woman and a couple of kids away from daily support of extended family and friends. Circumstances do change, my ex became mentally ill and because of our inability to make him seek treatment he now lives in abandonded houses, this person with a degree from Dartmouth. There was very little about him when I met him that would have allowed me to know this was going to happen and trust me the kids were way better off not living with him. Which one of us failed? Is his illness a failure, then so is MS. Was my leaving a failure or should I have stayed and let him keep us up all night every night with his loud conversations with invisible Godesses.
05:02 PM on 01/23/2011
Of course, most divorce lawyers would love to have the stigma of divorce removed - more business for them. When the value of a marriage and its meaning decreases, the clients increase.
11:33 AM on 01/25/2011
Amen.
photo
lcr999
scientist
04:04 PM on 01/23/2011
I don't buy it.
Happily married=success
Divorce= failed marriage.
Of course, unhappily married is also a failure.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CeeCee
Salta prima di inacidire
01:46 PM on 01/23/2011
Many people marry too quickly, too easily, and for the wrong reasons. That's where the "failure" is.
11:22 AM on 01/23/2011
I think that staying in a bad marriage that is no longer working for either person (if you're both being honest) is the failure. This isn't a life sentence, it's a choice. People change (thankfully) and if you change and find that your values, interests, desires, etc., no longer are compatible, why continue to suffer year after year? I was so depressed for so long living in an unhappy marriage/family and I think my daughter was too. My husband's business folded, he was bitter and angry at the world. I was trying to keep going and help him, but we just went in two different directions. Nothing about failure, just about moving on. I feel that the success came in admitting it and though we are not having an amicable divorce, I think it's part of the process of letting go. My daughter is doing better now that we are all living a more honest life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
10:14 AM on 01/23/2011
We, as a society, should stop referring to casual cohabitation as "marriage." We, as a society, should stop referring to people who fail at one thing as "failures."

But if you really set out on a till-death-do-us-part commitment, and then you separate, you have failed to do as you intended. That doesn't make you a failure as a person. It doesn't mean you should stay together when you, your partner, and your relationship have changed. It doesn't mean you should automatically be judged unfavorably. It doesn't mean that separating is any more of a failure than staying in a failed relationship.

But it does mean you failed to do what you set out to do.
10:45 PM on 01/26/2011
Well put. If we wanted to make that personal and public commitment of togetherness foreverness, then I need to also acknowledge that this was not the desired result of that promised commitment. We both did our part in failing to keep that commitment. I am still a good person. But I failed in my marriage. This is simply a factual statement. It's the judging that accompanies it that becomes problematic.
09:14 AM on 01/23/2011
I think anyone brave enough to admit that a relationship is not working and does not have a viable future is in fact behaving intelligently and with love and compassion. We have decided that love/relationships SHOULD last till death. Who says? Being divorced is no picnic and acknowledging what is true and honest between two people is a huge SUCCESS.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Obama 2012
03:43 AM on 01/23/2011
Divorce is a failure. You failed, get over it. It is how we learn. My first marriage failed. Acknowledging that, examining what went wrong, allowed me to marry again with a much better chance of success. Both marriages were entered into with love, but the second one had some wisdom thrown in.
photo
Openyermind
runs with scissors.
04:05 AM on 01/23/2011
Well put, as usual. People get too hung up on failure and don't realize that you can learn from the mistakes so hopefully one can avoid the same mistake in the future.
05:08 AM on 01/24/2011
Bob Dylan said in his song - Love Minus Zero / No Limit,

"My love she speaks like silence
Without ideals or violence
She doesn’t have to say she’s faithful
Yet she’s true, like ice, like fire
People carry roses
Make promises by the hours
My love she laughs like the flowers
Valentines can’t buy her

In the dime stores and bus stations
People talk of situations
Read books, repeat quotations
Draw conclusions on the wall
Some speak of the future
My love she speaks softly
SHE KNOWS THERE’S NO SUCCESS LIKE FAILURE
AND THAT FAILURE'S NO SUCCESS AT ALL

The cloak and dagger dangles
Madams light the candles
In ceremonies of the horsemen
Even the pawn must hold a grudge
Statues made of matchsticks
Crumble into one another
My love winks, she does not bother
She knows too much to argue or to judge

The bridge at midnight trembles
The country doctor rambles
Bankers’ nieces seek perfection
Expecting all the gifts that wise men bring
The wind howls like a hammer
The night blows cold and rainy
My love she’s like some raven
At my window with a broken wing"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KsWrangler
01:50 AM on 01/23/2011
Yeah it is.
photo
opus 6
concerned citizen
12:24 AM on 01/23/2011
He makes a good point. To stigmatize both parties in a divorce, particularly when there is spousal battery involved, is unfair to the victim. And to say divorce when children are involved is always a failure is unfair. Should the victim not seek safe haven? Even if the couple has children?

Thank you for publishing this compassionate article. I hope that some who read it, who may feel low of spirit, are lifted up.
07:42 AM on 01/23/2011
Whereas I say no benefit in the critique of a marriage from those outside the marriage, I have yet to know an individual who didn't benefit from self-reflection into their own behavior that contributed to the marriage ending in divorce.  In cases of spousal battery, why they were attracted to a one who batters can help prevent repeating the same pattern with another one.
photo
lcr999
scientist
04:06 PM on 01/23/2011
Sorry, it was a joint committment. If it fails, then it was a joint failure.

Note, a bad marriage is a failure even if it doesn't result in a divorce.