iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gary Hart

GET UPDATES FROM Gary Hart
 

A Landslide Election

Posted: 08/18/2012 11:53 am

The media-friendly catch-phrase "It's the economy, stupid" appeals to those who like their politics, and their government, simple. By and large people do vote their pocketbooks. But those same people have sons and daughters in the military, work for companies with international operations, and are threatened, at least to some degree, by terrorists in dark alleys of foreign capitals. Let's call this globalization. Our economy, and the jobs it does or doesn't produce, now exists in an international set of complex networks.

So the economy the "stupid" candidate talks about, whether specifically or more likely vaguely, cannot be separated from this world. This means that our leaders, especially the president and vice-president, better know something about the world in which we operate and to whose financial, banking, communications, security, environmental and a host of other systems we are connected.

All of which suggests that the traditional three categories of policy -- economic, foreign and defense -- are interconnected and international. Thus, knowing a good deal about the 21st century world, having traveled it and experienced it, is more crucial today for a president than ever before in our nation's history.

On this scale, Obama-Biden beats Romney-Ryan hands down. President Obama, as the "birthers" dementedly remind us, had an African father and was schooled for a time in Indonesia. Yet he is an American, born in America. Vice-President Biden made foreign policy his focus in the Senate. Like the president, he is comfortable in the widest variety of international arenas. They both know how to relate to and communicate with foreign leaders and peoples.

Their opponents, on the other hand, have only the scantest experience in today's world. Mr. Romney served in a Mormon mission in France in his youth. Mr. Ryan has yet to share his international experience and outlook, quite possibly because he has spent his public life trying to calculate how to lower taxes and balance the budget without both shredding the social safety net and destroying all the discretionary spending that keeps our food, environment and streets safe, our workers trained and healthy, and virtually every other public service necessary to a civilized society.

We should not hold out much hope that the media will focus on this wide difference in tickets. This is in part because most political journalists have yet to understand the degree to which our economy -- jobs -- is internationally dependent and because the new strategy of campaigns, especially on the Romney-Ryan side, is to prevent the candidates from answering difficult questions or departing from a simplistic, scripted "message."

In a perfect world, the focus of this campaign would be international and the degree to which creation of jobs in America is so closely interwoven with world affairs. If that were to be so, this election wouldn't even be close.

 
 
 

Follow Gary Hart on Twitter: www.twitter.com/gary__hart

FOLLOW DENVER
 
 
  • Comments
  • 870
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
05:11 PM on 09/18/2012
This comes down to the middle 4%, the impact of the debates, voter purging and Intimidation.
08:39 PM on 08/22/2012
Cannot think of any past president that spent so much money to maintain shroud of secrecy about his past. That alone casts enormous doubt about his character and to question all motives behind his actions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alanramsey
The Founders were Social Progressives, too.
10:06 AM on 08/21/2012
Great column, Gary...and so true.

You know, back when I was an activist in the party of Reagan, before the GOP left me with its theocratic Pat Robertson/Jerry Falwell/Franklin Graham/Tim Pawlenty/Michelle Bachman/Christine O'donnell/Sharron Angle (etc.) agenda ...

I hated you with a passion. I was a "simple minded" (43m61l65 below) minion of Rush Limbaugh back in the day...and did the same knee-jerk reaction as we see so often today.

But your knowledgeable column was very enlightening.

I'm not big on globalism as relates to the GOP's outsourcing of our manufacturing sector to their soulmates in Communist China and other slave-wage nations...

...but there is no doubt that the world is connected now, as was evidenced very clearly by the Arab Spring and social media.

Great column and you're right: Barack and Joe understand not just the common folks like us, but also the importance of global interaction. It's why, according to Daily Finance, the world's financial leaders have stated very openly that President Obama is the right one to ensure sound economic policies for the world in which we live.

They know what happened last time around when the GOP caused all the problems here at home and abroad...$15 trillion in debt and counting and facing the challenges of fixing failed GOP policies for years to come.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alanramsey
The Founders were Social Progressives, too.
09:58 AM on 08/21/2012
"Mr. Romney served in a Mormon mission in France in his youth."

Actually, as the serial coward that he is, he was dodging the draft, after organizing counter-demonstrations to the anti-war protests on campus where he was living with his silver spoon and beating up on people who he thought "might be" gay.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emanonecafon
07:46 AM on 08/21/2012
This article brings up an interesting point. What about America's economy from a global perspective? From a global perspective Obama has got our economy right on track heading right where he wants us. Obama is not only interested in redistribution of wealth within America. Obama's wealth redistribution goals are global. In his liberal radical eyes, America is far too rich and Africa, the Middle East, South America, and Asia are far too poor. In Obama's core philosophy, America's economy needs to slow down. The more money America loses, the more money gained by Africa, the Middle East, South America and Asia. Obama is a citizen of the world. He gas a deep compassiin for his fellow citizens of the world. The best way for him to benefit the citizens is to redistribute America's vast excesive wealth to them. So yes, let's talk about Obama's ideas on the economy from his unique global perspective and make this a landslide election to kick him to the curb.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:23 PM on 08/22/2012
While I doubt the truth of your claims, in the grand scheme of things, why do you lash out at the notion of the poor receiving aid?

In reality, the dollars you so covet for the USA to keep will certainly stay here....in the pockets of the top 1% that you are soldiering for.

Surely, not one red cent is coming your way.

But hey, it's free to vote against your own interests.
02:52 AM on 08/21/2012
Gary Hart has good points but I disagree here where he is too kind in motive to Rep. Ryan:
"Mr. Ryan has yet to share his international experience and outlook, quite possibly because he has spent his public life trying to calculate how to lower taxes and balance the budget without both shredding the social safety net and destroying all the discretionary spending that keeps our food, environment and streets safe, our workers trained and healthy.."

Mr Ryan has not tried to lower taxes and balance budget WITHOUT shedding the social safety net. That is not his goal. He has a Randian ideologue, a purist who is trying to apply his theoretical beliefs onto our country.
Mr. Ryan doesn't want people to suffer, but he does believe that privatizing social security and Mediare is somehow the way. He wants people completely and singularly responsible without any collective effort, he has said, for their destiny.
Government and it's social welfare programs exist because people came togeather to solve social problems of society which they had not been able to solve successfully as individuals.
Ryan actually believes that the social safety net as we know it is a crutch that supports victimization ONLY and it is better to get rid of it. I've seen him communicate that in his own words.
09:59 PM on 08/20/2012
Poor old simple minded Gary Hart, to think that Obama had foreign policy experience prior to his 2008 election. Obama had no qualifications for the job other than being different than what we had, and a good speaker offering 'Hope & Change,' something we all wanted. There's no greater failure in the office since Jimmy Carter.
Obama had no economic experience, and it shows. He lacks the ability to relate to the average person, and it shows. He was just another friggin' lawyer that comes out of the woodwork, a dime a dozen!
Gary Hart is only trying to distract the electorate from our real problems; that is, a president that is in over his head with no executive experience other than being a community organizer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:00 PM on 08/22/2012
While not living up to many of his campaign promises, the community organizer (who, after being president of the Law Review @ Harvard, taught constitutional law at Chicago University and served 3 terms in the senate) has:

Saved the domestic auto industry with loans (since paid back)
Accomplished a degree of health care reform - for better (kids & pre-existing conditions) or for worse (individual mandate?)
Facilitated the elimination of Bin Laden and countless other Al Queida leaders
Wall Street Reforms and Consumer Protection (crackdown on unethical credit card practices)
Much improved foreign relations (you see Romney getting crowds of 150,000 in europe?)
Emphasizes importance of education (this one pisses off most republicans)
Cut taxes for 95% of America's working families, lowest rate since 1950
Ended Iraq War

A complete list: http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/

Cheers.
09:40 PM on 08/20/2012
If you think that a community organizer that has extremely little experience not only in life but in government can run this Country to lead the world go vote for him. I'm voting for a man who ran multimillion dollar businesses, an Olympics and has the intelligence to surround himself with people who know better than he does other venues of expertise and wants a VP with sixteen years experience in Congress to help him.
09:23 PM on 08/20/2012
Hey Gary, How is that Hanky Panky? Obama administration has ben a foreign policy nightmare. Mentalisfit Joe may say soemthing to start WWIII. Who values your opinion? Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alanramsey
The Founders were Social Progressives, too.
10:13 AM on 08/21/2012
Well, the spudnik clearly has forgotten recent history.

Can you say bin Laden?

Can you say: the dismantling of the financial infrastructure of Al Qaeda.

Can you say: the vast majority of foreign nations support President Obama for his economic policies over the draft-dodging Willard Romney?

It's no wonder you have only 5 fans...

...and just how many screen names do you have to try to convince yourself that anyonw "values your (mindless and thoughtless) opinion? Really?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mark331blue
Left leaning independent
06:39 PM on 08/20/2012
Since when have we ever been able to count on the press to focus on what matters?
02:54 AM on 08/21/2012
answer: we used to be able to to a much greater degree, at least it seems to be the case.
05:49 PM on 08/20/2012
Experience should be considered, of course, but equally important is how that experience gets translated into action. On the foreign policy front, I don't see much that has been gained from this experience gap. We've kowtowed to the Russians, allowed Egypt to become ruled by Islamic extremists, failed to stop Iran's progression toward a nuclear weapon, and we can't even prevent the dictator of Syria from murdering thousands of his own people. If that's the results you get from experience, count me out. But the writer doesn't mention experience in the economy, probably because the gap there between Romney and Obama favors Romney by miles. I doubt we'll see any landslide in November, but if I had to predict who's more likely to win by a landslide, I would pick Romney.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julescator
Just the FACTS, Por Favor!
07:29 PM on 08/20/2012
Romney would make a better business consultant to the White House than a POTUS. He is woefully inept on everything. His life was handed to him. There isn't a lost of work that goes into taking over a company if you can read a balance sheet. The Presidency has a lot of facets and Romney pales to Obama on most of them.
09:41 PM on 08/20/2012
Evaluating competence is, of course, subjective, so I suspect we will be unsuccessful convincing the other of our own evaluation. Romney's father was wealthy, but the son was highly successful in his own right -- his wealth was not purely inherited. You argue that taking over a company (I assume you're referring to the CEO position) doesn't require a lot of work, but the pay scale for CEOs (especially as compared to community organizers) would suggest that those skills are rare enough (like NFL quarterbacks, for example) to command considerable compensation. I would have a much easier time arguing that the work of a community organizer requires little work. You only have to know which buttons to push to make people agitated. That last comment likely agitated you, so you see how easy that is.
10:08 PM on 08/20/2012
julescator: One FACT you failed to mention. Obama is extremely more inept than Romney on most everything. Obama does not understand foreign policy and where the U.S. stands in our world. Obama does not understand economics because he has never operated a business, nor hired people, nor fired people, nor balanced a budget. He can't get any votes, Dems or Repubs, on his budget proposals. (I bet Mrs. Obama does not let BHO touch their checkbook.)
08:27 PM on 08/20/2012
"allowed Egypt to become ruled" by leaders the Egyptian people voted for? What supreme arrogance would presume that the U.S. is, or was ever, in a legal or moral position to "allow" any people their right to self-determination? As for our failing "to stop Iran's progression towards a nuclear weapon", we've not only "failed" to do the same with regard to Israel, but we've financed them, enabling them to possess several nuclear weapons. Dengold, your vision of American is one of a 19th-century Imperial power. Mine is of a country that actually attempts to respect international law and its highest aspirations.
09:45 PM on 08/20/2012
Where do I begin with what hullp just said???

1. What is wrong with being arrogant and trying to influence the outcome of other countries to help ours??? I am really tired of apologist for america's greatness. Our model of free market capitalism is why we won the 20th century.

2. Our lack of action in Egypt has resulted in leadership that is now meeting with Iran and trying to figure out how to attack our only ally "Isreal" in the Middle East.
A. You think the Egyptian people are better off? Thats nuts.
B. They are performing crucifixions and already going after media that is against their views. Shame on them.

3. Don't you dare attack Israel for having nuclear weapons. They are surrounded by people that want to wipe them off the map. With friends like Hullp who needs enemies.

4. It is necessary for America to be the dominant influence in the world. Have you seen how other countries treat their people??? Your policy of apathy will undoubtedly lead to America's decline.

5. Look how Russia treats us now? They don't even send their President to the G20. You show weakness they feed on it like sharks.
10:01 PM on 08/20/2012
The argument for self-determination is a strong one, and it's one that I respect. I'm not willing to say that it trumps all other ideas, however. Admittedly, I am making judgments in this case, and my judgments might easily turn out to be wrong, but I feel quite strongly that the Egyptian people have traded one dictatorship for another. While I would not advocate that the U. S. impose a government over the desires of its people, I do think we are perfectly within our rights to "help" those candidates that more closely represent the values we stand for. The Muslim Brotherhood represents the antithesis of those values. Perhaps our "efforts" would have been unsuccessful, and we would have wound up with this regime anyway. But I would feel much better if we had, at least, tried. My opinion is that an Egypt that is strongly anti U.S. is a result that comes in second only to the loss of China as a diplomatic failure. As for imperialism, I would oppose it the same way I oppose Islamic fundamentalism. Both are overly restrictive of human rights. And, finally, in regards to Israel, I strongly believe that this Jewish state would have been utterly destroyed by now without our support and without their acquisition of nuclear weapons. I would never apologize for either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dixonpa
03:13 PM on 08/20/2012
Yes, the world is interconnected and we as individuals are also interconnected at every level of life. Those who think otherwise have to ask themselves: Do we share the same air, water, sky? When we get sick do we just wait to get better or do we go to a doctor? Where do the products we consume come from? and last, does a foreign policy based on fear and reaction leads to PEACE?
We are all one human race and we must depend on each other.
Thank you Mr. Hart for reminding us that the stakes are high in this election and that only the HYBRIDS like president Obama have the skills to lead us into the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
corte33
02:38 PM on 08/20/2012
As Mitch McConnell made it clear, lots of folks don't like blacks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julescator
Just the FACTS, Por Favor!
07:29 PM on 08/20/2012
Especially this one in the White House.
02:56 AM on 08/21/2012
anything particular that he said? I'm not surprised but would love to hear the details of what you mean.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
02:33 PM on 08/20/2012
We hear that we should think global yet vote local but in this 21st century where we have to acknowledge how humanity is connected collectively whether we know it or not, we have to be concerned about what happens in other countries around the globe. We may be thinking we should vote in our immediate neighborhoods but not ONLY. What happens on the other side of the globe is affecting our lives (think our economy). I believe conservatives are not up to speed in this regard so voters : GIVE OBAMA 4 MORE YEARS ! !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
H Diggity
02:28 PM on 08/20/2012
"In a perfect world, the focus of this campaign would be international and the degree to which creation of jobs in America is so closely interwoven with world affairs. If that were to be so, this election wouldn't even be close."

Hilarious. Any discussion of the economy would mean Obama would lose in grand fashion. There is a reason that the Dems are pushing trivial things like tax returns ("Taxer" is the new "Birther") and "international plan". It's because Obama's economic record is dismal and his understanding of basic economic principles rivals that of your average 7th grader.