iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gary Johnson

GET UPDATES FROM Gary Johnson
 

Dear Republican Party: Talk Economics, Not Social Issues

Posted: 08/19/11 11:15 AM ET

Will the Republican Party be able to capture the White House in 2012? I believe the answer to that question will be found in how we as a party present solutions to revitalizing this current sluggish U.S. economy. The country's economic situation is just not good. The growth that we were hoping to see has not occurred. Fresh ideas are demanded if we are to have a business climate that creates an atmosphere for fostering growth and job creation.

I have always viewed the Republican Party as the party of efficient management of the government's pocketbook. We are the dollars and cents team. We are the ones who make decisions based on costs and benefits. When I was Governor of New Mexico I took the role of steward of taxpayer funds very seriously. I cut waste and eliminated unnecessary jobs and programs. It was not easy, but we made New Mexico more efficient, and we created private sector jobs and growth. (National Review states that I had the best job creation record of all the GOP candidates running for president, June 20, 2011) This is the same kind of management style that we need in the White House today and I believe this is the type of leadership America wants and needs now.

The Republican Party should be leading the economic discussion with the presentation of new ideas and solutions for recovery. This country is looking for a new kind of leader, someone to provide new ideas and real solutions, someone who is willing to balance the budget immediately and is not afraid to make tough decisions. Over the next few weeks and months I will be presenting real solutions and ideas that we can implement to turn this country around and create jobs and build growth in America.

While some of us talk of solving economic problems, unfortunately, there exists a part of the Republican Party that wishes to sidestep this important discussion and instead turn the attention toward social issues and morality. By making such a choice, we are missing a golden opportunity to provide leadership for America. Social issues are not going to win the White House in 2012 for the Republican Party. When I see Republican presidential candidates discussing morality as if the government were some type of watchdog and moral compass for America -- then I see the American electorate being turned away from the Republican Party. America does not want government dictating actions in the bedroom, and they do not want government invading personal lives. We want a government that allows freedom and personal liberty for responsible adults. As long as we do not do harm to others, we should be allowed to live our lives in peace and free from government intervention.

I truly believe that the Republican Party is about efficient management of the government pocket-book, and that we are the party that can restore economic prosperity. However, if we continue to get sidetracked by the social conservative fringe of the party -- we will never get that chance.

Note: Governor Johnson will be addressing the National Press Club August 19, in Washington, DC, on the role of social issues in the Republican Party.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:31 PM on 08/20/2011
Gov. Johnson, I am rooting for you to beat the odds and take the presidency. I truly think that you are the best man out there for the job, and I resent the media for continuing to ignore your ideas (I would think that The Daily Show with Jon Stewart might be a media outlet willing to have you as a guest, since they just recently did a segment on the media's intentional silence about Ron Paul, and you are even more a victim of that than he is).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Stanley
12:46 PM on 08/20/2011
The Republicans in the private sector within the business world are physcally conservative but, not in the U.S. Congress. BOTH Democrats and Republicans spend our money like drunken sailors.
They are addicted to spending other peoples money and buying votes with it. They are all owned by the corporate and union lobbiest on K Street. Until the people rise up and change the culture of Washington, then nothing will change.

The solution is to rid the country of all those in power in Washington now and replace them with people who put our country first and their pcketbooks and re-elections second.

At thispoint, drastic changes need to be made in order to save this country and those now in Washington do not have what it takes to get the job done.

The solution is to enact the recommended changes from the Bowles/Simpson plan but none of these idiots in Washington will do what is needed in fear of hurting their chances for re-election.
iridium53
Semper Fi
07:33 PM on 08/19/2011
A budget is a moral document.

As a society we can either deal with hunger, poverty, homelessness and sickness - or we can ignore it.

Evil is the absence of good.

You can say that government is about efficient management. I fundamentally disagree.

Our forefathers set up a government to, "form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity."

Establish Justice. What is justice when the U.S. is #48 in the world in economic disparity?
Promote the general Welfare. What is the general welfare when the Republican party is giving 23% of national income to the top 1%, while excoriating and blaming the poor?

Leadership is about morality, ethics and justice.

You just failed the test.
06:36 PM on 08/19/2011
Dear Gov. Johnson --

How can you "truly believe that the Republican Party is about efficient management of the government pocket-book" in light of the combination of tax cuts and spending increases that occurred during both the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations? In each instance, a Republican President acting in concert with Republicans in Congress deliberately took actions (i.e., decreasing revenue while increasing spending) that any rational person would have to realize would result in enormous deficits.
photo
libnproudof it
Consumers are the real "job creators."
05:57 PM on 08/19/2011
The Republicans are not talking about economics because they truly don't really understand it. For years they have been enjoying the misnomer that they are the party of fiscal responsibility but now that light has been shined on them letting every know they have no idea of how to make the economy work for everyone's benefit, not just the rich. No they can't get that little genie lie back in the bottle because no one believes them now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DustyMills
A liberal tree-hugging Oregonian...
04:42 PM on 08/19/2011
Once again, a republican assumes he speak's for Americans........Stop doing that Mr.Johnson, you honestly have no idea what Americans want or need, nor do you care. If republicans cared about the people of this nation, they would work with democrats to improve the lives of all citizens, you would care about the infrastructure that is falling into ruin and you would stop "playing" politics and work earnestly for all people, not just the rich ones.

As for fiscal responsibility.....you guys proved how responsible you are during the Bush years.....that dog has died.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:50 PM on 08/19/2011
The "dollars and cents team"? It's not often that I'm helpless but to turn to that tired internet cliche "LOL", but this is one of those times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cookie Monsta
Angry Young Men, ltd
03:45 PM on 08/19/2011
Dollars, sure, but their economic policies have not made sense since before Regan.
02:43 PM on 08/19/2011
I could, and I'd love to have the option of, voting for sane fiscal conservatives. But, so long as the GOP continues its unholy alliance with the extreme religious right, I refuse to vote for any Republican. My conscience trumps my wallet every time.
02:55 PM on 08/19/2011
Gary Johnson is a religious moderate that believes in evolution :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cookie Monsta
Angry Young Men, ltd
03:46 PM on 08/19/2011
Lord knows the last 3 fiscal conservatives were anything but.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
02:34 PM on 08/19/2011
You should be on the short-list for VP candidate. Your record on job creation, waste management, vetoes, and personal liberty is strong.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KenKo
02:31 PM on 08/19/2011
I wasn't sure if this was a comic piece or not. Did he say that Republican Party was the party of efficient management of the government's pocketbook? When was the last time this happened? During the Civil War? Or was it when both Bushes ran up more debt than all previous and current Presidents combined? This is so laughable except he sounds so serious that I think he actually believes what he says. Perhaps at the state level, there were governors (both Republicans and Democrats) who might have been efficient (not sure who), but to make such a flagrantly untrue claim, you gotta wonder what these people smoke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
02:30 PM on 08/19/2011
The GOP doesn't want to talk about the economy since that brings them back to the jobs their corporate masters are shipping overseas, union busting and the fact that while the rich got richer, the rest of us got laid off.
photo
thejazz
I'll burn that bridge when I come to it.
02:14 PM on 08/19/2011
"I have always viewed the Republican Party as the party of efficient management of the government's pocketbook"

Sure, If you are a large corporation/bank/wall street star, the republicans are very efficient at removing money from the government pocketbook and into the pockets of the afor mentioned groups. And yes, republicans SHOULD stop talking social issues and start talking economics. But then where would their votes come from? Half of the rich and corporate? That's only 2% of the population, the rest have to be bamboozled into voting against their own interests.

I heard your address to the press club, and I'm sorry to say that a pro choice, legalizing drugs, type conservative doesn't have a chance with the GOP. And when you mention free markets in the same sentence as health care, all I see is money being sucked out of my personal bank account. So the liberal vote is no as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
01:45 PM on 08/19/2011
Without social issues used as wedges to get white working class voters to vote for candidates with economic theories designed to transfer their weaker wealth up to the top 1%, the Republicans couldn't win.

The so-called "religious right" is bankrolled primarily as a method of getting working class voters to vote against their economic interests.
01:19 PM on 08/19/2011
GOOD MORNING!! MY FELLOW HOMO SAPIENS WHICH MEANS THE SPECIES WHO IS WISE.
The CIA recently won two court rulings allowing the agency to refuse comment about its former contractor Dennis Montgomery - rulings that issues involving him are "state secrets" (despite strong evidence that the main "secret" is merely how foolish the agency, and the U.S. Air Force, were to pay Montgomery at least $20 million for bogus software following 9-11, according to a New York Time report.) Mongomery, a small-time gambler who said he was once abducted by aliens, convinced the two agencies that his sophisticated solftware could detect secret Al Qaeda messages embedded in video pixels on Al Jazeera's news website. According to the Times report, Montgomery has not been charged with wrongdoing and is not likely to be, since the agencies do not want their gullibility publicized proving the Central Intelligence Agency it misnamed and should be called the: Comedy Idiots Aggregation!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
01:19 PM on 08/19/2011
Well of couse conservatives aren't going to talk economics. Their economic ideology just imploded. In just 30 short years they created over $13 TRILLION in National Debt, outsquandering literally anyone else in human history. Then, they manufactured the Bush Second Great Depression, decimated the US jobs market, and made sure no money would be spent maintaining America's roads, schools, bridges, etc. Conservative economics is a Bridge To Nowhere... and conservatives know it. That's why they're so desperate to always change the subject.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
whirlybird
Time's a-wastin'!
02:38 PM on 08/19/2011
Republican voters don't have an economic ideology. To them, economic consequences are simply unimportant, residual effects of the social policies they support. They don't care to know what they don't care to know.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
08:52 PM on 08/19/2011
Well, they do have their talking points ("Smaller Gubment", "Industry Self-Regulation", "less spending", etc). That's why I call it an economic ideology, rather than an economic policy. What conservatives believe is like how Ayn Rand's "philosophy" got laughed off by real philosophers, and scientology got laughed off by real scientists, and "intelligent design" got laughed off by real scientists, and their global warming denialism gets laughed off by real scientists. The fact is, if conservatives say it, we can essentially guarantee it's a scam, and morally bankrupt.