Let me please share a few things that have zero impact on my life.
Gays in the military. The Facebook IPO. The Ivy League college admissions process as regards to my three high school age kids. Lindsay Lohan. Gay marriage. The new Spiderman movie. Roger Clemens. The two gay guys on Modern Family. The NBA finals. Jerry Sandusky. Betty White.
Not that these things (and people) aren't important to some and I respect that. It's just that I don't have to think about them very much. They are of little consequence to me.
Oh, I forgot healthcare reform. That is also of little consequence to me. Or my business for that matter.
Because very, very soon the Supreme Court will rule on whether all or parts of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is constitutional. It'll be big news. But not for me. And not for my small business. Or most of the small business owners I know. Contrary to what many anti-legislation groups are arguing, most small businesses like mine have been blissfully left out of the healthcare debate. Healthcare reform doesn't affect most of us, at least not in the short term. And even in the long term its effects are murky at best.
For example there's the tax credit for small business that's part of the legislation. Companies like mine can take a credit against taxes owed based on how much health insurance we're paying. Sounds like a good thing, right? It is a good thing. But for a very select few. That's because to take full advantage of the credit you need to have less than 10 full time employees earning an average salary of $25,000 per year. From there it gets reduced. So unless you're employing oompah loompas making everlasting gobstoppers somewhere in Alabama you're going to find yourself disappointed by the actual benefit you receive, if any. Sure, it can add up to a few bucks saved. But for most it's not such a big impact. This would be why only 170,000 small businesses actually took advantage of the tax credit last year. Remember...that's out of 20 million small businesses.
By the way...these aren't the only tax implications of the bill. Starting in 2013 there's a new "unearned income" tax, an increase in our Medicare tax rate and a decrease in the amount of itemized deductions we're allowed to take against income. This is all part of the funding of the legislation. Who here thinks, with the government's current deficit problems, that these taxes will be changed or removed regardless of the Supreme Court's decision? Anyone? Bueller?
There's a lot of yelling and screaming about "the mandate." Individuals will be required to have health insurance or pay a fine. And the government will require businesses to provide a qualified health insurance plan for their employees or face a penalty of up to $2,000 per year for each. I'm not sure why this upsets them. Most companies pay an average of $9,000 per year per employee for health insurance as it is. So, in a worst case scenario, a company could ditch their plan and just pay the penalty. Or, as most executives I know are considering, just pay the fine and then come up with a reimbursement for an employee who then buys their insurance on their own so that they're not paying any more than before. For many, the cost would still be about the same, or even less. What does this amount to? It amounts to not much of a difference whether the legislation moves forward or not.
In either case, it definitely doesn't affect my business. That's because I forbid my people from drinking sodas in 32 ounce cups. Oh, and it's also because I employ less than fifty people. So therefore my business, like the great majority of those 20 million small businesses, is exempt from the legislation. Nyah! Nyah! We can offer health insurance. Or we can ditch our plans and tell our employees to go fend for themselves. Or meet them somewhere in the middle. We can do all this without fear of paying a penalty. For many of us, the upcoming Supreme Court ruling is about as important as Arsenio Hall returning to late night TV. See? You don't care either. Whether the legislation is blessed by the Supreme Court or not, we will not stop providing health insurance for our employees. And the cost will likely be the same to us too.
And from what I read recently, it's unlikely that many health insurers are going to turn back on some of the coverage they've been required to provide as part of the legislation: "UnitedHealth Group, Humana, Aetna and BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee all said that they will continue to cover preventive care such as immunizations and screenings without requiring patients to pay a set fee called a co-payment. They also said they'd still cover adult children up to age 26 through their parents' insurance plans." Let's put aside the obvious fact that this is just too good a PR opportunity for them to pass up and give them credit where credit is due. And although I'm happy that these insurers will continue to provide these benefits for my employees, unless they announce coverage for the treatment of pattern male baldness I'm really not affected by this decision either. Granted, some of the more expensive parts of the coverage, like pre-existing conditions, may likely never see the light of day, which is a shame.
And is any small business owner yet seeing a reduction in their healthcare premiums? Hello? I thought not. That's because two years into the legislation the cost of healthcare continues to rise. It's one of those invoices, like the cable bill and the spouse's credit card, that business owners fear opening every month. This has not changed. And most of us don't believe it ever will. This is why so many small business owners are ambivalent about the current healthcare reform legislation. We have our reasons.
And here's the biggest reason: we don't understand the numbers. We don't believe the supporters who say that the legislation will lower the cost of healthcare over the long term. The crux of the plan assumes that states, with federal assistance, will setup their own exchanges where individuals and businesses can go to purchase their health insurance. You've heard about this, right? The exchanges will be a level playing field. It will be a gloriously competitive marketplace for insurance providers. All types of insurance options will be available. And insurance companies will need to get the approval from government appointed committees before raising their rates or denying coverage. The economic models rest on the assumption that the 34 million people who are now currently without healthcare will (under law) be forced to join the market and create a giant new market opportunity for the insurance providers, therefore lowering their costs for all. Makes sense, right?
Not to the business people I know. We wonder how those 34 million are going to pay for their health insurance from an exchange when they can't afford to pay it now. Or don't want to. And when this becomes a required mandate in 2014 we wonder how the government is going to enforce the law. Will all, or most of these people enter the market and drive down costs? Really? And will the government be able to go after those who don't without adding thousands of auditors and overhead to their already unbalanced budget? Hey...are you thinking what I'm thinking? Bring in those oompah loompahs! They'll do the job for almost nothing...and sing about it too! Most of us don't believe that costs will go down. The numbers don't add up. We just don't know.
But to be sure, many small business owners don't believe in the doomsday predictions either. That's because there are a lot of good things about healthcare reform that could benefit the economy. The theorists could be right and those 34 million new consumers may drive down costs. It may be more efficient to let a governmental body oversee insurance rates. The state exchanges may be a more effective way to deliver health insurance. Required coverage for things like pre-existing conditions may provide added benefit to employers who can then hire key talent without being restricted by their health insurance companies. It's just that like the ingredients contained in those over the counter energy drinks: we're drinking it, but we're a little nervous what inside.
But here's what we do know: given all that could happen it's likely that the same will happen whether the Supreme Court weighs in favor of the legislation or not. Costs will likely continue to rise. Gaps in coverage will still exist. Our national deficit will continue to be our national deficit. Our health system will still be far from perfect. But whatever the case, my small business is really just a bystander to the whole event. So go ahead Justices, rule as you see fit. It's not going to make much of a difference to me. And for what it's worth, the two gay guys on Modern Family are hilarious.
A version of the above appeared on Inc.com
Follow Gene Marks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/genemarks
Eric Segall: Umpires, the Affordable Care Act and the Rule of Law
AZ immigration law passed most important issue by Supreme Court. The health care bill will be thrown out by the supreme court and Obama has 5 more months in the white house. Now, get over yourself.
So, yea, right, vote Republican - the party that is willing to let millions of people go without health care and die rather than raise taxes on the wealthiest people. The party that would rather defend corrupt bankers who have fleeced trillions of dollars. The party that has sent the economy into a terrible recession and won't lift a finger to help us get out of it.
We can have whatever we're willing to fight for. Yes we can! We WILL have single payer. Count on it!
So, the best solution for everyone is that health insurance be tied to individuals/employees and not to employers. It helps level the playing field in my view. Anyway you rationally look at it, there is no legitimate argument that can be made against universal health care. Though the U.S. Chamber of Commerce spent millions to persuade us otherwise. Given the cost of delivering health care, the last thing we need are for-profit insurance companies to take a slice.
As you can tell I really do understand the true cost of health insurance and the affect of the healthcare law to a small business. There is a premium being paid because of it. The real truth is it won't revert even if the law is overturned. It just cost every american except those in congress more for their medical care.
Hint: Anyone or any business which pays for any part of any health insurance policy.
As far as Health Care is concerned ..with 2000 page plus law which most people in DC have not read is an indiaction how we are being overloaded by all the regulations that can only raise cost. Unless people start taking personal responsibilty ..be it health,education, money etc our Economy thus unemployment will drag on regardless which party in white house or controls Congress.
Only good thing is Mrs Obama's obesity project..So there is some "HOPE"
Roop Bhakuni
In other words....It hasn't dropped "yet"...let us know when it does....Im open minded
I truly and deeply wish Americans were capable of studying and learning facts instead of propaganda, and that they were capable of thinking logically, rationally. That rarely happens in declining empires, though, so there isn't much hope.
Also, third party insurance standing between service provider and service recipient removes the market incentives for improved quality and lower costs, which is why we have not seen either.
We need single payer with consumer's incentivized to select the best value services if we want to see health care improve in quality and achieve lower costs.
WRONG
Try tort reform and fraud.
The reality is that tort 'reform' (which is not actual reform in any sense) costs less than 2% of the total spent on health care in the U.S.
Here's another reality for you: as a part of the A.C.A., the Democrats took aim at fraud and abuse in health care. In fact, they like to make the claim that they will eliminate $50 billion per year in fraud. The reality is that they are likely to eliminate about half of that, but Republican political commercials are running in my state every 15 minutes on the TV claiming that Democrats have eliminated $500 billion dollars from Medicare (based on that $50 billion per year)...all the while not bothering to mention that they claimed that THEY could, and would, eliminate at least $100 billion in fraud per year ($1 trillion).