The election of Senator Barrack Obama brought jubilation across Africa, where millions celebrated him as "one of their own." His election victory shattered myths about America and caused some discomfort among Africa's gang of "hippos" - the nasty, ornery and unrepentant hard-knocks. Wedded to seats of power, not even bulldozers can dislodge them. "No African head of state should be in power for more than 10 years," declared President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda in 1986. He is still president.
Ferociously resistant to change, they would have crushed an Obama who dared challenge their iron grip on power. They would have tossed him into jail the night before the elections (Rwanda); mercilessly bludgeoned him (Zimbabwe); thuggishly annulled his election victory (Nigeria); or threatened to feed him to crocodiles (Malawi). Their security forces would have opened fire on Obama's supporters, killing over 250 and hauling over thousand into jail (Ethiopia). Even in his own father's country, Kenya, his victory would have been stolen, his supporters used for target practice by the police, where recent elections sparked violence that claimed over 1,000 people and dislocated more than 250,000. Municipal elections on November 29 in Jos, Nigeria, have claimed the lives of more than 400 people.
Such is the state of "elections" on a broken and dysfunctional continent of shattered dreams and unfulfilled promises. Immensely rich in mineral resources, it is mired in grinding poverty, social destitution and humanitarian crises. It has been reduced to a wasteland by marauding hippos -- in Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Zimbabwe -- enabling vulture mercantilist countries to pick with chopsticks dexterity a platinum from Zimbabwe, oil from Sudan, col-tan from Congo, and bauxite from Guinea, all to the detriment and impoverishment of their people.
In much of officialdom, common sense is on vacation while arrogant tomfoolery rampages with impunity. The rule of law is a farce: Bandits are in charge and their victims are in jail. The police are highway robbers and soldiers protect not the people, but the crooks in power. Rape serves as a political weapon in Congo, and Sudan (Darfur), whose president, Omar el-Beshir, has been indicted by the International Crimes Commission for crimes against humanity.
"Government" doesn't care about the people, let alone provide them with basic social services (clean water, electricity or health). In fact, the role of government is not to serve but to fleece the people. It has been hijacked by a cabal of gangsters, who use the state machinery to enrich themselves, their cronies and tribesmen. The richest in Africa are heads of state and ministers. Says a tribal chief: "Here in Lesotho, we have two problems: Rats and the government."
Between 1970 and 2004, more than $450 billion in oil revenue flowed into the coffers of Nigeria's governments but $412 billion was looted by Nigeria's military thugs. Even the little that was recovered by the Obasanjo regime in 1999 was immediately re-looted! Lagos, the commercial capital lacks reliable supplies of electricity and water. The country can't feed itself, spending $3 billion annually to import food it could grow itself. Yet, it is spending $89 million to build a Space Center!
To be sure, there are bright spots in Africa where countries are well governed: Benin, Botswana, Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, South Africa among others. But they are pitifully few. The vast majority of Africans still labor under vapid repression and mismanagement - their struggle for freedom from white colonial rule perfidiously betrayed. Independence was in name only: One set of masters (white colonialists) was replaced by another set - a disgusting assortment of black neo-colonialists, Swiss bank socialists, crocodile liberators, and crackpot revolutionaries -- while the oppression and exploitation of the African people continued unabated. Such leadership is a far cry from the traditional leadership Africa has known for centuries.
These hippos have left a trail of wanton destruction, gratuitous mayhem and human debris in their wake. Since 1960, more people (over 16 million) have died than were snatched from Africa during the West African slave trade (operated by Europeans) and the East African counterpart (organized by Arabs). In Congo alone, more than 5 million have died since 1996 and over 4 million in Sudan. Hippos kill more people in Africa annually than any other wild animal.
For decades, the U.S. and the international community served as unwitting enablers - faithfully cleaning up the mess and dispensing band-aids to the victims: Somalia, Rwanda, Burundi, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Congo, Sudan, Zimbabwe, etc. Political correctness shielded Africa's brutal despots. Burdened by guilt over the iniquities of colonialism, Westerners were reluctant to criticize them - for fear of being labeled "racist." As a result, the root causes of Africa's crises were seldom addressed. These have little to do with racism, colonialism, American imperialism or artificial colonial borders. They are more about power, pure and simple. Zimbabwe and the plethora of failed African states would have been saved had their leaders been willing to relinquish or share political power. Without new leadership and genuine reform, more African countries will implode. But reform or change is anathema to Africa's hippos:
* Ask them to develop their countries and they will develop their own pockets. Ask them to seek "foreign investment" and they will invest the loot in a foreign country.
* Ask them to curb corruption and they will set up "Anti-Corruption Commissions" with no teeth and then sack the Commissioner if he sniffs too close to the fat cats (Kenya), issue a Government White Paper to exonerate corrupt ministers (Ghana in 1996), or send the anti-corruption czar off to the U.K. for graduate studies (Nigeria in 2007).
* Ask them to establish democracy and they will empanel a coterie of fawning sycophants to write the electoral rules, toss opposition leaders into jail, hold "coconut" elections and return themselves to power (Ivory Coast, Kenya, Rwanda).
* Ask them to reduce poverty and they will arrest the poor. Said Kibirige Ssebunya, the late and former minister of agriculture in Uganda in 2004: "They are poor. They are hard to lead. They should be arrested. This is the way to develop."
Africa's reform process has been stalled by contumacious chicanery, willful deception, and strong-arm tactics. Only 16 out of the 54 African countries are democratic and fewer than 8 African countries are "economic success stories." Intellectual freedom remains in the Stalinist era: only 8 African countries have a free and independent media.
The incoming Obama administration should not coddle Africa's hippos, nor should it put up with their vaunted acrobatics. These hippos need tough and blunt talk. Accordingly, Obama needs to revamp US-Africa policy to center around the following postulates:
1. Africa doesn't need aid. Its begging bowl leaks. According to the African Union (AU) corruption alone costs Africa more than $148 billion a year - nearly six times the aid ($25 billion) Africa receives from all sources.
2. Formulation of a new U.S.-Africa policy requires input from native born African dissidents and exiles living in the U.S. - the same role played by Soviet dissidents in the West. These Africans have a better understanding of conditions back home and, moreover, are not so encumbered by political correctness. But, hitherto fore they have been excluded from the formulation of U.S.-Africa policy.
3. The new policy should place less emphasis on the rhetoric of African leaders. When President George Bush declared a war on terror, immediately a host of African despots also claimed that they too were fighting terrorists (in order to win more U.S. aid) when they themselves were the real state terrorists! Even Charles Taylor, former president of Liberia and now an indicted war criminal at the Hague, had an Anti-Terrorist Unit, ran by his son, now in jail in Florida. And the warlords of Mogadishu, who had been terrorizing residents for years, formed a Coalition against Terrorism to secure CIA funding. This time around, more emphasis should be placed on institution building. Leaders come and go but institutions endure. Six institutions are critical:
* An independent central bank: to assure monetary and economic stability, as well as stanch capital flight out of Africa. Witness Zimbabwe where the rate of inflation is 11 million percent - whatever that means. It even ran out of paper on which to print the currency.
* An independent judiciary -- essential for the rule of law.
* A free and independent media to ensure free flow of information. Get the media out of the hands of corrupt and incompetent governments in Africa.
* An independent Electoral Commission to ensure free and fair elections.
* An efficient and professional civil service to deliver essential social services to the people on the basis of need and not on the basis of ethnicity or political affiliation.
* The establishment of a neutral and professional armed and security forces.
Give Africans these institutions and they themselves will do the rest of the job of cleaning up the continent.
4. Forget about that useless continental organization called the African Union (AU). It can't even define "democracy." On Zimbabwe, it is doing the watutsi and has yet to resolve one single African crisis. It dispatched a feckless contingent of peacekeepers to Darfur. When their Haskanita base in El Fasher in northern Darfur came under rebel assault on October 1, 2007, the AU peacekeepers fled.
5. The U.S. and the international community cannot forever continue to pick up the pieces and clean up the mess left by Africa's hippos. A United Nations protectorate should be declared over failed states (Congo, Somalia, Sudan, Zimbabwe, etc.) Sufficient force should be deployed to remove an errant regime and the country administered for say 10 years before holding free and fair elections to turn it over.
Finally Obama might consider following Nelson Mandela's example and serve only one term in office. This will send a powerful message to Africa's long-standing despots. The obsession with power is what has ruined Africa.
Africa is always lumped as one group - this isn't done w/ other continents. No one lumps all of the European countries as one, or all of the Asian countries as one - yet the Africans are all grouped as one. All 53 countries should be looked at as 53 separate entities. No one would group America's problems w/ Belize's or Russia's problems with Cambodia's.
People fail to take into a account how young African Independence is - yes some are 50 years old, but some like Gabon are only 16 years old. It was 109 years before America ended slavery (1776 -1885), another 80+ before legal equality was gained and another 40+ before Obama was elected. To compare that w/ Gabon where 5% of the population, the left over German colonialist, own 50% of the land is unrealistic. Don't forget that America was full of corruptions and murder and lynchings and false imprisonments and rape and discrimination and political exclusion as a means of control and political pressure well into the 1970's.
There's no doubt that many of the individual countries in Africa need to be responsible to their citizens and their souls - but if you're going to compare them w/ America, make a complete comparison. 50 years into American democracy African-Americans were still slaves.
Deceit and Violence. They make up the hallmark of the system of White Supremacy. If the biggest problem is fixed, which is the race problem, then logically the rest of the problems can be fixed.
It is not a coincidence that the world has a white over non-white "equation".
It's Mathematics. White people generally know that justice is better than racism, but many are waiting to have to be forced to practice justice. Frankly, people (especially non-white people) are slow to catch on, but they are catching on, and they are getting smarter. Racism is getting more refined. Let's replace it with justice.
Africa is still a continent that is still learning how to be independant, centuries of colonial rule unfortunately are still felt throughout the conitinent. we are still plagued by many many challenges,... but the last thing we need is yet another one-dimensional assessment.
but the issue of leadership is a complex issues that needs to be looked at on a case by case basis. Mr. Ayittey I was bafled to see how you can make a one dimensional caricature of African leaders.
I can only speak for example on the situation in Rwanda. where before the genocide Rwanda was ruled by a totalitarian dictator named juvenal Habyarimana who ruled for twenty something years and widely erncouraged descrimination and against the Tutsi people. It is after the assasination of Habyarimana that Genocide happened.
Kagame who is the current president of Rwanda was the head of the rebel group that put an end to the killings which the U.N. and the international community ignored, as they had done so also with the genocides in Cambodia, Iraq, bosnia and currently Darfour.
While Kagame still has some improvements to do in terms of free media and the problems of corruption, he has improved the country on a lot of issues like women's rights, the country is now first in the world in terms of the number of women in the parliament(49%)
Kagame has significantly courted foreign investors to invest in the various sectors of the Rwandan economy. there is a steady rise of the middle class, The country is much more secure, tourism has resumed,... the are significant and they are visible.
Africa is still a continent that is still learning how to be independant, centuries of colonial rule unfortunately are still felt throughout the conitinent. we are still plagued by many many challenges,... but the last thing we need is yet another one-dimensional assessment.
Look at how little comments are here. But when Aniston says something about Pitt/Jolie, the comments section just piles up. Our priorities are evident.
The obssession about "leadership change" is a rouse that distracts us from the main issue; how does Africa snatch its assets from foreign control and trade them fairly for the benefit of its own people!
It is true, African leaders leave a lot to be desired. It is also true to say that Mr. Ayittey pretends that most African leaders (as indeed are most third world leaders) generally operate within bounds prescibed for them by powerful forces from the West. This is why we see democracy thwarted in Egypt but encouraged in say Zimbabwe.
To prevent "undesirables" from power in Egypt, western money and might supports dictatorship there. To remove strident nationalist in Zimbabwe, an opposite formula of never ending elections (constantly proclaimed "rigged" until the opposition wins) is thrust on the country.
Africa's problem is not how often it changes its leaders. ALL countries that moved from poverty to stability and wealth this past century did this not thru "democracy" nor leadership change, but thru largely strongwilled and long reigning dictatorships! The list is endless, Imperial Japan, military ruled South Korea, Thailand, dictatorships in Malaysia, Indonesia, Chile, Botswana etc. And western nations gained their wealth in an earlier century not thru the spread of democracy and fairness, but thru brutal domination of others and enforcement of trade rules that benefited them (largely their kings and queens then).
very good points! the example you gave of Egypt is good one. also in saudi arabia, which is 100% times more abusive than zimbabwe but Oil makes the saudis democrats. The same with palestines who elected their leaders but they were rejected by WEST because they elected terrorists. what africa needs to do is remove poverty. Otherwise, everytime america/europe tells africa that a change of leadership is definition of democracy, africa will keep going back & starting from SCRATCH because of the humanitarian crisis & violence caused in trying to implement american formula. Africa needs to control its destiny with a strongmen leadership. it is all about the economy.
as you said, america secured its economic power thru world domination & trade barriers which helps it give social service to the poor. so American-blacks & other oppressed people don't raise arms. otherwise, it would have been same like many decades ago when minorities raised arms and protested as the CIA assassin/killing machine gunned down & incarcerated minorities. Africa needs to be smart. No need to bend to americans who suddenly applied human rights to the rest of the world years after they finished using up slavepower to build their infrastructure, and 400 years after they exterminated millions of Native Indians to take their land.
AFRICA, DON'T LET WHITE MAN PREACH HUMAN RIGHTS TO YOU AS IT NEVER KNEW IT, AND DON'T BE TRICKED BY THEIR "DEMOCRACY" CLAIMS. Each African nation needs to control its own destiny. Economy first,
Obama has to change himself to someone else to be elected. you can do that in america but i doubt in africa.
As others said, the politics is also different from the past and from africa. would america have elected supporters of the BLA in 1960s? If we can recollect, most of those proud African-Americans were jailed or massacred by CIA. At that time, the poverty in African-American community made the politics more "extremist" and "hardline" and the CIA either killed or jailed all black movement leaders. That old era in America history is similar to present day Africa. Let us not compare apples and oranges. Otherwise, you end up reminding us how much white Obama had to be to get elected.
I had hoped that I would some day be blessed with the chance to one day visit the great nation of Africa. I am sadden to see that the world continuing to forget such a beautiful and ingenious land.
http://www.hr2003.org/index.php
A country like Haiti, an old colony that was occupied by the French, American, Brittish, Spanish at different times during its 204 years of independance; that faced embargoes and that is still a weak state to this date mainly because outside pressures overwhelm the inside influence. One might be quick to point out that the corruption, yes there is. I might also point out to you, who was those who try to overthow the democratically elected president in 1994? Who supported these guys? If you can answer these correctly, you have a greater understanding on a large scope on the topic that Mr. Ayittey has introduced authorthan the