More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
George Elerick

George Elerick

Posted: April 28, 2010 04:10 PM

The Biblical Imperative to Embrace the Immigrant

What's Your Reaction:

We've been fighting for land and our rights since the early years of mankind. Way back when we were settlers, we figured out that war got faster results than bartering. Then when a small band of English people were suffering religious and political oppression, they fled to another land to live out their new dreams of liberation. Yet their liberation came at the cost of those who were already there. Their blood, sweat, and tears became the blood, sweat, and tears of the newly displaced. I think we might have forgotten our genesis into a new life. How we react to immigration tells us a lot about how our worldview has developed in terms of entitlement. The ancient nomadic followers of God have something to impart to us on the subject of being displaced and how we might better learn to treat our foreign neighbors.

One of the big, week-long parties the ancient Jews used to hold was called Sukkot, which means "dwelling." It was a house party, but one without walls. They had a set of building instructions to make a house with a hole in the roof and no walls. Changing clothes might have been an issue!! The reason for this was to remind the desert travelers that they were not only connected to the foreign neighbors and enemies, but that they had a responsibility to care for them when in need. As one website explains:

What is the lesson, when we learn that we -- all of us -- live in a Sukkah? How do we make such a vulnerable house into a place of shalom, of peace and security and harmony and wholeness? If I treat my neighbor's pain and grief as foreign, I will end up suffering when my neighbor's pain and grief curdle into rage. But if I realize that in simple fact the walls between us are full of holes, I can reach through them in compassion and connection.

The ancient Jews weren't strangers to the feelings of being an outsider. According to the Tanakh, they had their share of what it means to be a foreigner. One of the more famous stories is that of the Hebrew people in slavery at the hand of a tyrannical Egyptian pharaoh. At this point in their story, they were the inconvenient truth, the unfortunate stranger who just happened to be around when the Egyptians colonized other lands. This is the danger of aggressively shutting our doors to the outsider: we unintentionally colonize the lands and lives of others, and in that moment they stop being human and are more of a devalued commodity that we get to sale and trade. At one point, the Jews forgot this, and their God reminds them, "You shall not wrong or oppress a resident alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt" (Exodus 22:21). Here, God invites them to not become what they experienced.

This is key when responding to things like immigration. Anthony Robinson, a pastor and author, says this about immigration:

A second reason that the scriptures of Judaism and Christianity press their adherents to respect and not exploit the alien in their midst is especially pertinent to the contemporary American scene. Injustice anywhere leads inexorably to injustice everywhere. If there is a class of people without rights, without voice, without legal recourse and protection, it puts not just that group at risk. It puts an entire society at risk. It becomes a cancer that eats away at the whole social body. If a certain group can be exploited, then exploitation begins to infect the whole society. Its overall standards of justice and fair play are lowered and distorted.
It is hard for us to deal with an issue like immigration because it forces us to confront the reality that at some point in history, every person used to be the immigrant. If you search the ancient scriptures you might see a common thread: "Care for the foreigner." What do you when that foreigner is the enemy? Well, Jesus helps us with that by offering the option of loving our enemies. If we love our enemies, then they no longer are our enemies. Immigration reform is necessary not because the Bible says it is, or because of my worldview. I think we need to be more open to immigration because we are all human. If you were lying in the street dying, you wouldn't say to the person helping you, "Excuse me, do you have your green card?" Why? Because it doesn't matter; the person is someone who is there to help. Compassion is the thread that sustains our humanity. The more we meet the needs of those in need, the more human we become. The less we respond to societal expectations (and even some laws), the more we agree to the idea that only certain people have value. In that regard, than all we do is perpetuate a spirit of self-indulgence.

I think one of the biggest things we struggle with as people, as a humanity, is our lack of remembrance. We forget that we once were without a home. We forget that we were once without warmth, without care. We were isolated. For you it may have been a moment, but for others it is a part of their lives. To be an immigrant is to recognize that we are in need. I think we have forgotten what it feels like to be in need, because in the West we have our fill of things to drown out the shadows in our past that remind us of our ongoing immigrant status. Sometimes we even become foreigners to who we once were.

We are a changing people. We are a changing culture. As we change, we move forward and leave things behind, and we shed old skin. If we're honest with ourselves, we realize that we are foreigners who have forgotten that we are constantly living in a new land. This new land for you might look different from that of the person sitting next to you on the train home from work. This new land might be a new job. It might be a new relationship. It might be the new territory of a broken relationship. Maybe it's the discovery of the new life that is to come. We are foreigners. I know I am using this word generously, but I do think there is truth here. The reason why it's so hard to open borders, gates, and country policies is because we are terribly afraid that we might be forced to remember our own alienation.

I am not advocating an overpopulated state of anarchy. I am not saying that we don't need laws in place. I am simply stating that we need to be more aware of how we treat the outsider, the other, and that we might need a more inclusive attitude mentally, physically, politically, and even spiritually. I am also attempting to inspire a spirit of compassion and understanding for those who might be looking for a better life that for some reason or another can't be found in their native land.

The Neolithic Revolution was the moment when we went from being nomadic travelers who hunted and took only what we needed to farming settlers who began learning what it looked like to transform the act of consuming into consumerism. Consumerism tends to lead to entitlement. The spirit of entitlement then leads to preservation. Then preservation has the potential to lead to things like war, to preserve what is ours at all costs.

What if that has sneaked in and somehow whispered words of treason? That this land is my land rather than our land. That what is mine should stay mine at the cost of alienating others, even to the point of intentional abuse, even if it really isn't mine. Our control of things tends to only be an illusion.

The moment we realize that the world was not made just for us is the moment we begin to redeem the pieces of our own humanity. The moment we invite the foreigner is the moment we come to accept the foreigner in us. The moment we accept that to be human means to treat other humans with respect, compassion, hope and integrity is the moment that we all come together and defiantly proclaim that they world can be a better place.

 
 
 

Follow George Elerick on Twitter: www.twitter.com/atravelersnote

 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DefiningReality
05:50 PM on 05/07/2010
You're right, the Old Testament definitely is concerned with the welfare of widows, orphans, and foreigners. The NT only broadens this issue by bringing in foreigners (gentiles) to the fellowship of God.

So you're right, the abuse of foreigners is blatantly against scriptural morality.

But, here's another question. According to Torah, how were foreigners subject to the Mosaic Law? At once we see they were granted forms of grace (Leviticus 19 includes a law where Grain would be left in fields for the poor and foreigners). But we also see that they were excluded from some points of the Mosaic Law. For instance, interest could be charged to foreigners but not to Israelites. Furthermore, while foreigners were forbidden from partaking in the passover meal, they were required to remove all leaven from their dwelling.

So in the ML we see examples of Foreigners both of protected and unprotected and not under the law and under the law.

How do you choose which examples to build your paradigm from?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
2sunny
Sing....when shadows fall...
09:53 AM on 05/04/2010
....how we might better learn to treat our foreign neighbors. Well said.
A long time now, I've held a firm conception of "what is mine" My space, my home & property, my village (patri'tha), my country and this earth. Well, I say to you, we are caretakers to each of these. Not to be owned, simply cared for and watched over. Gently as we go about this ritual of sweet existance ~ life.
03:20 PM on 05/02/2010
I assume this is focusing on 'immigrant' and not 'illegal alien'.
They are not the same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
George Elerick
cultural theorist. writer. speaker. seller of thou
09:59 AM on 05/03/2010
i would say the label shouldn't matter how we treat one another. love and compassion should be the credo with breath as oxygen. labels sometimes can deny that opportunity.
02:49 PM on 05/03/2010
I certainly agree that we have the imperative to have compassion. A thirsty/hungry/sick illegal ought to receive water and food with dignity from a compassionate person. But he then needs to go back and re-enter the legal way.

I may have falsely assumed the thrust of this article concerned the illegal alien issue in general and the new AZ law in particular. If not, I stand 'straightened out'. Thanks.

But, if you see a Biblical imperative to aid and abet an illegal activity, I strongly believe you have mis-read the Scriptures. Having compassion in a personal way has nothing to do with the legal status of an 'immigrant'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AceNewsServices
Changing The World One Step At A Time
11:54 AM on 05/02/2010
Hi and Shalom George,

This is the way to greet all people on their travels through life and to leave people feeling better when we pass on our way. This side-lining of immigrants through-out the land has been around since before Christ and we called them Pharisees or similar as by giving any race of people a label we make anyone entering into our land a foreigner or by the time they migrate they become our modern day immigrant.

It is about time that that anyone entering the so-called foreign land or Britain, America, Germany or similar should be treated just as " A Foreigner In A Foreign Land" but with care and compassion of just that "Suddok" and maybe then we can remove the walls between racism and acceptance of someone different to ourselves.

We need to remember that all people that left Egypt a so-called foreign land to the Israelites as the Egyptians had side-lined the inhabitants and made them foreigners in a foreign land, so God took them to the Promised Land to make Suddok for all.

The Story is just beginning and we still have a lot to learn about ourselves first and this will allow us to understand others in a better and more consistent way.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
George Elerick
cultural theorist. writer. speaker. seller of thou
10:00 AM on 05/03/2010
this is brilliant. thanks for the thoughts!
12:47 AM on 05/01/2010
What is ours is ours. It is not another person's, just because they need. I am not being an unfair, hateful person by seeing that the law is enforced fairly. If we say "total amnesty" applies to immigration law breakers, and let who ever wants to come, come illegally, then why not empty the prisons, those people broke a law also, but why enforce it?
And the operative word is "invite". Those I invite to my home can come and stay. But if some one breaks in, camps out in the living room, I have the right and obligation to myself and my family to ask them to leave. Not only that, I have the right to demand for them to show me anything that entitles them to be there, if they have it.
If a policeman mans a traffic check to verify licenses, and I cannot produce one, can I say I am being discriminated against by that officer because he found out I had no license and gave me a ticket , but those with licenses didn't get one?. We see no problem with that kind of verification, why a problem with verification to check conformity with immigration laws.
Or is it simply because some want the illegals here no matter what.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
George Elerick
cultural theorist. writer. speaker. seller of thou
06:36 AM on 05/01/2010
the 'ours is ours' is one of the many credo's that has gotten us into a lot of trouble. if its ours than it can only eventually lead to the entitlement syndrome which then has the potential to lead to preservation and protection, like i shared above. this post is dealing with more of the mindset, like above. i am not condoning an over-populated anarchy, but more of a gracious response and to remember that we were all foreigners in our history. i personally think we need to loosen our grips with the aggressive idea of what is mine is mine and trying to abuse others under that justification.
08:59 PM on 05/02/2010
Truly you need to read "Crazy Love" a great book, and give away as is exampled there by Christ's words if you believe that what is yours should be given to others.
10:29 AM on 05/01/2010
If the Native Americans had had that same "mine is mine" way of thinking, there would be no Europeans on this continent now.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
George Elerick
cultural theorist. writer. speaker. seller of thou
04:32 PM on 05/01/2010
great point!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mabinog
My micro-bio is a desolate wasteland
11:16 PM on 04/30/2010
After reading the many pro AZ law comments I get the feeling that many of these folks are so attached to their anger, fear, hatred that they think the illegals have come here to personally offend them.

Thus, illegal immigration must stop utterly and completely, no matter if it is possible, no matter how much money it costs, no matter the cost to the illegals.
12:29 PM on 04/30/2010
some musings:

Moses said he was a stranger in a strange land and was taken in, but when Ezra the scribe returned from exile by oredered the repudiation of all foreign wives.

I've watched parts of clips on youtube of a speech given by Meir Kahane, founder of the JDL, who cited biblical and extrabiblical sources and commentaries to say that the alien is not welcome in the promised land, should not be allowed to dwell there, or even to travel through the land without restriction.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
George Elerick
cultural theorist. writer. speaker. seller of thou
03:19 PM on 04/30/2010
thanks carolus: i think its important to remember that JDL wasn't around during the OT which is important within that context. I think its also good to remember that as time went in the development of the OT that Israel lost the point that they were meant to invite the foreigner and used their festivals as reminders that they were responsibility for the outsider, they forgot it later on.
03:51 PM on 04/30/2010
Yes, George and as you know, religions no longer follow their original traditions. Judaism has a long traditon of commentary and so the Talmud, Rambam, etc.,. -- the texts are considered sacred and so as I said Kahane was using these to defend a practice the polar opposite of what you are defending. Here is something that John Romer recounted in his great TV documentary Testament (I tried to find the reference in his book of the same name but can't locate it) Here goes: A group of rabbis are having a heated debate on a point of law. One rabbi maintains that he is right against the opinions of the others. He says, if I am right, let a wind blow through this assembly. A wind blows through. Still, the arguments continue. He says again, If I am right let the trees bow down. The tress bow down. The argument continues. In exasperation he calls on G-d to affirm that he is right. The mighty voice of G-d booms out, This man is correct. The other Rabbis say they do not care what G-d said, they have the correct answer written down. The text is sacred, and if the text says not to welcome the stranger, not to let the alien reside in the promised land, then that overrides the prior tradition.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
George Elerick
cultural theorist. writer. speaker. seller of thou
04:32 PM on 04/30/2010
yes. totally. i guess people can choose to use the same information either to heal or to destroy. either to accept or reject. and also there is a jewish joke that goes something like this, that if you get 4 rabbi's talking about one passage of scripture that you will end up with 5 opinions.