Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Georges Ugeux

Georges Ugeux

Posted: February 18, 2010 03:11 PM

Is the Next Financial Crisis Approaching? The Case of Public Debt

What's Your Reaction:

2010-02-18-Budget2010.jpg


Over the last three months, the Credit Default Swap (CDS) rates for public bonds doubled in countries around the globe. This means that the market now requires between 60 and 80 basis points to cover the credit risk of those countries, almost twice as much as in December 2009. Is this happening in Greece? Not at all. This is the situation of the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom. In fact, most countries in the "developed world" are now way above the ratios of prudent debt management, and the market starts paying attention.

The champion in all categories is undoubtedly Japan, with about 200% of debt/GDP. Its public finance deficit has historically been at a record level, but with a zero interest rate policy, it did not hurt current spending as it did in other countries.

Governments all over the world now have to take serious measures and those that are reluctant to do so now will have tears in their eyes when they find it next to impossible to refinance their public debt. A recent study from the Bank of International Settlement (the Bank of the Central Banks) clearly indicates that the budget surplus that the countries will have to reach to go back to the 2007 levels, which are higher than 10% for Japan and the United Kingdom.

While there will be a lot of finger pointing focused on the support of financial institutions, these are not the most important cause of this deficit. The financial crisis required stimulus packages that were larger than normal to rescue consumers who were on the verge of bankruptcy. Furthermore, the situation started to evolve negatively from 2000 onwards in developed economies, while the emerging markets remained stable.

But the most serious question is in the market that still remains -- what about the United States? The U.S. administration is taking steps in the right direction with a freeze on additional expenses and a halt on big ticket items like lunar exploration. But there is no real reduction of the public debt ratio before 2014.

The real issue is that, while Governments and Central Banks have done the best they can to absorb the shock of the financial crisis, they could not anticipate or prevent it. The numbers that come, one by one, increase the worries that markets might ask for higher rates on public bonds, domestically but also abroad. This would have a snowball effect and challenge our foreign lenders.

This is particularly true for China whose national pride has been bruised after the Taiwan financing, the Google affair and the forthcoming visit of the Dalai Lama. Is it really useful for the US to antagonize its largest lender? If China would stop adding US debt instruments, let alone sell existing holdings, the U.S. Treasuries market would be in a complete turmoil. Recent reports indicate a shift of Chinese public investments away from the US. China sold $34 billion of US treasuries to $769 billion and is now below Japan, the primary foreign holder of US treasuries. China and other foreign countries will not endlessly continue to finance the US budget deficit.

Things have not yet reached a dramatic point. It gives us time to anticipate market reactions and reassure them. Let's use it wisely, and not rejoice in other countries' problems. Our turn will come, and if we are not careful, we might be facing huge interest rate increases across the board and threaten our modest recovery.

What we need now is wisdom and prudence. The White House and Congress might be well advised to take this risk into consideration. It might be a good topic for the next G-20 meeting.

 

Follow Georges Ugeux on Twitter: www.twitter.com/refuse to go to

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RudyEbert
04:03 PM on 02/21/2010
The threats posed by the potential defaults of more than a few sovereign over-leveraged borrowers, will make the events of the past 18 months pale by comparison. It's no surprise these countries (which include Greece, Poland, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Argentina, the US, etc.) are encountering debt pressures. Their long-standing policies of maximizing leverage in the face of questionable ability to either increase taxes at home or refinance the obligations in the debt markets, seem now to have been wholly irresponsible given where things stand at present. The US is no exception though the ability we have to print the money needed to reduce our stock of debt is some, but not much, consolation. Fact is, we're back to where we were in the 1980s when most of Latin America defaulted and it seemed the world was coming to an end. This time around, however, the victims are potentially those who otherwise might have stepped in to resolve a burgeoning debt crisis. So who's out there that can fix this, should it blow up? Nobody.
06:02 PM on 02/19/2010
No wonder this country is screwed up. These financial morons have been tought that all money must be issued as debt and paid back with interest.

The money borrowed from China and Japan comes from reserves. It has already been earned, spent, introduced into the economy. Cut them a dam check for it out the treasury office. It is not inflationary. The US can coin money and introduce it into the economy. We have let the central bank and bankers monopolize that function so they can make interest.

Money is for nothing more than the exchange of goods and services. I agree with Roger E, money does not have to be introduced as debt. Money is so I don't have to take my loaf of bread to somebody who don't want it to buy other goods. I can sell to someone who wants my bread and then use the currency to buy what I want. Its that flippin simple.

People are economically stupid.
02:36 PM on 02/19/2010
"finance the US budget deficit" ? Please at least connect to operational reality.

Nothing about this post fits how things really work in modern monetary systems;
Professor Bill Mitchell's blog is about as good as it gets if you have 20 minutes for a comprehensive, scholarly review of how it all works:

http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=8117

the point of departure for everything else is that "SOVEREIGN NATIONS DO .N.O.T. FINANCE DEPLOYMENT OF THEIR OWN CURRENCY" - any group issuing it's own currency does so only to deploy an efficient bookkeeping tool;

Post 1971, when the gold std ended, there's no real point in selling Treasury Securities. Countries do so ONLY out of prior habit, and maybe to help manage Fx and interest rates, which are minor worries compared to keeping citizens alive and productive.
07:16 PM on 02/19/2010
>>"Post 1971, when the gold std ended, there's no real point in selling Treasury Securities."

??

"U.S. Treasury marketable securities are debt instruments issued to raise money needed to operate the federal government and pay off maturing obligations."

-from the Treasury's own site.
02:27 PM on 02/19/2010
"finance the US budget deficit" ? Please at least connect to operational reality.
Nothing about this post fits how things really work in modern monetary systems;
Professor Bill Mitchell's blog is about as good as it gets if you have 20 minutes for a comprehensive, scholarly review of how it all works:
****
http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=8117
***
the point of departure for everything else is that "SOVEREIGN NATIONS DO .N.O.T. FINANCE DEPLOYMENT OF THEIR OWN CURRENCY" - any group issuing it's own currency does so only to deploy an efficient bookkeeping tool;
Post 1971, when the gold std ended, there's no real point in selling Treasury Securities. Countries do so ONLY out of prior habit, and maybe to help control Fx and interest rates, which are minor worries compared to keeping citizens alive and productive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:34 PM on 02/19/2010
Wisdom and prudence in the White House and Congress?
01:28 PM on 02/19/2010
The interest on the national debt is costing U.S. taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Eventually, this will become unsustainable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
11:07 AM on 02/19/2010
Government debt? Public debt?

Surely you mean the financial industries debt, don't you?

The crashed and burned the world, let them figure it out.
10:13 AM on 02/19/2010
The strategy of the Obama administration seems quite simple. They will continue with new stimulus and spending measures, will try and create a new entitlement program, will make no effort to cut the current entitlement spending or defense spending, and will not put forth the type of tax increases we need for political reasons. Their only strategy is to "hope that things work out" and if they don't, "hope that the Federal Reserve will continue printing large amounts of money" to fund the deficits. What's even worse is that the Obama administration has made no effort to correct the fundamental flaws in the economy with undermine any additional stimulus and spending measures, the trade deficit and particularly our dependence on foreign oil. They are focused on hurting the domestic coal, natural gas, and refining industries, instead of pushing for measures that will actually help, like reducing oil demand.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
09:24 AM on 02/19/2010
Wow a warning with almost no solutions.

You really are going to give big business a pass for the bailouts but want to hold the public accountable for stimulus?

Those breadcrumbs are really the cause of all the trouble, not the truckloads of loaves that went out the back door?
11:21 PM on 02/18/2010
Good column. Four sovereign debt defaults during 2010-2011 seems like a reasonable possibility- if the EMU fractures, six would not be astonishing.