iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Georgianne Nienaber

Georgianne Nienaber

Posted: November 11, 2009 03:08 PM

Ashley Judd: Please, Population Control is Not the Answer for Congo

What's Your Reaction?

Ashley Judd's op-ed in USATODAY drove me to the Tao Te Ching before my head exploded. In another example of celebrity naiveté falling prey to the obfuscations of non-governmental organizations in Congo, Judd wrote: "In Congo, 600,000 babies a year are born only to suffer and die." She added, "My husband and I despondently call these precious little ones 'the born to dies.'" Judd's solution, a parroting of the NGO Population Services International, is that family planning is the answer, since fewer babies means less babies will die and society as a whole will benefit.

2009-11-11-ashleyjudd2.jpg

Image: Ashley Judd


This is a naïve analysis, since the population in Congo is barely sustainable with a life expectancy at birth of 54.15 years, and it is far less in remote areas. The statistics Judd uses are hardly compelling when she says that 20 percent of Congolese men and women approached in 2007 said they did not wish to have more children. I am sure Ashley Judd is a nice person with good intentions, but she is another example of NGO's using the bully pulpit of celebrity to line their coffers, while they operate with a western sensibility, forcing western values on tribal populations.

Let's do a reality check.

Judd profiles a home in Kinshasa, the capitol of DR Congo, and bemoans the lack of amenities in the home she visited. Let's remember that Kinshasa is one of the safest places to be in Congo these days. She describes a family with two toothbrushes, some furniture and bad drinking water. The conditions are horrible, but this family has a roof over its head and is not living in the open-air, plastic tents and volcanic rock environment of eastern Congo. Travel in eastern Congo and you will learn that the women there are fighting to have their children and keep them alive. New life equals hope and Judd has completely missed the tenacity and resolve of poor Congolese women. Judd says, " In my work around the world with PSI and our many partners, I have seen irrefutable evidence that unregulated fertility undermines every other effort to improve health, living standards, the economy and the environment."


2009-11-11-photo_home.jpg

Image © Nienaber: Home in the IDP Camps Where Children are Cherished


Is this true? Hardly.

Congo's economy is not undermined by "unregulated fertility" rates. Why do these NGO's feel they have the right to regulate birth rates? Civil society has been destroyed by decades of war and over a hundred years of exploitation of Congo's wealth by international interests. Congo is not a country. It is a place on the map where the tribal population struggles to survive. Local populations are fed up with western interests meddling in their lives.

Consider this report from the November 4 Weekly Threat Assessment issued by the UN mission in Congo, MONUC. It is a window into the anger the Congolese feel regarding conservation and medical NGO's.


Human rights abuses by men in uniform are widely reported all over the province and the FDLR continue to pose a threat to peace and security.


During the weekend, the civil society of Lubero demonstrated violently against the deterioration of the security situation in Lubero Territory since the beginning of the Kimia II operations. They presented several grievances, including urgent action to be taken against perpetrators of human rights abuses, the extrication of the FARDC from Lubero town, a stronger MONUC presence in the backing of the FARDC operations and the removal of all NGOs (claiming they want security instead of food).

"Security instead of food," and one might argue life and liberty instead of "family planning."

The statistics are heartbreaking. 83.11 deaths per 1,000 live births. Since the outbreak of fighting in August 1998, at least 5.4 million people have died. Although only 19 percent of the population consists of children, children and infants account for 47 percent of the deaths in DR Congo. How can Ashley Judd maintain that the solution for the Congolese is having fewer children?

2009-11-11-photo_chidren.jpg

Image © Nienaber: The camps. Are they better off not being born?

In villages around Goma, 70% to 80% of delivery cases are performed at home and only 20% to 30% are performed at medical centers. Volunteer midwives brave rape and shootings to visit these villages to assist fragile new life as babies and mothers struggle to survive. The family is the heart-center of village life. Who are American celebrities to deny women the right to bear children?

In January of this year we met with Josephine K. who has been a witness to war and brutality for most of her 86 years. She is also a founding member of a midwife grass roots organization operating out of Goma. Josephine told us that when she was a child there were hardly any white men. With the coming of "the whites," the wars became worse. "There are so many wars, what do you want me to say?"

2009-11-11-photo_josephine.jpg

Image © Nienaber : Midwife

Now, the white western world wants to tell these poor black women not to have so many children. When will it stop? I would invite Judd to accompany me to the IDP camps in Kivu and meet the midwives who risk all to save babies and offer mothers nourishment in order to swell shriveled breasts.

In a separate arena, conservation groups, in some cases, are using community health initiatives and birth control as a smokescreen for land grabs and fundraising. In 2007 I visited an area in the Graueri Landscape of eastern Congo as part of an investigation into NGO abuses. American mainstream press organizations, celebrities, and television shows tout wildlife conservation and community health in this region as progress. What we found was something else. Congolese doctors and nurses in these conservation arenas explained that NGO's are paying their salaries and at the same time requiring that health professionals convince the local women--the poorest woman in the world--that they should not be having babies, because having babies is "dangerous to their health." Resist chemical sterilization and you cannot use the clinic.

But the women know that three out of five babies will die, and they resist the "required" shots of Depo-Provera which line the shelves of these remote "clinics." How do conservation organizations conserve primates in the wild? They stop hungry people from trying to keep their children alive or even having children. Meanwhile the diamonds, gold, coltan, uranium and niobium flow out of these areas and into the profits of the mining cartels in America, England, Russia and China.

Based on projections made by the United States Department of Agriculture and the Census Bureau, the American population is projected to increase to 392 million by 2050 -- more than a 50 percent increase from the 1990 population size.

Amazing. We look to be worse off than Africa, but no one is shoving Depo-Provera down our collective throats like the conservation and family planning organizations are doing in Africa. I hate to source myself, but no sense reinventing the blog here.

Joint operations between Congo and Rwanda since January 2009, have exacted a terrible toll on the civilian population and human rights groups have accused the United Nations of complicity. Most of the estimated 1200 deaths per day in eastern Congo are due to the ravages of war and preventable disease.

I have yet to see a major op-ed on United State's Special Envoy Howard Wolpe's call for the arrest of Bosco Ntaganda in conjunction with the failed operation Kimia II. This is something celebrities could really sink their teeth into if they would do some research on their own and not regurgitate the agenda's of NGO's. Congo unfortunately is the cause "du jour" on the cocktail circuit now that Sudan has exhausted its turn in the news cycle.

Former rebel general Jean Bosco Ntaganda, also known as "the Terminator", is a deputy commander of an anti-rebel offensive (the regular Congolese army, FARDC) that is being supported by the U.N. mission in Congo, MONUC. But the UN keeps denying it is supplying Ntaganda, despite repeated proof offered by human rights organizations.

Speaking like the diplomat he is, Wolpe offered a weak condemnation, but at least it was something coming from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's turf.

We just feel that anybody who has committed war crimes should not participate in military operations of this sort at the moment and he needs to be held accountable. We're trying now to work with (MONUC) and others to manage that situation in a way that will allow continued pressure on the FDLR but hopefully minimize the risk to civilians.

I addition, there is an un-reported and under-investigated story that the International Crimes Tribunal in the Hague is about to indict the former governor of North Kivu, Eugene Serufuli, for collusion with Ntaganda, who is already wanted by the Hague for war crimes in Ituri-Bunia, as Wolpe noted. Sources tell us it is assumed that General James Kabarebe of Rwanda financed both men and their militias.

Given the real stories coming out of Congo, it is a terrible thing to see USA Today giving op-ed space to "family planning" as a solution to the tragedy known as Congo. Judd termed the death of 8 million children worldwide "genocide," a bastardization of the term.

Judd should take some time and visit with the wise woman midwives who risk all for new life. The solution to the suffering of children is not the removal of children from the equation. I am not a religious person but the phrase, "suffer the children to come unto me for theirs is the kingdom of heaven," has some meaning here.

Ashley Judd is recipient of USA TODAY's Hollywood Hero Award and is also on the board of director's of Population Services International.

 
 
 

Follow Georgianne Nienaber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nienaber

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:11 PM on 11/15/2009
It is understandable, considering the history of the Rwandan genocide, that this history would create apologists who cannot accept that there are good and bad people on both sides of the Rwandan and Congo conflict. I am not an expert on this issue, but it seems quite obvious that Rwandan elements are involved in the ongoing disaster in DRC. There will never be a resolution of this conflict using the same arguments that have been used for the last 50 years. If Rwanda truly had nothing to hide, they would either release Gen. Nkunda or give him a fair trial. Quoting Albert Einstein: " We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them "
09:00 PM on 11/14/2009
.".....Sources tell us that it is assumed that James Kabarebe financed both men..." - In other words a source that assumes what they are telling you does not make it a fact. This kind of reporting is what has demonized Rwanda as if it is the cause of all of Congo's problems. I know that you know better than that. So with your high-end knowledgeable caliber of journalism, it is irresponsible to post assumptions that most people take for truth. As you say yourself quite often Congo's problems are so complex and they have a history that is as long as Chinese history! - I respect your efforts in speaking for the women and children of Congo, but let's not blame Rwanda for every hiccup Congo gets. Anyone who cares to know what really happened can ask themselves where all the people that killed 800,000 people in 100 days went......
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Georgianne Nienaber
Author, Investigative journalist
08:41 AM on 11/15/2009
Thank you for your comment.

I stand solidly behind my sources. As you know, Kabarebe is now Chief of Staff of the Rwandan Defense Forces. Remember that in 1996 Kabarebe was under the command of Congo’s Laurent-Désiré Kabila, and fired once Mobutu was defeated.

In 1996 when Congo was first invaded by Rwanda, Kabarebe marched across Congo killing thousands. The United Nations says that the killings were so massive that they can be considered crimes against humanity. The United Nations investigation into these crimes by the Rwandan army, Kabarebe and Kabila still remains to be resolved: http://www.inshuti.org/onua.htm).

Let the Criminal Courts come to some sort of verdict, but since you brought up Rwanda, remember that Rwandan President Paul Kagame, James Kabarebe, and President Kabila worked out a deal that resulted in over 5,000 Rwandan soldiers entering Congo in January 2009. The civilian casualties have been catastrophic, as reported by Human rights organizations, and Kabarebe has been supporting war criminal Bosco Ntaganda. In fact Kabarebe orchestrated the ouster of CNDP General Laurent Nkunda who is being held illegally and without charges in Rwanda.

The best way to help the women and children of Congo is to out those responsible for the heinous crimes, torture, abuse they endure at the hands of these men. Eugene Serufuli and Kabarebe have more than enough blood on their hands and the bloody fingers are about to point in all directions.

This is hardly a "hiccup" for the Congolese.
07:19 AM on 11/13/2009
Thanks for this article. I wasn't aware of the operations of population reduction NGOs.
04:02 AM on 11/16/2009
Thank you for your idea, thank you Georgianne too. What they(Congolese) need now is to have MONUC out, they failed really.
To the Star Judd and birth control she came up with, for her information that will be an additional birth control westerners are sending over here while smiling. What about the toxic stuff brought from Europe and dump in Africa. Vaccines that are given to kids there are they the same sent here? War imposed on us can not be weighted with controlling the coming of one baby. Let's speak of true love, if we care really about each one's back. I like a movie "Sacred Planet" We are all related. Cant say I have nothing to do with Amazon Forest. Before I know the consequences of not being friendly to it, it will reach me where I am. Can we please look for a real solution together?
photo
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
04:59 PM on 11/12/2009
Well written. I definitely tire of the argument that "if those Africans just wouldn't reproduce so much, they'd be better off." I fully agree with Ms. Nienaber’s rationale and would like to add an additional reason why Judd’s effort is misplaced.

People tend to think only that increase birth rates causes poverty when in fact, the opposite is an even stronger correlation. Poverty is the strongest cause of increased fertility rates. When there’s a good chance your baby will die, you have more children. When you need the labor to feed your family, you have more children. When there’s no retirement program after you are too old or sick to work, you have more children. There are several more factors that lead poor families in developing countries to have more children.

The best way to fight “over population” in development countries is to fight poverty. However, that does not mean we should all give money to Save the Children and other NGOs. This money does not help poor Africans. I, however, am a big advocate of micro-lending programs. If these celebrities used some thought and research and poured their money into constructive causes instead of destructive or useless ones, they could actually help the people of Africa.

However, what we can do is help educate families about about birth control and make contraceptives available to them. Provide them with the choice, then get out of their personal lives.

Jeremy Casterson
RPCV Kenya, MA International Development, Fulbright Scholar
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Georgianne Nienaber
Author, Investigative journalist
05:13 PM on 11/12/2009
If you are available some time, I would very much like to discuss your impressions of international NGOs working in the Great Lakes Region. There seems to be very little interest in the States regarding the abuse they inflict on indigenous populations, and the amount of money that vanishes into the coffers of corruption.

Jeremy, you seem very well placed in terms of academic background and location to have insight.

And yes, choice is the answer, but you cannot survive on choice.

I can be reached at info@thelegacyofdianfossey.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPerez
04:08 PM on 11/12/2009
While everything that Georgianne says is most likely true, given her expertise, the fact remains that women how have fewer children and can control the number and timing of children they have do better - worldwide - in all terms of quality of life. It's also undeniable that a second-rate movie star is not the right person to be making these statements. This does not make the need for population control any less compelling.
03:20 PM on 11/12/2009
What you are saying is right but population control is a must - it is not mutually exclusive.
09:01 PM on 11/11/2009
I would guess that the number of Americans that are more knowledgeable than Ashley Judd in the areas of infant mortality, population dynamics and geopolitical issues in central Africa number in the millions. While she is certainly entitled to her opinion, it is truly frightening that a major news outlet would give her a soapbox, or that ANYONE would seriously listen to her on these issues. Our celebrity obsessed culture can no longer differentiate between true experts and faux -experts, apparently. Also, while Depo-Provera is generally safe, it carries a black box warning that it has been shown to cause bone mineral loss. In addition, it can cause irregular, unpredictable bleeding and occasionally prolonged infertility. Can a desperately poor, often illiterate Congolese woman truly give consent to this therapy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetiebird
09:00 PM on 11/11/2009
Thank you once again Georgianne for your tireless efforts to inform people about the true situation in the Congo.

Once again celebrities such as Ashley Judd are advocating so-called "solutions" to the humanitarian crisis overseas that they would never advocate as a solution to a crisis in this country. It is shameful that they preach "do as I say" and "not as I do" solutions to problems in other countries. They fly in, hear what well-meaning foreign NGOs advocate as solutions to problems, and then fly out parroting those solutions without ever engaging in any fact finding on their own. It is a wonder that more countries are not critical of us for such behavior, and that there is a reservoir of good-will for this country despite such behavior.

I can only hope that you and other journalists who are not affiliated with the NGOs will continue to investigate and provide the reader with all of the facts concerning these humanitarian crisis overseas to enable individuals to draw their own conclusions about how to proceed to redress these situations.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Coleen Rowley
retired FBI agent/legal counsel
06:20 PM on 11/11/2009
Georgianne's been to the Congo many times and she does a good job advocating for the poor people who are victimized there by a variety of different organizations and different forces fighting for power there. Sometimes the Hollywood celebrities don't know it all.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Coleen Rowley
retired FBI agent/legal counsel
06:17 PM on 11/11/2009
Thanks for providing a perspective born of your on-the-ground experience in the Congo. The truth never makes everyone happy and sometimes it makes almost no one happy. The poor people who are repeatedly victimized almost never have an advocate.