Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Georgianne Nienaber

Georgianne Nienaber

Posted: June 27, 2010 10:23 AM

Despite the fact that the government of Paul Kagame in Rwanda has denied assertions by international journalists' rights groups that the government may have been involved in the shooting death of a journalist, Human Rights Watch thinks differently (HRW). Insecurity and political repression are increasing in advance of Rwanda's August 2010 presidential elections, HRW warned.

Foreign Affairs Minister Louise Mushikiwabo said on Saturday that the government was not involved in independent journalist Jean-Leonard Rugambage's death on Thursday. She called the allegations "dishonest."

The killing of Rugambage was not the first incident of violence against journalists. In February 2007, a group of assailants attacked the independent newspaper Umuvugizi's editor, Jean-Bosco Gasasira, in a near fatal incident outside his house, after he spoke out at a presidential news conference about the harassment of journalists. No one has been brought to justice for the attack.

HRW reports that besides the murder of Rugambage, the police have detained the leader of an opposition party, and other opposition party members have been arrested.

"The security situation is rapidly deteriorating," said Rona Peligal, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "With only 45 days left before the election, the government is lashing out to silence its opponents and critics."

The Rwandan government should investigate all incidents of violence and ensure that opposition activists and journalists are able to carry out their legitimate activities in safety, HRW said.

Jean-Léonard Rugambage, a journalist for the newspaper Umuvugizi, was shot dead shortly after 10 p.m. on June 24 outside his home in Nyamirambo, in the capital, Kigali. His colleagues and other sources in Rwanda told HRW that the assailant appeared to be waiting for the journalist as he returned home.

As Rugambage drove up to his gate, a man approached his car and fired several shots at close range, hitting him in the head and chest. Rugambage died on the spot. The assailant then drove off. Police arrived on the scene and took Rugambage's body to the police hospital in Kacyiru for autopsy. The police stated on June 25 that they were investigating his death, HRW says.

Whether this will be a vigorous investigation is doubtful.

Umuvugizi, an independent newspaper that has often been critical of the government, had published an article online on the morning Rugambage was killed, alleging that the Rwandan government was behind the attempted murder of a former Rwandan general, Faustin Kayumba Nyamwasa, in South Africa on June 19, and implicating senior officials. General Kayumba, once a close ally of President Paul Kagame and a former chief-of-staff of the Rwandan army, has become an increasingly outspoken critic of the government since fleeing to South Africa in February 2010. Umuvugizi's editor said that Rugambage had been investigating the murder attempt on Kayumba and had reported being under increased surveillance in the days leading up to his death.

In the early hours of June 24, police entered the house of Bernard Ntaganda, leader of the opposition party PS-Imberakuri, and took him away for questioning. He has spent two days in police custody and is believed to be detained at Kicukiro police station. Members of the PS-Imberakuri reported that the police raided Ntaganda's house and the party's office and took away documents and other belongings. By June 25, the party's flag and sign had been taken down from their office.

Later on the morning of June 24, several members of PS-Imberakuri were rounded up by the police and taken into custody after they gathered outside the US embassy; they had gone there to ask for help following Ntaganda's arrest. Some were released, but several, including the party's secretary-general, Théobald Mutarambirwa, remained in detention in various locations in Kigali on June 25.

In January 2009 the Rwandan government all but telegraphed pending attacks on independent journalists when the information minister publicly declared that "the days of the destructive press are numbered," referring to Umuvugizi and a second independent newspaper, Umuseso.

These new allegations come on the heels of the release of Minneapolis attorney Peter Erlinder, a relentless critic of the Kagame government and an internationally known expert on the Rwandan genocide, after being held on charges of "genocide denial." The Minneapolis Star Tribune Reports, "In a shrill statement e-mailed to the Star Tribune this week, Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs Louise Mushikiwabo said Erlinder is 'a conspiracy theorist who seeks to willfully promote his extremist views on Rwandan soil.' Jailing him, she said, is an 'act of justice.'''

The Star Tribune, in a bold editorial, questions whether Rwanda is the democracy it claims to be.

The 800,000 people who died in Rwanda's bloody 1994 massacres unquestionably deserve justice. Unfortunately, the Rwanda government's decision to jail Minnesota attorney Peter Erlinder raises serious questions about the fitness of the African nation's judicial system to determine who's guilty of genocide and mete out punishment accordingly.

Journalists use supposedly US friendly Rwanda as their safety net, and I have written in the past that this compromises our ability to critically examine the oppressive nature of the Kagame government.

We might reflect on the fact that General Laurent Nukunda has been held in Rwanda since January 2009 without the ability to visit family or get a proper hearing.

We might also recall the work of the late human rights advocate Alison Des Forges who, before her death in a plane crash, was summarily banned from Rwanda by the regime of President Paul Kagame. At the time, Kagama was under indictment by French Judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere on terrorism charges.

Why is Laurent Nkunda, once Kagame's ally, being held without addressing his civil liberties and rights?

Perhaps it is because civil liberties are a non-sequitur in Rwanda, while Paul Kagame tries desperately to hold onto his regime at the expense of the people who are still struggling to put the genocide behind them. The fact that the United States continues to place its influence behind this regime should be open to vigorous debate and criticism.

The American free press and mainstream media are culpable for ignoring this grievous attack on the press. The situation in Rwanda should be a prominent part of the current news cycle.

 
 
 

Follow Georgianne Nienaber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nienaber

 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:54 AM on 07/02/2010
@Aimable: The congolese are still dying and their ladies and daugters raped! So your 7 millions number is still in progress.
10:42 AM on 07/02/2010
Ms Giorgianne! let tell you that, even you have read much, You know little bit from what you are telling. The big problem is that, we rwandans, we are like grass field where players are battling.
04:37 AM on 06/30/2010
So what? does political participation mean provocation?
02:29 AM on 06/28/2010
@ Georgina; so now you joining the ranks of people who are experts on Rwanda? 16 years and now everyone cares what happens in Rwanda! Go take your hypocrisy else where....If you really care about those genocidaires, adopt them. Hate speech being peddled by the opposition is nonsensical and we Rwandans wont let ourselves be pulled back to those dark times. How do you even sleep with yourself? Going to bed knowing you are supporting someone that advocates for a particular group of people to be killed?

@Aimable: You sad pathetic person, your rhetoric is getting boring. I imagine you have a template for commenting on all these blogs for you never say anything new....just repeating yourself. Well I guess you have the time. We don't have time for your comments.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Georgianne Nienaber
Author, Investigative journalist
09:23 AM on 06/28/2010
I suggest you go back through my archives, which are available here, before you accuse me of "advocating for a particular group of people to be killed." You posting this does not make it so. Other than that, I have no comment. My words stand on their own.
10:25 AM on 06/28/2010
Oh Georgina...please save us!You are no expert on Rwanda and you know nothing about Rwanda.You know what??We are tired of you patronising attitude towards us>We Rwandans can deal whatever we are faced with better than...why do you suddenly seem to care when all is well?Where were you when the genocide took place?You just lack something to do than spend all your precious time discussing issues concerning Rwanda.NO,we dont need you views mum!!Why dont you go ahead and blame the RPF for downing the plane in which De Forges died??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aimable
06:06 AM on 06/29/2010
@Igikobwa, your insults will not change reality. The fact remains that in my country Rwanda, the extremist Tutsis have killed millions of Rwandans and millions of Congolese. If Rwanda is to ever move on and become a peaceful nation, we need to denounce the extremist Tutsis as much as we denounce the extremist Hutus. They are both violent and they are both murderous. Your insults will not prevent me from speaking out about my country.
05:06 AM on 06/30/2010
If we are to denounce extremist hutus, i guess we need to begin with you. Aimable, i know you so well, and i know the reason why you keep emphasizing the 'numbers of people killed in Congo' and 'millions of Rwandans.' It is true there are extremists in Rwanda, but the most dangerous are the hutu extremists whose thirst for blood is on record. If there were tutsi extremists, then there would not be any activity at all in the countryside, where development is now more pronounced than ever before. Tutsis are 'in power' as you would like to say, but are there machetes being imported to exterminate hutus? no. are there mass graves where hutus are being killed and buried? no. Instead, the RPF government is releasing genocidaires from prisons only to go back and continue killing those who survived their atrocities. The government has more hutu leaders than tutsis, there is no discrimination in education or jobs (but some hutus are doing so,secretly). Kagame has made sure that nobody carries out revenge killings and has disciplined the army, especially genocide survivors, and prevented them from terrorizing the people. That is why there is peace. If there is anybody who is truely a Rwandan president, it is Kagame for he has stood up for all Rwandans and made sure there is equality, justice and fairness for all Rwandans. In fact tutsis accuse him of favoring hutus.
05:17 AM on 06/30/2010
But extremists like you will never give credit where it is due, because to you, a tutsi is guilty even when proven innocent. Thats why God created tutsis with resilience to prevent them from becoming extinct. Let me clarify this hoping you will not bore us again with your uniform blog comments. The people you say died in Congo would not have died if you and you people had not killed Rwandans and fled to Congo to organize a come back. You expected the RPA to sit on their hunches and wait for you to come back and ruin the country? no, even today, our policy is 'take the war to the one who starts it' if you want a war with us, we give you a fight you will never forget - aimable, i know you are very aware of this, and that is why you keep whining like a dog that has just see a lion approaching. If anybody died from the RPA bullet, it is definitely an interahamwe, an ex-far, Mai-mai and others who put themselves in the firing line. RPA has a record, since 1990, of not harassing civilians - and that is why Byumba is still inhabited by all its original inhabitants. The RPA lived with them peacefully until they launched the attack on Kigali. So, all you say, you will find it very difficult to provide even 1% evidence
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sweetiebird
10:36 PM on 06/27/2010
It is unfortunate that Africa like much of the world fails to get the media attention that it richly deserves unless there is a tragedy or a media event such as the World Cup. Most Americans are not cognizant of the mineral wealth found in places such as the Congo and Nigeria, nor of the many potential customers for our products that reside in Africa. They are only aware of the charismatic wildlife. As a result the political upheavals in Africa go unreported as is evident from the failure to report on the efforts to silence the media and opposition politicians in Rwanda, which is often cited as an example of democracy in Africa.

Thank you Georgianne for an article which points out the need to reexamine our assumptions about African democracies, and to focus attention on their short-comings, to enable people to deal with them before countries once more become dictatorships.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aimable
02:57 PM on 06/27/2010
Kagame's forces have massacred more than 7 million Rwandan and Congolese civilians since October 1st, 1990. Kagame's RPF forces used weapons provided by the Western powers, in particular the United States and the United Kingdom governments. Therefore, these countries will do everything possible to protect him. In 2003, UN Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte held a conference to announce that the UN court would start investigating war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Kagame's forces. The next day she was fired from her job. Go figure!
02:56 AM on 06/28/2010
Aimable, cant you get another narrative? We do get bored with your repeated statements. You use the same statements on every blog - we are developing stress by reading your postings. Get SOMETHING ELSE TO TELL US OR RETIRE OR STOP BLOGGING
10:44 AM on 06/28/2010
Anything wrong about repetion? or is that the truth that pains? cheers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aimable
06:12 AM on 06/29/2010
@Intare Batinya, thank you for continuing to read my statements. Sounds like the truth hurts.
05:50 AM on 06/30/2010
Kagame's forces have massacred more than 7 million 'Rwandan' and Congolese 'civilians' since October 1st, 1990.Should i assume the Rwandans massacred were soldiers? and the congolese were civilians? too bad for the Congolese, but why complain if kagame's forces massacred Rwandan soldiers? they were at battle, simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aimable
08:54 AM on 07/01/2010
By definition, civilians means not soldiers. I don't know how to put this any clearer.