Gerald Bracey

Gerald Bracey

Posted: May 13, 2008 10:22 AM

Hillary's Desperation


I sent what follows to the columnists of the Washington Post--Richard Cohen, Harold Meyerson, David Broder, E. J. Dionne, David Ignatius, Eugene Robinson, and Colbert King, George Will, Anne Applebaum and Ruth Marcus (no use fiddling with Gerson and Novak), editorial page editor, Fred Hiatt, and the Post Ombudsman on Sunday. So far, no response. Since I sent this, Maureen Dowd did break the color line, slapping Hillary for the comment in her Sunday New York Times column.


I think it amazing and appalling that Hillary's amazing and appalling "hard-working Americans, white Americans" comment has received so little attention in the Post. Indeed, in the MSM generally. The only MSM reactions I've seen were from Eugene Robinson in the Post, Bob Herbert in the NYTimes, and Derrick Jackson in the Boston Globe. All black guys. You white guys on this list were all over the Jeremiah Wright thing--too much, actually, as was most of the MSM. Is that because Wright and Obama are black? And is the neglect of Hillary's Southern Strategy--she actually outdid Nixon with her comment--because she is white? Hmmm.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:13 PM on 05/13/2008
One of the lessons that should be taken away from this campaign is that it failed in a large part due to Penn's insistence that his "micro-trends" philosophy for targeting electorate was a valid approach to a winning strategy.

The numbers that the Clinton campaign points to were not statistics that magically appeared, but represent the result of intentional targeting and nurturing. That the campaign believed that they could then use those skewed stats to reach any valid conclusions of real support... and have that tactic go unobserved, was a compounded mistake. That they then used those stats for baiting was despicable.

Clinton's choices for her team of strategists left only the spinners at the top of the heap, in a desperate and failed attempt at damage control. That as a last gasp, they now depend entirely on division and destruction of the cohesion and harmony that once proudly defined the Democratic party, is not just sad... it is unforgivable.

Decades of effort to join a diverse constituency together to address real concerns and affect positive change, have been damaged to the extent of disrepair by those who only have self-serving interests at heart. The Clinton legacy is darker than tarnish.
12:07 PM on 05/13/2008
The MSM for the most part also let her comments slide about obliterating Iran. Again, if McCain or Obama had made those remarks, there would have been a big hoopla about it and we would still be discussing them today.
11:33 AM on 05/13/2008
I wholeheartedly agree! The lack of outrage from the MSM and Liberal establishment is as appalling as her comments. If John McCain had said what she said, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would have been knocking each other down to get to the media microphones to express outrage and call for his resignation from the campaign. They fully understand that she is echoing the shameful past of the Democratic Party, but yet nothing but silence. Even from self-professed media liberals like Keithe Olbermann, the silence is deafening. He would have been on the air the next day with a special comment had John McCain said that. As far as I'm concerned--and it's ashame not more Americans of every race don't feel the same way--no one who stakes claim to being the candidate on one particular race has any business being President of the United States.
11:27 AM on 05/13/2008
And - by the way - Clinton's comments about "hard-working Americans... white Americans" were factually WRONG.

Obama GAINED among these voters between Pennsylvania and Indiana/North Carolina!

Stunning.
11:24 AM on 05/13/2008
Could white men, even so-called "unbiased" news wags, feel threatened by a black man, black men? That would be unheard of, wouldn't it? A concept so new it boggles the mind. Say it isn't so. I don't think I can handle that information. Arrghhh.
11:15 AM on 05/13/2008
If Carville had said this, she would have had to "reject and denounce" him.

This coverage vacuum happens at the same time that the same pundits speculate that she might reduce her negativity as she "softly lands."

It's happening at the same time that they speculate about her on the ticket.

And it happens in tandem with a similar vacuum on the incredibly relevant fact that she seems FAR less capable of winning black voters... what are they?... chopped liver?

She will richly deserve her oblivion.

Her supporters deserved better.
11:13 AM on 05/13/2008
Thanks for drawing attention to the MSM's double standards and hypocrisy.
11:05 AM on 05/13/2008
OK, so she lied three times about her Bosnia trip. So she signed a pledge not to participate in the MI and FL primaries and then broke that pledge. So her husband lied about her lies about the Bosnia trip. So she endorsed McCain over Obama. So she elevated the Rev Wright story to smear Obama. So she sponsors the Women's Votes group that makes misleading robo calls. So she is self-financing her own campaign. So she will pronounce Obama 'illegitimate' if MI and FL are not seated according to her wishes. So her campaign sends out surrogates to say that Obama can't win because he's African American. Isn't she a great and noble leader of vast experience and high ethical standards? No. Hillary and Bill Clinton are a disgrace to the Democratic party and to this country. They should both be run out of town tarred and feathered on a rail.
10:50 AM on 05/13/2008
Actually, it is more likely because Clinton is effectively done. I doubt this is a pro-Clinton bias so much as an acknowledgement of the fact that the only news left about Clinton is how she gets out of the race.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fairwitness
Not content with stunned disbelief
10:43 AM on 05/13/2008
All those media names you listed are employed by someone--could it be they are influenced by their employers' views and intentions? Could it be the media are finally, as intended, under nominal control by owners-with-agendas? Hmmmm?
10:31 AM on 05/13/2008
Thank you for being so brave and honest. Yes, the MSM is hypocritical and has always fanned racial politics in this country. Most of those White guys who have chosen to stay quiet and to not even respond to you, feed on this kind of polarization. It is the drama that keeps them in business and they could care less about America and the fate of its millions. Thank you.