More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Giles Slade

Giles Slade

Posted: August 26, 2010 06:22 PM

Future Weather

What's Your Reaction:

As an engineer, climate scientist and former journalist, Heidi Cullen has a unique perspective on climate change.

Other recent books like Eric Pooley's excellent The Climate War or Laurence Smith's lamentable The World in 2050 look at the struggle over consequences of climate change. Cullen's book, Weather of the Future, begins with her realization that scientists have done a poor job helping people understand the causes, magnitude and stakes of ongoing climate change. This worries her because she knows that if America does nothing to fix climate change "until after it has begun to affect us personally... it will be too late."

Cullen feels the scientific community has failed to "communicate the threat of climate in a way that [makes] it real for people." They have not "given people the proper tools to see that the impacts of climate change are visible right now and they go far beyond melting ice caps." Weather of the Future is her attempt to remedy science's failure to convey the immediacy and importance of a threat that has been left as an easily dismissed abstraction for nearly 30 years.

A good first attempt to"'make climate change" real is Cullen's explication of the historical development of the computer models that predict climate in chapter three. The whole chapter is a lucid explanation of how we can attribute escalating temperatures to human rather than natural "forcings" (processes that result in changes to the climate). The chapter closes with a second strong proof of climate change's human origins through "carbon fingerprinting" that traces the isotopes of atmospheric CO2 back to their origins in fossil (and other) fuels.

There are obligatory chapters about the Sahel and the Great Barrier Reef, and these are fresh and informative, but in chapter seven (which concerns California's Central Valley) Weather of the Future finds its footing and begins landing solid body blows.

The entire chapter is really a warning about America's next most likely environmental disaster. Like Hurricane Katrina, the impending collapse of the Central Valley is a long foretold disaster that combines climate change in a lethal mixture that includes neglect, vested interests, and overwhelming human demands on a confined eco-system. With the lives and livelihoods of 6.5 million Americans at stake, soil liquefaction in the Central Valley seems inevitable. It will occur during a Richter level 6 or 6.5 earthquake that will destroy the agricultural heartland by driving sea water from the San Francisco Bay into the Delta that joins the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers.

Even if such an earthquake never occurs during the coming century -- a real impossibility -- sea level rise will achieve the same destructive ends by poisoning both the fresh water and rich soil of the Delta with sea-salt. As I read Cullen's pages describing the fatal game of chicken playing out in California's interior, I am reminded of Mark Schliefstein and John McQuaid's 1997 Pulitizer winning pieces warning New Orleans residents about the impending disaster of Hurricane Katrina eight years before it happened.

More good chapters follow. Refreshingly there are two separate chapters about the western and eastern Arctic, followed by a stark description of Bangladesh's vulnerability to climate change. Finally, there's an excellent chapter concerning the vulnerability the low-lying antique infrastructure of New York City to the extreme storm events and sea level rise that characterize climate change along America's northeastern shore.

Over the phone Dr. Cullen is optimistic and very positive. She ignores the geo-engineering solutions like those described in Eli Kintisch's new book Hack The Planet, saying our climate change investment dollars should be spent first on either adaptation solutions (by which she means "infrastructure investment") or on mitigation solutions (meaning "the adoption of clean-energy technology, and emissions reductions").

All that we lack is the kind of strong leadership that depression-era America found in FDR who confronted the threat of the Great Depression by solidifying the nation's political will and then mustering it resources to invest in a nation-wide program to develop America's infrastructure.

If you're tired of being confused about climate change, buy this book. It's refreshingly readable, reliable and Heidi Cullen is one of those gifted Americans who sees much "more clearly on a cloudy day".

You can find Weather of the Future here

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:12 AM on 09/09/2010
Darn it, I was going through my comments just now and came to your reply. It sometimes takes awhile for them to show up, but just in case you might get this one, I would like to say that I checked out your article and it started out good, but I was unwilling to subscribe. I just don't have the cash to or the reading time to subscribe to everything I would like to.

I read Bright Sided last February. I got some good sardonic chuckles out of it. I have been Nickled and Dimed quite frequently by people that the universe loved.
05:43 PM on 08/29/2010
No thank you, there are more important books to read. She has a superficial grasp of both the politics and the science of climate. I am not 'tired of being confused' - that is the natural state of anyone interested in science. We move to the frontier where the confusion is, and work on it. We thrive on trying to resolve confusion, including our own. Cullen has not gone that far, and is a victim of the spin of the alarmists. Shame on her. Shame on them.
05:17 PM on 08/28/2010
I meant to Say Recovering Academic Writer.

While you are recovering, maybe you could write some new stories that are compelling reads, and have ideas about viable solutions to our present problems woven into them. Doom and gloom narratives are a real turn off. I mean turn off quite literally.

Coming up with constructive stories will be very hard, but it could be a very therapeutic thing for a recovering academic writer to do.
08:17 PM on 08/30/2010
Well, we're at a critical juncture in the history of our species, so feel-good books aren't entirely appropriate for aspiring 'public intellectuals' like myself. I do have a piece in this months The American Interest about consumer electronics. It's called 'Electric Company', I think it's quite good.

Meanwhile, an alternative would be Barbara Ehrenreich's BRIGHT-SIDED, HOW POSITIVE THINKING IS UNDERMINING AMERICA, which is basically about how we have a conditioned inability to deal with serious and disturbing topics. It's really a fascinating and timely book by another recovering academic writer. You can order that here:

http://www.amazon.com/Bright-Sided-Positive-Thinking-Undermining-America/dp/0312658850/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1283213259&sr=1-1

If you're not getting enough comfort from reading there's always fiction. But then, there too things are tending towards a very dark vision of the world. Recently, I really enjoyed the Steig Larrson books including THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNETS NEST which is currently on the bestseller list with a lot of other 'downers'. Sorry.
04:52 PM on 08/28/2010
Recovering Academic write, that's funny Giles.

Any new environmental FDR would be quickly neutralized by the new masters of obfuscation. They are working hard to discredit Dr. Cullen as I type.

As I see it, nothing will be done unless the rich and really rich feel that they will be threatened by climate change. The working rich have tunnel vision and the idle rich may be too distracted with their toys to give it much thought.

Then there are the mean spirited rich, I can pretty much figure out what their plan is, but it won't work out as well in reality as it does in their power day dreams.
photo
DickTater
American Livestock
07:15 PM on 08/26/2010
Maybe scientists have done a poor job, but they have tried mightily. Scientists are not the problem. They are up against perhaps the biggest anti-information campaign ever seen, fighting mental sloth and lethargy, and perhaps the biggest factor...wilful ignorance and native stupidity.

That is quite a hill to climb.
09:49 PM on 08/26/2010
You're right Dick. There has been a cynical and systematic campaign to discredit warnings from scientist about climate change for over a decade. This is described in CLIMATE COVER-UP; The Crusade to Deny Global Warming by James Hoggan. Eric Pooley's new book CLIMATE WAR also delves into this. But Dr. Cullen's book is full of more practical information for people who want to know where the next blow will land.

thanks for surfing in!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
03:50 PM on 08/27/2010
With an exploding population, and an even faster rise in idiocy, I'm beginning to wonder if we'll ever do anything about it. Someone needs to shut the Palins of the world up, and start telling people the truth. It's like, when something this technical in nature is too hard to understand, they just turn to whatever talking head they can relate to, in order to explain it to them. IMO, between climate change, nuclear proliferation, and / or some viral outbreak, we will be extinct or at least severely diminished within the next century.
05:45 PM on 08/29/2010
But Palin is a bright and sensible, free-thinking woman. If she gets 'shut up', we really will be in the gulag. Try reading 'The Rational Optimist' by Ridley. He mostly makes sense to me.