iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Gloria Bonilla Santiago

GET UPDATES FROM Gloria Bonilla Santiago
 

Early Education Gives Poor Kids a Chance to Succeed

Posted: 08/24/11 05:12 PM ET

Education -- most especially pre-school programs which have been on budget chopping blocks throughout the country -- is inextricably tied to the recovery of our nation's economy.

It's like the song "Dem Bones" that is taught in preschools to help children learn basic anatomy -- each part is connected to another part to make the whole thing work. Only in this version, the lyrics wouldn't be about the connection between toe bones, heel bones and foot bones. It is more like this: Quality educational programs that begin early in life have the potential to close gaps in school achievement that exist between poor minority children and their middle class counterparts.

In the United States today, we spend less than five percent of our education dollars on preschool programs. I would argue that -- similar to the health care system in our country -- we need to invest in "preventive" or early education to produce "healthier" educated citizens who will contribute to rather than drain our nation's coffers.

What we have is a case of pay me now, or pay me later.

Research proves the tremendous value of early childhood education, especially for children from poor families. In fact, the National Institutes of Health found that every $1 spent on preschool programs could generate more than $11 in economic benefits over the course of a child's life.

Even a pre-schooler can see that it is a wise investment to make in our country and in our children's future.

In urban areas, early education is not a luxury; it is a necessity for children from poor and ethnic families if they are to overcome academic and socioeconomic disadvantages that will dog them without early intervention. Without it, these kids will start school already "behind" causing years of learning challenges and fostering the kind of relationship with education that leads to high drop-out rates.

Taking it a step further, these are the kids who remain wound up in the cycle of poverty that more than likely leads to reliance on public assistance, involvement in criminal activity and a poor quality of life for the next generation.

I write this as we prepare to open the Early Learning and Research Academy affiliated with Rutgers University and LEAP Academy Charter School in Camden, N.J. -- a city where two out of every five residents live below the poverty line. When our little folks arrive in September, we will have achieved LEAP-style education intervention from birth to high school graduation.

Our program is working: all our students graduate from high school and go on to college. Many of them came to us without early learning, and not all are able to overcome the deficit. Our goal is to provide children from one of the poorest cities in America with a positive relationship with education so they can be productive, self-sufficient and successful adults.

If we can change the equation in Camden, then similar paradigm shifts can occur in other impoverished parts of the country, too. The endgame: We will create a strong self-sufficient workforce to fuel a strong economy.

 

Follow Gloria Bonilla Santiago on Twitter: www.twitter.com/GloriaBSantiago

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
11:06 PM on 08/31/2011
I am supportive of early childhood education, the more the better. But studies have shown that poverty erodes much of the good that this early education provides. I was shocked to see the status of poor children in the seventh and eighth grades after having been enrolled in the Head Start Program! Head Start had them in pretty good shape for the first grade but as they moved up in grades they kept falling further and further behind their middle class peers. Early Childhood Education is great but we need more to see to it that these children keep on improving not start falling behind again in the lower grades!
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
04:22 PM on 08/27/2011
Those first five years are crucial, and it is much less costly to fill in then than to try to make up later.
03:16 PM on 08/25/2011
God forbid the PARENTS of these children sit down and try to teach their kids a few things. Then again, those who are "poor" are so due to their poor choices, most of which consists of having children w/out the financial means to support them.

I bet most of those so called poor people have money for cable TV and at least one computer in the house. That doesn't make them poor, it makes them STUPID!
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
04:26 PM on 08/27/2011
Parents should be filling in. However, many don't know how to, and many are too exhausted by trying to survive. Cable TV may be a luxury, but a computer isn't.
Finally, as a society, we have a choice; we can say, "Parents' job, parents' job," and continue to have the problems that flow from the parents who can't or won't do that job, or we can say, "Our future as well," do the humane (and fiscally responsible) thing, and help the kids who are otherwise trapped. I would rather pay for pre-school than prison, and those are my choices.
06:33 PM on 08/24/2011
Of course it is. Everyone knows THAT. That is why liberals favor it and conservatives hate it and are defunding it.
05:41 PM on 08/24/2011
Early childhood education is important, but you need to go young and drive changes in child rearing practices at the infant and toddler stages. By age 3 there are enormous differences in childhood accomplishment by mother's educational attainment. Look at slide 36 in James Heckman's presentation found here: http://www.heckmanequation.org/content/resource/presenting-heckman-equation

Professor Heckman has a Nobel prize in economics and has been focused upon skill formation and labor markets for some time. His data is probably the most relevant to arguing for early childhood intervention programs.
02:54 PM on 08/25/2011
We are beginning with two months old and with mothers that in early pregnancy stage. Our ELRA project focuses on early child rearing practices for poor parents before they get pregnant. This population is in crises and very fragil in terms of socioeconomic conditions and in terms of social capital. I have been a longtime fan of Dr. Heckman's work. Thank you the feedback.
03:17 PM on 08/25/2011
They should be sterilized. Poor people shouldn't be having children. That's the problem right there. If they didn't have children, they wouldn't be poor.

But I don't have the big fancy Ph.D. so what do I know.
04:44 PM on 08/25/2011
You are trying to do it right then. Good luck.The project is vitally important.