More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Greg Dalton

GET UPDATES FROM Greg Dalton
 

Gov. Schwarzenegger Peeks in the Shower, and Talks Climate

Posted: 09/29/09 03:22 PM ET

In his crusade to cut greenhouse gases California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has included a call to cut water use across the parched state by twenty percent per person.

He's starting at home by pressing his four children to shorten their showers. And the Kindergarten Cop isn’t kidding around, noting that moving water accounts for 20 percent of electricity use in California. Revealing that he grew up in a house without running water, the Governor spoke last week at Climate One in San Francisco on the third anniversary of his signing California’s climate change law (AB 32). A class of fourth graders was in the audience of 500 people and one of the schoolchildren wanted to know what the governor tells his own children about energy conservation. Here’s video of his humorous shower riff that got picked up by the New York Times over the weekend.

In more serious moments, the Governor touched on a range of climate and energy issues in our conversation last week marking the third anniversary of his signing the California Global Warming Solutions Act, the first law in the country mandating reductions in greenhouse gases.

On whether the law creates jobs and investment or, as Meg Whitman said in launching her gubernatorial campaign, it is "well intentioned” but is “wrong for these challenging times.” Dismissing her comments as campaign rhetoric, Schwarzenegger said “She will probably reconsider what she has said,” and reiterated his insistence that he is pressing “full speed ahead” on California’s efforts to curb greenhouse gases via the climate law. “I’m sure she does not want to be counted as one of those Republicans that will want to move us back to the Stone Age.”

On whether California should wait for the federal government or other countries to work out policies and technologies that will drive a clean energy future"

"Did they do that when we said we'd land on the moon? "Did we say, China, you go first with human rights? Then we will follow you. No, we led."

On Keeping Solar Energy Moving As usual, he was all pumped up on the topic of solar energy, joking that new panels on the Staples Center in Los Angeles could have given the Los Angeles Lakers “extra energy” that propelled them to the NBA championships. Specifically, he said he supports raising the cap of power that utilities must buy from homeowners with solar panels to 5 percent from 2.5 percent. Solar companies say that move is imperative for sustaining solar companies and the jobs they are creating.

Solar and clean tech companies and advocates also want the governor to sign AB 920, a "net metering" bill authored by Assemblyman Jared Huffman and recently passed by the California legislature.  It requires utilities to pay homeowners for excess electricity they generate on their roofs. Right now homeowners (like my wife and me) who produce more electricity than they use leave money on the table with their utility and have little economic incentive to keep finding efficiencies. Homeowners can't be net producers of electricity over the course of a year.With audience questions coming fast and furious during our 40 minute conversation I didn't get a chance to ask the governor his thoughts on this one. 

In his speech, the Governor cited the promise of clean technologies to create jobs and drive the California economy. On the day when there were walkouts across University of California campuses to protest budget cuts and tuition increases, a member of the audience asked “If it’s all about technology why are we cutting the budgets of our universities?” Citing the combined hole of more than $60 billion in the state budget, he responded, “What is your choice?”

Once the budget axe started to swing, he said, “The teachers are screaming. The doctors are screaming. The prison guards are screaming. Firefighters are screaming. Where are you gonna [cut]?”

 

 

 

Follow Greg Dalton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Climate One

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
04:10 PM on 10/05/2009
The San Francisco airport is a few feet from the sea and in serious danger of flooding, as is the park where the Giants play. The shoreline around the whole state is easily erodible. Further, Sacramento is at sea level and at risk either from an excursion of water from the bay or flash flooding from melting snowcaps in mountains and flash rainfalls. Sacramento is only protected by an old, earthen levee that makes the New Orleans levee look futuristic.


"Sacramento and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta’s risk for flooding is the highest in the country because of the city’s aging levee system that has been inadequately maintained. The River City has even less protection than that of New Orleans despite spending $300 million to strengthen the Sacramento and American rivers levees that has taken place for the past 20 years."


http://www.ask.com/bar?q=sacramento+at+risk+of+flooding&page=1&qsrc=2417&ab=0&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsacramento.about.com%2Fod%2Flocalgovcivics%2Fa%2Fleveeflood.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
04:29 PM on 10/04/2009
The Governor needs to check up on the doings of his state government, which has produced a draft climate adaptation report. The Governor referenced the fact that the San Francisco tide station data indicated a 6 or 7 inch rise in sea level during the 20th Century. Yet he failed to note that since 1998 the sea level has gone down, not up, in San Francisco and the same pattern is repeated at the other 15 NOAA tide stations in California.

The draft report is predicting sea level rises much greater than the range predicted by the IPCC, a range which by itself appears overly aggressive. The staff is suggesting that the San Francisco Airport is at risk of flooding. The Governor needs to direct the state government to include an objective discussion of the San Francisco tide station data, including the fact that for all of the 21st Century so far, the sea level has been lower than in 1998.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
08:23 PM on 10/04/2009
"Yet he failed to note that since 1998 the sea level has gone down, not up, in San Francisco and the same pattern is repeated at the other 15 NOAA tide stations in California." Yes, Governor Schwarzenegger failed to note it because it is not true. Unlike deniers he does not like to ignore facts and cite propaganda. Why pay attention to the one year 1998, anyway? Using it as some measure is just as arbitrary as using any other year, besides the base years used for comparison purposes. It is a cheerypicking game deniers love who do not understand statistics, but only how to manipulate them!


at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-dalton/governor-defends-climate_b_303178.html?show_comment_id=32202577#comment_32202577
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
11:21 PM on 10/04/2009
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends/html

Hit: California, pick tide station. Repeat.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
03:59 PM on 10/05/2009
You did not answer my question: Why should 1998 suddenly become the year to compare things to, it is totally arbitrary?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
08:49 PM on 09/30/2009
Our do-nothing know-nothing governator rides again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RogerHWerner
12:59 AM on 09/30/2009
I live in California and I have no sympathy for the governor because he largely helped to create the present mess. I'm not blaming him for the entire mess. California voters should bare the lion's share of the blame flowed by the legislature. As for water...If California wants to save 20% without anyone having to cut anything I suggest ending wasteful irrigation practices by enclosing canals and adopting more water friendly irrigation practices. It's easier to ask individuals to cut 20% of their water use then JG Boswell Co and the other mega agricultural interests. We can;t be cutting into their profits!