- BIG NEWS:
- Conde Nast
- |
- Oprah
- |
- Wash Post
- |
- Katie Couric
- |
In a widely-read posting here last weekend (nearly 3000 comments), I chronicled the controversy over a photograph shot in Afghanistan in mid-August by Associated Press staffer Julie Jacobson. From a distance, it captured the moments after a U.S. Marine, Lance Corp. Joshua Bernard, was mortally wounded by a grenade, and showed him with one leg partly blown off, tended to by his comrades. He died at a hospital a short time later.
AP moved the photo, even though the Marine's parents, and the Pentagon, objected. Few newspapers ended up running it online, even fewer in print. A debate broke out over the handling of the photo, and the "sanitizing" of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to date. I appeared on NPR to discuss it on Monday, along with two newspaper editors.
It is fascinating, and vital, to look at one case study.
Mike Tharp, editor of the Merced Sun-Star in California, opted to print the photo on Saturday and post it online. He thinks his paper might have been only McClatchy paper to put it in a print edition. He also estimates that public opinion on this matter ran roughly 70-1 against that decision.
So I'll reprint here Mike's response to the heated criticism from the paper's Comments log.
09/05/2009 04:15:24 PM:
I expected these reactions when I ordered that both the AP photo and story be published in our pages and on this Web site. It's my responsibility, and mine alone, at the Sun-Star. I did so because, as a veteran, a war correspondent and an editor, I feel a deep duty to show American civilians the costs of fighting a war. To show the ultimate sacrifices paid by our servicemen and women in our name. Printed words, as your comments vividly show, wouldn't have generated the same responses as the image we ran.Those of you in the Greatest Generation can recall hundreds of far more graphic images from both World War II and Korea. Those of you in my generation can do the same about iconic images from Vietnam. But since then Americans have become desensitized to the sacrifices we ask from those we send to war. Regrettably, the American press has censored itself and failed in its mission to bear witness to what war does to people -- and not just Iraqis or Afghanis ... but to mostly young Americans.
Follow Greg Mitchell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/GregMitch
Nathan Gardels: Will More U.S. Troops Strengthen the Taliban?
With another surge of troops in Afghanistan, won't America and its NATO allies come to be seen just as the Afghans saw the Soviets?
Jonathan Morgenstein: Eight Weeks of America's War, Not Eight Years of "Obama's War"
The Obama administration is trying to salvage the situation in Afghanistan after the Bush Administration lost the war over eight years.
Recently we convened a workshop of senior scholars of South Asia studies and asked them to evaluate the US role in the region. They agreed upon the following five principles as the bases for formulating a new policy
Derrick Crowe: Vested Interests in Afghanistan
Bruce Riedel at Brookings says we have a vested interest in shoring up Karzai's legitimacy. That's not surprising, given that Riedel certainly has such a vested interest.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
The only issue I have with it is that apparently the family did not want it published. I would be happier if they had given their consent. Other than that, I absolutely think the consequences of war need to be shown.
The media do have a duty to make sure we see things as they are. We also have a duty to our servicemen and servicewomen to know what's happening to them in our name; to regularly reassess the true costs and benefits of keeping them in harm's way.
When people sign up for military service, they hand their lives over to us, for safe keeping. They should know that when we send them to war, we're still watching and and paying attention to what they're going through, and that we won't risk their lives for one second longer than necessary.
If our country is to persevere as a democracy, it requires an informed public. Supressing harsh reality in favor of building a mythology will lead us astray.
This is a picture of war. A great man once said, war is cruelty and you cannot refine it. This is war at its simplest, a young man dying. Let those who cry out for war face its consequences. The death of a young American is one of those consequences. I mourn for the death of this young man, but it's time that we, as a nation, remember that it's young men like these that pay the price for our choices.
ditto
When one considers the the proclamation of Bush 43 after the 911 attacks that we should "go out and shop"; "Mission Accomplished"; "Bring 'em On"; Dick Cheney most recently saying "So', when told that many Americans think the wars were not worth it; these are the notably evident dynamics of where our country has compartmentalized the subject of wars in the aggregate. so it should be no surprise that they should react the way they have to the stark reality of war.
We stand at a place right now where we are less apt to end these wars due to there grotesque nature, than because we can no longer afford them. How pitiful is that.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with